A $10bn oil empire in tatters: how Prax collapsed
'He gave a presentation about how everyone should be very proud,' one source at the event said.
But even the most optimistic in the audience could not avoid arching an eyebrow as Soosaipillai presented profit numbers that seemed off the chart. Some attendees were incredulous and left the celebrated Mayfair hotel with one thing on their mind: how could Soosaipillai possibly back up the figures?
The following day, Prax's executive committee convened for an off-site day at another luxury hotel – this time at the £2,000-a-night Fairmont hotel golf retreat on the outskirts of Windsor. To say that the gloss had come off Soosaipillai's sunny disposition was something of an understatement, as senior leaders grilled him on the previous day's profit number, which had even come as a surprise to some of them, according to one of those involved.
The company was facing 'challenging markets… which affected our financial performance', Soosaipillai would later disclose. What followed was 'Project King', an initiative where Soosaipillai temporarily handed over control of his empire to consultants from Deloitte, such was the parlous state of its finances.
One senior figure familiar with the situation said this led to the brutal axing of one in five staff to balance the books.
Soosaipillai was typically sanguine. He referred to the exercise as 'a journey of value creation and cost efficiencies to extract the benefits from our consolidated diversified business which has grown substantially over the past years'.
'But that was a little bit futile,' said the source. 'Because the biggest problem was the refining.'
Soosaipillai and his co-owner, wife Arani, have proven an enigma to outsiders after opening their first petrol station in St Albans with the help of an HSBC overdraft more than a quarter of a century ago.
The reclusive couple's empire unravelled in spectacular fashion last week when it declared bankruptcy after being pursued by HMRC for £250 million in unpaid taxes. Rumours abound that they have fled the country. 'Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai no longer works for the Prax Group' and 'Arani Kumar Soosaipillai no longer works for the Prax Group' were the automated emailed responses in response to efforts by The Sunday Times to contact them for comment.
Administrators are now in charge of Prax's parent; and the government's official receiver has seized control of the Lindsey oil refinery in Humberside — one of only five remaining in the UK that keep the country running.
And it can this weekend be revealed that Britain was just a whisker away from handing over another major strategic asset to the couple. Prax had exchanged contracts with French oil major Total to acquire its interests in the West of Shetland gas fields.
This included the Shetland Gas Plant, which is responsible for producing about 8 per cent of the UK's gas needs, enough for two million homes, according to Total. The deal had been due to complete in the final week of June, just days before administrators and receivers intervened.
With their multi billion-pound empire in tatters, ministers have called for them to 'put their hand in their pocket' to pay for the huge bill that will now otherwise fall on taxpayers. The Insolvency Service has ordered an investigation.
The couple's refusal to put their side across is, in their defence, consistent with how they have behaved over the years. Although regulars at private industry events, the husband and wife team – both 52, and who met while studying accountancy at the University of Kent – have shunned the media spotlight. Their preference has been to lock themselves inside a lavish 15,500 square foot mansion in a private gated community at St George's Hill, Surrey, or behind the tall brick walls that surround their head offices in nearby Weybridge.
Sanjeev and Arani's first foray into oil came in 1999 when they opened a forecourt in Hertfordshire. Extra sites were added, in part funded by remortgaging their home. By 2005 they had added an oil storage site in Dagenham, east London, and thereafter carved out a niche in blending diesel, before diversifying into gas oil, kerosene and petrol.
Armed with cheap bank loans, the Prax group of companies snaffled unwanted assets from oil majors such as BP, Total and Shell.
A landmark deal came in 2015 when Prax landed the debt-fuelled takeover of Harvest Energy from commodities trader Trafigura and the Irish magnate Denis O'Brien for a cut-price $23 million. Harvest supplied a tenth of Britain's road fuel and owned forecourts of its own, but low oil prices had hit the group's bottom line, allowing the Soosaipillais to pounce.
The pair's ambitions went well beyond the UK. In 2016, Prax swooped on AIM-listed oil explorer Tethys Petroleum, thrusting it into a legal row over the rights to thousands of barrels of oil that culminated with armed guards preventing oil tankers from leaving a Tethys base in Kazakhstan. By 2024, Prax could justifiably boast of an empire upon which the sun would never set, with interests as far east as Malaysia and southeast China, across the Middle East and Africa and over to Texas. The company made a virtue of being 'vertically integrated' — that is, owning a toehold in every bit of oil supply, from wells to refineries to petrol stations. It was, in effect, a mini oil major.
Throughout this time, and flanked by his wife, Sanjeev retained an iron grip on his company. 'He is energetic, charismatic, and very charming,' said one person that worked with him. The problem was that he was either unable or unwilling to delegate, they said.
'I was surprised how he surrounded himself with less capable people,' the person added. 'He wants to do everything. The answer would always be: 'I'll fix it.''
This management style yielded results in the early years, but caused complications as the Prax group grew and grew.
Located in North Killingholme, the pastel-painted tanks of the Lindsey oil refinery provide a much-needed dash of colour to the otherwise drab Lincolnshire flatlands on the south bank of the Humber Estuary.
Lindsey processes about 113,000 barrels of crude oil per day, equivalent to approximately 7 per cent of the UK's demand for petrol, diesel and aviation fuel.
Prax's acquisition of this site from French giant Total in 2021 would define the Soosaipillais as a major player in the UK energy market.
The acquisition would also prove to be the couple's undoing.
The Soosaipillais knew Total well by this point, having struck a deal to operate petrol stations under the French company's brand in 2019. They paid $167 million for Lindsey, including the Fina pipeline, which runs through the east of England, and an oil storage terminal.
The Lindsey deal completed in March 2021. Within a year, Prax was toasting not only smashing through the $10 billion revenue barrier, but fat profit margins as oil prices soared in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. It allowed the couple to book a $500 million paper profit from their investment in the refinery.
But as oil prices normalised, profit margins narrowed and may have even been negative, according to some industry experts.
Whether it was poor due diligence, or inexperience in refining, the poor state of the refinery meant that it was not long before Lindsey turned from goldmine to millstone.
The Soosaipillais put the refinery into a 'turnaround' – a standard practice that takes place every few years to overhaul and refurbish a plant. It is a major undertaking and requires careful planning to minimise the period of outage.
Prax issued a press release last month hailing Lindsey's turnaround, which it said had taken place earlier in 2025. Bosses said the successful overhaul was a 'testament to the dedication, meticulous planning and safety mindsets of everyone involved'.
Multiple sources dispute this version of events, however. They said that the turnaround actually commenced in March 2024 and dragged on until September.
In the northern hemisphere, turnaround programmes typically occur in the spring or autumn. This is so they miss inclement weather during the winter, and avoid the summer, when oil prices are typically higher in response to 'driving season' in the US, when there is an increase in motorists using their cars.
Industry sources said that a turnaround would typically take 45 days, meaning the March 2024 start date would have been perfectly timed, with reopening commencing in mid-April.
Sources close to the company dispute the 45-day average, and pointed out that Lindsey refinery was in a poor state of repair, meaning that it was always likely to take longer.
Nevertheless, some say that the effective four-month shutdown of Lindsey was a hammer blow to the wider Prax group. During this time, cashflows dried up. Given the size of the refinery, this had implications for the wider group.
Not even a two-year offtake deal with FTSE 100 commodities giant Glencore, agreed in July 2024 on more favourable terms than the previous contract with Trafigura, could stop the difficulties mounting.
Dealmaking became difficult at the same time. Prax agreed to acquire Shell's 37.5 per cent stake in a major refinery outside Berlin that was majority-owned with Kremlin-controlled Rosneft, only for the deal to collapse after the UK firm's financing fell through late in 2024, according to a source familiar with the deal.
By May this year, the government had finally cottoned on to the travails of a group that owned a major piece of Britain's energy infrastructure.
Energy secretary Ed Miliband summoned Soosaipillai into Whitehall for an explanation. Yes, it had been far from smooth-sailing, but Prax was not in peril, he was told. In fact, Soosaipillais is reported to have told Miliband the group was planning future investment.
Whether or not Soosaipillai discussed his company's towering tax bill with Miliband is unclear.
But it was ultimately his and his wife's undoing. Officials from UK Government Investments stepped up their preparations to take control of the Lindsey refinery in the week commencing 23 June. Special managers from FTI Consulting, acting on behalf of the government's Official Receiver, began taking control of the business on Friday, 28 June.
Meanwhile, insolvency practitioners from Teneo were appointed as administrators to Prax's parent entity, State Oil Limited.
So what next for Prax? On Friday, it emerged that FTI had struck a deal with Glencore for taxpayers to foot an unpaid bill for crude oil.
That means that its consultants, working on behalf of the government's Official Receiver, are now free to consider sales options for the Lindsey refinery and associated companies.
Previously, Glencore had security over the site as part of its offtake agreement with Prax. Some sources questioned whether Lindsey would find a buyer, given its relatively small size. It is the smallest of the UK's five oil refineries, after all. That said, next-door neighbour Phillips 66, which operates a refinery double its size, could be tempted.
Teneo has a far larger job. It is now preparing the rest of Soosaipillai's sprawling network of companies for sale. It is understood that Teneo was first contacted by the company just four days before it collapsed into bankruptcy. Originally, the consultancy was asked to assist with raising new financing. Within hours, Teneo's team realised they were dealing with a group that was not financially viable.
Sanjeev initially worked with Teneo before being suspended from his post by Prax's non-executives ahead of the group's insolvency. Teneo is understood to have opened a forensic investigation into Soosaipillai's actions as a company director.
The likes of Lancaster offshore oil field west of the Shetland basin, bought as part of the takeover of AIM-quoted Hurricane Energy for £250 million in early 2023, is likely to attract suitors. Control of Total's Shetland assets, so close to becoming part of the group, have reverted back to the French oil giant.
Likewise, the company's portfolio of petrol stations. Among the potentially interested parties are EG On The Move, EG Group and MFG. Sources said the preference was to sell the sites as one job lot.
'Twenty-five years on from the birth of Prax, we have the opportunity to set our business up for the next wave of growth and success,' Soosaipillai wrote in the company's 2024 annual report. 'Across Prax, we are embracing this opportunity with out classic 'can do' spirit.'
When it comes to Prax, such sentiment only gets you so far, it would seem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tories demand foreigners are banned from getting disability benefits as Kemi Badenoch seeks to tighten access to handouts after Labour's U-turn
The Tories are demanding foreigners are banned from claiming key disability benefits in the wake of Labour 's humiliating U-turn on welfare reforms. Kemi Badenoch 's party will attempt to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten access to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit. The Conservatives will table an amendment proposing a requirement for eligibility for PIP to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually. They also want to prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of Universal Credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD. And a third amendment would block a planned increase in Universal Credit and restrict PIP for some people who are not British citizens. It comes after Sir Keir Starmer was forced to shelve Labour's own plans to restrict eligibility to PIP, the main disability payment in England, in the face of a huge Labour rebellion. As he endured his worst week in office so far, the Prime Minister also witnessed Chancellor Rachel Reeves openly weeping in the House of Commons. She said her upset was due to a 'personal' issue, but it came as the welfare U-turn piled further pressure on Ms Reeves to fill a black hole in the public finances. Mrs Badenoch branded the Government's watering down of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - now set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – as 'farcical'. The Tories will now look to lay amendments to the legislation with Mrs Badenoch due to deliver a major speech on welfare on Thursday. She is expected to say the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'. 'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will add. Under the Tory plans, PIP and both categories of Universal Credit health top-up would be limited 'to British citizens, excluding all foreign nationals', according to The Telegraph. There would be an exception for citizens from EU countries who have settled status, who are entitled to equal treatment under the Brexit deal. Under current rules, foreign nationals must prove that they have lived in Britain for two of the last three years to claim PIP. Helen Whately, the Tory shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'The Government's welfare plans are in chaos. Instead of saving money, the welfare Bill we're voting on next week costs money. 'We've told them how to fix it: stop signing people off sick for mental health problems like anxiety, bring back face-to-face assessments, and only give sickness benefits to British citizens. 'If ministers had the guts to take up even one of these proposals, they could save billions – and spare the country from more tax rises this autumn.' Labour's original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5billion a year. Economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to Labour rebels, as well as Sir Keir's previous U-turn on axing winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. Ms Reeves has said it is impossible for her to rule out tax rises in the autumn, as she warned 'there are costs' to the watering down of the welfare bill. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, has demanded the Office for Budget Responsibilty (OBR) watchdog carry out an emergency forecast to update the fiscal outlook in the wake of Sir Keir's climbdowns. In a letter to OBR chair Richard Hughes, he wrote: 'The public, Parliament and markets deserve clarity and transparency about the impact of recent events on the nation's finances and the Government's fiscal strategy.'
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer should be bold and consider a wealth tax, Neil Kinnock says
Keir Starmer's government is suffering from a 'lack of narrative' about what it is trying to achieve and should be more fiscally bold and consider a tax on wealth, Neil Kinnock has said. The former Labour leader said too many of the government's achievements were being overshadowed. A year after a landslide election win, the party is struggling in the polls and has U-turned on policies including cuts to winter fuel payments and welfare. 'It's not a mess, but what has gone wrong is really the lack of a narrative, a story of the objectives of the government and where they're working towards it and how they're working towards it,' Kinnock said. The government had implemented 'a series of really commendable and absolutely essential policies', added Kinnock, who led Labour into two elections. But these policies, he said, had been obscured by controversies over things such winter fuel and welfare, 'all those negative things that really are heartily disliked across the Labour movement and more widely'. 'And that means that, apart from the distaste for undertaking those policies, the cloud hangs over the accomplishments of the government, which are substantial and will become greater.' Kinnock was scathing about the move by Jeremy Corbyn and other former Labour MPs to set up their own leftwing party. 'I understand the difficulty of thinking up a name, and in a comradely way, I'd suggest one: It would be the Farage Assistance Group.' Amid increasing speculation that Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will have to raise taxes at the autumn budget, Kinnock said that while Labour's election focus on fiscal discipline was vital for restoring credibility, 'it did mean that they depressed expectations and limited themselves by saying they were going to rigidly stick to fiscal rules'. Kinnock said there was a risk of the government being 'bogged down by their own imposed limitations' and he believed a number of cabinet ministers would want more fiscal boldness. One option, he said, would be a form of wealth tax, which would be useful not just to raise revenue but as 'a gesture, or a substantial gesture in the direction of equity fairness would make a big difference' in a time when 'earned incomes have stagnated in real terms, while asset values have zoomed'. He said such a policy should target wealth above £6m or £7m, where a 2% tax would raise £10bn or £11bn a year. 'That's not going to pay all the bills, but it does two things. One is to secure resources, which is very important. But the second thing it does is to say to the country: we are the government of equity, and this is a country which is very substantially fed up with the fact that whatever happens in the world, whatever happens in the UK, the same interests come out on top, unscathed all the time, while everybody else is paying more for gutted services.'
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fears grow over Chinese 'spy campus' at heart of London
A new Chinese 'super embassy' in London will have on-site accommodation for more than 200 intelligence officers, diplomatic sources have warned. The revelations about the 'spy campus' are likely to increase concerns about the development on the site of the Royal Mint buildings near the Tower of London, which has been revived by No10 despite being blocked by the previous government after warnings from MI5 and Scotland Yard. The Bank of England has also warned Downing Street about the risks of allowing it to be built close to sensitive financial centres. Mapping data shows the proposed site lies directly between financial hubs in the City and Canary Wharf and close to three major data centres, including the Stock Exchange. Earlier this year, The Mail on Sunday revealed that planning documents for the embassy included 'spy dungeons' – two suites of basement rooms and a tunnel, with their purpose redacted for security reasons. A source said: 'There will effectively be a student-style campus for spies in the heart of the City. 'And those spy dungeons are so deep that the sensitive cables are virtually at head height.' A US security source said 'cultural interests/exchange' is a 'euphemism for intelligence and security services', adding: 'It's where they often stuff their security and intelligence staff, among other diplomats. And if it's a "cultural" centre/space, why do they always declare it off limits in planning documents?' Ex-Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said: 'Everywhere there is a mega embassy... Chinese state-sponsored, trans-national repression of those who have fled the Chinese state or who criticise it grows dramatically. 'It's simple: a bigger embassy has more spies and more repression.' Shadow Levelling Up Secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Labour had been 'caught red-handed trying to ram through this sinister embassy' in a 'desperate attempt to woo the Chinese Communist Party to bail out their failing economic policies'. He added: 'It is shocking Labour want to sign a legal document that will ban British officials checking what is being built in the embassy building. This is yet another surrender document from a Labour Government that puts foreign interests over British interests.'
