
Scientists reveal exactly how many microplastic particles we inhale in our homes and cars every day – it's 100 times MORE than previous estimates
Now, a study has revealed just how many toxic particles are lurking in our homes and cars.
Scientists from the University of Toulouse collected air samples from their own homes as well as their cars in realistic driving conditions.
Their analysis revealed that adults inhale about 68,000 microplastics measuring 10 micrometers across or less every day – 100 times more than previous estimates suggested.
Worryingly, these particles are small enough to penetrate our lungs, according to the experts.
'Everywhere we look, we find microplastics, even in the air we breathe inside our homes and cars,' the team said.
'The biggest concern is how small these particles are – completely invisible to the naked eye. We inhale thousands of them every day without even realizing it.
'Deep inside our lungs, microplastics release toxic additives that reach our blood and cause multiple diseases.'
Previous studies have detected microplastics suspended in the air across a wide range of outdoor and indoor environments.
However, most research has focused on particles ranging in size from 20 to 200 micrometers.
In their new study, the team decided to focus on smaller particles ranging in size from one to 10 micrometers – which are more likely to penetrate the lungs.
The researchers collected air samples from their own apartments and cars, before using a technique called Raman spectroscopy to measure the concentrations of microplastics.
Their analysis revealed that the average concentration of microplastics in a home is 528 particles per cubic metre, while in cars it is 2,238 particles per cubic metre.
Almost all (94 per cent) of the particles were smaller than 10 micrometres.
By combining these results with previously published data on exposure to indoor microplastics, the researchers estimate that the average adult inhales about 3,200 microplastic particles ranging in size from 10 to 300 micrometres every day.
We also breathe in an estimated 68,000 particles of one to 10 micrometres – 10 times more than we previously thought.
'We found that over 90% of the microplastic particles in indoor air across both homes and cars were smaller than 10 µm, small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs,' the researchers said.
'This was also the first study to measure microplastics in the car cabin environment, and overall, we detected indoor concentrations up to 100 times higher than previous extrapolated estimates, revealing indoor air as a major and previously underestimated exposure route of fine particulate microplastic inhalation.'
Currently, research investigating how microplastics affect human health is in its infancy, but there is a growing body of evidence suggesting they could be harmful.
Since plastics contain chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, scientists are concerned that a buildup of microplastics could damage tissues in our bodies.
In rodent studies, exposure to high levels of microplastics has been found to damage organs, including the intestines, lungs, liver, and reproductive system.
In humans, early studies have suggested a potential link between microplastic exposure and conditions such as cardiovascular disease and bowel cancer.
HOW MUCH PLASTIC POLLUTION DO WE BREATHE IN PER DAY?
Plastic pollution has become so widespread that we may be inhaling up to 130 tiny pieces a day, research found.
Fibres from fleece and polyester clothing and particles from urban dust and car tyres are the biggest sources of so-called microplastics in the air.
The tiny specks are lighter than air and could cause asthma, heart disease and auto-immune conditions, the research, published in December 2017, found.
The study, a review of a number of recent plastics studies, revealed washing a single polyester garment can produce 1,900 plastic fibres.
This plastic pollution is on the rise as more and more synthetic clothing is produced.
While only people working with plastic fibres are known to develop respiratory problems, experts say the pollution is so widespread that it may now pose a risk to everyone's health.
The study's author, Dr Joana Correia Prata, of Fernando Pessoa University in Portugal, said: 'The evidence suggests that an individual's lungs could be exposed to between 26 and 130 airborne microplastics a day, which would pose a risk for human health, especially in susceptible individuals, including children.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Eating cumin can help reduce the risk of heart disease
Cumin, a versatile spice, is rich in antioxidants that can help reduce the risk of heart disease and other chronic illnesses. Grinding cumin seeds enhances the body's absorption of its beneficial vitamins (B, E) and minerals (iron, magnesium). Studies suggest cumin extract may alleviate symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and improve liver function in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Historically used for thousands of years, cumin has become one of the most widely used spices globally. While some research indicates potential benefits for weight loss and cholesterol reduction, dietitians note that more studies are required to confirm these effects. The ancient spice that reduces bloating - and could boost weight loss


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zara published photos of models who appeared to be ‘unhealthily thin'
Fashion giant Zara published 'socially irresponsible' photos of models who appeared to be unhealthily thin, the advertising watchdog has ruled. The two product listings on the Zara website in May featured an image of a model wearing an oversize pocket shirt and another of a model wearing a voluminous combined short dress. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received one complaint that the ads were irresponsible because the models appeared to be unhealthily thin. Zara said the models had worked for well-known and reputable fashion brands and confirmed that both models had medical certification which proved they were in good health. They said that none of the images had been modified, beyond very minor lighting and colouring edits. Zara confirmed that it had amended the product listings after receiving the complaint and removed the specific images. The ASA said the low-cut design of the shirt in the first ad drew attention to the model's upper chest area, creating a focal point around her collarbone, which was protruding. In addition, the positioning of her arms, while wearing a baggy shirt, created the impression that her arms, shoulders and chest were very slim. The ASA said: 'Overall, we considered that the pose of the model and the choice of clothing in the ad created the impression that the model was unhealthily thin.' The watchdog said the styling and lighting of the second image and the choice of clothing meant the ad created the impression that the model was unhealthily thin. The ASA said: 'For the above reasons, we concluded that the models… appeared unhealthily thin and that the ads were irresponsible.' A Zara UK spokesman said: 'We note the ASA's decision following an individual complaint regarding two images on our website which we removed when the ASA made us aware. 'We are committed to responsible content and follow stringent guidelines and controls in the selection and photographing of models, as well as in the selection of images.'


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Zara ads banned for featuring 'unhealthily thin' models
Two adverts by fashion brand Zara have been banned for featuring models who appeared "unhealthily thin".The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said shadows and a slick back bun hairstyle made one model appear "gaunt" while the pose and low cut design of a shirt in another image showed the model's "protruding" watchdog ruled that the "irresponsible" adverts must not appear again in their current form and that Zara must ensure all its images were "prepared responsibly."Zara has removed the adverts and said that both models in question had medical certification proving they were in good health when the pictures were taken. The two banned adverts previously appeared on the retailer's app and website in a carousel of images showing clothes on and off advert was for a short dress and the ASA felt shadows were used to make the models legs look "noticeably thin".It also said the positioning of her upper arms and elbow joints made her look "out of proportion." 'Protruding collarbones' The other banned advert was for a shirt and the model was said to be in a position that made "protruding" collarbones a "focal feature" of the ASA investigated two other Zara adverts but neither were chose to remove all the images flagged and said it had not received any direct retailer told the ASA that none of the images had been modified beyond "very minor lighting and colouring edits".It added that it followed recommendations of a report called Fashioning a Healthy Future, which was published in 2007 by the UK Model Health said it specifically complied with recommendation three of that report which said models "should provide a medical certificate attesting their good health from doctors with expertise in recognising eating disorders." It comes after adverts by other retailers were banned earlier this year for models being too July, an advert by Marks & Spencer was banned because the model appeared to be "unhealthily thin".The ASA said the pose of the model and the choice of clothing - including "large pointed shoes" which emphasised "the slenderness of her legs" - made the advert "irresponsible".Earlier this year, fellow retailer Next also had an advert for blue skinny jeans ASA said the advert emphasised the thinness of the model's legs using camera angles, and deemed it "irresponsible".Next said it disagreed with the advertising watchdog's decision and said the model, while slim, had a "healthy and toned physique".The Next advert ban left BBC readers asking why adverts showing models who appear unhealthily overweight are not banned.