Beamish, The Living Museum Of The North wins Museum Of The Year award
The £120,000 prize was presented to Rhiannon Hiles, chief executive of Beamish, by comedian and prize judge Phil Wang, at a ceremony held at the Museum Of Liverpool.
Wang, 35, said: 'Beamish is a worthy winner of this year's Art Fund Museum of the Year award. Our visit was one of the most fun days I've had in years.
'An unbelievable level of commitment from staff, and a jaw-dropping amount of detail ran through everything. They had to drag me kicking and screaming out of there!'
Jenny Waldman, director of Art Fund and chairwoman of the judges for Art Fund Museum Of The Year, added: 'Beamish is a museum brought to life by people – a joyous, immersive and unique place shaped by the stories and experiences of its community.
'The judges were blown away by the remarkable attention to detail of its exhibits across a 350-acre site and by the passion of its staff and volunteers.'
In the past year Beamish has completed its Remaking Beamish project, which has seen the recreation of a 1950s town and 1950s farm.
In 2024 they opened a 1950s cinema, toy shop and electrical shop, as well as a Georgian tavern.
The museum, which celebrates its 55th anniversary this year, was in a list of finalists that comprised Chapter in Cardiff, Compton Verney in Warwickshire, Golden Thread Gallery in Belfast and Perth Museum in Perth and Kinross.
Art Fund annually shortlists five outstanding museums for the prize and the 2025 edition recognises activities that took place from autumn 2023 to winter 2024.
The judges were tasked with identifying impactful projects and looking at the overall achievements of the organisations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Careful, there may be a painful secret behind this door
We jest, of course. It wasn't a pasty-'n'-pop scoffathon. Instead, the garrulous garden nosherati tucked into dinky sandwiches and cakes, plus tea and apple juice. And everyone was dressed to impress. Chaps in smart suits; ladies in pretty Edwardian-style summer dresses, with hats as tall and textured as the Manhattan skyline. (Can you tell that the Diary is auditioning for a gig with Paris Vogue?) Yup, men were dashing, women were dazzling… until they left the party. For our spies inform us that two lady partygoers were spotted awaiting their homeward-bound carriage at Waverley Station. Still wearing pretty Edwardian-style summer dresses. Still in those tall, textured hats. But one lady was now barefoot, while the other had changed into a pair of comfy bedroom slippers. Clearly it had been a VERY long day… Home sweet home On the subject of Waverley Station. A Tannoy announcement was heard on the concourse, warning people not to feed the pigeons. The announcer explained that this was to encourage the birds to find 'a better home'. But what could be more ideal than Waverley Station, wonders the Diary? For it has a café, if the pigeons desire a coffee perk-up plus seed cake. There's also a newsagent where the birds can buy a copy of The Herald, thus keeping up to date with essential Diary exclusives. There's even an M&S, if the pigeons want to purchase fresh Y-Fronts. Come to think of it, maybe the feathered residents should vamoose… and let the rest of us move to Waverley. Talking balls They're whacking yellow, fuzzy hingmies over nets in SW19 again, which inspires Eddy Cavin to provide his favourite Wimbledon clichés. 1. Defeated British players must be described as 'plucky losers'. 2. There must be a reference to Virginia Wade's win 'in Jubilee year'. (The tennis version of 1966.) Candid couture Philosophical thought from reader Lisa Scott: 'Three things that always tell the truth… Small children, drunk people and yoga pants.' Party pooper 'No offence to the Von Trapps,' says reader Chris Robertson. 'But if I go to a swanky party and seven kids start singing about going to bed, I use that time for a toilet break.' Zero effort 'What's a lazy person's favourite exercise?' asks Nicola Munro. 'Diddly squats.'
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
How postcards made Britain
Worse for drink, and lonely in his Hollywood apartment, F. Scott Fitzgerald sat down to write a postcard. He began, 'How are you?', an important question as he was planning to send the postcard to himself. Although he never sent it, perhaps he understood the magical ability of the postcard to cheer us up. They've been doing that since the first ones – plain cards bearing a pre-printed stamp – were introduced into Britain in 1870. It took time for the current format as we know it to develop: picture on one side and, on the other, a space for the address and some words. By the Edwardian period, 800 million cards were being sent a year. They had the same kind of impact on communication that early text messages had for us and for similar reasons – they were quick, cheap and the limited space tended to make the messages more immediate. Postcards could even be lifesavers. Sweetheart messages during the first world war between troops in the trenches and loved ones at home were good for morale, as long as they escaped the attention of the army's censors. Often the troops drew painted love tokens and messages on one side – a moment of tenderness as the shells fell. Sometimes they sent cards embroidered by local French and Belgium families. These little pieces of art were a way of standing up against the brutality of the conflict. They might feature a flag or patriotic message or black cats for good luck. No two cards were the same, and millions were sent. It was in the 1940s that the postcard became a cultural icon, defining a certain kind of bawdy humour. James Bamforth was a portrait photographer who began producing the first saucy seaside postcards in 1910. They are glorious, rude and full of larger-than-life ladies and little men. Usually, they highlight a misunderstanding between the sexes and are pretty astute on sexual politics. The master of the art was Donald McGill, who produced 12,000 magnificently vulgar designs. His work caused such an uproar that in 1954 he was fined under the Obscene Publications Act. An early defender of his cards was George Orwell: 'The corner of the human heart that they speak for might easily manifest itself in worse forms, and I for one should be sorry to see them vanish.' I have a lot to be thankful for when it comes to postcards. Indeed, I owe my life to them. My father was a cockney who couldn't read or write. When he was on active service in Suez he received a postcard from a prospective pen pal in London. He showed the card to his commanding officer, who answered it with another one – pretending to be my dad. He commented that the young woman who was writing seemed quite posh and nice. He became my father's Cyrano de Bergerac. Correspondence by card continued for a year or so and after my father was demobbed, he met his pen pal. They married and they had me. Sadly, postcards have been in steep decline for decades, but they are still sent as a memento of a family holiday in some seaside town. I received one recently from a relative which simply said: 'Weather shit, can't wait to come home.' There is something quite profound in those seven words.
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Who's deceiving whom?: The Art of the Lie, by Laura Shepherd-Robinson, reviewed
In this age of lies and delusions, the trickster may seem to be a peculiarly modern creature, but he or she is almost as old as literature itself. Long before phishing or fake news, stories about cunning foxes, Loki, Anansi the Spider-Man and Odysseus brought delight; Puck, Tom Ripley and Sarah Waters's fingersmith Sue Trinder are some of their descendants. Encountering such a figure is always a joy, and in Laura Shepherd-Robinson's latest novel, The Art of a Lie, there are two. Hannah Cole is a shopkeeper in 18th-century London, struggling to keep her confectionary business open. Her husband Jonas has been murdered, and we soon learn that not only is the celebrated author and magistrate Henry Fielding investigating Mr Cole's death but that Hannah is, in fact, his killer. What may save her fortunes, and possibly her neck, is William Devereux, a friend of her late husband. He suggests that she try her luck at making a new delicacy for the gentry: 'iced cream'. And he is enlisted by Hannah to try to misdirect Fielding as to her husband's killer. Only William, too, is not what he seems. A serial confidence trickster, he seduces rich widows and leaves them broken-hearted and empty-pursed. The stage is set for a novel of suspense whose artfulness echoes the elegance, imagination, wit and ruthlessness that Georgian craftsmen (and women) excelled in. Each of Shepherd-Robinson's previous novels, beginning with Blood & Sugar in 2019, has plumbed the social and criminal depths of an era which many regard as the apogee of British life. She interweaves its beauties and its villainies (the slave trade, prostitution, gambling) in a way that pricks the conscience even as it entertains. The Art of a Lie is about an era in which men and women of every class practised to deceive each other for pecuniary gain, either through marriage or manipulation – something that is less remote from us than we like to think. The novel is narrated by Hannah and William in turn, each deftly depicted and neither entirely reliable. Hannah has no weapon but her little pastry knife, concealed in her bodice, her wits, her looks and the assumption that a woman must be weak and helpless. She has killed her treacherous husband in self-defence, and is clever enough to make it look like a robbery: but will Fielding's strange mix of reforming zeal, honesty and insight prove her undoing? William seems to be the perfect gentleman of means, and he does indeed help Hannah turn her business around with a recipe for peach ice cream before bedazzling her with his supposed fortune. His true character is shockingly different. 'Did you ever see a bigger cunt than Henry Fielding?' is how he introduces himself to us; and believing the novelist and tenacious inquisitor to be his only problem is the first of many mistakes. With a crew of criminals to back up his deceptions, he also has his own demons, in the shape of a violent crook to whom he owes a lot of money. But he is confident that his four-part technique with widows (which he calls the Mirror, the Dance, the Rope and the Drop) will carry him through to another success. This is a pleasingly sophisticated and twisty novel. Hannah is intelligent, brave and sharply observant about human psychology, but insufficiently wary about what she is being led to believe. William's insouciant voice, misogyny, lies and self-delusion are skewered in a way that 21st-century readers may find sadly contemporary, even as you also feel his charm. 'Contrary to what you might think, I don't hate women. I couldn't do this job if I did,' he says. He claims he's not 'the worst kind of villain' – because he refrains from taking everything, leaving his victims 'with their pride intact and their fortunes only somewhat diminished'. For guiding widows out of grieving for their husbands and lost youth into a new world, he argues that he deserves payment – and only one furious, broken former conquest from Bath is hot on his trail, seeking vengeance. He has more feelings than he likes to admit, just as Hannah has more sense and resilience. Falling genuinely in love with your victim is fatal for the trickster, but who will be the less deceived? Unusually, The Art of a Lie is also a celebration of the early days of trade, with the dawn of businesses– such as Fortnum & Mason, Floris and Berry Bros – which still carry lustre to this day. The author tells us in an afterword that there were a surprising number of businesses owned by women in this period, and Hannah stands for those who did not need rescuing by a Mr Darcy or, for that matter, Fielding's Tom Jones. She is an intriguing character, and I hope we meet her again. Too much literary fiction falls into a softened version of the past, but the best historical crime novels are sharply corrective of this. Like C.J. Sansom, Abir Mukherjee, Tim Pears and S.J. Parris, Laura Shepherd-Robinson has taken a moral microscope to her chosen period and shown us the truth about its lies – and our own.
