logo
Opinion On caste census, the BJP was rattled into action by Congress's demand

Opinion On caste census, the BJP was rattled into action by Congress's demand

Indian Express02-05-2025
The BJP-led Narendra Modi government has relented grudgingly, and that's good news. It has announced that the Census will enumerate caste. There is little doubt that for the past few years, the government was rattled by Congress's constant demand for such a Census — a demand which was accompanied by the charge that the current regime is a votary of status-quo norms. Congress's objectives were always clear — resources must be apportioned according to the needs of communities, and for that, the magnitude of historical deprivation must be out in the open. The government resisted — till it couldn't.
The BJP 's response to Congress's demand had been either evasive or diversionary. In late 2023, Prime Minister Narendra Modi went on to say that only four castes exist in India — the poor, the youth, women and farmers — ironically appropriating the classic Marxist dogma of social divisions. The class-based repudiation of caste, though a trite, even well-meaning rhetorical device, had a different intent for the PM. First, it was meant to weaken the voices calling for a caste census by initiating so-called welfare schemes for targeted classes. These schemes were essentially compensation for the government's economic blunders. But the government appeared to see them as magical potions of sorts that would suddenly turn caste into class.
Second, there was already a slow project to expunge references to caste discrimination in textbooks and university curricula. For instance, Delhi University removed celebrated writer Mahashweta Devi's short story 'Draupadi' — about an eponymous tribal girl who wages a gritty battle against patriarchy — from its BA English course. Another text chronicling caste-gender relations by Bama, a Dalit Christian writer from Tamil Nadu, suffered a similar fate. And NCERT's policing has created an impression that social divisions were absent in the past.
Meanwhile, Congress, along with other opposition parties, kept up the pressure on the government. In the run-up to the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra led by Rahul Gandhi emphasised nyay or justice. Throughout the journey, tough and disturbing questions on India's asymmetrical social order were repeatedly asked. Who wields real power and who follows orders? Who owns and who serves? How representative are our executive, bureaucracy, judiciary, and newsrooms? How equitable are our everyday encounters? The yatra was a springboard of uncomfortable truths, belying those who had suggested that the politics of caste census would not be able to sustain itself.
Congress had a history to protect. Social justice was a challenge but the party had ensured notable victories. Reservation, as an empowering tool, was added to the Constitution in 1951 by the First Amendment. This was followed by the abolition of untouchability and the institution of quotas in promotions in government service. The latter was significant because discrimination, as yet, has no expiry date — access to power does not ensure that people from historically marginalised sections continue to wield it. That is the reason hierarchies of bureaucratic authority mimic traditional caste stratification, with privileged groups cloistered at the top.
The Rajiv Gandhi government enacted the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, while the 73rd and 74th Amendments enacted by the Narasimha Rao government mandated women's reservation in panchayats. The Manmohan Singh -led UPA-I implemented OBC reservation in higher education institutions, while UPA-II initiated the Socio-Economic and Caste Census — the first time since 1931 that such a Census was conducted. The government's term came to an end before the report could be made public. The UPA was working to include reservation in the private sector, emphasising the responsibility of all stakeholders to be agents of social justice.
If the caste enumeration is undertaken, then the almost primitive debates over reservation and its perceived antithesis, merit, will no doubt rage again. Along with the caste census, there has been a demand for removing the 50 per cent cap on caste-based quotas. In 2015, the RSS chief called for a review of the reservation policy, mouthing a widely held right-wing belief. It's surprising that many who call themselves liberals publicly agreed with him. The peddlers of meritocracy must be exposed, since in India, it is a direct function of the entitlements and opportunities accorded by caste. That is why the economic argument for reservation does not hold — wealth and poverty are dynamic categories while caste attributes are inherited. To a great extent, caste-based reservation can mitigate these age-old polarities, which is why it must be given full play.
The bogey of merit needs to be debunked.
There is now consensus that Congress's clarion call for a caste census, and the BJP's own low tolerance for social justice, led to a big fall in the ruling party's seats in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. It has been forced to apply correctives, albeit only in nominal terms. With the BJP government, there is, of course, no guarantee that the Census will run its course. But the question of injustice needs to be settled. It remains among the incomplete tasks in the process of nation-building. For many of us, caste discrimination is a shameful scourge. For some others, it appears that such discrimination never existed. With the Census, it will be apparent that it did.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Modi lands in London: All eyes on historic India-UK FTA signing
PM Modi lands in London: All eyes on historic India-UK FTA signing

First Post

time26 minutes ago

  • First Post

PM Modi lands in London: All eyes on historic India-UK FTA signing

This is a breaking development. Please refresh the page for the latest updates. read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in London during the early hours of Thursday (July 24). He is on a two-day visit to the UK and is seeking to strengthen defence, trade and technology ties. The formalisation of a long-awaited free trade agreement (FTA) is expected to dominate the agenda. The agreement, hailed as a landmark development, is likely to provide a major boost to economic ties between the two nations. Modi's arrival comes amid efforts by both governments to re-energise their strategic partnership, with hopes high that the deal will cement closer cooperation across multiple sectors. On Thursday, Modi is set to hold talks with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that are expected to focus on delivering fresh momentum to bilateral relations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Starmer will host Modi at Chequers, the British prime minister's official country residence located about 50 km northwest of London. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade Jonathan Reynolds are expected to sign the FTA in the presence of both leaders, according to people familiar with the matter. India and the UK reached an agreement on the FTA in May after nearly three years of negotiations. The deal will eliminate tariffs on 99% of Indian exports and make it easier for British firms to sell products such as whisky and cars in the Indian market, while expanding the overall trade basket. The deal is expected to offer full market access for Indian goods across all sectors. Officials said tariff elimination would apply to around 99% of tariff lines, covering nearly the entire trade value between the two countries. In addition to the FTA — described as the UK's most significant trade deal since its departure from the European Union — the two sides concluded a double contribution convention, exempting Indian employers from making social security payments in Britain for their workers. This is a breaking development. Please refresh the page for the latest updates. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Gujarat Confidential: ‘Right' Prasad
Gujarat Confidential: ‘Right' Prasad

Indian Express

time26 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Gujarat Confidential: ‘Right' Prasad

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has awarded the 'Eat Right Prasad' certificate to mohanthal prasad provided to devotees by the Ambaji Temple trust. Stating that it is a matter of pride for Gujarat, the state government attributed the 'achievement' to the 'quality and cleanliness' of the prasad provided to devotees by the temple trust and the disciplined functioning of the temple. 'This success has been achieved under the guidance and leadership of Shree Arasuri Ambaji Mata Devasthan Trust and Additional Collector Kaushik Modi,' it stated. In 2023, the mohanthal prasad, made of gram flour, ghee and sugar, landed in controversy and was replaced by chikki, citing longer shelf life and reports of alleged adulteration that followed. The Drugs Control Administration (FDCA) also seized ghee from the firm, which was given the contract to make the prasad. 'Eat Right Prasad' certificate is awarded to religious places, which follows strict standards of food safety, hygiene and quality while preparing and distributing prasad. Councillors' Protest Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillors, during a general board meeting of the Surat Municipal Corporation on Tuesday, protested against the issue of creek floods in the city by showing up in mud-soaked clothes. The councillors, including Leader of Opposition Payal Sakariya, also raised slogans against the ruling BJP, blaming the party for the situation in Surat. AAP councillor Dharmesh Bhanderi said, 'Our motive behind attending the general board meeting in mud-soaked clothes is to register our protest against the ruling BJP, as they have failed to guard Surat against creek floods. Surat witnesses creek floods every year, and the ruling party has no solution. The flood-affected people have to shift from their houses to other places.'

​Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
​Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill

The Hindu

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

​Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill

The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store