Calgary real estate fraud leaves dozens of investors fighting to recover millions
'Mr. Hare has defended and continues to dispute the serious allegations made against him in the Action, which has not yet proceeded to the discovery phase,' Hare's lawyer said in an email. 'Our client is confident that a just resolution will be reached in the Action going forward.'
Article content
The managing broker declined to comment on ongoing litigation and emphasized that neither he nor Re/Max Central was named in the civil suit.
Article content
Re/Max Central was long considered one of the top-performing Re/Max offices globally. According to the company's website, the brokerage consistently ranked among the leaders in sales both in Canada and internationally.
Article content
In a statement, Re/Max said Drinkwater has not been affiliated with the brand since April 2024.
Article content
'The actions alleged are not representative of the values and principles upheld by REMAX and its franchisees and their affiliated sales associates. The REMAX network shares and honours a commitment to professionalism and honesty,' Re/Max said in an email. The company did not comment on allegations against Hare.
Article content
Article content
Meanwhile, the Real Estate Council of Alberta (RECA) is facing mounting criticism from victims and industry leaders over its handling of Drinkwater's case, which they say raises questions about the industry watchdog's ability to fulfil its mandate to protect consumers.
Article content
Several victims allege the regulator has tried to distance the fraud from the real estate industry to avoid paying out claims through its Consumer Protection Fund. They accuse the regulator of pushing Drinkwater to characterize the fraudulent investments as unrelated personal loans.
Article content
RECA declined to comment on those claims, citing ongoing proceedings.
Article content
'We're very limited in what we can say at this time,' a RECA spokesperson said in a May 15 email to Postmedia. 'Like other regulatory or judicial processes, we want to ensure our actions don't impact the independent hearing process or jeopardize victims' rights.'
Article content
Making a claim to the Consumer Protection Fund is the only path to recover losses for many victims, who say the process to apply is unclear and costly.
Article content
Several victims who spoke to Postmedia asked not to be identified, citing concerns it could affect their claims with the regulator.
Article content
One victim said she turned over hundreds of pages of evidence pertaining to the scheme to the regulator, who later told her in an email there were still 'gaps' in her file.
Article content
Article content
Shelley Todd initially felt hopeful after reporting to the regulator, believing its process would bring a just resolution for victims — but that hope quickly disappeared, she said.
Article content
'RECA's requirements for accessing the assurance fund are complicated — close to impossible without legal representation,' she said. 'Luckily, my lawyer has shown compassion with regard to legal fees, but it's still costing me a significant amount to meet RECA's requirements.'
Article content
Todd says mounting legal fees are a barrier for victims to access payment from the fund.
Article content
'It feels like the regulator is re-victimizing us,' she said. 'It's so expensive and it causes more hardship.'
Article content
Her lawyer echoed those concerns, noting the legislation meant to provide consumer protection instead forces defrauded victims to pursue costly litigation before they can access the fund.
Article content
'The process to get to consumer protection ends up being impractical for most people and a significant and costly barrier,' said Ben Frenken, a partner at Code Hunter LLP, in a statement.
Article content
Article content
Brad Mitchell, CEO of the Alberta Real Estate Association, criticized the regulator for what he called serious regulatory failures exposed by the Drinkwater case. His association represents and advocates for more than 15,000 Realtors across Alberta.
Article content
'The regulator has absolutely failed in its mandate … to detect, suppress and prevent fraud in the industry,' he said, calling for 'wholesale changes' at the regulator to restore public trust. 'They're not fulfilling their sole purpose.
Article content
'What is the point of even having a regulator if they are not going to act?' he said. 'If the courts are always forced to rule before the regulator does something, then it begs the question, what do we need a regulator for?
Article content
'This was a completely preventable scenario,' he added. 'It really is a black mark on the industry.'
Article content
For victims, the path to justice remains uncertain.
Article content
The regulatory process has been slow, with no decision yet on possible sanctions. Meanwhile, the criminal case against Drinkwater is still in its early stages.
Article content
He was to appear in court on June 11 on the fraud charge, but his hearing was adjourned to August 11. He has yet to enter a plea.
Article content
After being betrayed by the Realtor she trusted and let down by the system meant to protect her, Shelley Todd is now focused on helping others navigate the aftermath of the scheme.
Article content
'I have compassion for Eric, but I'm on the side of justice,' she said. 'We've been traumatized by this. So many victims feel shame, believing this was their fault.'
Article content
For Todd, the fight is no longer just about recovering her losses. She's spent countless hours helping others prepare their claims to the Consumer Protection Fund and continues to push for broader accountability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. Treasury says it will borrow $1-trillion in third quarter to rebuild cash balance
The U.S. Treasury said on Monday it expects to borrow US$1.007-trillion in the third quarter partly to replenish its cash balance that dwindled during the latest debt ceiling episode. The figure was US$453-billion higher than its April estimate primarily due to the lower beginning-of-quarter cash balance and projected lower net cash flows. The third-quarter financing projection assumes cash of US$850-billion at the end of September for the Treasury, the department said in a statement. Much higher borrowing in the third quarter were needed to rebuild the Treasury's cash balance following President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill being signed into law on July 4. The debt ceiling increased by US$5-trillion to US$41.1-trillion following the spending legislations enactment. The Treasury's cash had dropped to US$313-billion on July 3, data from money market research firm Wrightson ICAP showed. Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill set to further tarnish U.S. Treasuries' lustre overseas 'These [financing estimates] are in line with our projections and should not be a surprise to the markets since the increased financing need is almost all due to the shortfall in cash balances on September 30, which was a function of the debt limit,' said Kim Rupert, managing director, global fixed income analysis at Action Economics, The Treasury also said it expects to borrow US$590-billion in the fourth quarter, as it projects a cash balance of US$850-billion at the end of December. In the second quarter, the Treasury said it borrowed US$65-billion in privately-held marketable debt, ending the period with a cash balance of US$457-billion. In April, Treasury had estimated borrowings of US$514-billion and assumed an end-of-June cash balance of US$850-billion. The Treasury will unveil details of it borrowing estimates for the quarter on Wednesday when it announces its financing plans. It is widely expected that the Treasury will maintain current auction sizes for notes and bonds and will likely keep them steady for some time. Investors will be looking for guidance as to how long the Treasury can hold off not raising the size of the debt auctions used to fund the ballooning U.S. budget deficit.
Globe and Mail
3 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Rosen Law Firm Encourages Simulations Plus, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLP) resulting from allegations that Simulations Plus may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. So What: If you purchased Simulations Plus securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses. What to do next: To join the prospective class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@ for information on the class action. What is this about: On July 15, 2025, during market hours, Benzinga published an article entitled 'Simulations Plus Sees Weaker Demand Persist, Outlook Softens.' The article stated that Simulations Plus shares had declined 'following the release of [Simulations Plus'] third-quarter 2025 earnings report.' The article stated that Simulations Plus had reported sales of $20.4 million, representing a 10% year-over-year increase, but this fell short of the consensus estimate of $20.9 million.' Further, '[t]his miss followed preliminary third-quarter sales figures released in June, which were already lower than expectations at $19 million to $20 million, compared to a consensus of $22.78 million.' On this news, the price of Simulations Plus stock fell 25.75% on July 15, 2025. Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Calgary Herald
6 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Calgary real estate fraud leaves dozens of investors fighting to recover millions
Article content 'Mr. Hare has defended and continues to dispute the serious allegations made against him in the Action, which has not yet proceeded to the discovery phase,' Hare's lawyer said in an email. 'Our client is confident that a just resolution will be reached in the Action going forward.' Article content The managing broker declined to comment on ongoing litigation and emphasized that neither he nor Re/Max Central was named in the civil suit. Article content Re/Max Central was long considered one of the top-performing Re/Max offices globally. According to the company's website, the brokerage consistently ranked among the leaders in sales both in Canada and internationally. Article content In a statement, Re/Max said Drinkwater has not been affiliated with the brand since April 2024. Article content 'The actions alleged are not representative of the values and principles upheld by REMAX and its franchisees and their affiliated sales associates. The REMAX network shares and honours a commitment to professionalism and honesty,' Re/Max said in an email. The company did not comment on allegations against Hare. Article content Article content Meanwhile, the Real Estate Council of Alberta (RECA) is facing mounting criticism from victims and industry leaders over its handling of Drinkwater's case, which they say raises questions about the industry watchdog's ability to fulfil its mandate to protect consumers. Article content Several victims allege the regulator has tried to distance the fraud from the real estate industry to avoid paying out claims through its Consumer Protection Fund. They accuse the regulator of pushing Drinkwater to characterize the fraudulent investments as unrelated personal loans. Article content RECA declined to comment on those claims, citing ongoing proceedings. Article content 'We're very limited in what we can say at this time,' a RECA spokesperson said in a May 15 email to Postmedia. 'Like other regulatory or judicial processes, we want to ensure our actions don't impact the independent hearing process or jeopardize victims' rights.' Article content Making a claim to the Consumer Protection Fund is the only path to recover losses for many victims, who say the process to apply is unclear and costly. Article content Several victims who spoke to Postmedia asked not to be identified, citing concerns it could affect their claims with the regulator. Article content One victim said she turned over hundreds of pages of evidence pertaining to the scheme to the regulator, who later told her in an email there were still 'gaps' in her file. Article content Article content Shelley Todd initially felt hopeful after reporting to the regulator, believing its process would bring a just resolution for victims — but that hope quickly disappeared, she said. Article content 'RECA's requirements for accessing the assurance fund are complicated — close to impossible without legal representation,' she said. 'Luckily, my lawyer has shown compassion with regard to legal fees, but it's still costing me a significant amount to meet RECA's requirements.' Article content Todd says mounting legal fees are a barrier for victims to access payment from the fund. Article content 'It feels like the regulator is re-victimizing us,' she said. 'It's so expensive and it causes more hardship.' Article content Her lawyer echoed those concerns, noting the legislation meant to provide consumer protection instead forces defrauded victims to pursue costly litigation before they can access the fund. Article content 'The process to get to consumer protection ends up being impractical for most people and a significant and costly barrier,' said Ben Frenken, a partner at Code Hunter LLP, in a statement. Article content Article content Brad Mitchell, CEO of the Alberta Real Estate Association, criticized the regulator for what he called serious regulatory failures exposed by the Drinkwater case. His association represents and advocates for more than 15,000 Realtors across Alberta. Article content 'The regulator has absolutely failed in its mandate … to detect, suppress and prevent fraud in the industry,' he said, calling for 'wholesale changes' at the regulator to restore public trust. 'They're not fulfilling their sole purpose. Article content 'What is the point of even having a regulator if they are not going to act?' he said. 'If the courts are always forced to rule before the regulator does something, then it begs the question, what do we need a regulator for? Article content 'This was a completely preventable scenario,' he added. 'It really is a black mark on the industry.' Article content For victims, the path to justice remains uncertain. Article content The regulatory process has been slow, with no decision yet on possible sanctions. Meanwhile, the criminal case against Drinkwater is still in its early stages. Article content He was to appear in court on June 11 on the fraud charge, but his hearing was adjourned to August 11. He has yet to enter a plea. Article content After being betrayed by the Realtor she trusted and let down by the system meant to protect her, Shelley Todd is now focused on helping others navigate the aftermath of the scheme. Article content 'I have compassion for Eric, but I'm on the side of justice,' she said. 'We've been traumatized by this. So many victims feel shame, believing this was their fault.' Article content For Todd, the fight is no longer just about recovering her losses. She's spent countless hours helping others prepare their claims to the Consumer Protection Fund and continues to push for broader accountability.
