logo
Stonewall Uprising: A Look at Transgender Activists Who Led the Movement

Stonewall Uprising: A Look at Transgender Activists Who Led the Movement

Newsweek17 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
The Stonewall Uprising, a pivotal moment in the LGBTQ+ rights fight, occurred 56 years ago and sparked a movement led in part by two transgender activists: Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera.
The Context
The Stonewall uprising began after police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York City, sparking protests and pushback from the local LGBTQ+ community. Johnson and Rivera emerged as two community leaders from the movement, though there is debate about their exact involvement during the protests.
Earlier this year, the Trump administration sparked backlash after removing references to transgender people from the Stonewall National Monument website. Meanwhile, the Pride Month display at the Stonewall National Monument excluded transgender pride flags this year, according to ABC News. LGBTQ+ activists have raised concerns about attempts to erase the history of transgender activists this year.
What To Know
The exact history of Stonewall is complicated, and accounts from participants have varied over the years. Who exactly threw the first brick at Stonewall, for instance, has been debated, and there remains no clear consensus on the question. Still, Johnson and Rivera emerged from Stonewall as two of the most prominent leaders in New York's LGBTQ+ community who would shape the movement for decades to come.
The uprising began early on June 28, 1969, when patrons at the bar fought back against police harassment during a raid. The riots continued for about six days and drew national attention to the LGBTQ+ rights cause.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty
Johnson had said she was not at Stonewall when the uprising began and showed up a bit later. But she was among the most prominent participants in the days-long riots, resisting police after they raided the bar. In one well-reported account of the riots, Johnson climbed up a lamppost to drop a heavy object onto a police car.
Rivera, who was 17 years old at the time of the riots, had also said that she was in attendance, although some historians have questioned whether she was present at Stonewall on the first night of the riot. Historian David Carter wrote in 2019 for The Gay City News that activist Bob Kohler, who was present at the riots, told him Rivera was not at Stonewall.
But the debate about who was at Stonewall when is "pointless and silly," Michael Bronski, author of A Queer History of the United States, told Newsweek. He said it's important to look at the activists' work after Stonewall, such as the founding of Street Transvestite Activists Revolutionaries (STAR) and the first halfway house for young gender non-conforming individuals.
STAR was an organization founded in 1970 by Johnson and Rivera to support transgender people. It was an early activist group for trans rights that went on to inspire others in the movement.
At the time, notably, the term "transgender" was not in use, so the term "drag queen" was used to describe Johnson and Rivera, though they are considered to be transgender. They had also used the term "transvestite," which is now considered outdated or offensive by many, despite its historical use.
Héctor Carrillo, a professor of sociology and sexuality & gender studies, told Newsweek it is "not automatic" that all drag queens at Stonewall would think of themselves as transgender, as the trans movement "didn't crystallize until the 1990s."
While activists like Johnson and Rivera are now recognized as pioneers of the LGBTQ+ rights movement, at the time, the transgender community was not "idolized" by many gay and lesbian people, Bronski said.
"Back then, often the queer community, the more mainstream queer community, was not particularly open to trans people, and for some reasons—if trans people went into a bar, police might be likely to raid the bar. Trans people were more hassled on the streets by police," he said.
Vincent Stephens, an associate dean of diversity and inclusion at Boston University's College of Arts & Sciences, told Newsweek activists like Johnson and Rivera were "integral to really being at the forefront of liberation."
After Stonewall, groups like the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) were founded to advance the acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community, he said. But those groups had many "internal fissures" that caused women and people of color to break off. This led to the creation of STAR.
"In many ways, they were integral to articulate the needs and concerns of gender nonconforming people," Stephens said. "They also exposed in many ways a tension within the queer community, which is that some people who were very focused on concerns of gay men and the concerns of lesbians but weren't necessary addressing concerns of gender-nonconforming people. STAR is an early example of gender non-conforming people organizing and saying, 'We are integral to this.'"
The two continued working on causes including AIDS and homelessness throughout their lives, as well as remaining active in the battle for LGBTQ+ rights.
Stonewall Anniversary Comes as Many View New Attacks on LGBTQ+ Community
This year's anniversary of the riots comes as many in the LGBTQ+ community see setbacks in a legal sense, as well as a shift in public opinion against gay and trans rights. The Trump administration's removal of mentions of the transgender community from the Stonewall National Monument website is among those concerns.
Bronski said the erasure of the transgender community cannot be viewed "in isolation." Those who oppose gay rights have realized they cannot push for the eradication of the gay community from public life, but could still "focus on the most vulnerable of those people, which is trans community," he said.
"I think it's really telling that they didn't get rid of all of LGBT, but just the T. I think they knew that getting rid of LGB would cause complete outrage, but you can get away with getting rid of the T because there's enough ambivalence and lack of understanding about transgender people," he said.
A key part of the legacy of Stonewall is remembering that 1969 wasn't all that long ago, Stephens said.
"Many of the fights that LGBTQ+ people have been fighting are relatively recent fights, and the fight is not over," he said. "We have to think about the long-term vision for how we want to exist as human beings and as contributors to society. Stonewall reminds us that we have to sometimes get up, take risks and advocate for ourselves."
Every movement "needs a moment," and Stonewall is that for the LGBTQ+ rights movement, Bronski said. While LGBTQ+ Pride Month has become "very commercialized," it's still important to remember the deeper meaning behind the role of power in society and how that can harm people.
"There is a great lesson to be learned that what happens to the most vulnerable people can happen to anyone," he said.
What People Are Saying
Héctor Carrillo, a professor of sociology and sexuality & gender studies, told Newsweek: "The Stonewall Uprising acquired enormous cultural symbolism. It came to be seen as marking the beginning of the LGBTQ movement, even when there had been other instances of gay and lesbian protest before. Those include the Mattachine Society's picketing and the Compton Cafeteria riot in San Francisco in 1966.
GLAAD criticized the Trump administration's move to remove references to the trans community from the Stonewall National Monument website in February: "The Stonewall Uprising – a monumental moment in the fight for LGBTQ rights – would not have happened without the leadership of transgender and gender non-conforming people. The tireless work of Marsha P. Johnson, Sylvia Rivera, and countless other trans women of color paved the way and continue to inspire us. You can try to erase our history, but we will never forget those who came before us and we will continue to fight for all those who will come after us."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iranian Woman Who Has Lived in US for Four Decades Detained by ICE
Iranian Woman Who Has Lived in US for Four Decades Detained by ICE

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iranian Woman Who Has Lived in US for Four Decades Detained by ICE

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Mandana Kashanian, a 64-year-old Iranian woman who came to the United States at 17 years old just ahead of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, was arrested by U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Sunday and is being in detention in Louisiana. Newsweek has confirmed her detention in the ICE detainee database. Newsweek has reached out to ICE for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters Kashanian's detention comes amid an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration and inflamed U.S. relations with Iran. The U.S. struck three of Iran's nuclear sites, Isfahan, Fordow, and Natanz, lastSaturday. Iran later struck a U.S. base in Qatar. Also last weekend, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) arrested 11 Iranian citizens who were in the U.S. illegally. Since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran and the U.S. have severed main diplomatic ties and maintained a tense relationship, with occasional high-profile nuclear talks. Ahead of and during the Iranian Revolution, hundreds of thousands of Iranians fled to the United States. Many had supported Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi or belonged to ethnic and religious minorities and faced persecution under the new government. At the time, U.S. President Jimmy Carter maintained close ties with the Shah who was backed by Washington. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. In addition to people residing in the country illegally, immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, have been detained and face legal jeopardy. What To Know Kashanian came to the U.S. on a student visa on July 24, 1978 and "gained authorization to remain in the U.S. until May 31, 1983 by changing her status to that of a spouse of a nonimmigrant student" according to documents from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reviewed by Newsweek. She eventually applied for asylum, but her claim was denied, according to the 2001 court documents. Her family told MSNBC that she applied for asylum and was denied multiple times. Kashanian has appealed several court decisions relating to her status as well as filing a motion to reopen appeals. She married early on and then divorced. She then married Russ Milne, a U.S. citizen, in 1990 and the couple share a 32-year-old daughter together, who is also a U.S. citizen. Part of the complication of Kashanian's status is due to her first marriage, which the court reported as "improper" and fraudulent, and subsequently interfered with her green card application once married to Milne. Her father had worked as an engineer for the Shah in Tehran, according to and she claimed she would "experience extreme hardship if deported," per court documents. The local outlet said she was granted a stay of removal on the basis that she comply with immigration requirements, which her family says she has always met. Her husband told MSNBC on Friday that she has no criminal history. She has lived in the states for almost 50 years, setting down roots in New Orleans. She shares Persian recipes on a YouTube channel, was involved in her daughter's parent-teacher association, volunteered after Hurricane Katrina, and helps out family and neighbors, her husband told MSNBC. On June 22, she was arrested by officers in unmarked vehicles, her neighbor Sarah Gerig, told noting that the arrest was less than a minute. Kashanian is currently held in South Louisiana ICE processing center, according to the ICE database. The GEO Group runs the 1,000-person capacity facility located in Basile, Louisiana. The South Louisiana ICE Processing Center is seen in this aerial photo in Basile, Louisiana, on April 8. The South Louisiana ICE Processing Center is seen in this aerial photo in Basile, Louisiana, on April 8. AP Photo/Gerald Herbert What People Are Saying Russ Milne, Kashanian's husband, told "She's always worked, she's had a driver's license, she has a social security card, she's paid taxes/ She's about to qualify for Medicare. She's been a contribution to the community for her whole life." Joe Giarrusso, a member of the New Orleans City Council, said in an X, formerly Twitter, post sharing the article about Kashanian on June 25: "I usually don't comment on federal issues but this is a local issue, too. Someone living here with the federal government's full knowledge and approval for nearly 50 years is hardly Public Enemy Number 1. This should not happen." Kaitlynn Milne, Kashanian's daughter, told MSNBC on Friday: "She's tried going through the correct system and ... it's been hard for always caring. She's our support system, so it's obviously been really rough this week. She's the person that was always at my school. Always taking care of things around my school. She was, you know, always a huge volunteer, always helping everybody around." Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security said in a June 24 press release about the arrest of 11 Iranian nationals: "Under Secretary [Kristi] Noem, DHS has been full throttle on identifying and arresting known or suspected terrorists and violent extremists that illegally entered this country, came in through Biden's fraudulent parole programs or otherwise. "We have been saying we are getting the worst of the worst out—and we are. We don't wait until a military operation to execute; we proactively deliver on President Trump's mandate to secure the homeland." What Happens Next It is not clear when Kashanian will have an immigration hearing.

California Closes $12 Billion Budget Deficit With Hit to Migrants
California Closes $12 Billion Budget Deficit With Hit to Migrants

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

California Closes $12 Billion Budget Deficit With Hit to Migrants

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a $321 billion budget on Friday that closes a $12 billion deficit by scaling back several progressive priorities, including a landmark health care expansion for undocumented immigrants. Newsweek reached out to the governor's office via email on Saturday for comment. Why It Matters The budget agreement between Newsom and Democratic leaders marks the third consecutive year the nation's most populous state has been forced to reduce funding for programs championed by Democratic leadership. The governor and legislative leaders framed the budget as a response to what they describe as economic challenges stemming from President Donald Trump's tariff policies, immigration crackdowns and rising costs tied to increased enrollment in Medi-Cal, California's state-funded healthcare program for low-income residents that was expanded last year to include undocumented adults as part of the state's universal healthcare goals. The cuts to immigrant health services represent a significant retreat from California's universal healthcare ambitions, affecting hundreds of thousands of residents. With projected annual deficits of $17-24 billion in coming years and potential federal revenue losses of $16 billion, the state faces sustained financial pressure that could force deeper cuts to essential services. What To Know The budget addresses the deficit primarily through state savings withdrawals, borrowing from special funds, and payment delays rather than implementing new taxes on families or businesses. The most significant immigrant health program changes target Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program. Starting next year, the Golden State will halt new enrollments for undocumented adults in Medi-Cal, effectively capping the program's growth. Additionally, beginning July 2027, the state will implement a $30 monthly premium for immigrants currently enrolled in the program, including some with legal status, affecting adults under 60 years old. These changes represent a scaled-back version of Newsom's original proposal from May, which would have imposed deeper cuts to the landmark program that began just last year. The Medi-Cal modifications mark a retreat from California's ambitious universal healthcare expansion, which had made the state a national leader in providing comprehensive health coverage regardless of immigration status. The program cuts come despite California's role as home to the nation's largest immigrant population, with undocumented residents comprising a significant portion of essential workers in agriculture, construction, and hospitality sectors. Healthcare cuts extend beyond immigrant services, eliminating $78 million in mental health phone line funding that served 100,000 people annually and removing dental service funding for low-income residents in 2026. However, lawmakers successfully preserved funding for in-home care services, Planned Parenthood, and reproductive health programs. A Napolitan News/RMG Research poll released in May, conducted between February 10–12 among 800 registered California voters, found that 60 percent of Californians think illegal immigrants living in America should not be provided with taxpayer funded health care. The poll also found that 72 percent believe illegal immigration is harmful to the country. The poll had a margin of error of ±3.5 percentage points. RMG Research is a Republican-leaning pollster. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at Gemperle Orchard on April 16 in Ceres, California. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at Gemperle Orchard on April 16 in Ceres, People Are Saying Governor Gavin Newsom in Friday's press release announcing the balanced budget: "As we confront Donald Trump's economic sabotage, this budget agreement proves California won't just hold the line — we'll go even further. It's balanced, it maintains substantial reserves, and it's focused on supporting Californians — slashing red tape and catapulting housing and infrastructure development, preserving essential healthcare services, funds universal pre-K, and cuts taxes for veterans." Speaker of the California State Assembly Robert Rivas in Friday's press release: "This is an incredibly difficult time for Californians. Trump is undermining our economy with reckless tariffs, harsh cuts, and ICE agents terrorizing our communities. At a moment when so many are already struggling, he's adding fear and instability. In contrast, Democrats have delivered a budget that protects California. It cuts red tape to build more housing faster — because housing is the foundation of affordability and opportunity." He added: "It preserves critical investments in health care, women's health, education, and public safety. And it honors our commitment not to raise taxes on families, workers, or small businesses. In unprecedented times, under painful circumstances, Democrats are delivering for Californians." Republican state Senator Tony Strickland told reporters prior to the vote on Friday: "We're increasing borrowing, we're taking away from the rainy day fund, and we're not reducing our spending." He added: "And this budget also does nothing about affordability in California." Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire in Friday's press release: "The State is delivering a responsible on-time budget in a challenging year focused on fiscal restraint and investing in the people and programs that make this State great. This budget prioritizes record funding for our kids and public schools, protects access to health care for millions of the most vulnerable, and will create more housing at a scale not seen in years." He added: "Thanks to this budget agreement, the state will help get more folks off the streets and into permanent shelter, and we'll expand the ranks of CalFire, deploying hundreds of additional full-time CalFire firefighters, which will save lives and make us all more wildfire safe. And this agreement helps prepare our state for the ongoing chaos and massive uncertainty caused by the Trump administration. Thank you to our Senate Budget Chair Scott Wiener, Speaker Rivas and Governor Newsom and their staffs for their hard work for the people of California." Representative Pramila Jayapal, a Washington state Democrat, wrote on X in May: "Immigrants aren't making health care more expensive – Republicans are. Trans people aren't making health care more expensive – Republicans are. Poor people aren't making health care more expensive – Republicans are." What Happens Next The budget's implementation depends entirely on lawmakers passing housing legislation (AB 131 or SB 131) by Monday's deadline, or the entire spending plan becomes void. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.

‘Let them do their dirty work': School trustees react as Ford government takes over four boards, including Toronto public and Catholic, over finances
‘Let them do their dirty work': School trustees react as Ford government takes over four boards, including Toronto public and Catholic, over finances

Hamilton Spectator

time7 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

‘Let them do their dirty work': School trustees react as Ford government takes over four boards, including Toronto public and Catholic, over finances

The province has seized control of four school boards, including Toronto public and Catholic, accusing them of financial mismanagement — an unprecedented crackdown that drew both criticism but also praise from trustees who've been stripped of their powers. With the Dufferin-Peel Catholic board 'at the brink of bankruptcy' and unlikely to make payroll later this summer, Education Minister Paul Calandra said he is also sending a supervisor there, as well as to Ottawa's public board. The four boards have either continued to run deficits or failed to balance budgets this year, instead relying on multi-year plans or wanting to use funds from the sales of properties to get out of the red, which Calandra told the Star shows just how precarious their situations are. 'It's gone on long enough,' he said in an interview. 'These boards have run multi-year deficits with no plan to come back to balanced budget, despite the fact that both Ottawa and the TDSB (Toronto District School Board) were trying to present balanced budgets at the last minute. Both of them — Toronto in particular — have balanced budgets based on the sale of surplus assets,' which are funds intended to pay for school renovations and upgrades. Boards, however, argue that even though funding from the province has increased, it has not nearly kept up with their actual costs — especially when inflation is factored in — nor covered mandatory increases such as employment insurance contributions. Supervision was unnecessary 'given the meaningful steps the board has taken over the years to address its financial challenges' and an independent report confirmed 'there was no financial impropriety on behalf of staff or the trustees,' said Toronto Catholic board chair Markus de Domenico, adding he was 'shocked' by the move. 'Structural deficits of this scale do not arise overnight,' he added. 'They are the result of chronic underfunding in key areas such as sick leave, statutory benefits and the high costs associated with operating under-enrolled schools, which boards are not permitted to close under provincial direction. These pressures are not unique to the (Toronto Catholic board) and are shared by many large urban school boards across Ontario.' The Toronto Catholic board initially reported a deficit of $65.9 million, but found savings and reduced it to $48.5 million. It had been asking for ministry approval to apply $30 million in building sales to the remaining deficit, and had a multi-year financial recovery plan. Calandra called the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board 'just a complete disaster' with an ongoing deficit, depleted reserves, 'trustees resigning and parents just in a fury over decisions that are being made.' The Dufferin-Peel Catholic board 'again, unwilling to really balance the budget, but also carrying historical bad decisions when it comes to long-term disability and managing it themselves … it only survives based on funding that the province gives it in advanced payments,' he said. Calandra said while not all boards are in such trouble, the supervision of a few puts all on notice. 'I'm just, literally, done with trustees or boards of education that go on tangents, that work outside their mandate, that refuse to live by the funding model ,' he told the Star. 'We have schools that are unsafe, teachers who are frustrated and students and parents who don't feel that they're getting the quality of education that $30 billion' should provide. He said he's frustrated with ineffective governance, 'and I'm reviewing that as well.' Weidong Pei, a trustee with Toronto District School Board, welcomed the provincial clampdown, saying 'it really has become abundantly clear to me that the (board) is dysfunctional. It's crisis after crisis.' Decisions are driven by politics, not data, he added, citing the replacement of merit-based admissions to specialty schools with a lottery system and the desire to rename three schools with ties to historical figures. He said recent budget discussions highlight how 'wholly dysfunctional' the board is because there were cuts to programs that will affect kids, but no cuts to senior administrators. Calandra said for decades, governments have downloaded responsibility to school boards 'to avoid owning issues, and that has to stop. Whether it's curriculum, whether it's safety in schools, whether it's budgeting, it is time for us to take on that responsibility as a ministry and make sure that the system that we expect is what we deliver.' He said supervisors will look at things such as unfunded programs, reducing bureaucracy or redeploying principals who aren't working in schools, and if structural budgetary issues are found, they will also be addressed. What does placing an Ontario school board under supervision look like? Toronto school board pools are not provincially funded, an issue Calandra said he is sympathetic to because of their history in the city, 'and where there's a shortfall in our funding, if that model needs to change, then we'll be able to do that.' Both the Toronto boards and Dufferin-Peel have been placed under supervision under previous Conservative and Liberal governments, with Toronto public in 2002, Dufferin-Peel in 2007 and Toronto Catholic in 2008. In April, Calandra put the Thames Valley District School Board under supervision, saying Friday there's been 'incredible progress.' That means five boards are currently under provincial control, a number not seen before. Kathleen Woodcock, president of the Ontario Public School Boards' Association, said that 'trustees want the very best for students and view this as an opportunity to pause, reflect and rebuild together in the best interests of all learners.' Her association 'also looks forward to engaging directly with the supervisors to help surface and share strong practices from school boards across the province — practices the minister himself has acknowledged.' Michael Bellmore, president of the Ontario Catholic School Trustees' Association, noted Calandra said 'most boards across Ontario are doing the right thing' and that 'we look forward to ongoing discussions with Minister Calandra and Ministry of Education officials regarding the unique circumstances of certain school boards, as well as challenges associated with rising sick leave costs, special education and student transportation funding.' The province is spending $30.3 billion on education for the coming school year, $2 billion for school upgrades and $1.3 billion for new schools. The school boards' association has said that per-pupil funding since the Ford government took power in 2018 has dropped (when adjusted to 2018 dollars), leaving a $693-million gap for the province's 31 English public boards alone. Calandra had sent investigators into the boards to examine their finances, and said Toronto public trustees had rejected about half of all savings proposed by senior board officials, and had a projected $58 million deficit for 2025-6. Toronto Catholic board Trustee Maria Rizzo wants to see how the province balances the books without affecting students and programs, such as international language instruction. 'If they think that they can do this better, let them try. Let them do their own dirty work,' she said. 'They don't give us enough money for special education and they don't give us money for any of the Catholic programs.' Rizzo said 'I get paid a nickel an hour — it doesn't hurt me. My problem is that the constituents I represent in my community won't be able to come to me and I can't address any of the issues.' Chair de Domenico said for the province to 'appoint a high-powered, high-priced lawyer to run a board with the idea of saving money is in itself ironic. It is not democratic. This is an attempt by the minister to take over the entire system and remove the public voice.' He said the board was 'caught up in this maelstrom of frenzy here to exert control over what should be a democratic institution.' Meanwhile, Calandra is also pausing for one year curriculum updates that were to be implemented this fall, including in literacy, math and STEM in kindergarten and history in grades 7, 8 and 10 to give teachers additional time to become familiar with the material and create lessons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store