Who is Yeonsoo Go? South Korean student and a priest's daughter detained by US immigration officials
, a South Korean student, was detained by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents following a routine visit hearing at Federal Plaza Immigration Court in New York, according to media reports. Go, 20, the daughter of local Episcopal priest Kyrie Kim, was arrested and placed in federal detention nearby and was eventually moved, like so many recent ICE detainees, to a facility in Louisiana, according to CNN.
The development comes as US President Donald Trump has vowed to launch the largest mass deportation operation in American history. As a part of the exercise, immigrants living in the US, both illegally and legally, including those with valid documentation such as green cards and visas, are being detained.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
The administration's deportation plan has led to intensified ICE raids nationwide, along with reports of arrests at immigration appointments.
Speaking to CNN, Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said that Go was arrested and placed in expedited removal proceedings after overstaying a visa 'that expired more than two years ago.' 'The fact of the matter is those who are in our country illegally have a choice—they can leave the country voluntarily or be arrested and deported,' McLaughlin said.
Who is Yeonsoo Go?
Live Events
Yeonsoo Go is a South Korean native and a Scarsdale High School graduate. She moved to the US from Seoul with her mother on a religious visa roughly four years ago. She was in the process of switching to a student visa.
After completing her freshman year at Purdue University, where she's studying to become a pharmacist, Go returned home to Scarsdale in Westchester County to spend the summer with her mother. Go's mother, Rev. Kyrie Kim, serves with the Asian ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of New York and, according to the church, is the first woman ordained in the Seoul Diocese of the Anglican Church of Korea, as reported by CNN.
According to ABC7 NY, Go's lawyer stated that the 20-year-old was asked to appear in court on Thursday (July 31, 2025) for a procedural hearing on her visa renewal application. After the judge gave her a return date in October, ICE agents detained her as soon as she left the building.
Go's arrest sparks protests
The arrest of the South Korean student over immigration issues triggered protests during the weekend, with around 75 faith leaders and advocates gathering outside 26 Federal Plaza on Saturday morning to demand their release.
Supporters from the Episcopal Diocese of New York, the Interfaith Center of New York, and the New York Immigration Coalition called for Go's release on Saturday (August 2, 2025) during a gathering in Manhattan's Federal Plaza, where Go was held immediately after her arrest, according to Davis and the diocese.
According to CNN, the crowd of protesters prayed, sang songs, and marched with signs bearing the picture of the 20-year-old. Go's friends spoke about the positive influence she had on those around her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
3 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Should Not Burn Relationship With "Strong Ally Like India": Nikki Haley
New York: The US should not burn its relationship with a "strong ally like India" and give a pass to China, Indian-American Republican leader Nikki Haley said on Tuesday, amid President Donald Trump's attacks against New Delhi over tariffs and purchases of Russian oil. "India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause," Nikki Haley said in a post on X. "Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India," she said. Haley, the former Governor of South Carolina, was the US Ambassador to the United Nations under Trump's first presidential term, becoming the first Indian-American to be appointed to a cabinet-level post in the US administration. In 2013, she officially announced her candidacy for the 2024 presidential election and withdrew from the race in March last year. Her comments came hours after Trump said India has not been a "good trading partner" and announced he will raise tariffs on India "very substantially over the next 24 hours" because New Delhi is buying Russian oil and "fueling" the "war machine". India on Monday mounted an unusually sharp counterattack on the US and the European Union for their "unjustified and unreasonable" targeting of New Delhi for its procurement of Russian crude oil. New Delhi's response came after Trump asserted that Washington will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its energy ties with Russia. Meanwhile, Trump, in an interview with CNBC responded to a question on China and its leader, Xi Jinping, and said, "We have a very good relationship". Trump added that he might have a meeting with the Chinese President "before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal." He said he won't have a meeting if a deal doesn't materialise. "But we're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well." Trump added that China is "very reliant" on the US. "My relationship with them is very good. I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal." He added that he has had a "great relationship" with President Xi. "We respect him a lot. They respect us a lot." (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump ends Musk's ‘five things' rule for federal workers — why did the White House finally snap and pull the plug?
Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email program officially scrapped by Trump administration amid backlash and confusion- In a major move that reflects growing tension between President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, the Trump administration has officially ended Musk's controversial 'Five Things' email directive that had stirred widespread confusion and discontent across federal agencies. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a formal notice on August 5, 2025, revoking the program, marking a definitive shift away from Musk's once-celebrated push for government efficiency. Trump administration pulls the plug on Musk's 'Five Things' mandate The 'Five Things' initiative, introduced earlier this year under Elon Musk's short-lived leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), required all federal employees to send weekly emails listing five key accomplishments from their work. Originally promoted as a tool for enhancing productivity and accountability, the policy quickly became a source of confusion, frustration, and resistance across multiple government departments. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program In the official memo released this week, OPM Director Scott Kupor stated that federal supervisors already have the 'tools and flexibility needed' to evaluate employee performance, rendering Musk's email summaries redundant and ineffective. This announcement comes just months after Musk's high-profile departure from the federal government and a public falling-out with President Trump, who had initially championed the program but later distanced himself as implementation faltered. Why Elon Musk launched the 'Five Things' emails In January 2025, President Trump tapped Elon Musk to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a bold experiment aimed at reducing bureaucracy, slashing government costs, and streamlining federal operations. Musk, known for his disruptive business style at Tesla and SpaceX, wasted no time in pushing aggressive reforms. One of his first and most visible directives was the weekly 'Five Things' email rule. Live Events According to internal sources, Musk believed the practice would enhance workplace discipline, improve visibility into government functions, and cut down on inefficiencies. But what seemed like a simple accountability tool on the surface turned into a logistical headache for many government workers. Government agencies resisted Musk's rule early on As early as February 2025, signs of internal pushback began to surface. Agencies such as the Department of Defense, NASA, State Department, and Health and Human Services began advising employees to pause or disregard the directive entirely. Internal memos cited concerns about legal risks, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and conflicting chains of command. Some supervisors complained that the requirement added administrative burdens without delivering meaningful insights. Others argued that the centralized summaries violated existing agency reporting protocols. In fact, by April, many departments had already unofficially stopped enforcing the rule—even before Musk left his post. Trump's shifting tone on Musk and his government efficiency agenda Initially, President Trump praised Musk's approach, calling it 'ingenious' and a 'wake-up call for lazy bureaucracy.' But as criticism mounted and implementation faltered, the administration began quietly stepping back. By June, tensions between the two had boiled over. Trump publicly criticized Musk's handling of internal reforms and later revoked federal appointments aligned with Musk's DOGE team. Additionally, federal contracts involving Musk-owned companies like SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company came under review—further escalating the rift. The formal termination of the 'Five Things' policy now cements that rift, signaling the Trump administration's broader rejection of Musk-style micromanagement and automation-driven government models. OPM memo signals return to traditional oversight In the memo issued August 5, the Office of Personnel Management stated that agencies would now 'return to existing oversight mechanisms' that include performance reviews, project evaluations, and internal accountability metrics. 'This directive is no longer in effect,' the OPM memo read. 'We believe agency leadership is fully equipped with the tools necessary to assess team performance without weekly reporting mandates.' The Trump administration's move underscores its confidence in traditional supervisory structures—and a desire to minimize administrative chaos stirred up by Musk's reforms. Fallout from Musk's departure continues Musk's exit from government in late May followed a wave of resignations and infighting within DOGE. Critics called the agency 'chaotic' and 'visionless,' while supporters defended Musk's attempts to modernize Washington's outdated systems. Even after his departure, Musk remained vocal on social media, slamming what he called 'deep state resistance' to accountability and claiming that Trump 'betrayed the vision for real change.' Since then, he has focused on expanding his ventures in AI and space exploration, while DOGE has been largely sidelined within the administration. What the end of 'Five Things' means for federal workers For the more than 2 million federal employees affected by the weekly email directive, the repeal comes as a major relief. The program had added extra hours of unpaid administrative work and opened employees to new levels of scrutiny, according to union leaders. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) had been advocating for the policy to be scrapped, citing unfair labor practices and stress-related issues among staff. With this formal announcement, agencies can now focus on core mission work without the added burden of weekly summary submissions. Bigger picture: Is this the end of Musk's influence in Washington? The unraveling of Elon Musk's influence in Washington politics is now evident. From once being hailed as the face of 'Silicon Valley meets Capitol Hill,' Musk now finds himself on the outside looking in. His bold but divisive ideas—like algorithmic personnel tracking and AI-assisted departmental decision-making—failed to gain lasting traction. What's clear is that President Trump is reasserting control over his administration's direction, refocusing on efficiency through conventional oversight, and stepping back from experiments that stir more dysfunction than results. Trump draws line between innovation and disruption While innovation remains a key part of Trump's agenda for his second term, the administration has now drawn a clear line between meaningful reform and disruptive overreach. The end of Musk's 'Five Things' email rule symbolizes that shift. By formally terminating the program, the White House is sending a message: government reform must be functional, clear, and supported by institutional leadership—not just dictated by tech billionaires with grand visions. As 2025 moves forward, it's expected that the Trump administration will continue pushing for government modernization, but with greater respect for the realities of federal operations and agency autonomy. FAQs: Q1: Why did the Trump administration end Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email rule? Because it caused confusion, added workload, and was no longer seen as useful. Q2: What was Elon Musk's government email directive all about? It required federal workers to send weekly emails listing five things they accomplished.
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Disrespect to Mahatma's statue: HC quashes criminal proceedings against law student
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against a law student who had been charged with disrespecting a statue of Mahatma Gandhi on his college campus in Aluva in 2023. He had allegedly placed a pair of sunglasses and a Christmas wreath on the statue and added that 'Gandhi is long dead'. A video recording of this was also posted in WhatsApp groups of students, following which a complaint was lodged with the Principal. Subsequently, a criminal case was registered, and he was suspended from college for five days and directed to remit ₹5,000 as fine. Allowing the student's petition to quash the case, a Bench of Justice V.G. Arun said that the alleged act was undoubtedly immoral. But it cannot be termed as illegal in the absence of any law that prohibited such conduct or prescribed punishment for such conduct. The court said that every Indian citizen had the moral duty to respect freedom fighters who played a crucial role in liberating the country from colonial rule. It hastened to add that 'Our transition from 'native Indian subjects' to 'proud Indian citizens' wouldn't have been possible, but for the untiring and selfless crusade led by Mahatma Gandhi and other national leaders. To borrow the words of Will Durant, an American historian, not since Buddha has India so revered any man. Not since St. Francis of Assissi has any life known to history been so marked by gentleness, disinterestedness, simplicity of soul, and forgiveness of enemies. The preface became essential as this case is about a youngster, then a law student, who is facing prosecution on the allegation of having denigrated the image of Mahatma Gandhi,' the court said.
