
UK sanctions Russian spies, hackers for ‘malicious' cyber activity
The latest set of measures unveiled by the UK's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) target three units of the Russian military intelligence agency GRU and 18 military intelligence officers.
The British government said that GRU routinely uses cyber and information operations to sow chaos, division and disorder in Ukraine and across the world, with 'devastating real-world consequences".
'GRU spies are running a campaign to destabilise Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens," said UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
'The Kremlin should be in no doubt: we see what they are trying to do in the shadows and we won't tolerate it. That's why we're taking decisive action with sanctions against Russian spies… [US President] Putin's hybrid threats and aggression will never break our resolve. The UK and our Allies support for Ukraine and Europe's security is ironclad," he said.
Russia's Unit 26165, which was sanctioned on Friday, is said to have conducted online reconnaissance to help target missile strikes against Mariupol in Ukraine in 2022 – including the strike that destroyed the Mariupol Theatre where hundreds of civilians, including children, were murdered.
The GRU military intelligence officers sanctioned are said to be responsible for historically targeting Yulia Skripal's device with malicious malware known as X-Agent – five years before GRU military intelligence officers' failed attempt to murder former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia with the deadly Novichok nerve agent in Salisbury.
The FCDO said that in the UK, Russia has targeted media outlets, telecoms providers, political and democratic institutions, and energy infrastructure. The United Kingdom and our international allies are watching Russia and are countering their attacks both publicly and behind the scenes.
The ministry has flagged hybrid threats as cyber-attacks involving hacking government systems or stealing trade secrets; disinformation or spreading false or misleading information online; sabotage or damaging infrastructure or supply chains; and political interference or influencing elections or public opinion.
'The UK government is committed to accelerating its efforts to counter hybrid threats at home, protecting the UK's national security – a key foundation of the Plan for Change – and abroad, working in collaboration with a growing international coalition including all 32 NATO Allies, the EU and its member states, and our partners in the FBI," the FCDO said.
'The Kremlin has also used cyber operations in support of Putin's illegal war – including targeting critical infrastructure like Viasat satellite communications. Some of these attacks were conducted on the eve of the full-scale invasion in 2022 with the express purpose of degrading Ukraine's ability to defend itself," it said.
The UK accused Russia of 'insidious activity" that stretches far beyond Europe. In addition to the GRU Units and officers, the UK government also sanctioned three leaders of 'African Initiative", a social media content mill established and funded by Russia and employing Russian intelligence officers to conduct information operations in West Africa.
This includes reckless attempts to undermine lifesaving global health initiatives in the region by pushing baseless conspiracy theories to further the Kremlin's political agenda, the FCDO said. PTI AK SCY
view comments
First Published:
July 18, 2025, 20:00 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Russia-US bilateral ties separate from Ukraine settlement and shouldn't be governed by it, says Kremlin
Moscow/Washington, July 18 (UNI) Russia's ties with the United States are a separate issue and its settlement with Ukraine should have little bearing on them, said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, stating that Moscow and Washington have enough issues as it is, reports TASS. "These lines are different. One topic is the Ukrainian settlement, and another one is our bilateral relations, all irritants in our ties, problematic issues, which we have a lot of," the Kremlin spokesman clarified. Peskov's statement comes following US President Donald Trump's statement that he was disappointed with Russian President Vladmir Putin over his reluctance to end hostilities with Ukraine, and threatening 100% tariffs on all of Russia's trading partners within the next 50-days if Moscow does not come to a deal. Meanwhile, Moscow and Washington have been engaged in talks aimed at easing tensions and improving bilateral ties. However, progress on this front has recently stalled at the initiative of the United States. Russia has nonetheless been dismissive of Trump's threats, with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov openly mocking the threat of sanctions, saying that it has become 'old news for Moscow', more so as the country is already under facing 90% tariffs, which have had little effect on its economy. The Kremlin has further called the move impractical and little more than overly dramatic theatrics by the White House, citing Trump's long history of making drastic threats and almost never going through with them, as well as the potential socio-political and economic destruction such a move could unleash on Washington, if it decides to impose 100% tariffs on Russia's trading partners, which include economic giants China and India, who are also two of the US' biggest partners. UNI XC ANV GNK


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?
AP U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard departs following a closed door meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at Malacanang Palace in Manila, Philippines Monday, June 2, 2025. (Ezra Acayan/Pool Photo via AP) Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, July 18, unleashed a barrage on posts X, accusing former Obama administration officials of politicizing intelligence ahead of the 2016 US election. She claims that the intelligence community's assessment of Russian election interference was manipulated to falsely suggest that foreign cyber operations influenced Donald Trump's victory. 'These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House,' Gabbard posted, adding that the effort was to 'subvert the will of the American people.' Also Read: How much is Dylan Dreyer worth in 2025; and who's doing better after her split from Brian Fichera? She further stated she has handed over all related documents to the Department of Justice, calling for a full investigation. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released declassified documents that revisit intelligence assessments made after the 2016 election. The documents, originally circulated within national security agencies, suggested that foreign actors, primarily Russia, did not alter vote counts or directly impact election results via cyber in one such Presidential Daily Brief from December 2016, intelligence officials reportedly assessed it was 'highly unlikely' that Russian actors had succeeded in changing vote outcomes. Despite these conclusions, a separate Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, indicated that Russia sought to help Trump win. That assessment became central to the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion and later led to investigations, including the Mueller Mueller probe was launched in May 2017 under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to examine Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, and whether President Trump obstructed justice. The investigation concluded that Russia did interfere through hacking and propaganda but did not find sufficient evidence to charge Trump or his campaign with conspiracy. Now, with newly declassified documents released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, questions have resurfaced about the origins and motivations behind the probe, raising claims that the intelligence was politicized to justify a prolonged campaign to undermine Trump's timing of Gabbard's post and document release has also raised eyebrows among political observers. On July 17, the WSJ published a report detailing the involvement of President Donald Trump in a 2003 birthday letter that he allegedly signed in a leather-bound album for Jeffrey Epstein. However, he called it fake and threatened legal renewed interest in the matter, critics point out that Donald Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from the controversial case involving alleged ties between global elites and the now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. Observers also note a sudden shift in both media and political discourse, steering attention back to long-standing Russia-related narratives and raising questions about whether this pivot is intended to divert focus from the unresolved Epstein saga. Online commentators have begun asking: Is the revival of this 2016 controversy meant to bury or distract from Epstein-related revelations?Gabbard, who was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence earlier this year under President Trump's second term, said that her actions are not partisan. 'This is about the integrity of our democratic republic,' she she has called for accountability, none of the individuals named, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, or former FBI Director James Comey, have publicly responded to the allegations as of publication. The Department of Justice has not confirmed any formal investigations on the newly declassified documents.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, July 18, unleashed a barrage on posts X, accusing former Obama administration officials of politicizing intelligence ahead of the 2016 US election. She claims that the intelligence community's assessment of Russian election interference was manipulated to falsely suggest that foreign cyber operations influenced Donald Trump 's victory. 'These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House,' Gabbard posted, adding that the effort was to 'subvert the will of the American people.' Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category PGDM Project Management Design Thinking Public Policy Cybersecurity Data Science MBA Product Management Leadership CXO Healthcare MCA Operations Management Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence Digital Marketing Degree healthcare Technology Data Science Others Management Finance others Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details Also Read: How much is Dylan Dreyer worth in 2025; and who's doing better after her split from Brian Fichera? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ethiopia: Bathroom Remodeling Trends in 2025 May Surprise You Bathroom Remodeling | Search Ads Search Now Undo She further stated she has handed over all related documents to the Department of Justice , calling for a full investigation. Live Events New declassifications of an old allegation The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released declassified documents that revisit intelligence assessments made after the 2016 election. The documents, originally circulated within national security agencies, suggested that foreign actors, primarily Russia, did not alter vote counts or directly impact election results via cyber means. Earlier, in one such Presidential Daily Brief from December 2016, intelligence officials reportedly assessed it was 'highly unlikely' that Russian actors had succeeded in changing vote outcomes. Despite these conclusions, a separate Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, indicated that Russia sought to help Trump win. That assessment became central to the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion and later led to investigations, including the Mueller probe . The credibility of Muller Probe The Mueller probe was launched in May 2017 under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to examine Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, and whether President Trump obstructed justice. The investigation concluded that Russia did interfere through hacking and propaganda but did not find sufficient evidence to charge Trump or his campaign with conspiracy. Now, with newly declassified documents released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, questions have resurfaced about the origins and motivations behind the probe, raising claims that the intelligence was politicized to justify a prolonged campaign to undermine Trump's presidency. Why Now? Epstein case receives little attention The timing of Gabbard's post and document release has also raised eyebrows among political observers. On July 17, the WSJ published a report detailing the involvement of President Donald Trump in a 2003 birthday letter that he allegedly signed in a leather-bound album for Jeffrey Epstein. However, he called it fake and threatened legal action. With renewed interest in the matter, critics point out that Donald Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from the controversial case involving alleged ties between global elites and the now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. Observers also note a sudden shift in both media and political discourse, steering attention back to long-standing Russia-related narratives and raising questions about whether this pivot is intended to divert focus from the unresolved Epstein saga. Online commentators have begun asking: Is the revival of this 2016 controversy meant to bury or distract from Epstein-related revelations? Accountability Promised, but Questions Linger Gabbard, who was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence earlier this year under President Trump's second term, said that her actions are not partisan. 'This is about the integrity of our democratic republic,' she wrote. While she has called for accountability, none of the individuals named, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, or former FBI Director James Comey, have publicly responded to the allegations as of publication. The Department of Justice has not confirmed any formal investigations on the newly declassified documents.