You don't want smoke? How about a mirror?
Dear Ambassador Pete Hoekstra,
A couple of weeks ago, half a dozen Republicans wrote to Canada's ambassador to the United States to complain about the wildfire smoke that sometimes drifts from our country to yours.
According to the Canadian Press and the Associated Press — you know the latter crowd for sure; they're the ones still calling the Gulf of Mexico by its recognized name and not the one declared by your oh-so-capricious president — representatives Tom Tiffany, Brad Finstad, Tom Emmer, Michelle Fischbach, Glenn Grothman and Pete Stauber of Wisconsin and Minnesota are saying that 'successive years of wildfires in Canada have undermined air quality in their states and robbed Americans of their ability to enjoy the summer.'
Jacquelyn Martin / The Associated Press
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media, Sunday, July 13. American politicians are complaining about wildfire smoke drifting south. Columnist Pam Frampton points out something just as noxious is drifting north from the U.S.
Let me just say right off the bat that we're terribly sorry if our pesky wildfires are interfering with folks' God-given right to play cornhole in the backyard, enjoy a Bud Light on the deck, or set an apple pie out to cool on the kitchen windowsill. Believe it or not, Canadians like those sorts of things, too, of a summer's day.
The representatives are demanding answers and action, writing in their letter, 'As we are entering the height of the fire season, we would like to know how your government plans on mitigating wildfires and the smoke that makes its way south.'
Well, forgive my boldness, sir, but those remarks seem a little light in the empathy department. Wildfires are caused by many things: some by arson, some accidentally set — by a dropped cigarette, say, or a backyard fire that sends sparks flying into tinder-dry woods — some by Mother Nature messing around with lightning. Some are even started by the sparks from trains.
But the underlying factor in all of these is climate change, and the representatives' letter had nary a mention of that. Climate change can bring hotter weather and drought, earlier snow melt and high winds, all of which can set the stage for raging fires.
Are there things countries can do to try to lessen the risk? Why of course, and Canada has. I don't mean to boast, but we've won recognition for our work in that regard. The Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System, for example, has been adapted by countries outside of our own. (Acknowledging that climate change is real is a good place to start).
Those Republic representatives are worried about their constituents' —and presumably their own air quality — and fair enough. But have they given any thought to the thousands of Canadians who have had to flee their homes this summer — 12,000 evacuated in Manitoba alone so far — because of wildfires that are far more present and dangerous than second-hand smoke? And what of those who have lost their lives and properties in the fires here? Do those elected representatives care about their neighbours at all?
And speaking of neighbours, your country hasn't exactly been exemplary in that regard of late. With U.S. President Donald Trump turning the tariff screws on Canadian products at every opportunity, you're no longer the ally you once were.
Come to think of it, we have a complaint of our own.
The squalid nature of politics in your country, sir, is making it difficult for many Canadians to enjoy their summer.
Why, we can't even open our newspaper or turn on CBC Radio out on the deck without reading your president's name or hearing his voice. Instead of 'The World This Hour,' CBC might as well call their newscast 'What's Trump Done Today?'
Government departments decimated. Massive employee layoffs. Families ripped apart by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Detainees caged in Alligator Alcatraz. Science denounced and underfunded. Bizarre conspiracy theories endorsed and spread by the Oval Office (we hear Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced by a robotic clone). Playing politics with the judiciary. Promises of peace deals that don't materialize. The 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Trump's incessant use of ALL CAPS. The Epstein files.
Did we mention the Epstein files? Soon, Canadian children will be tearing off daisy petals to the refrain 'Is there a client list or isn't there a client list?,' instead of 'He loves me, he loves me not.'
Weekday Mornings
A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day.
Enough already. Can you do something about that, Ambassador Hoekstra? Can you take our complaint to the highest levels, as we have done with yours about wildfire smoke?
To paraphrase the Republican representatives, we would like to know how your government plans on mitigating the claptrap and twaddle that makes its way north — in all seasons since Trump took office, and not just in summer.
Because right now, the president's vapid ramblings, poison politics and social media proclamations are about as welcome as a parade of ants in a potato salad at a picnic.
Sincere regards.
Pam Frampton lives in St. John's. Email pamelajframpton@gmail.com | X: @Pam_Frampton | Bluesky: @pamframpton.bsky.social
Pam Frampton
Pam Frampton is a columnist for the Free Press. She has worked in print media since 1990 and has been offering up her opinions for more than 20 years. Read more about Pam.
Pam's columns are built on facts, but offer her personal views through arguments and analysis. Every column Pam produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
23 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Clean energy is the future — why are we investing in fossil fuels?
Opinion I don't know about you, but I have to say I'm a bit confused these days. In fact, in political terms, I really don't know whether I'm coming or going. Am I coming out of a fossil fuel-addicted world into a greener cleaner one, or going back to fossil fuels as the only default position to keep Canada financially afloat in the face of a fascist's tariffs? I know which direction almost 80 per cent of us want to be headed, but I'm not sure our provincial and federal leaders agree, given all this talk about gas and oil pipelines cutting through environmentally sensitive northern lands and mega-mining projects in Ontario's 'ring of fire' — peatlands that store a staggering 35 billion tonnes of the world's carbon. So I'm left asking — is this the only way we can cut loose from the U.S. and cope with a trade war, or are our leaders simply taking the easy way out? Easy in the sense that it's all too familiar, seems to be pragmatic and, at least in the short term, may more or less maintain our standard of living. In the somewhat longer term, it won't be easy at all, given that we live in a world that's already blown past the 1.5 degree Celsius mark above pre-industrial levels, and crossed several of the seven thresholds that measure the distance between a climate emergency and climate chaos. Given the latter reality, I find myself asking a couple of simple questions — why aren't Mark Carney and Wab Kinew talking about a clean energy revolution as a way to beat the tariffs and trade war? Why isn't Carney talking about a bolder vision, challenging the government to work together to retool Canada's economy and set our country up to become a world leader in clean energy and green technology? Now, maybe I'm naïve, and god knows I'm no economist, but it seems to me, as I've said before, that if Canada was able to blast forward from an agrarian based economy to an industrialized one in just six years during the Second World War, why can't we do the same now? I mean, we've got a lot of smart Canadians who would likely rise to the challenge and there are quite a few highly skilled Americans looking for a way out of the current political nightmare in their own country, who could be recruited to the cause. And transitioning to clean energy like solar and wind doesn't just make environmental sense, it's also a financially smart, given that renewable energy is now 41 per cent cheaper and just as efficient. It's also more secure, because as UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recently observed — 'There are no price spikes for sunlight, no embargos on wind.' In fact, countries like Denmark and Germany have already demonstrated that the transition to clean energy works by generating 50 per cent to 67 per cent of their power needs with solar and wind. Canada, meanwhile, is generating a paltry seven per cent to 11 per cent of its total electricity with alternate sources. This when Atlantic Canada is deemed to have some of the best wind power potential in the world and the Prairies have excellent prospects for solar. Not to mention the fact that clean energy technologies offer numerous business opportunities for economic growth, which also expands Canada's trade options. Just look at China where investments low carbon manufacturing as well as solar and EVs have created new and booming markets. And the irony is that the vast majority of Canadians want a renewable energy transition to happen. According to the Pembina Institute, even 70 per cent of Albertans are worried about their heavy dependence on oil and gas, and more than 80 per cent think their government should be planning for new opportunities for energy workers. Which suggests to me that most Canadians know the world is undergoing an energy transition and are worried that our country will be left in the dust by Europe and China where efforts to reach Net Zero are accelerating. Look, the truth is we don't have much time to get this done, given that climate driven, extreme weather events — from flash floods in Texas, to the massive forest fires in Manitoba — are accelerating. So instead of building pipelines and mining one of the world's largest carbon sinks, maybe we should be focused on investments that will bring Canada into an economically stable, low carbon future. Maybe it's time for our leaders to halt the fool's errand of looking to the past for short-term, carbon-heavy solutions, and start talking to Canadians about a just transition to clean energy. One that will guarantee a better, safer, more secure future for our grandchildren. Erna Buffie is a writer and environmental activist. Read more at
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Vice President JD Vance is on the road again to sell the Republicans' big new tax law
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Vice President JD Vance is hitting his home state on Monday to continue promoting the GOP's sweeping tax-and-border bill. He will be in Canton, Ohio, to talk about the bill's 'benefits for hardworking American families and businesses,' according to his office. Aides offered little detail in advance about the visit, but NBC News reported that his remarks will take place at a steel plant in Canton, located about 60 miles south of Cleveland.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Vice President JD Vance is on the road again to sell the Republicans' big new tax law
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Vice President JD Vance is hitting his home state on Monday to continue promoting the GOP's sweeping tax-and-border bill. He will be in Canton, Ohio, to talk about the bill's 'benefits for hardworking American families and businesses,' according to his office. Aides offered little detail in advance about the visit, but NBC News reported that his remarks will take place at a steel plant in Canton, located about 60 miles south of Cleveland. The visit marks Vance's second trip this month to sell the package, filled with a hodgepodge of conservative priorities that Republicans have dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' as the vice president becomes its chief promoter on the road. In West Pittston, Pennsylvania, Vance told attendees at an industrial machine shop that they should be able to keep more of their pay in their pockets, highlighting the law's new tax deductions on overtime. Vance also discussed a new children's savings program called Trump Accounts and how the new law promotes energy extraction, while decrying Democrats for opposing the bill that keeps the current tax rates, which would have otherwise expired later this year. The legislation cleared the GOP-controlled Congress by the narrowest of margins, with Vance breaking a tie vote in the Senate for the package that also sets aside hundreds of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration agenda while slashing Medicaid and food stamps. The vice president is also stepping up his public relations blitz on the bill as the White House tries to deflect attention away from the growing controversy over Jeffrey Epstein. The disgraced financier killed himself, authorities say, in a New York jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump and his top allies stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein's death before Trump returned to the White House and are now reckoning with the consequences of a Justice Department announcement earlier this month that Epstein did indeed die by suicide and that no further documents about the case would be released. Questions about the case continued to dog Trump in Scotland, where he on Sunday announced a framework trade deal with the European Union. Asked about the timing of the trade announcement and the Epstein case and whether it was correlated, Trump responded: 'You got to be kidding with that.' 'No, had nothing to do with it,' Trump told the reporter. 'Only you would think that.' The White House sees the new law as a clear political boon, sending Vance to promote it in swing congressional districts that will determine whether Republicans retain their House majority next year. The northeastern Pennsylvania stop is in the district represented by Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a first-term lawmaker who knocked off a six-time Democratic incumbent last fall. On Monday, Vance will be in the district of Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, who is a top target for the National Republican Congressional Committee this cycle. Polls before the bill's passage showed that it largely remained unpopular, although the public approves of some individual provisions such as increasing the child tax credit and allowing workers to deduct more of their tips on taxes.
