
Russia could scrap smoke-belching, disaster-plagued aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov because Putin can't afford it anymore
The Russian navy and the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) are in talks on whether it's worth restoring the damaged Admiral Kuznestov, a rusted Cold War-era hulk whose repairs would cost more than $250 million — a significant price tag for President Vladimir Putin to pay while still running his meatgrinder war in Ukraine.
'This is a very expensive and inefficient naval weapon,' Admiral Sergei Avakyants, ex-commander of the Pacific Fleet, told the state-owned Izvestia newspaper.
5 The troubled Admiral Kuznetsov serves as the Russian navy's sole aircraft carrier.
AP
5 The ship has been plagued by disaster in recent years, including a 2019 fire that killed two people and left 14 others injured.
AP
'If the Admiral Kuznetsov is decided not to continue repairs, it remains only to take it, cut it into scrap metal and dispose of it,' he added.
The aircraft carrier first took to the seas in 1985 as a symbol of the Soviet Union's naval might, with the Kuznetsov set to be the first of a two-ship carrier fleet that never was.
The USSR dissolved just six years later.
The 1,000-foot-long ship can carry 26 fighter jets, the Sukhoi Su-33 Flanker-D, along with 24 helicopters. It has been deployed seven times around the eastern hemisphere to complete missions for the Kremlin.
The ship has been out of service since 2017 after the Kuznetsov sustained damages when it lost two aircraft in a botched landing off Syria, where Russia had been backing now-ousted President Bashar al-Assad.
5 The Soviet-era ship can carry 26 of Moscow's jets, along with 24 helicopters.
forsvaret/AFP via Getty Images
The setback caused the ship to undergo repairs at a shipyard in the Murmansk region, where a crane collapsed onto the deck of the ship when a floating dock sank in October 2018.
The following year, a major fire killed two people on board and injured more than a dozen others, according to Russian media. USC CEO Alexey Rakhmanov warned that it would take nearly $5 million to repair the ship after the blaze.
By 2021, the general director of the shipyard overseeing the Kuznetsov was arrested and charged with embezzling more than half-a-million dollars allocated to the ship's repairs.
5 The ship has been deployed seven times, including a mission in the Mediterranean that hosted former Cyprus President Nicos Anastasiades.
EPA
Moscow had originally hoped to return the Kuznetsov to service by 2022, but the date kept being pushed back further and further, with the budget to repair the ship ballooning to $257 million.
The latest estimate claimed that the repairs would allow the ship to carry on for another 20 years, but many in Moscow believe that would be a waste of resources.
'Aircraft carriers are a relic of a bygone era,' Avakyants said. 'They're expensive and ineffective. The future lies in robotic systems and unmanned aviation.
5 The ship was stationed in the Murmansk region for repairs that have gone on for eight years.
Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
Ilya Kramnik, of Moscow's IMEMO RAS Center for Strategic Planning Studies, echoed the calls to retire the Kuznetsov and have the Kremlin instead focus on building a new generation of aircraft carriers.
'Even if it (the Kuznetsov) lasts until 2040, it won't last long. Therefore, taking into account the experience gained during the operation of the Admiral Kuznetsov, it is necessary to build another ship.' Kramnik told the state outlet.
Kramnik suggested that there would be no hope to save the Kuznetsov as a museum piece or a relic of the Soviet era, joining calls for the ship to be scrapped and to have its name stripped and transferred to a new ship.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Witkoff to travel to Russia ahead of U.S. sanctions, Trump says
President Trump said on Thursday that White House envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to travel to Russia in the coming days ahead of the sanctions the U.S. is going to impose on Moscow over the war in Ukraine. Why it matters: Trump's deadline to President Vladimir Putin will expire in eight days. If the Russian president doesn't agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine by then, the U.S. will impose new sanctions on Russia for the first time since Trump assumed office. While Trump voiced skepticism about the effectiveness of the upcoming sanctions on Russia, he made clear he is going to do it. Trump has resisted for six months to impose the sanctions that will potentially deal a heavy penalty to buyers of Russian oil, notably China and India, in the process. What he's saying:"It is disgusting what they are doing. Very sad. It should be stopped. It's a disgrace," Trump said when asked about the Russian bombing of Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities. "We are going to put sanctions. I am not sure it bothers him or if it has any effect, but we are going to do it," he added. Catch up quick: Two weeks ago, Trump said he is giving Putin a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine. Trump's deadline came after he became convinced the Russian president wasn't negotiating in good faith. Earlier this week, Trump shortened the deadline he gave Putin and said that considering Putin's position, there is no reason to wait 50 days. What we're watching: Witkoff's trip to Russia and a possible meeting with Putin hasn't been fully finalized, a source with knowledge says. If Witkoff goes, it will be his first trip to Russia in three months.


Hamilton Spectator
23 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
2026 race for California governor goes into new gear and directions with Kamala Harris out
LOS ANGELES (AP) — After months of uncertainty, the race to become California's next governor started Thursday. Former Vice President Kamala Harris' decision Wednesday to bypass the 2026 contest pushed the campaign into a new phase, lacking its biggest potential star and the presumptive early favorite. Harris' formal exit opens the door for additional candidates to venture in, while scrambling a crowded field with no dominant candidate. Democrats remain favored to hold the seat now occupied by term-limited Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, in a state where Republicans have not won a statewide election in nearly two decades. Democrats hold a nearly 2-to-1 advantage over registered Republicans statewide. 'The starting gun just popped,' said Democratic consultant Andrew Acosta, calling it the first truly wide-open governor's race in over a quarter-century. 'The race is on.' Other Democrats work to position themselves Former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter moved quickly to establish herself as a leading contender, as her campaign pleaded for donations to 'solidify Katie as the Democratic front-runner.' Former Biden administration health secretary Xavier Becerra sought to position himself as an heir to the Harris legacy: They both previously served as California attorneys general. 'The vice president and I have been together in this fight to restore the American Dream for a long time,' Becerra said in a statement. ''I'm proud of our shared record — expanding health care for millions of Americans, bringing down the cost of prescription drugs, tackling our country's mental health crisis and defending reproductive freedom.' Harris' decision 'reshapes this race for governor, but not the stakes,' he added. Because of Harris' potential candidacy, the contest had been in a slow-walk for months. Now, following her decision, campaigns will be chasing her supporters while reevaluating a field in which Harris will not be taking part. Fundraising emails jammed inboxes. Democratic consultant Michael Trujillo, a former aide to Democratic candidate and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, said voters loyal to Harris are going to have to rethink their choices while looking at candidates they might not know much about in a large and growing field. 'I think everyone is picking up points from Kamala's voters now that she is not an option,' Trujillo said. 'There now is more oxygen for everyone else.' California is known as the epicenter of the so-called Trump resistance. The race will unfold with President Donald Trump dominating daily headlines as his administration battles the liberal-leaning state over health care funding for lower-income residents, immigration and environmental protection. More than half of voters think the state is headed in the wrong direction, with many households vexed by inflation, notorious taxes and some of the nation's highest utility bills. Soaring rents and housing prices are driving residents to other, more affordable states. The state budget is expected to be in the red in coming years. And billions in spending on homelessness has done little to check the crisis. But the primary election is not until June 2, so it is impossible to know what will be motivating voters in 10 months. Republicans see glimmers of hope Long-suffering Republicans in the state have been heartened by last year's elections, in which the heavily Democratic state displayed a slight rightward shift. While Harris — a former San Francisco prosecutor, state attorney general and U.S. senator — won the state in a landslide, she fell well short of former President Joe Biden's vote totals in 2020 while Trump picked off a string of counties that eluded him four years earlier. Among the candidates, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said in a statement that Harris realized 'the status quo is impossible to defend.' And conservative commentator Steve Hilton welcomed Harris' decision and said 'after 15 years of one-party Democrat rule, everyone can see it's time for change in California.' As is the case in high-profile races for governor, a long list of candidates — some known, others not — fills out the ballot. California has what is known as a top-two primary system, in which all candidates appear on the same primary ballot regardless of political party, but only the top two vote-getters advance to the November general election, regardless of party. Other Democrats in the mix include Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis; former state controller Betty Yee; former state Senate leader Toni Atkins; state schools superintendent Tony Thurmond; and real estate developer Stephen Cloobeck. Rich outsider could shake up race In California, home to some of the nation's richest Americans, it is always possible a wealthy outsider could shake up the race. That was the case in 2010, when billionaire Republican Meg Whitman spent nearly $180 million, much of it her own money, but lost to Democrat Jerry Brown, a former governor. Newsom — who has not endorsed a successor — was asked Thursday what he thought of the possibility that he and Harris, old friends from the San Francisco Bay Area, might meet again in the 2028 presidential race. Harris has not ruled out another run for the presidency after falling short in 2020 and 2024. Newsom is widely seen as positioning himself for a run in 2028 though he has veered away from speculating about his political future. 'We'll see where fate brings all of us,' Newsom told reporters. 'I'm looking forward to what she does next.' ___ Associated Press writer Tran Nguyen in Sacramento contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bipartisan pair of senators seek billions in new Ukraine aid
A bipartisan pair of senators introduced legislation Thursday calling for tens of billions of dollars in aid for Ukraine to be spent over the next two years, as Russian President Vladimir Putin rebuffs calls from President Trump to halt the war. The bill was introduced by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a member of the Appropriations Committee, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a member of the Appropriations Committee. The top line figure for the bill comes in at over $50 billion, according to Shaheen's office. The Shaheen-Murkowski bill comes as the Senate Appropriations Committee advanced on Thursday a defense funding bill with $1 billion in military assistance related to Ukraine. Still, the bill's passage faces long odds in the Republican-controlled Congress, where GOP leaders in the House and Senate have deferred to Trump over which legislation makes it to the floor. The administration has slashed foreign aid so far, and administration officials and some GOP lawmakers regularly rally against sending U.S. military and assistance abroad. While Congress approved $60 billion in Ukraine funding in April 2024, 18 senators voted against it, including Vice President Vance, then the Republican senator from Ohio. And Senate Majority Leader John Thune has held back putting on the floor a bipartisan Russia sanctions bill — with a veto-proof majority of co-sponsors — at the request of Trump, who wants to decide when to impose sanctions on Russia if Moscow fails to negotiate an end to the war. Trump has set an Aug. 8 deadline. But Shaheen and Murkowski are framing their legislation as giving Trump additional tools to force Putin to the negotiating table — by scaling up Ukraine's military capabilities to withstand Russian attacks. The legislation also sets up guardrails to protect against executive action limiting assistance to Ukraine. The language responds to Trump's decision in March to pause intelligence sharing to Ukraine for one week after a public spat with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, and a decision by the Pentagon earlier this month to pause certain weapons transfers to Ukraine pending a review. Shaheen and Murkowski's legislation provides billions of dollars in direct military assistance to Ukraine, but much of the funding is intended for investing in military production in the U.S., and also seeks novel ways of raising funds to pay for support for Kyiv. This includes using interest earned from frozen Russian assets in the U.S. to fund assistance for Kyiv, sending to Ukraine 'seized,' 'illicit' weapons from non-state actors or using the sale of those weapons to fund military equipment for Ukraine, and prioritizing American military production for purchases by U.S.-allies to then be sent to Ukraine. The bill also codifies Trump's so-called minerals deal with Ukraine, called the Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, which was established in May. U.S. military assistance to Ukraine is expected to be counted as a U.S. contribution into the fund. Direct funding for military assistance for Ukraine includes $30 billion lasting until 2027 and provides $3 billion in Foreign Military Financing for Ukraine over the next two fiscal years. The bill increases the Presidential Drawdown Authority from $100 million to $6 billion each year, allowing the U.S. to pull directly from Pentagon weapons stockpiles to send to Ukraine, with the money to pay for backfilling those stocks. The bill also provides $600 million for the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement to support Ukrainian law enforcement and anti-corruption programming. It provides $50 million for war crimes prosecutions. Shaheen and Murkowski also include $1 billion for a trilateral drone initiative — for research, development and production of drones with Ukraine and Taiwan — to learn lessons from Ukraine's fight against Russia. The bill also creates a task force 'to process lessons learned from Ukraine's fight, including modern warfighting doctrine' and how to counter U.S. vulnerabilities to drone attacks. 'This bipartisan bill is a win for America,' Shaheen said in a statement. 'It supports our defense industrial base, American manufacturers and workers — all while ensuring the U.S. military learns from Ukraine's battlefield innovations. Make no mistake: unprovoked violence against U.S. partners by would-be aggressors in the Kremlin and Beijing will be met by unshakable resolve from the U.S. and our allies.' 'I'm pleased to work with Senator Shaheen in introducing the Supporting Ukraine Act of 2025, which reaffirms our commitment to both Ukraine's sovereignty and America's national interests,' Murkowski said in a statement. 'By providing critical funding for military and humanitarian assistance, this legislation ensures Ukraine can continue to resist Russia's illegal and brutal war.' She added, 'We are also incorporating the use of seized Russian assets to hold aggressors accountable, while strengthening America's military preparedness by applying valuable battlefield insights from Ukraine's fight and sharing these lessons with critical partners like Taiwan. It's time to reaffirm our leadership on the world stage and show that our support for our allies is unwavering.'