Japan PM to visit Netherlands from Tuesday for NATO summit
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba will be in the Netherlands for three days from Tuesday to attend a NATO summit, the government said Friday, as Japan aims to deepen its partnership with the military alliance.
It will be the fourth straight year that a sitting Japanese prime minister has participated in a NATO summit. Japan is not a NATO member but is one of the alliance's Indo-Pacific partners.
Ishiba also plans to hold bilateral talks with leaders of NATO members and those of its partners while in the Hague for the summit, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said.
U.S. President Donald Trump is among the expected attendees at the two-day summit from Tuesday.
"Given the severe security environment we face, and based on the shared view that the security of the Euro-Atlantic and that of the Indo-Pacific are inseparable, Japan, along with other partners from the region, will discuss how we can cooperate with NATO in concrete terms," Hayashi said.
At a meeting in Tokyo in April, Ishiba and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte underlined the need to strengthen the Japan-NATO partnership amid security threats from Russia and China and agreed to push for defense industry cooperation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kyodo News
21 minutes ago
- Kyodo News
Japan tariff negotiator in Washington holds talks twice with Lutnick
KYODO NEWS - 1 hour ago - 12:39 | All, Japan, World Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, spoke with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick by phone twice on Saturday, an official said, as they try to iron out some of the most difficult issues in pursuit of a deal that will be beneficial to both countries. Akazawa, who has extended his stay in Washington, spoke to Lutnick for about 15 minutes in the morning and about 20 minutes in the evening, the Japanese government said, adding Tokyo will continue to work "strenuously" with Washington toward an agreement. Akazawa's calls with Lutnick came a day after they held a meeting that lasted about an hour, with sharp differences apparently remaining over U.S. President Donald Trump's hefty tariffs on foreign-made cars and auto parts. In the ongoing negotiations, Japan has placed top priority on mitigating the impact of the Trump administration's increase in April of the tariff on imported automobiles to 27.5 percent from 2.5 percent. Trump and his trade team have shown no signs of scrapping or lowering such sector-based tariffs, including on steel and aluminum, that the president has imposed on national security grounds. Akazawa arrived in Washington on Thursday for his seventh round of ministerial meetings on tariffs with U.S. Cabinet members. Akazawa, Japan's minister for economic revitalization, was initially due to leave for Tokyo on Saturday, but he extended his visit to explore a separate meeting with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The official said it remains unclear how long Akazawa will stay in the U.S. capital. Related coverage: Japan wrestling with U.S. tariff talks as July deadline looms Trump could extend 90-day tariff pause in July, White House says Japan reiterates that higher U.S. auto tariffs are unacceptable
Japan Times
31 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Top Japanese official visits Australia as bid to build new frigate heats up
A top adviser to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has visited Australia for discussions on deepening security ties, as Japan looks to win a government contract to replace the quasi-ally's aging frigates. Akihisa Nagashima, special adviser to Ishiba, visited the cities of Canberra and Perth from Tuesday through Saturday, meeting with officials from Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the prime minister's office, as well as the country's director-general of national intelligence, according to the Foreign Ministry in Tokyo. The visit was also seen as another move by Japan to up its game in the race for the multibillion-dollar Australian frigate contract. Japan, together with Germany, are the finalists in the bid to jointly develop the new frigates with Australia. Canberra is expected to make a final decision on the matter by the end of the year. Nagashima said in a post Sunday to his X social media account that he had held discussions in Canberra 'with key members of the Australian government on deepening the Japan-Australia 'quasi-alliance' for peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,' adding that he had also traveled to Perth 'to give a final push for the Mogami-class multipurpose frigate joint production project.' Japan is pitching an as-of-yet unfielded upgraded version of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' Mogami-class frigates, which are operated by the Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF). The top adviser to the prime minister also said he had held informal talks with representatives from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' Canberra office, discussing defense-industrial cooperation between the two countries, while later visiting Perth's Henderson shipyard, where some of the new Australian frigates are expected to be built. If won, the contract would be the largest military export deal in Japan's postwar history, offering a major breakthrough for the country's defense industry. Akihisa Nagashima, special adviser to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, speaks during an interview in Tokyo in December. | BLOOMBERG Under the project — which has a budget of between 7 billion and 11 billion Australian dollars ($4.3 billion to $6.8 billion) over the next decade — Canberra is seeking seven to 11 general-purpose frigates optimized for undersea warfare to replace its Anzac-class warships. Japan has pulled out all the stops to win the contract, sending one of its Mogami-class vessels to Australia earlier this year for joint military exercises and making a port call earlier this month with another Mogami ship to the city of Darwin, where the MSDF hosted a reception for Royal Australian Navy officials on board the ship. Experts, however, say that German shipbuilder Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems has significantly increased its chances in the frigate competition by partnering with Saab — an entrenched supplier of crucial equipment for Australian warships — late last month. The German firm signed up Saab to 'explore opportunities for collaboration on the MEKO A-200, with a focus on enhancing naval capabilities through joint innovation and integration,' it said in a statement. Together with the Mogami-class vessel, Australia has also shortlisted Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems' MEKO A-200 design. 'This challenges widespread assumptions that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is the favorite,' analysts from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute wrote in an analysis earlier this month. 'A German victory, if it occurs, will be a serious blow to what has been a revitalised security relationship between Australia and Japan.'
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
New Japanese citizen in int'l marriage confronts single-surname rule for married couples
FUKUOKA -- A man who acquired Japanese nationality two years ago has reflected on the Japanese system requiring married Japanese couples to share a single surname -- following years in an international marriage in which he and his wife retained separate surnames. Japan has been contemplating a bill that would give Japanese couples the option of retaining separate surnames after marriage. The bill recently entered deliberation in the Diet for the first time in 28 years, but without a conclusion being reached before the end of the latest Diet session on June 22, the talks are set to continue. Discussions have been met with persistent opposition from conservatives who argue that it would "undermine family unity." However, the man interviewed by the Mainichi Shimbun says that the rule actually caused confusion for his family. This raises the question: What is the ideal form for surnames and family? The man, originally from Sri Lanka, is Pathmasiri-Jayasena Hara, 54, a professor in peace studies at Fukuoka Women's University in Fukuoka's Higashi Ward. He came to Japan as a student in 2000 and, except for temporary stays in Britain and elsewhere, has mostly lived in Japan. He married a Japanese woman in 2006, and they have four children. Japan alone forces married couples to have single surname Hara began the process of acquiring Japanese citizenship around 2022. Although he held "permanent resident" status, he had developed a deep attachment to Japan after living in the country for many years, and wanted to engage with society as a Japanese national. In 2023, he acquired Japanese citizenship, whereupon the issue of the couple's surname came up. In international marriages involving a Japanese citizen, if the spouse retains foreign nationality, there is no problem with the couple retaining separate surnames. But if the foreign national acquires Japanese citizenship and it becomes a marriage between two Japanese nationals, a new family register is created, so they are asked to decide which surname to keep. According to the Ministry of Justice, Japan is the only country in the world that mandates a single surname choice for married couples. Hara's sister, who lives in Sri Lanka, did not change her surname after marriage. The option of being able to choose separate surnames is taken for granted there, and Hara reflected, "I had never even considered it before it became a personal issue." Sensing an implicit social rule Hara's primary concern about changing his own name was the potential disadvantage in his research -- a change in surname could lead to difficulties in being recognized in academic searches, and his achievements might not be properly evaluated. He considered the option of continuing to use his original surname. His wife and children, too, expressed a desire to take his surname. When he asked them why, his daughters, high school and junior high school students, replied, "Because everyone does." According to the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 94.5% of couples who married in 2023 chose the husband's surname. However, Hara felt a lingering discomfort, suspecting they were unconsciously conforming to unspoken social rules they didn't need to follow. In his job, Hara has raised issues with the Japanese system, prepared to face any criticism. One of those issues is Japan's male-dominated society. "It doesn't make sense for us to adopt my surname after I have acquired Japanese nationality," he said. After much deliberation, he decided to take his wife's surname. At the same time Hara registered his original surname "Jayasena" and his given name "Pathmasiri" as a single name, "Pathmasiri-Jayasena," to avoid confusion in academic searches and so he wouldn't be mistaken for someone else. The university allows him to use the name by which he is regularly known, and he hasn't encountered significant inconveniences so far from changing his name. However, official documents related to employment and salary require the surname on the family register, leading to more instances where he needs to be mindful, telling people who are wondering what to call him, "Please call me 'Jayasena.'" The partial change in a name he had held for half a century shook his identity. "It feels like there are two of me," he said. Diversity a key to family happiness The introduction of a system allowing couples to retain separate surnames after marriage was proposed by the Legislative Council, an advisory body to the minister of justice, in 1996, but has been blocked by opponents including conservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lawmakers. Opponents argue that "the sense of family unity and bonds would break down" as a result, but Hara counters that this claim has "absolutely no basis." For 17 years before he acquired Japanese nationality, Hara and his wife lived with different surnames, with the children using their mother's surname, but this was never a topic of discussion. They were a close-knit family. Rather, it was being bound by the single-surname rule that caused them trouble. Hara sometimes wonders what his wife truly feels about him adopting her surname. If they hadn't been forced to choose a surname, such a thought might never have crossed his mind. "That's why the freedom to choose is important. What matters is that family members respect each other, and surname uniformity should be irrelevant," he said. Deliberation on the issue, which had long been shelved in Japan, began in the House of Representatives Judicial Affairs Committee for the first time in 28 years after the LDP became a minority party in the lower house. However, due to differing views between the ruling and opposition parties on the direction of the amendment, a vote was postponed, and the discussion continues. In a survey conducted by the Cabinet Office in 2021, 52.1% of people who had changed their surname due to the same-surname system agreed that there were inconveniences or disadvantages in doing so. Hara stressed, "There are still people worrying about this now. The system of selective surnames for married couples doesn't take away anyone's rights; it increases options. Surely increasing options fosters diversity and contributes to everyone's happiness."
