logo
Hyderabad bizman duped of ₹2.69 lakh in online scam

Hyderabad bizman duped of ₹2.69 lakh in online scam

The Hindu29-05-2025
A 33-year-old businessman from Hyderabad was duped of ₹2.7 lakh by fraudsters posing as dealers of 'return stocks' or goods which have been returned by customers on leading e-commerce platforms.
The scam began on April 9, 2025, when the victim received a call from a Kolkata-based number. According to the Cyber Crime Wing of the Hyderabad police, the caller introduced himself as a seller dealing in 'return stocks' from Flipkart and Amazon, claiming to offer items such as school bags, fans, crockery, and shoes at wholesale rates. Swayed by the seemingly genuine offer, the victim requested product photos and received images of school bags.
The fraudster sent copies of his Aadhaar card, Voter ID, and PAN card. Upon online verification, the Aadhaar and Voter ID appeared authentic, further convincing the victim of the deal's legitimacy. He then requested a formal quotation and proceeded to place an order for 750 school bags, 25 mist fans, and 60 normal fans.
The fraudster claimed to have dispatched the consignment via a transport company named Maa Vaishno Transport and promised delivery within five days. The victim made an initial payment of ₹18,000, but the delivery was delayed. When he followed up, the fraudster claimed the consignment was stuck in Warangal. When the victim asked for a refund, the fraudster promised delivery by April 28. However, the victim grew suspicious and attempted to verify the transport company. He discovered that the contact number provided was fake, and subsequent enquiries revealed that no such logistics firm existed in Bardhaman, West Bengal.
Meanwhile, 25 days later, the fraudster sent a train ticket, claiming he was travelling to Hyderabad to deliver the goods personally. Despite the assurance, he later switched off his phone, though he remained active on WhatsApp. By the end of the ordeal, the victim had transferred a total of ₹2,69,530.
Citizens are advised to verify business credentials such as GSTIN, trade licences, and company registration before entering any transaction. All suspicious activities or fraudulent calls should be reported immediately via the cyber crime helpline 1930 or online at www.cybercrime.gov.in.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Myntra under ED lens: Indian government issues Rs 1,654 crore FEMA notice for FDI violation
Myntra under ED lens: Indian government issues Rs 1,654 crore FEMA notice for FDI violation

Indian Express

time26 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Myntra under ED lens: Indian government issues Rs 1,654 crore FEMA notice for FDI violation

Myntra, one of India's largest fashion e-commerce brands, has received a notice from the country's financial crime watchdog for allegedly violating the country's foreign investment rules. On Wednesday, July 23, the Enforcement Directorate stated that Flipkart-owned e-commerce platform Myntra received foreign investment worth Rs 1,654.35 crore by claiming to operate a 'wholesale cash and carry' business, but instead sold most of its goods to Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd, which then sold them to the consumers. According to the Enforcement Directorate, Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd and Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd belong to the same group of companies. India has a policy that prevents foreign companies from participating directly in wholesale business and making direct sales to consumers, in order to protect local retailers. While foreign-owned e-commerce platforms like Myntra, Amazon and Flipkart are allowed to act as marketplaces to connect buyers and sellers, government policies prevent these giants from stocking goods or selling them directly to consumers. In the last few years, the Walmart-backed online fashion retailer has been expanding its quick commerce market and controls almost half of India's fashion e-commerce market. It is also venturing into social commerce by partnering up with influencers and celebrities on platforms like Instagram, Amazon Live and YouTube. In a statement to Reuters, Myntra said that it is yet to receive any documents related to the case from Indian authorities and that it remains 'fully committed to cooperating with them at any point of time.' 'At Myntra, we are deeply committed to upholding all applicable laws of the land and operating with the highest standards of compliance and integrity', a company spokesperson added. Founded in 2007, Myntra, the Bengaluru-based e-commerce platform, was acquired by Flipkart in 2014 and later bought by US-based Walmart as part of its Flipkart acquisition. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has emphasised that foreign-backed online retailers have been violating FDI norms and has urged the Indian government to take action against malpractices like deep discounting and predatory pricing. Myntra isn't the first e-commerce giant to face heat from India's financial crime watchdog. Last year, an Indian antitrust investigation found that foreign-backed e-commerce platforms – Amazon and Flipkart have been violating local laws by giving preference to select sellers and colluding with smartphone makers like Samsung and Xiaomi by restricting their products to their websites, which breaches the country's antitrust laws. Similarly, food delivery platforms like Zomato and Swiggy are also facing heat for breaching competition laws by giving select restaurants preferential treatment. The Enforcement Directorate has also asked Walmart-backed Flipkart to explain why the e-commerce platform should not be slapped with a Rs 11,656,47 crore fine for violating its foreign investment laws.

Bombay HC judgement acquitting 2006 Mumbai train blasts accused won't be treated precedent: Supreme Court
Bombay HC judgement acquitting 2006 Mumbai train blasts accused won't be treated precedent: Supreme Court

Hans India

time29 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Bombay HC judgement acquitting 2006 Mumbai train blasts accused won't be treated precedent: Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday said that the Bombay High Court judgment acquitting 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case will not be treated as a binding precedent. A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh passed the order after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that the questions of law decided in the impugned judgment will affect other pending trials under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA). The Justice Sundresh-led Bench also issued notice on the Maharashtra government's plea challenging the Bombay High Court order in the July 11, 2006, Mumbai blast case. Directing immediate release of 12 accused, of whom five were on death row and seven others on life imprisonment, the acquittal order passed by a bench of Justices Anil Kilor and S. Chandak on Monday came as a major blow to the investigation agencies in Maharashtra. The Justice Kilor-led Bench castigated the shoddy probe prosecution, opining that the prosecution failed to even establish the type of bombs used in the crime. The 12 accused -- incarcerated for 19 years -- succeeded in establishing before the Bombay High Court the fact of torture inflicted on them to extort confessional statements. As a result, it held the statements inadmissible, saying, "On all the tests relating to voluntariness and truthfulness of the confessional statements, the prosecution failed." On July 11, 2006, seven bomb serial blasts in packed Mumbai local trains brought the maximum city to its knees within 11 minutes. The terror attack left 189 dead and over 800 injured. Earlier in 2015, a special court convicted 12 individuals in the case, sentencing five -- Faisal Shaikh, Asif Khan, Kamal Ansari, Ehtesham Siddiqui, and Naveed Khan -- to death, while the remaining seven were given life imprisonment. The prosecution had argued that the attack was planned by Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, and carried out by operatives of Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba with help from the Students' Islamic Movement of India, a banned Indian group. Last week, Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai agreed to urgently list the Maharashtra government's special leave petition (SLP) for hearing on July 24. Seeking an urgent hearing on the state government's special leave petition (SLP), Solicitor General Mehta said that it was a 'serious matter' requiring the top court's consideration on 'some important issues'.

Microsoft says some SharePoint server hackers now use ransomware
Microsoft says some SharePoint server hackers now use ransomware

Economic Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Microsoft says some SharePoint server hackers now use ransomware

Agencies A cyber-espionage campaign centered on vulnerable versions of Microsoft's server software now involves the deployment of ransomware, Microsoft said in a late Wednesday blog the post, citing "expanded analysis and threat intelligence," Microsoft said a group it dubs "Storm-2603" is using the vulnerability to seed the ransomware, which typically works by paralyzing victims' networks until a digital currency payment is made. The disclosure marks a potential escalation in the campaign, which has already hit at least 400 victims, according to Netherlands-based cybersecurity firm Eye Security. Unlike typical state-backed hacker campaigns, which are aimed at stealing data, ransomware can cause widespread disruption depending on where it lands. The figure of 400 victims represents a sharp rise from the 100 organizations cataloged over the weekend. Eye Security says the figure is likely an undercount."There are many more, because not all attack vectors have left artifacts that we could scan for," said Vaisha Bernard, the chief hacker for Eye Security, which was among the first organizations to flag the details of most of the victim organizations have not yet been fully disclosed, but on Wednesday a representative for the National Institutes of Health confirmed that one of the organization's servers had been compromised."Additional servers were isolated as a precaution," he said. The news of the compromise was first reported by the Washington outlets said the hacking campaign had breached an even broader range of U.S. agencies. NextGov, citing multiple people familiar with the matter, reported the Department of Homeland Security had been hit, along with more than five to 12 other which cited two U.S. officials, said multiple agencies were believed to have been cyberdefense arm, CISA, did not immediately return a message seeking comment on the reports. Microsoft did not immediately return a message seeking further details on the ransomware angle of the hacking or the reported government victims. The spy campaign began after Microsoft failed to fully patch a security hole in its SharePoint server software, kicking off a scramble to fix the vulnerability when it was discovered. Microsoft and its tech rival, Google-owner Alphabet , have both said Chinese hackers are among those taking advantage of the flaw. Beijing has denied the claim. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Can victims of Jane Street scam be compensated by investor protection funds? Did the likes of TCS, Infosys, Wipro let India down in AI race? How India's oil arbitrage has hit the European sanctions wall Apple has a new Indian-American COO. What it needs might be a new CEO. Stock Radar: Tata Chemicals breaks out from 1-month consolidation; time to buy the dip? Power sector companies: Will they be able to outperform? 5 power stocks with an upside potential ranging from 6 to 29% For risk-takers with long-term perspective: 7 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of over 26% Multibagger or IBC - Part 16: Regulatory tailwind turns compliance into cash. This auto ancillary could be a winner

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store