Wimbledon: Novak Djokovic vs. Miomir Kecmanovic odds, predictions
There's been so much chaos at Wimbledon that Novak Djokovic's solid play has flown under the radar.
The 24-time Grand Slam champion has dropped just one set through the first two rounds, and more importantly, looks fit as a fiddle.
Djokovic came into the tournament as the third favorite behind Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, so it's not a shock that he's made quick work of his first two opponents, but what is a bit surprising is how little he's being talked about as a title contender.
Most fans, pundits, and bettors believe another Sinner-Alcaraz final is a foregone conclusion, but Djokovic will fancy his chances given his draw.
Djokovic is a prohibitive -4000 favorite to beat his fellow Serb Miomir Kecmanovic on Saturday afternoon.
Kecmanovic, who peaked as the World No. 27 early in 2023, is far from a walkover against most opponents, but Djokovic should have no issues with the 25-year-old.
Not only has he dominated the head-to-head, but Kecmanovic has been unconvincing in his two wins at Wimbledon this year. He's already spent five-and-a-half hours on court at the All England Club.
Kecmanovic has the game to pop an upset, but there's no indication of it coming right now. He fell to Dan Evans, who Djokovic just whitewashed, in Eastbourne as a warmup for Wimbledon.
Miomir Kecmanovic has spent over five hours on court through the first two rounds of Wimbledon.
Geoff Burke-Imagn Images
The prices on Djokovic to win this match (he's -215 to win in straights) are too expensive, but now seems like a decent time to back the Serb to win this tournament.
He's got a couple of tricky players left in his quarter, and he'll need to find a way through Sinner and Alcaraz eventually, but there are some signals that he'll be up to the challenge when we get into the semifinals and finals.
Not only is Djokovic's form in great shape, but he's not spent much time on the court, and that should pay off if he gets the chance to go up against the heavyweights.
The Play: Djokovic to win Wimbledon (+500, DraftKings)
Why Trust New York Post Betting
Michael Leboff is a long-suffering Islanders fan, but a long-profiting sports bettor with 10 years of experience in the gambling industry. He loves using game theory to help punters win bracket pools, find long shots, and learn how to beat the market in mainstream and niche sports.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
Wimbledon says a call on a shot that landed out was missed because the electronic system was off
Associated Press LONDON (AP) — A ball that clearly landed long in a match at Centre Court wasn't called out Sunday because the electronic system that replaced line judges at Wimbledon this year accidentally was shut off for three points. And, because the replay review procedure that used to be in place also has been scrapped, the chair umpire called for a do-over on the point at 4-all in the first set — much to the dismay of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, the player who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally. Pavlyuchenkova wound up getting broken there to trail Sonay Kartal of Britain, but she eventually did manage to come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 and reach the quarterfinals at the All England Club for the first time since 2016. 'You took the game away from me,' 2021 French Open runner-up Pavlyuchenkova told chair umpire Nico Helwerth at the changeover after the game ended. Pavlyuchenkova, who is Russian, also said in the moment that the decision-making there went in Kartal's favor because she is a local player. At her news conference, Pavlyuchenkova said Helwerth told her following the match that he did think Kartal's shot landed out. 'I think he felt bad, a little bit,' Pavlyuchenkova said. 'He probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out.' She also said Helwerth 'probably was scared to take such a big decision.' Pavlyuchenkova was serving and had a game point when Kartal hit a backhand that landed beyond the opposite baseline, TV replays showed. But there was no sound of one of the recorded voices being used for the first time at Wimbledon to reflect when the technology being used in place of human officials determines that a ball landed out. At least Pavlyuchenkova could joke about the whole episode later. Asked how she'd feel about it had she lost the match, Pavlyuchenkova responded with a laugh: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back.' She also cracked that chair umpires are 'very good at giving fines and code violations' and never miss those, but perhaps it would be beneficial if they did a better job of noticing mistaken calls. Kartal said she couldn't see where her shot went. 'That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened — if it has. It's tough. What can you do? The umpire's trying his best in that situation, and he handled it fine,' Kartal said. 'I think the system just malfunctioned a little bit, and the fairest way was what he did: replay the point.' Helwerth delayed play while he made a phone call from his stand. Eventually, play resumed, Pavlyuchenkova missed a forehand on the replay, then lost the game a few points later. The tournament looked into it afterward and blamed 'human error,' saying that the line-calling setup 'was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system,' according to an All England Club spokesperson, who added: 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology.' The spokesperson also said Pavlyuchenkova and Kartal received apologies from the club. The French Open is now the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges instead of electronic calls. From 2007 through last year, players were allowed to challenge in-or-out calls at Wimbledon; a video review was employed to decide whether a line judge's — or chair umpire's — ruling was correct. That challenge system was removed for the current tournament, but there immediately were demands on social media from some tennis fans or observers to bring that back to aid chair umpires. Pavlyuchenkova agreed, saying: 'We should probably look into something else to have better decisions.' Taylor Fritz, who reached the quarterfinals with a win at a different court Sunday, didn't see what happened. But when it was explained by a reporter, his biggest question was why the chair umpire didn't just make the call himself if it was so clear what actually happened on Kartal's shot. 'The chair umpire has to make the call,' 2024 U.S. Open finalist Fritz said. 'Why is he there if he's not going to call the ball?' ___ More AP tennis: in this topic
Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
Carlos Alcaraz's Wimbledon win streak reaches 18. Sabalenka gets to another Slam quarterfinal
Associated Press LONDON (AP) — Carlos Alcaraz's latest up-and-down Wimbledon performance began with a dropped set. Later Sunday, he was in danger of getting broken to fall further behind in the third. And then, as he so often does, Alcaraz seized the moment, produced some magic and moved closer to a third consecutive title at the All England Club. Alcaraz stretched his winning streak in the grass-court Grand Slam tournament to 18 matches — and his current unbeaten run across all events to 22 — by coming back to beat No. 14 seed Andrey Rublev 6-7 (5), 6-3, 6-4, 6-4 at Centre Court to return to the quarterfinals. In this fortnight's first matchup between two men ranked in the top 20, No. 2 Alcaraz brought out his best while down 3-2 in the third set. First, he needed to fend off a break chance for Rublev, doing so with a forehand passing winner. After eventually holding to 3-all, Alcaraz earned his own break opportunity and didn't let Rublev escape. On an eight-stroke exchange, Alcaraz sprinted from one corner of the court to the other and, with a stomp of his right foot and a bit of a slide, he flicked a cross-court forehand winner. Oh, did he relish that one. Alcaraz spread his arms wide, pointed to his right ear and basked in the crowd's loud adulation, the noise bouncing off the underside of the stadium's closed roof. Rublev sat in his sideline chair, looked up at his guest box and made a sarcastic 'OK' hand signal. Just 10 minutes later, that set belong to Alcaraz, who will face 2022 semifinalist Cam Norrie — the last British player in singles — on Tuesday for a berth in the final four. 'I always said that it's just about belief in yourself. It doesn't matter that you are one-set-to-love down,' Alcaraz said. 'Tennis is a sport that can change in just one point. One point can change the match completely, turn around everything.' The 61st-ranked Norrie, who played college tennis at TCU in Fort Worth, Texas, advanced with a 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-7 (7), 6-7 (5), 6-3 win over qualifier Nicolas Jarry, who hit 46 aces. Norrie had a chance to close things out much earlier than he did but failed to convert a match point while ahead 6-5 in the third-set tiebreaker. The other men's quarterfinal Tuesday will be No. 5 Taylor Fritz vs. No. 17 Karen Khachanov. Fritz, last year's U.S. Open runner-up, had a short day because his opponent, Jordan Thompson, quit after about 40 minutes with back and leg injuries that he'd been dealing with throughout the tournament. Alcaraz is just 22 and already owns five Grand Slam trophies, the latest arriving in June at the French Open. He hasn't lost a match anywhere since April 20 against Holger Rune in the final at Barcelona. There have been lapses, of course, including when Alcaraz fell behind by two sets against No. 1 Jannik Sinner in the final at Roland-Garros. Or when the Spaniard lost four points in a row after going up 5-3 in the opening tiebreaker against Rublev. He hasn't been as close-to-perfect as others over the past week: Sinner, No. 10 Ben Shelton and No. 22 Flavio Cobolli haven't dropped a set heading into their fourth-round contests. So, sure, Alcaraz has ceded five sets already, but all that matters is that he hasn't lost a match. What else happened at Wimbledon on Sunday? No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka reached the quarterfinals at her 11th consecutive Grand Slam tournament, defeating No. 24 Elise Mertens 6-4, 7-6 (4), and will play unseeded Laura Siegemund, the 37-year-old German who followed up her elimination of Australian Open champ Madison Keys by beating lucky loser Solana Sierra 6-3, 6-2. Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova overcame a missed call late in the first set — when the electronic system accidentally was off — and beat Sonay Kartal 7-6 (3), 6-4 to return to the grass-court major's quarterfinals for the first time in nine years. Pavlyuchenkova's opponent Tuesday will be Amanda Anisimova or Linda Noskova. Who plays at the All England Club on Monday? Monday's fourth-rounders include Novak Djokovic against No. 11 Alex de Minaur at 1:30 p.m. local time (8:30 a.m. ET). They were supposed to face each other in last year's quarterfinals at Wimbledon, but de Minaur was forced to withdraw with a hip injury. That'll be followed at Centre Court by Mirra Andreeva vs. Emma Navarro, and then Sinner vs. No. 19 Grigor Dimitrov. ___ More AP tennis:
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
How to watch USMNT vs. Mexico in the Gold Cup 2025 finals for free
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. For the eighth time in tournament history, the USMNT and Mexico will meet in the finals of the CONCACAF Gold Cup. Most recently, the teams met in the 2021 Gold Cup final, where the United States beat Mexico 1-0. Mexico still has the head-to-head edge with five victories to the USMNT's two. RELATED: How to bet USA vs. Mexico in the Gold Cup final Advertisement The USMNT advanced following a 2-1 win over Guatemala that extended their overall Gold Cup unbeaten streak to 16 matches. Mexico's El Tri is playing in their fourth consecutive Gold Cup final following a 1-nil semifinal victory over Honduras. usa vs. mexico: what to know When: July 6, 7 p.m. ET July 6, Where: NRG Stadium (Houston) NRG Stadium (Houston) Channel: Fox Fox Streaming: DIRECTV Here's everything you need to know about USA vs. Mexico, including how you can tune in for free. When is the USA-Mexico match? Advertisement The USMNT and Mexico meet in the final of the 2025 CONCACAF Gold Cup today, July 6, at 7 p.m. ET. How to watch USA vs. Mexico in the CONCACAF Gold Cup for free: If you don't have cable, you'll need a live TV streaming service to stream Gold Cup matches for free. One option we love is DIRECTV, which comes with five days free and starts at $59.99/month, with plenty of subscription options that include Fox. You can also take advantage of free trials of fuboTV (seven days) and Hulu + Live TV (three days). Why Trust Post Wanted by the New York Post This article was written by Angela Tricarico, Commerce Writer/Reporter for Post Wanted Shopping and New York Post's streaming property, Decider. Angela keeps readers up to date with cord-cutter-friendly deals, and information on how to watch your favorite sports teams, TV shows, and movies on every streaming service. Not only does Angela test and compare the streaming services she writes about to ensure readers are getting the best prices, but she's also a superfan specializing in the intersection of shopping, tech, sports, and pop culture. Prior to joining Decider and The New York Post in 2023, she wrote about streaming and consumer tech at Insider Reviews
