
Billionaires' staff reveal their most demanding tasks
One recent job listing with the Celebrity Personal Assistant Network advertised a $250,000 position working as an executive assistant to a New York City billionaire, although staff of wealthy individuals can make as much as $500,000 per year. Applicants to that specific post required an Ivy League degree, must be on-call 24/7 and be prepared to leave town for 'weeks at a time with a moment's notice'. High standards like these are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to billionaires' demands. Daily Mail spoke to several insiders who revealed the extent of their employers' requests, which range from the outrageous to the illegal.
Sarah Korpela has spent 15 years working as property manager for wealthy clients and in that time, she has seen no shortage of outlandish requests. Once, Korpela helped one of her clients move out of his roughly 10,000-square-foot home and sell seven of his cars, five ATVs, seven motorcycles and a few horses, she told The Wall Street Journal. Korpela, president of Luxury Estate Managers of Aspen, also helped him sell his $1 million wine collection to a local restaurant for about $400,000. But she drew the line when a client asked her to ship him his gun collection internationally. 'There's something called trafficking,' she recalled telling him. She said she sold the guns instead. 'If it's legal, I have done it in this business,' she added.
Jamie Gagliano, a real-estate agent at Douglas Elliman who used to be the chief of staff for hedge-fund executive Larry Robbins, oversaw the billionaire's homes and vehicles. This included his personal helicopter. 'We're talking about assets that are sometimes north of $10 million — each of them,' she told The Journal. In her role, Gagliano led a staff of 25 people for Robbins. A job like hers pays anywhere from $300,000 to $500,000 annually. Robbins, a lifelong hockey fan, retrofitted one of his mansions in Alpine, New Jersey, so it would have a full-sized ice hockey rink while Gagliano was working for him.
This meant that Gagliano soon found herself on a crash course for how to drive a Zamboni. She was heavily involved in working through the complex approval process. She also acted as Robbins' representative when discussing the project with a team of architects and engineers, an experience she credits with nurturing her interest in real estate. Another home that was in Robbins' portfolio during Gagliano's nine-year tenure was an absolute behemoth of a home sitting on 43 acres of pristine land in Mahwah, New Jersey. The home was bought in 2009 by Robbins' then-wife Amy Towers, who was once the COO for his company Glenview Capital Management.
Complete with a 20-stall horse barn, an indoor riding area, a wine cellar and a football field, it clearly wasn't the average house. The 10-bed, 14-bath home is now on the market for $22.5 million. The property taxes alone are estimated to be $120,000 a year. The type of work Gagliano and people like her do isn't for the faint-hearted, as it often requires you to be on call all the time for any sort of emergency. That was certainly how it was for Kelly Fore Dixon, who served as the estate manager for the late Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen. Allen died in October 2018 after a decades-long battle with cancer. He had a large portfolio of properties all over the world.
She managed his home in Beverly Hills, California, and recalled sleeping with her phone by her ear. The 12,000-square-foot estate had a recording studio, a home theater, a pool and 30 HVAC units, Dixon told The Journal. All of that was in the purview of Dixon, a maintenance worker, two housekeepers and a gardener — plus private security and about 80 subcontractors. The staff were 'silent and unseen' when Allen was around the property, said Dixon, who now runs the consulting firm Estate Management Systems. The house had $50 million worth of artwork, including a Monet that was accidentally sprayed with soda. 'The art contractor came in for an annual inspection and said, "What the hell have you done to the painting?"' Dixon recalled. It turned out that Allen himself was the culprit.
However, there are also the mundane requests that staff, particularly housekeepers, must keep on top of as well. 'People are passionate about how their pillows look,' Korpela said. 'Do they like sheets ironed? Pillow straight or karate chopped? What's on the bedside table?' Attention to detail is just as important for chefs who work for one percenters. They can make anywhere from $100,000 to $300,000 per year. 'Before we know what food they do like, we really want to know what food they don't like,' said chef Mike Shand, co-founder of Elite Private Chefs, a placement agency that has cooked for Beyoncé and Adele.
However, it's not just the fact that these staffers have to be at the top of their game. They have to be on it just about 24/7. That's according to Stephanie Shepherd, who worked as Kim Kardashian's personal assistant from 2013 to 2017. 'Obviously Kim and I text all day every day,' Shepherd told Refinery29 in November 2017. 'From the second we wake up until we go to bed, so we just bounce off ideas.' Kim herself has previously disclosed that she has her assistant carry out even the most minute of tasks — including removing the cardboard sleeve from her Starbucks cup before presenting it in the morning. Servants for the rich and powerful also have to deal with some eccentric personalities.
Brian Daniel, who worked as a personal assistant for years before founding his own staffing firm, said he's run into some truly strange things. 'I had one client who was a financial genius, and it turns out he was a nudist. He walks around in his birthday suit. They said the assistant would have to be okay with that because it's random — you come to work, he opens the door, and voilà,' he added. Still, many staffers form close relationships with their bosses. In 2019, Jeff Bezos gave a public shout-out to his longtime assistant John Connors. 'You're a big reason I'm able to be so busy and not go nuts — in fact, you somehow even make it calm,' Bezos gushed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Kamala Harris' former advisor left flustered after being asked simple question about economy
A former senior adviser to Kamala Harris was left visibly flustered during a live television segment after he failed to accurately answer a basic question about the current U.S. inflation rate. During a Friday appearance on Fox News ' America Reports, anchor Sandra Smith pressed Mike Nellis, once a Senior Advisor to former Vice President Harris, on the latest economic data, asking, 'Do you know what the inflation rate is?' 'Yeah, it's like about three or four percent,' Nellis responded. But Smith quickly fired back, correcting him. 'No. It's below three. And it's been a long time since it's gotten there. I mean, you're looking at 2.5 percent inflation now.' According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 2.7 percent year-over-year in June. While slightly above Smith's figure, the inflation rate has remained below 3 percent for several consecutive months, reflecting a significant cooldown from its 9.1 percent peak in June 2022 - the highest in four decades, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Despite the data, Nellis insisted that inflation continues to rise. 'Inflation is still going up,' he said. 'And it's rising, according to the latest stats.' 'That's not the case,' Smith countered. 'Inflation has come down. Inflation by nature is growth in prices, but the growth has slowed.' Earlier in the segment, Nellis blamed Republicans and President Donald Trump for ongoing economic concerns. 'Right now the president of the United States is Donald Trump. Republicans are in control of Congress,' Nellis said. 'They're currently in recess rather than doing anything about inflation.' He went on to claim that beef and alcohol prices hit record highs over the July 4 weekend and criticized Trump's promises to reduce prices immediately after taking office. 'Donald Trump promised to make grocery prices go down on day one,' Nellis said. 'We're six months in and everything's more expensive.' Smith pushed back, noting that 'prices have definitely come down,' but that 'they can go down more.' Meanwhile, some economic indicators suggest relief for American consumers, according to AAA, average gas prices hit a four-year low in June. The tense exchange came just days after the Democratic Party had its own messaging blunder when its official X account posted a graphic blaming inflation from 2021 to 2024 on 'Trump's America' - even though Joe Biden and Harris were in charge the whole time. The post later deleted. The White House later shared the same graphic again, this time fixing the mistake and crediting the Biden administration. That slip-up highlights the tough spot Democrats are in as they face growing criticism over the party's handling of the economy. A new Wall Street Journal poll this week showed that 63 percent of voters view the Democratic Party unfavorably - the worst rating they've seen in 35 years. Just 33 percent said they view the party favorably, and only 8 percent said they had a 'very favorable' view, according to the poll. In contrast, Republicans, while also viewed more unfavorably than favorably, had stronger numbers - sitting at just 19 percent. President Trump's job approval stands at 46 percent, higher than the 40 percent approval rating he received at the same point in his first term, according to the WSJ. When asked which party they trusted more on major issues such as inflation, tariffs, and immigration, voters consistently favored Republicans. 'The Democratic brand is so bad that they don't have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,' Democratic pollster John Anzalone, who conducted the WSJ poll with Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio, said. 'Until they reconnect with real voters and working people on who they're for and what their economic message is, they're going to have problems.' Republicans currently hold a financial edge as well, with campaign filings showing the Republican National Committee has over $80 million on hand, compared to $15 million held by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the WSJ reported.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
There won't be a wealth tax – but Rachel Reeves can't afford to rule it out just yet
Normally, when politicians decline to rule something out, a sceptical media and public believe they are about to do it. But there should be one exception to this rule. Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and other ministers are refusing to rule out introducing a wealth tax in this autumn's Budget, when the chancellor is likely to raise taxes by at least £20bn to stick within her fiscal rules. I'm told Starmer and Reeves will not bring in a new wealth tax, such as the 2 per cent levy on assets of more than £10m advocated by a growing number of Labour MPs and Neil Kinnock, the party's former leader, to raise £10bn. A wealth tax is an easy slogan and fits on to a banner. It would do nicely for the Starmer allies hoping to nudge him in a more progressive direction as he seeks a long overdue 'story' for his government. But Reeves and Starmer are not convinced. The chancellor thinks wealth taxes don't work. Twelve developed nations had them in 1990s but only three remain; only one, in Switzerland, brings in lots of money. Reeves burnt her own fingers by targeting non-doms – a process begun by Jeremy Hunt, the outgoing Tory chancellor. I'm told Reeves privately dismissed fears the rich would respond by leaving the UK, saying: "They always say that, but it never happens." It is happening, and she is now considering changing her plan to make worldwide assets, including those in foreign trusts, liable to inheritance tax. One government insider told me: 'People can choose where to pay their taxes. It's very easy to move countries and they are doing it.' A new wealth tax would be complex, take years to introduce and probably not be worth the candle. Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said its study found such a tax would 'lower long-run growth and employment, thanks to a decline in foreign and domestic investment. It would make UK businesses more fragile and less competitive, and create strong incentives for capital reallocation and migration.' Why not just say no to a wealth tax now? Reeves offered one explanation to her Tory predecessor Norman Lamont at a Lords committee hearing this week. He told her he found it 'a bit strange' the government has not ruled out the move. Reeves replied that if she ruled out one tax rise, the media would move on to the next option, and assume that one was going to happen if she failed to rule it out. A fair point – but not her only reason. Reeves and Starmer need to build bridges with the parliamentary Labour Party after it filleted their welfare legislation, so rejecting a wealth tax now would inflame tensions. I suspect that when the Budget comes, Reeves and her allies will whisper to Labour MPs they are introducing a form of wealth tax through other measures, while avoiding headlines about implementing a specific one. Another reason not to rule out a wealth tax is to help message discipline. Labour certainly needs more of that: ministers unwittingly fuelled speculation about tax rises in media interviews by giving different definitions of "working people'. Far easier to say taxes are a matter for the Budget and we don't comment in advance. Some senior Labour figures think Reeves's reticence is because she is considering proposals that are close to being a wealth tax – for example, increasing property-based taxes. I think she should bring in higher council tax bands for the most expensive properties. It's ludicrous that this tax is based on 1991 property values, and that in England, people in homes valued at more than £320,000 pay the same amount in their local authority. Reform could be sold as a genuine levelling up measure the Tories flunked as it would cut bills in the north and Midlands while raising them in the south. Alternatively, Reeves could increase capital gains tax for the second Budget running, perhaps by bringing it into line with income tax rates, which are higher. Some in government favour a rise in income tax with the money earmarked for defence, as I have suggested. Another option is to raise the top rate of income tax from 45 per cent to 50 per cent. But both ideas would leave Labour open to the charge of breaching its manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. Reeves could argue that circumstances had changed in a more dangerous world. But breaking its promise might be a step too far for an already deeply unpopular PM and party. I don't think there will be a wealth tax. However, the rich shouldn't celebrate. The Budget will increase existing taxes on the wealthy, in line with the government's mantra of protecting "working people", while ensuring 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. Health warning: creating losers is not pain-free for them or the government, as Reeves discovered when she brought in the ' family farms tax '. But reforming some taxes under a better banner – 'fair tax' – is her best shot.


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Company at heart of Coldplay viral video releases tongue-in-cheek clip - with a big twist
The company at the centre of a viral video at a Coldplay concert has released a tongue-in-cheek clip on social media - featuring Gwyneth Paltrow as a "temporary spokesperson". Astronomer was thrust into the spotlight after two of the tech firm's senior executives were filmed embracing on a kiss cam during a gig in Boston. Andy Byron subsequently resigned as chief executive officer - while the woman in the video, Kristin Cabot, stepped down as chief people officer a few days later. 0:28 Paltrow, who used to be married to Coldplay frontman Chris Martin, is seen sitting at a desk in the new video uploaded to X - and begins by thanking the public for their interest in Astronomer. She adds: "I've been hired on a very temporary basis to speak on behalf of the 300-plus employees at Astronomer. "Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days - and they wanted me to answer the most common ones." Before the final word appears, the video cuts back to Paltrow, who goes on to promote some of the services Astronomer offers. In a subtle nod to the countless column inches the company has attracted, Paltrow adds: "We've been thrilled so many people have a newfound interest in data workflow automation." Another question then pops up on screen, which begins to type out: "How is your social media team holding up?" But before the sentence fully appears, Paltrow abruptly interrupts by declaring that Astronomer has spaces at an upcoming conference in September. "We'll now be returning to what we do best: delivering game-changing results for our customers," she adds at the end of the video. The marketing stunt is a sign that Astronomer is trying to put a positive spin on the scandal, which sparked feverish speculation online. After Mr Byron resigned, the company had said in a statement: "Astronomer is committed to the values and culture that have guided us since our founding. "Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met." Pete DeJoy, who has taken over as interim CEO, admitted on Monday that the company has faced an "unusual and surreal" amount of attention in recent days.