China says ready to 'expand practical cooperation' with Russian army
World War II Victory Day parade
.
The two countries have drawn closer in recent years, including since Moscow launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Xi's trip to Russia last week drew ire from Kyiv's allies, who have accused Beijing of giving Moscow economic and political cover to wage a war of aggression.
Beijing says it is a neutral party to the conflict and has made indefatigable efforts for peace.
On Thursday, in response to a question linked to Xi's visit asking how China would promote military-to-military ties with Russia, the defence ministry said the relationship was "operating at a high level".
Live Events
"The Chinese military stands ready to work with the Russian side to further deepen strategic mutual trust, step up strategic communication, and expand practical cooperation," defence ministry spokesman Jiang Bin said in a response posted to social media platform WeChat.
The moves would "enrich the content of China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era", Jiang said.
He added that they would also "contribute to maintaining and strengthening
global strategic stability
".
After a lengthy meeting with President Vladimir Putin on his trip, Xi said China's ties with Russia brought "positive energy" to a turbulent world.
He added that both nations stood firm against "hegemonic bullying" -- an apparent swipe at the United States.
Putin, for his part, told reporters he and Xi had held "traditionally warm, friendly" talks and addressed the Chinese leader as his "dear friend".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Peace was never West's goal in Ukraine, says Russia, accusing it of fuelling war by arming Kyiv
Peace talks and a settlement in Ukraine have never been on the real agenda of the West, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Saturday, in her first comments on negotiations since Russian and Ukrainian officials held talks on Wednesday. read more File- Flames and smoke billow from buildings during mass Russian drones and missile strikes on the Ukraine's capital Kyiv on July 4, 2025, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (Photo: OLEKSII FILIPPOV/AFP) Russia has accused the Western nations of never seriously seeking peace in Ukraine, instead charging them with prolonging the conflict through continued military support for Kyiv 'Peace talks and a settlement in Ukraine have never been on the real agenda of the West,' said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on Saturday, her first remarks since direct talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials earlier in the week. 'If the West truly wanted peace, it would stop supplying weapons to Kyiv,' she said, as quoted by the TASS news agency. Zakharova had previously declined to comment during her regular Thursday briefing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The criticism was echoed by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who reiterated that while Moscow remains open to negotiations, achieving Russia's military and political objectives remains a core priority. 'The main thing for us is to achieve our goals. Our goals are clear,' Peskov told state television. He emphasised that President Vladimir Putin is committed to a peaceful resolution but acknowledged that the process would be 'long and difficult.' Russia has long insisted that any peace agreement must include Ukraine's withdrawal from four regions Moscow annexed in 2022—territories it does not fully control—as well as Kyiv's formal renunciation of NATO membership and acceptance of strict limits on its armed forces. These demands have been flatly rejected by Ukraine and its Western backers. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Saturday that Kyiv had proposed a new round of talks this week. While Russian state media confirmed discussions were ongoing, no date has been finalised, though Istanbul is expected to remain the host city. The diplomatic developments come amid heightened U.S. pressure on Russia. President Donald Trump recently warned Moscow that it has 50 days to agree to a ceasefire or face 'severe tariffs.' Trump also announced plans to step up military support to Ukraine, including advanced Patriot air defence systems, and hinted at plans for European allies to buy large quantities of US arms to replenish Ukraine's supplies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite the proposed peace efforts, hostilities have continued on the ground. Russia has intensified its drone strikes in recent days, with Ukraine reporting one of the highest overnight barrages this year. Ukraine's air force said it downed 18 of 57 Shahed-type drones launched by Russia overnight into Sunday, while another seven drones went off radar. Civilian casualties were reported in both Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv regions. In Zaporizhzhia, two women were injured when a drone struck their home, while two others were wounded in Kharkiv after a drone hit a residential building, local officials said.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Muizzu's U-turn: India in, China out? Maldives seemingly pivots again as PM Modi offers big incentives
NEW DELHI: Maldives, which has had a pro-China tilt in the past, seems to be warming up to India with President Mohamed Muizzu praising Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a "wonderful person". Coming from someone who rose to power on an "India Out" campaign, followed by his cabinet colleagues making derogatory remarks against PM Modi, shows a significant shift in the geopolitical dynamics of the Global South. The two leaders held talks on Friday to repair bilateral ties as the also discussions focused on strengthening cooperation in trade, defence, and infrastructure. Strategic U-turn After coming to power by promising to reduce Indian influence and build closer ties with China—including a first state visit to Beijing and agreements for Chinese military assistance—Muizzu now calls India a "trusted friend" and rolled out the red carpet for PM Modi, breaking with protocol to personally receive him at the airport. "He is a wonderful person who is very fond of building relationships between India's neighbours. The Maldives and India have a very good relationship that goes back centuries, and with PM Modi's leadership, cooperation between the two governments is going to be even more prosperous in the days ahead," he said on the last day of PM Modi's trip. What could be the reasons behind change in stance? The Maldivian economy is under severe stress with a substantial budget deficit and dwindling foreign reserves, and the support offered by India is pivotal for Muizzu's government to stabilize finances. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No One Knew About Her Bags—Now They're Going Viral Handmakers Report Read Now Although Maldives still owes China large debts, New Delhi has emerged as a key partner to avoid potential economic default. During PM Modi's visit, India announced a fresh $ 565 million line of credit (LoC) for the Indian Ocean neighbour and signed an agreement to reduce its annual debt repayment burden by 40%. 'To give a new impetus to our development partnership, we have decided to provide a line of credit of $ 565 million, or approximately Rs 5,000 crore, to Maldives. It will be used for projects related to infrastructure development in line with the priorities of the people of Maldives,' PM Modi said, as he hailed Maldives as a "true friend". India's sustained efforts However, this diplomatic shift hasn't happened overnight, and it certainly can't be attributed to PM Modi's visit alone. Amid early concerns about losing a key ally in the region, India chose restraint over rhetoric. New Delhi maintained steady engagement, with PM Modi being the first world leader to congratulate Muizzu after his election victory. This gesture, combined with consistent diplomatic outreach and sustained economic support, laid the groundwork for rebuilding trust. Back in 2019, India had extended an $800 million Line of Credit (LoC) to the Maldives during the tenure of the pro-India Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) government. What PM Modi's trip has done, is to bring India's efforts to light, with Muizzu acknowledging it. "We all have seen how India has helped the Maldives in the past, and nobody will doubt how India will be a very crucial partner going forward," he said. "India is one of the major tourism countries that helps the Maldives with tourism. With PM Modi's visit, it is going to increase a lot. I am sure that people-to-people exchange between the two countries will greatly boost because of this visit," he added. Analysts note that Muizzu's pivot is a pragmatic recognition of Maldives' geographic and economic realities—India remains indispensable for trade, connectivity, and tourism. While China's support remains, India's proximity and willingness to provide urgent financial and developmental assistance have proved decisive in influencing Muizzu's recalibration
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US trade policy shift: Response to China's resource dominance
In recent years, the dynamics of global trade and economic relationships have undergone significant transformations, particularly in the context of US-China relations. Donald Trump's administration introduced a notable shift in trade policy, reflecting growing concerns over international resource competition. This change marked a departure from past practices, focusing instead on trade as a means to strengthen the American economy in the face of emerging challenges. One of the most pivotal factors in this policy evolution was China's increasing dominance over critical resources, leading to strategic decisions aimed at safeguarding US interests. President Donald Trump's policy shift from aid to trade is significantly driven by China's rapid acquisition of critical resources, although broader economic and strategic objectives also influenced it. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo(REUTERS) Trump's presidency marked a notable pivot in US foreign and economic policy, moving away from providing financial aid to other countries and toward emphasising trade relationships. This America First approach prioritised economic exchanges—such as goods and services—over traditional development assistance, aiming to bolster US economic strength and security. China's growing dominance over critical resources, particularly rare earth minerals, played a key role in shaping this shift. These resources are essential for industries like technology, defence, and manufacturing. For example, China controls a significant portion of global rare earth production, which includes elements vital for a wide range of applications, from smartphones to military equipment. This dominance raised alarms in the US about economic and national security vulnerabilities, as reliance on China for these materials could leave the US at a strategic disadvantage. Trump's administration viewed China's resource control as a threat and responded by leveraging trade as a tool to counter it. The Trump administration's key actions included tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to pressure China into making concessions and to reduce US dependency on Chinese supply chains, including those tied to critical resources. He invoked wartime powers to expand US mineral production, aiming to lessen reliance on China and secure alternative supply chains. The broader trade war with China, which intensified during his presidency, targeted not just trade imbalances but also China's strategic advantages in resource-heavy sectors. These measures were designed to protect US interests by rebuilding domestic manufacturing and reducing vulnerability to China's resource dominance. While China's actions were a major driver, Trump's shift from aid to trade wasn't solely about China. His economic nationalism also focused on reducing trade deficits with multiple countries, not just China. Renegotiating trade deals with allies like Canada and Mexico (e.g., the USMCA). These efforts reflect a comprehensive strategy to prioritise US economic self-reliance and competitiveness, of which countering China was a critical component. The Trump administration's 2025 mineral deal with Ukraine establishes a joint investment fund to tap into the country's $2–15 trillion in critical minerals, like lithium and rare earths, essential for AI, EVs, and defence tech. This agreement, a shift from demanding Ukraine repay $500 billion in US aid, grants the US 50% of future royalties from new mineral licences while supporting Kyiv's economic recovery. In Africa, particularly in the DRC and Rwanda, the US is promoting peace and economic agreements to secure cobalt and coltan, two vital resources for batteries and electronics and aiming to stabilise conflict zones and enable American investment. These deals reflect Trump's transactional approach, prioritising economic leverage over traditional aid, but face hurdles like Ukraine's war-damaged infrastructure and the DRC's ongoing violence, which deter private-sector commitment. The deals aim to counter China's dominance in critical mineral supply chains, reducing US reliance on Beijing for tech and green energy resources while challenging Russia's influence in both regions. In Ukraine, the agreement aligns with Trump's diplomacy to engage Moscow while securing economic benefits, though it risks exploiting Kyiv's resources without firm security guarantees. In Africa, stabilising the DRC could unlock vast mineral wealth, but competition with China's entrenched presence and local corruption complicates execution. Both initiatives signal a broader US strategy to reshape global supply chains and geopolitics, striking a balance between economic self-interest and regional stability; yet, their success hinges on maintaining peace and sustaining investment. Finally, China's rapid takeover of critical resources, particularly rare earth minerals essential for high-tech industries, significantly influenced the shift in US trade policy during the Trump administration. In response to this challenge, Trump implemented trade policies such as tariffs, aimed at levelling the playing field against perceived unfair practices by China, as well as initiatives to boost domestic production and diversify supply chains away from Chinese reliance. This shift was rooted in economic nationalism, prioritising American manufacturing and job creation, while also addressing national security concerns tied to resource dependency. The focus on rare earth minerals highlighted the strategic implications of China's dominance in the global supply of these resources, prompting efforts to reinforce domestic capabilities and establish partnerships with allies. Ultimately, the US approach to China during this period reflected a complex strategy aimed at safeguarding national interests while balancing immediate economic threats and long-term aspirations for a more resilient economy. This article is authored by Pravesh Kumar Gupta, associate fellow (Eurasia), Vivekananda International Foundation, New Delhi.
