EXCLUSIVE Lawyer claims state-owned oil company may have blocked efforts to rescue divers trapped inside underwater pipe because it was 'cheaper to allow them to die'
Play on Apple Spotify
On the latest episode of the Daily Mail's Pipeline podcast, reporter Isabelle Stanley examines the chilling theories as to why Paria blocked efforts to rescue four men trapped in an underwater oil pipe.
From compensation plots to international conspiracy, Stanley interviews legal experts and journalists to test the credibility of theories that emerged in the wake of the Caribbean Diving Disaster.
In February 2022, five divers were sucked hundreds of feet into a 30-inch pipe they were repairing off the coast of Trinidad and Tobago.
Despite one of the divers, Christopher Boodram, escaping after an unimaginable three-hour ordeal, rescue attempts for the remaining four were repeatedly blocked, leaving them to die slowly in what became a national scandal.
The pipe was managed by Paria, one arm of Trinidad's state-owned oil company.
In the aftermath of the tragedy, Trinidad's then-Energy Minister Stuart Young launched an official enquiry, led by one of the UK's top international criminal barristers, Jerome Lynch KC.
Lynch concluded that the four divers weren't rescued because of a series of mistakes, incompetence and inaction by Paria.
Despite his recommendation that the oil company be charged with corporate manslaughter, police have issued only vague statements that an investigation remains ongoing
Despite his recommendation that the oil company be charged with corporate manslaughter, police have issued only vague statements that an investigation remains ongoing.
This stalemate and lack of closure has created an information vacuum - which residents of Trinidad have filled with hundreds of theories, trying to work out why Paria abandoned the rescue effort.
Rightly or wrongly, the victims' families wonder if there is something more… another reason to explain why their loved ones were left to die - something other than pure negligence or incompetence.
Prakash Ramadhar, a lawyer representing two of the victims' families, told the podcast that he believes the oil giant may have thwarted a rescue to avoid the costs associated with caring for the injured divers if they had been pulled out alive.
He claims any survivors may have suffered life-changing injuries, creating lifelong financial liability for the company.
Mr Ramadhar said: 'I believe that Paria's initial belief was that they all had perished and if they had not perished, they would soon perish.
'As crass as it may sound, there is a belief in the legal fraternity that it may have been cheaper to allow the men to die than it was to rescue them, broken and maimed.
'Ensuring their medical wellbeing and upkeep for their rest of their lives is far more expensive than allowing them to die.'
To hear Stanley interrogate this theory and many others that emerged in the wake of the Caribbean Diving Disaster, search for Pipeline now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kristi Noem takes action amidst Lewandowski affair allegations
Donald Trump's Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has moved from her private residence into a U.S. military installation, after her cozy living arrangement with senior adviser Corey Lewandowski was exposed by Insiders tell that Lewandowski, however, still makes trips to see his longtime rumored lover, now at her new digs at the Coast Guard Commandant's quarters. 'Public safety is her concern here? That's rich,' one insider told 'She and her chief of affair(s) show up to every public safety event like it's a couples' retreat. 'If they spent less time staging optics and more time expanding and enhancing law enforcement operations, maybe ICE agents wouldn't be getting assaulted at record rates.' They argue Noem already has plenty of security and has exhibited little concern in her public appearances, joining agents at the border in Mexico, an El Salvador prison, ICE raids in New York and at last month's anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. She's even been called 'ICE Barbie' for treating her Cabinet position like a reality TV production, often joined on her trips by Lewandowski (pictured). Lewandowski had served as Trump's campaign manager in 2016 and his senior adviser during the 2024 presidential race, but his role within the president's administration has always been murky. However, the political operative, who has been described as Noem's 'de facto chief of staff,' has been seen accompanying the DHS secretary on various official trips. In April, DHS officials clarified that Lewandowski is an 'adviser to DHS' and a special government employee. Noem's recent move has led critics to question why she should get free, taxpayer-funded housing that they don't believe other officials such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio get. However DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin described Noem's situation as unique. 'Secretary Noem continues to pay rent at her Navy Yard residence and has sought temporary living with greater security as threats have continued to increase against her as she leads DHS law enforcement who are facing an 830% increase in assaults against them,' spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told Another administration official mocked this argument. 'She wanted to move so photographers couldn't be on site and show what's going on, so she and Corey could be more private,' the source told 'They are connected at the hip. After the story broke, it caused a little bit of a rabbit jump.' The former governor of South Dakota moved into DC's fashionable Navy Yard neighborhood over the winter. reported on their living arrangement in April, noting how she was renting a place across the street from Lewandowski. Lewandowski, 51, her 'chief of staff,' was a regular visitor to Noem's $3,750 per month, two-bed Navy Yard condo that enjoys breathtaking panoramic views of Southeast Washington and the Anacostia River. And he didn't have far to travel because his own luxe digs were directly opposite in a smart rental building boasting a lap pool, gym, and spa. 'I've seen them together here both in the elevator and in common areas,' one resident of Noem's building told in April. 'Don't forget DC is a small town and people talk. It is an open secret that they are together. It has always been joked about that Navy Yard is a dorm for Hill Republicans and Trump staffers – now it's even higher up, with married cabinet secretaries bunking their volunteer chiefs.' Widespread reports of their rumored years-long affair have caused persistent agita for Noem and Lewandowski, both of whom are married. They have repeatedly denied the rumors, which have continued to dog them and caused frustration and snickers among others in the administration, who question Lewandowski's influence as a special government employee exempt from many ethics' rules. can now reveal that Noem moved out a short time later. Her spokesperson blamed for exposing what had been an open secret, claiming it put her at risk at a time she and other officials and ICE border agents are facing increased threats amid the agency's crackdown on illegal immigration. 'Following the Daily Mail's publication of where Secretary Noem lives, including photos, she has faced an increase in threats against her, as well as extensive doxing,' McLaughlin stated. 'Her security detail had to be increased, particularly the security footprint outside of her living quarters.'
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How Carlton v Collingwood, a table tennis comp and a country hotel infiltrated the mushroom murder trial which stopped the world
It's said all roads lead to Rome but by the end of the marathon Erin Patterson trial, all roads led to a country Victorian hotel which became the epicentre of the mushroom murder case. Bridges on Argyle in Traralgon started off hosting a couple of crusty Daily Mail journalists - including myself - but by the end of the 11-week slog, it housed homicide detectives, prosecutors, court staff, opposition reporters and, towards the end, the jury. The man holding it all together was Bridges manager/owner Steve, (surname withheld), who was the only person allowed to communicate with the jury during their week-long stay at Bridges. He was only allowed to refer to them as room 22, room 23 or similar - not by juror numbers and definitely not by their real names. There were other measures to ensure no 'cross-contamination' occurred while the 12 people tasked with deciding the trial of the century cohabitated with other guests in a well-run 74-room hotel, which almost never had vacancy. The jury was given private access to the breakfast room before they bussed to court to deliberate. The jurors also had access to the hotel function room to debrief before they were fed and sent to their rooms which were well away from any potential problems, like, maybe, a Daily Mail journalist. There were other key measures as well. For background, I had been staying at Bridges since the first week of the trial and I came to know the hotel well. Every morning when I'd step out for work it was hard not to notice the TV in the lobby was playing Sunrise which features regular news updates. There were also always three Herald Sun newspapers stacked neatly on the mantle beneath the TV. I would always glance at the front page which, believe it or not, often featured the Patterson trial update as the splash of the day. I then read that day's Patterson article before flipping the paper and reading about the diabolical situation my Carlton Blues are in. But I digress, that's another story for another day. I first smelled a rat when one morning I walked out and the TV was showing a re-run of maybe Becker? I can't remember, it might've been the American Family Feud. Also the Herald Suns were missing. I asked staff about the papers and was told they hadn't been delivered. Not long after, I sensed the jury was at the hotel. The TV channel had been switched and the papers removed so the jury couldn't even catch a glimpse of media reporting of the case. That was how airtight the measures were, and how strictly Steve and his staff adhered to their duty as the hotel keepers of the jury. Steve and his staff managed to juggle their duty with aplomb and there were never any issues or mishaps which could've caused issues and nothing occurred which may have led to the atomic outcome of a mistrial. The gentle balancing act to keep everyone segregated while running a busy hotel, a commercial enterprise, and not disrupting the trial, should be commended. One of the big questions during the deliberation was what the jury was allowed to watch in their rooms. Were they just to sit there and stare at the wall? Were they allowed to read? Surely some sort of visual entertainment was allowed. We reporters speculated free-to-air TV was out of the question, and it was. I suggested maybe they could watch DVDs, but that wasn't the case either. In the end, jurors were allowed to watch Netflix with the hotel having to register four new accounts just to accommodate their special guests. There were other allowances too. The jury was sent out to deliberate the week Carlton played Collingwood on Friday July 4. Despite the Blues' woeful form it was still one of the biggest games of the year. Now, I had a faint feeling that if any Carlton or Collingwood supporters were on the jury - and considering they're the two biggest sporting clubs in the country it was a huge chance - then they might have wanted to get the verdict done so they could go to the game. Maybe not a Carlton supporter - you could've kept me locked away for a year and I wouldn't have minded - but a Collingwood supporter, they would be keen as mustard to get to the 'G. In fact, there was a Collingwood supporter on the jury, a big one at that, but the jury failed to reach a verdict and they were holed up on the night of the big game. However, the Collingwood supporter was granted special access to watch the game on Kayo while under the supervision of a jury keeper. Even footy with its vast tentacles managed to reach inside the Erin Patterson murder trial. Unfortunately, another juror who supported a smaller club was denied permission to watch their team play, but that's how influential Collingwood is. Now, when I realised the jury was staying at Bridges, I predicted deliberations would go for three weeks. It was a complex case to decide and I'm sure the jury conducted themselves beyond reproach, but a juror or two would've relished the quality and service at Bridges. Comfortable, quiet, self-contained rooms with ensuite and kitchen, aircon (not that it was needed in Traralgon) and heating, comfortable and large flat screen TVs were the norm for guests. But the pièce de résistance, the cherry on top, the jewel in the crown at Bridges was the access to four or five really good restaurants which delivered to your room, courtesy of the hotel. I tell you, Hog's Breath, local Thai joint Zaab Zaab and Goodfella's Pizza wouldn't have seen more business than they did in those 11 weeks. I'm sure jurors had access to these and various other restaurants at their fingertips during their five nights at Gippsland's best hotel. Throw in the full cooked and continental breakfast - which included pancakes - and one may come to enjoy their time at Bridges. Now I'm not suggesting anything, but you put someone like myself on that jury, who has nothing better to do, and a gruelling task could start to seem like a holiday. Listen to this as a theory. The jury deliberated from Monday June 30 to Monday July 7. This included deliberations on Saturday July 5, the day after the Carlton game. What is not known is why the jury had to shift out of Bridges Saturday morning and stay at a vastly inferior motel deeper east into Gippsland. Just after lunch, on Monday July 7, after spending two nights in the new motel, and at the earliest possible opportunity, the jury reached its verdict. The reason the jury was shunted was because of the 2025 National Table Tennis Championships which were held at the Gippsland Regional Indoor Sports Stadium Traralgon. I knew because I was dealing with the Daily Mail's accommodation situation that the table tennis competition had booked out 29 rooms ten months in advance at Bridges. So it's a strong possibility the Table Tennis Championships had a direct bearing on a monumental moment in the history of the world. I don't want to seem flippant. Erin Patterson is a multiple murderer, the tragedy she caused has crippled her family and clearly would've crushed her children. Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson died and a pastor Ian Wilkinson almost died after spending several harrowing weeks in an ICU. Estranged husband Simon Patterson was invited to the deadly death-cap-laden beef Wellington lunch but did not attend. A large family has been torn apart and a community has suffered, but work needed to be done. Journalists needed to cover the case, lawyers on both sides of the fence worked tirelessly for months and months, security were polite and professional and court staff, including the media team, toiled around the clock. The jury listened patiently for weeks to digest an extremely complex case and it's very likely they reached their guilty verdict when they did, simply because that's when they reached the verdict. But if there was a ray of sunshine in all this, it's the people of Gippsland especially those in Morwell and Traralgon who served, fed and met the needs of hundreds who swarmed their towns to cover the trial of the century. On behalf of the Daily Mail, I'd like to personally thank Bridges on Argyle, Steve and his staff for not only putting up with us (there was the matter of the spilt lasagne) but also their friendly and accommodating service throughout the entire 11-week period. I'm looking forward to staying there again. The Daily Mail Australia did not encounter or speak to any jury members, and all information contained within this article was obtained after the verdict was handed down and after the jury had departed Bridges.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Bryan Kohberger watches from jail as Idaho murders judge announces decision on lifting gag order
watched from his Idaho jail as the judge in his quadruple murder case made a critical decision about the far-reaching gag order. In a brief court hearing Thursday, Judge Steven Hippler granted a request from a media coalition - including Daily Mail - to lift the order ahead of Kohberger's sentencing for the stabbing murders of four students. 'At this point I do not believe the purpose of the non-dissemination order - the primary purpose that we can seat an impartial jury - is at play,' Hippler said, later adding: 'At this point I just don't think I can justify the continuance of the non-dissemination order.' Dressed in a burgundy t-shirt, Kohberger watched the proceedings over Zoom from Ada County Jail - the first time he has been seen in public since he finally confessed to the murders of 21-year-old best friends Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves and 20-year-old couple Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in a change of plea hearing earlier this month. A gag order of some sorts - known as a non-dissemination order - has been in place since the early days blocking law enforcement, attorneys for both sides and other officials from speaking publicly about the case. The order - together with the broad sealing of records and evidence by the court - has restricted what information the public and the victims' families have had access to throughout the almost three-year-long proceedings. Yet the court ruled it was necessary to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial. But now, in a stunning turn of events, Kohberger has avoided trial after pleading guilty to four counts of murder and one count of burglary. The 30-year-old criminology PhD student broke into a student home in Moscow, Idaho, in the dead of the night on November 13, 2022, and stabbed the four victims to death. He was arrested around six weeks later but spent more than two years fighting the charges. On July 2 - just over a month before his trial was set to begin - he changed his plea to guilty in a hearing in Ada County Courthouse in Boise. The bombshell development came after his defense struck a controversial plea deal with prosecutors that means the case will no longer go to trial and he will be spared from the death penalty. Instead he will be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole and will waive all rights to appeal. He will be sentenced on July 23. Despite Kohberger no longer facing trial, Judge Hippler said in the hearing that the gag order would remain in place through sentencing. Latah County Prosecuting Attorney Bill Thompson told the judge it would help the state 'have time to make sure there's the ability to completely answer questions' when the order is lifted. Judge Hippler agreed, saying it would give the prosecution and defense time to prepare for 'what I'm sure will be the deluge of media requests.' Following the hearing, a coalition of media organizations - including the Daily Mail - filed a motion to lift the gag order, arguing Kohberger's guilty plea had 'sharply changed the Sixth Amendment fair trial/First Amendment balance in this case.' Now that Kohberger has pleaded guilty and will no longer stand trial, the court's justification that the gag order is necessary to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial is 'moot,' the motion said. 'There is no possible set of circumstances under which Mr. Kohberger will ever face a jury to determine his guilt or to determine whether the death penalty should be imposed,' the coalition argued. 'No trial will occur. Thus, there is no need to preserve Mr. Kohberger's 'right to a fair trial' because he has already admitted guilt.' A hearing for arguments on the motion to vacate the non-dissemination order was scheduled for Thursday and both the defense and prosecution filed responses. The prosecution said it would no longer oppose the removal of the gag order. 'Upon further reflection, the State withdraws its request. Now that the Defendant has pleaded guilty as charged to all five (5) counts of the Indictment, his right to a fair trial on the issue of guilt is no longer at issue,' the prosecution said in its filing. 'Nevertheless, out of respect for the integrity of the judicial process and the privacy of the victims and their families as they consider their rights to provide victim impact statements at sentencing, the prosecution team does not intend to make any public statements about this case until after sentencing has concluded. ' But Kohberger's defense attorneys argued the gag order should remain in place through sentencing citing the 'ongoing publicity regarding the case and threats to Mr. Kohberger's safety.' 'The amount of publicity coming before sentencing, even with the Revised Order in place, is massive. Further release would only serve to gin up the anger and violent rhetoric already at a fever pitch,' lead attorney Anne Taylor wrote. 'Again, this Court is well aware of the threats posed not only to Mr. Kohberger, but to his family and to Court staff.' The lifting of the order would increase the 'media frenzy' around the case and 'change the atmosphere near the courthouse and may well push security needs beyond capacity' at the sentencing, the filing argued. The defense also pointed to the ongoing investigation into a potential evidence leak in the case in violation of the gag order. The probe was launched after a recent Dateline episode revealed never-before-seen details including Kohberger's internet history. Kohberger's defense argued that lifting the gag order while the probe is ongoing 'would only confound the efforts in the investigation into who actually violated the nondissemination order and makes the investigators job close to impossible.' As well as the request to lift the gag order, the media coalition has also filed a separate motion asking Judge Hippler to unseal all records in the case arguing that Kohberger's change of plea means 'there is no reason for this case to remain cloaked in secrecy.' The judge has not made a ruling on the matter. Despite Kohberger's guilty plea, a lot of information about the murders remains a mystery. The 30-year-old has not revealed a motive for the attack and there is no known connection between him and his victims. During the change of plea hearing, Thompson revealed that Kohberger bought a KaBar knife and sheath from Amazon in March 2022 - months before the killings. In June 2022, he moved from his parents' home in Pennsylvania to Pullman, Washington, where he enrolled on the criminal justice PhD program at Washington State University. From the following month onwards, his cell phone pinged close to the victims' home at 1122 King Road - indicating that he likely stalked or surveilled at least one of the women who lived there. At around 4am on November 13, 2022, Kohberger broke into the three-story home and went straight up to Mogen's room on the third floor, where he murdered Mogen and Goncalves. On his way back downstairs or on leaving the property, the prosecutor said he encountered Kernodle on the second floor, who had just received a DoorDash food order. He attacked her with the knife and then also murdered Chapin who was sleeping in her bed. Kohberger then left through the back sliding door on the second story of the property, passing roommate Dylan Mortensen who had been woken by the noise and peeked around her bedroom door. Mortensen and roommate Bethany Funke - whose bedroom was on the first floor - were the only survivors. Prosecutors believe Kohberger did not intend to kill all four victims that night - but did enter the home intending to kill and had planned his attack for some time. He was tracked down, after he left a Ka-Bar leather knife sheath next to Mogen's body at the scene. Through Investigative Genetic Genealogy, the FBI managed to trace DNA on the sheath to Kohberger. Kohberger will return to Ada County Court for his sentencing on July 23, where the families of the victims will be given the opportunity to deliver impact statements.
