Singapore construction sector sees fallout from US tariffs amid trade war truce
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 21 May 2025
Author: Grace Leong
Firms feeling strain from uncertainty over pricing and supply of raw materials.
Singapore's construction sector is starting to see some fallout from US President Donald Trump's global tariffs, with firms here grappling with uncertainty over pricing and supply of raw materials, according to local industry associations.
But analysts are mixed on the tariffs' impact on construction materials costs in Singapore, even as the temporary truce reduces the risks of acute global supply chain disruptions.
'New US tariffs on steel and aluminium are tightening global supply chains, and Singapore is starting to feel the strain,' said Mr Benjamin Lim, Singapore Manufacturing Federation's (SMF) industry group chairman for building products and construction materials.
'Mills in China and India are fully booked for the next six to seven months as US buyers stockpile materials, limiting availability in Asia, and driving up costs.'
On May 12, the US and China agreed to suspend part of their tariffs on their respective exports for 90 days. This was the latest development in what has become a tit-for-tat exchange between the two superpowers over trade since the US leader announced sweeping global tariffs on April 2.
Despite the 90-day truce, analysts pointed out that the 25 per cent sector-specific tariffs on steel, aluminium, automobiles and auto parts announced in March and April remain in place, albeit with rebates for vehicles assembled in the US and a partial exemption for the UK.
The 10 per cent universal tariffs announced on 'Liberation Day' are also still in place.
Tariff uncertainty has wreaked havoc on aluminium prices, which jumped from US$2,449.90 per tonne in September 2024 to a peak of US$2,658.30 per tonne in March 2025, before dropping to US$2,371.60 per tonne in April.
'This swing in aluminium prices over a few months is causing uncertainty in budgeting and procurement,' Mr Lim said, adding that some building materials manufacturers here have seen higher aluminium costs and longer lead times.
This refers to the number of days or weeks from the time orders for parts or materials are placed until the finished product is ready for delivery.
'For major projects, a 5 to 10 per cent increase in material costs could add millions of dollars in costs to budgets. Delays in delivery and unpredictable pricing are also disrupting timelines. Materials like facades and fittings, which rely heavily on aluminium, are especially affected,' he added.
'While April's aluminium price dip offers short-term relief, global trade uncertainty suggests continued turbulence ahead,' he warned.
Mr Lim noted that the local construction industry has not been too badly hit by the tariffs on steel so far. 'However, if global steel prices increase due to redirected demand and tighter supply, we may start to feel the effects over the next three to six months,' he said.
Singapore Contractors Association (Scal) president Lee Kay Chai noted that sector-specific tariffs on steel and aluminium have the potential to raise costs for Singapore's construction sector.
But the 90-day truce may provide a 'temporary window of stability' in global pricing, even though volatility remains a concern over the long term, he said.
'The actual cost impact in Singapore will still depend on how long-term supply arrangements and market sentiment adjust,' he said.
'The construction ecosystem remains vulnerable to any re-escalation of trade tensions, and contractors must remain vigilant about project timelines and materials availability in the second half of 2025.'
Although the risk of acute global supply chain disruptions is reduced for now, short-term supply re-directions are possible as Chinese exporters seek to re-route goods to markets in the region, such as Asean, said Mr Lee.
Experts say Chinese exporters are doing so for two reasons: to tap burgeoning construction demand in the region, and also because their goods could gain access to US markets at lower tariff rates if the final processing was done at a third-party country such as Indonesia before being exported to the US.
Meanwhile, some experts believe that the tariffs could benefit the construction sector in the Asia-Pacific as raw materials may get cheaper in the near term.
Dr Dominic Brown, Cushman & Wakefield's head of international research, noted that the tariffs on steel and aluminium – and potential retaliatory action from the European Union – are expected to push up construction costs in the US and the EU, and slow the construction pipeline.
In the short term, this may lead to excess product in the market. 'The Asia-Pacific, which currently has fewer tariffs in place and a significant construction pipeline of over 230 million sq ft of office space, is a likely destination for this surplus. This could lead to short-term price deflation in raw materials here,' Dr Brown said.
But he pointed out that raw material costs are only one component of overall development costs.
So even though the Asia-Pacific may benefit from lower raw material input costs in the near term, rising shipping fees, local labour and land costs continue to influence project viability, he added.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
18 hours ago
- Straits Times
India reels from the shock of Trump's onslaught
NEW DELHI – President Donald Trump's new list of tariffs on half the world's countries sent the United States' trading partners scrambling to understand how their businesses will be affected. India got the bad news a day earlier – its goods face a tariff of 25 per cent or more – but the extra time was hardly enough to adjust to the fresh chaos. Indian negotiators had not expected to conclude a meaningful deal in time to meet Mr Trump's revised deadline of Aug 1. But they did expect to be treated as well as their neighbours, and to keep haggling with US officials until October or November, when Mr Trump was invited to visit India as part of the Quad defense group, which brings together four big democracies – India, the United States, Japan and Australia – with a shared interest in standing up to China. Instead, they were fed a heap of insults and injuries. Along with the 25 per cent rate, one of the highest in Asia and only a point lower than what was threatened on 'Liberation Day' in April, India was informed that its existing trade barriers are 'strenuous and obnoxious'; it will be charged an untold penalty for buying Russian oil; it is a 'dead economy.' It's archrival Pakistan was praised and promised an oil exploration deal. Hurt feelings aside, the results are confusing. Two of the biggest categories of exports to the United States from India are personal electronics, worth about US$14 billion a year, and pharmaceuticals, worth US$10 billion. Mr Rajesh Sharma, executive director of India Cellular and Electronics Association, said smartphones were exempted from these tariffs; so did executives at pharmaceutical companies. But on Aug 1, after reading the executive order, the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi concluded the opposite. India's stock markets dipped on the news for two days running. Indian and international banks wrote notices warning that the country's generally hard-charging economic growth is likely to slow measurably as a result of the tariffs. Then there are the unknown tariffs. On July 6, Mr Trump wrote that countries aligned with the Brics group, of which India is a founding member, would incur an additional 10 per cent penalty. Then on July 14, he said that, if Russia didn't make peace with Ukraine within 50 days, he would punish its trading partners with 'secondary tariffs' of 100 per cent. That figure is making Indians worry anew. Mr Trump added 'plus a penalty' to the 25 per cent rate imposed on India, for buying Russian oil and weapons. Ms Shashi Tharoor, a prominent member of the opposition, spoke to an Indian news agency about the possible impact. 'There's even talk of a 100 per cent penalty,' he said, 'which will destroy our trade with America.' There is evidence that Indian buyers of Russian oil were already pulling back before the executive order. 'Indian refiners have reduced Russian crude purchases this week,' said Ms Sumit Ritolia, an analyst at Kpler, which tracks shipping and commodities. They were already 'looking to further diversify, amid rising concerns over potential US sanctions,' having spent years taking advantage of discounted Russian oil to reduce their imports from the Persian Gulf. Reducing the United States' trade deficit is one of the Trump administration's goals, so persuading India to buy more American oil and gas would make sense. Last year, India exported US$45.7 billion more goods to the United States than it imported. It spent about three times as much importing oil. If a third of that were redirected to American sources, their bilateral trade would be evened out. Mr Trump's angry barrage of social media has complicated further negotiations. The breakdown of trust between Mr Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, whom Mr Trump called his 'true friend,' the US president is likely to make it harder to complete any deal, analysts say. Indian news outlets have reported that Mr Trump wanted to iron out some outstanding issues, after four rounds of direct talks between the two sides, in a phone call with Mr Modi. The Indian government was anxious to avoid any of his last-minute surprises. The US commerce secretary accused India of 'slow-rolling' its trade negotiations. Indian officials and analysts say the friction is caused by a fundamental difference of approach. Mr Trump has a penchant for quick, top-down dealmaking. India's bureaucracy moves at a methodical pace, especially when it comes to opening up the agriculture market, which is politically sensitive. India's recently concluded trade deal with Britain took three years of talks, under two British prime ministers. On Aug 1, India's Foreign Ministry released a statement that put on a brave face. 'India and the United States share a Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership,' established in 2013 between President Barack Obama and then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, 'anchored in shared interests, democratic values and robust people-to-people ties.' The ministry stuck to principles, revealing no plan for breaking through Mr Trump's hard line. 'This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges,' the statement said. 'We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Singapore factory activity slips into contraction as tariff fears sink in
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Electronics, which accounts for around 40 per cent of Singapore's manufacturing output, was a modestly bright spot. SINGAPORE – Manufacturing output here slipped in July after a slight increase in June amid uncertainty over US tariffs. The purchasing managers' index (PMI) – a barometer of the sector's health – dipped from 50 points in June to 49.9 points. A reading above 50 indicates growth; one below suggests a contraction in output. Electronics, which accounts for around 40 per cent of Singapore's manufacturing output, was a modestly bright spot, with its PMI reading edging up from 50.1 to 50.2 from June to July. Mr Stephen Poh, executive director of the Singapore Institute of Purchasing and Materials Management, which compiles the index, said readings showing electronics in expansion and the broader manufacturing industry in contraction 'painted a mixed outlook'. 'Anecdotal evidence suggests that local manufacturers remained concerned about the uncertain global trade policy and tariffs, and many companies have held back their investment and hiring plans,' he added. The institute compiles PMI data monthly through surveys of logistics, procurement and supply chain managers. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet World As China-US tariff truce talks drag on, what are prospects for a 'big deal' for Trump? Singapore Thundery showers expected on most days in first half of August Singapore SPH Media awards three journalism scholarships to budding newsroom talent Singapore Synapxe chief executive, MND deputy secretary to become new perm secs on Sept 1 Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore Business Sumo Salad had valid insurance coverage for work injury claims: MOM It said the July reading reflects a slower expansion in areas such as new orders and exports and input purchases. Expansion in finished goods, imports, supplier deliveries and order backlog also slowed, while factory output and employment contracted at a faster pace. OCBC Bank chief economist Selena Ling noted that the electronics sector has benefited from the demand for artificial intelligence-related investment, even though demand from end consumers has been relatively subdued. The manufacturing and electronics employment indexes also stayed in contraction for the fourth consecutive month. This reflects 'cautious hiring intentions among factories, due to the high global uncertainty since Liberation Day (tariffs)', said DBS Bank senior economist Chua Han Teng. 'Labour demand in outward-oriented sectors, particularly those exposed to trade, will likely soften in the coming months.' A sub-index reflecting manufacturers' expectations of the business conditions ahead remained in contraction territory in July, although it shrank at a slower pace. This sentiment was seen in another PMI report also released on Aug 1. S&P Global data showed that manufacturers were the least optimistic about growth since the pandemic in July 2020, as US President Donald Trump pushes on with his tariffs. Front-loading – where advance orders are made to prepare for the prospect of higher tariffs – is a concern for manufacturers, Ms Ling said. 'We are probably at an inflection point where reciprocal tariffs are about to kick in, and there are concerns if the front-loading effects will start to subside, with potential implications for external orders and global supply chain recalibration,' she added. Mr Chua expects weaker demand to weigh on Singapore manufacturers in the months to come. He said the PMI data showed that 'new export orders remained in expansion in July 2025, suggesting supportive external demand for now, but this resilience is likely temporary. 'While the downside direct impact on Singapore would be contained from the unchanged global baseline US tariff rate of 10 per cent, (its) exports and economy will still face indirect negative impact through its trade linkages with key trading partners.'
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Apple and Cook get a boost – and breather
DID tariffs help Apple to a blowout quarter? That was one theory that emerged as the company disclosed a surprising surge in iPhone sales in the April-June quarter, up 14 per cent compared with the period a year earlier, handily beating estimates. Consumers, it was said, were rushing out to stores in fear that Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' trade levies would drastically increase the cost of an upgrade. It certainly makes some logical sense; though the data shows consumers' fears soon subsided. According to which uses mobile location data to monitor foot traffic, elevated sales in the immediate days after Trump's address rapidly petered out – visitors to US Apple stores were up just 0.93 per cent for the entire fiscal quarter compared to a year earlier. Meanwhile, visits to Apple's website from US consumers were down 3 per cent, according to data from Similarweb. On a call with investors to discuss the results, chief executive officer Tim Cook acknowledged that tariff chatter did create unusual buying patterns in April, mostly around sales in the US of the iPhone and Mac computers. But overall, the boost was limited – Apple said just one percentage point of its 10 per cent overall revenue growth came from these 'pull forward' sales. If Apple's analysis proves correct – and some analysts seemed sceptical, repeatedly asking for more detail – then that would be good news. It means investors would have to worry less that the better-than-expected sales won't mean a significant dip for the rest of this year. That's not to say tariffs won't be a drag – Cook said the company would take a US$1.1 billion tariff-related hit in the current quarter, up from US$900 million in the last. To emphasise the gusto of his most important product, Cook noted that somebody out there has the three billionth iPhone. That's a staying power that will count for a lot as the company moves to this next era of uncertainty. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The quarterly iPhone sales indicate that consumers don't yet care that the bulk of the device's artificial-intelligence features (AI) have yet to materialise – they'll stick with Apple anyway. I found myself agreeing with Cook when he said he felt AI-specific devices – such as glasses from Meta Platforms or whatever it is OpenAI and Jony Ive create – are 'likely to be complementary devices, not substitution' for the smartphone. Still, AI is on the mind of investors, and the blockbuster quarter was not enough to distract from that. The company reiterated its intent to increase spending to fund its AI efforts and to reallocate talent to speed things up. Cook didn't, however, address the fact that some of his top AI talent has reallocated itself to Meta. The Apple boss' apparent disinterest in partaking in the unprecedented talent war – one that would have made his predecessor, Steve Jobs, sick to his stomach – is one facet in Apple's obvious unwillingness to follow its peers and bet the entire house on AI. Its capital expenditures, while growing, are expected to be tens of billions of dollars lower than the other tech giants. The years to come will tell whether Apple was wise to separate itself from the pack. Tellingly, when asked on Thursday (Jul 31) whether he felt AI innovations like large language models might become commoditised, he declined to answer. 'That gives away some things on our strategy,' he said. That could be read as a sign Apple doesn't feel it needs to directly compete in building AI. I think this speaks to a confidence that the iPhone will still be the de facto device of choice for AI, whether or not Apple is successful in making a competent ChatGPT of its own. Another interpretation is that Cook doesn't want to show his hand in any mergers and acquisitions negotiations, but I guess we'll see. Cook said on the call that he was 'very open' to dealmaking – we'll see what exactly he feels he needs to buy rather than build. Frankly, you didn't need to see Apple's numbers to know it had been a great quarter – you could just listen to the tone of Cook's voice. Noticeably upbeat as he ran through his remarks, the tenor of the call was in stark contrast from last quarter, when some (myself included) wondered whether the weight of Apple's numerous challenges were starting to deplete the 64-year-old's energy reserves. Talk of succession will surely now quiet down for the foreseeable future: It's time to let Tim cook. BLOOMBERG
