logo
India's decision to restrict Bangladesh exports shaped by Dhaka's recent approach on Northeast

India's decision to restrict Bangladesh exports shaped by Dhaka's recent approach on Northeast

Time of India19-05-2025
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
India's decision to place restrictions on Bangladeshi products being exported to North-East India was shaped by several comments made by the interim regime including by Chief Adviser Md Yunus that it can choke the prosperity of NE states by denying them access to the Bay of Bengal.Members associated with the regime gave repeated threats including after Pahalgam attacks that Dhaka could even contemplate to annex the NE states. Ex-servicemen organised rallies in Dhaka last year in support of the demand. Recently Yunus was on a trip to Beijing where he mentioned that North-East India is 'landlocked' and Dhaka is the 'only guardian of the ocean for all this region'Under the Sheikh Hasina govt, India had concluded pacts giving NE states access to Bay of Bengal via Chittagong port. This was also aimed to increase Bangladesh's revenues through royalty earned from the port for transportation of Indian goods, recalled persons familiar with the Indo-Bangladesh dynamics.Sources sinister design by the Yunus regime and the radicals led by pro-Pak Jamaat-e-Islami to create disturbances in the Northeastern states. For close to two decades Bangladesh was home to insurgents from the Northeast till Hasina handed over them to India in 2009. The subsequent years witnessed Bangladesh businesses making inroads into the Northeast and establishing consulates. India received transit rights for the Northeast via Bangladesh, which was denied by BNP-led governments in the past.The ushering of the Yunus government also witnessed cargoes from Pakistan getting unloaded in Chittagong port for the first time in over 50 years. There are apprehensions of ISI cells getting reactivated in Bangladesh in the backdrop of Pakistan's growing military ties with Bangladesh. This will have cross-border implications into Northeastern states.The Directorate General of Foreign Trade issued a notification on Saturday night and decided to impose port restrictions on specified Bangladesh exports to India across all land customs stations (LCSs) or integrated check posts (ICPs) in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram and through Changrabandha and Fulbari in north Bengal.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea
Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea

The Hindu

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea

Nayara Energy informed the Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) that Microsoft has restored cloud services to its cloud-based services, following which the court allowed the company to withdraw its petition. Nayara Energy — an Indo-Russian oil refining and marketing company — had approached the court after being suddenly locked out of its Microsoft account, disrupting critical business operations. Also Read | CEO of Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara Energy resigns after E.U. sanctions, sources say The company contended that Microsoft's unilateral action was based solely on its interpretation of recent European Union (EU) sanctions against Russia, despite Nayara being an Indian entity. At the outset of the hearing, counsel for Nayara Energy told the court that 'the matter is resolved because they (Microsoft) have restored all services.' The court then allowed Nayara to withdraw the petition, granting liberty to approach the court again should Microsoft take similar action in the future. Senior advocates Rajiv Nayyar and Dayan Krishnan, appearing for Nayara, argued that Microsoft had acted without notice and urged the court to record that any future termination of services should not be abrupt. 'At least they should give 3–4 days' notice before terminating. There can't be an abrupt shutting,' the lawyers said. Narrating the background, Mr. Krishnan said, 'Originally, there were servers. Then the Ukraine war started. They (Microsoft) came to us to move to cloud servers. We were apprehensive. They assured us: 'Don't worry, the Indian entity will not be affected by any of these (sanctions).' After that, this has happened.' Microsoft's counsel said the service has been restored but further clarified that no assurances could be given for the future. 'They (Nayara) are a sanctioned entity by the EU. We have restored today, but I can't make these statements for the future,' Microsoft's counsel submitted. Taking note of the developments, the court observed, 'Earlier, without notice, they had shut their services. You came to court. Now they have restored it. The grievance stands mitigated. In the future, we believe they would not do the same exercise, and as and when they intend to, they will perhaps give you notice. If they don't, you can come back to court.' In a recent press statement Nayara had said, 'While the sanctions originate exclusively from the EU, Microsoft—a U.S.-headquartered corporation—has chosen to withdraw services from Nayara Energy without any legal requirement to do so under U.S. or Indian law'. According to a Microsoft spokesperson, 'Microsoft is committed to supporting all its customers in India and worldwide, and has restored services for Nayara Energy. We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the European Union towards service continuity for the organization.' Nayara Energy said it is a vital contributor to India's energy security, accounting for approximately 8% of the country's total refining capacity, approx 7% of its retail petrol pump network.

National child rights commission orders probe into alleged DYFI disruption of mid-day meal, assault of cook at school in Kerala's Kannur
National child rights commission orders probe into alleged DYFI disruption of mid-day meal, assault of cook at school in Kerala's Kannur

The Hindu

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

National child rights commission orders probe into alleged DYFI disruption of mid-day meal, assault of cook at school in Kerala's Kannur

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has ordered an inquiry into allegations that Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) activists disrupted a mid-day meal at Manathana Government School, Peravoor, Kannur, Kerala, after assaulting a cook and destroying food meant for students. According to a complaint filed by M. Arya Laxmi, state joint secretary, Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), during an SFI-led strike on July 10, a group led by DYFI block joint secretary Akshaya Manoj allegedly entered the school promises and assaulted cook-cum-helper Vasantha while she was preparing food under the Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM Poshan) scheme. The complainant alleged that the assault caused burn injuries to Ms. Vasantha and that food grains meant for children were destroyed. The complaint stated that the act was aimed at disrupting their statutory mid-day meal, thereby 'inducing hunger among children and compelling their early departure from school, impacting afternoon classes.' Ms. Arya said that such disruption violated the National Food Security Act 2013 and the Mid-Day Meal Rules 2015 which guarantee a free cooked meal to children up to Class 6 on all school working days. She observed that the alleged action undermined key objectives of the scheme. The complaint also flagged potential psychological harm to children. Ms. Arya in her complaint sought legal action against those involved. She also expressed apprehensions about a fair investigation under the Kerala government. The NCPCR has directed the District Collector to conduct an inquiry and take necessary action, with direct intimation to the complainant.

'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'
'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'

First Post

time4 minutes ago

  • First Post

'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'

Regarding Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's call for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to declare US President Donald Trump a 'liar', sources in the government have said that the India-US relationship goes beyond the disagreement over the ceasefire and trade talks and should not be compromised on these issues. read more Sources in the Union government have stressed that the India-US relationship goes beyond the disagreement over the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year and cannot be compromised over the issue. Since May when India and Pakistan clashed for four days before reaching a ceasefire on May 10, US President Donald Trump has claimed that he brokered the ceasefire between the two countries. India, on the other hand, has maintained that Pakistan made a request after four days of battering that India granted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi of the Congress party said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should publicly declare Trump a 'liar' over his false claims. Notably, while the government has not used the word 'liar', it has repeated multiple times that the ceasefire was a result of India accepting Pakistan's request and no third-party intervention was at play there. 'If Narendra Modi has even 50 per cent of the courage of Indira Gandhi, he should declare in the House that Trump is lying about the ceasefire,' said Rahul. On the intervening night of May 6-7, India launched Operation Sindoor and struck terrorist sites in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK). It was launched in response to the attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in which terrorists killed 26 people on April 22. After Pakistan responded to Indian strikes with attacks on Indian civilian and military sites, India struck Pakistani military sites, including airbases and air defence units and, after four days of battering, Pakistan reached out to India with a request for a ceasefire on May 10. India granted Pakistan the request. India-US ties go beyond disagreements, say sources Sources in the Union government have said that the India-US relationship goes beyond ongoing differences, such as differences over the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan conflict and ongoing trade talks. Even as the August 1 deadline for a trade deal is just around the corner, India and the United States have not been able to reach any deal. It is believed that the Trump administration's refusal to respect Indian red lines about sensitive sectors of dairy and agriculture and genetically modified (GM) crops is the main barrier in the two sides reaching a deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump on Tuesday said that India will likely face 20-25 per cent tariff starting August 1, which will be much higher than the 15 per cent tariff that he has imposed on the European Union (EU) and Japan that he has struck deals with. Sources said that the United States has so far stood with India in disputes with China, such as during the Doklam standoff of 2017, and such an important relationship cannot be compromised on one or two differences. Moreover, sources stressed that the prime minister has publicly declared that no leader asked India to stop the war. Similarly, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said that Modi and Trump never had the discussion about stopping the war. Sources further said that the Congress party has been in power before and it should know how governments function, suggesting that the party should realise the kind of words that the government would use to assert disagreement with the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store