German court rules at-risk Afghan family must be given visas
The new government under conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz has frozen the programme, but Berlin's administrative court said the family had been given a "legally binding" commitment and must be allowed to travel to Germany.
About 2,500 Afghans with similar approvals are estimated to be in Pakistan waiting to be able to travel to Germany.
The programme was set up for those who worked with Germany's army or other institutions in Afghanistan, as well as journalists and activists judged to be threatened by the Taliban.
However, the new government under Merz – who made a crackdown on immigration one of his key election pledges – has said in its coalition agreement it wants to end the programme "as far as possible".
The family concerned by Tuesday's decision is currently in Pakistan and had lodged an urgent appeal, telling the court they were about to be deported to Afghanistan where they would be in fear of their lives.
The family was given approval to come to Germany in 2023 under the programme. They then applied to the German embassy in Islamabad for visas, but these have not been issued.
The court said the government had the right "to decide whether and under what conditions the admission programme for Afghan nationals will be continued" and could "abstain from new approvals during this decision process".
But "it cannot release itself" from approvals which have already been given, it said.
According to the last update given about the scheme given in April 2024, more than 33,000 Afghans have travelled to Germany under the programme.
(om)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – The real story behind Europe's high energy bills
Critics who say expensive natural gas is the driving force behind Europe's high power bills have got it right – but miss the forest for the trees. Gas-fired power plants have a tight grip on Europe. Despite providing just 14% of electricity last year, they set the power price 40% of the time – making gas the decisive factor in calculating monthly energy bills. Lest we forget, our energy bills are around three times more expensive than in the US or China. However, don't let the very necessary fight against King Gas consume all the oxygen in the room. A power bill is usually split into three components: fuel (gas), grid costs and levies. Whilst the price of the fuel itself depends on international markets, there are still plenty of means by which Europe could bring consumer costs down. This is highlighted by the discrepancies in electricity bills across Europe. Take Austria, where the EU's 2000s market liberalisation simply failed and there is still 'no functioning national competitive market,' as the head of competition authority BWB has admitted. Instead, all the energy firms simply own shares in each other and local governments happily partake in the bonanza. Other issues affect all of Europe, like Paris blocking Spain from constructing cross-border cables to connect the sun-rich Iberian Peninsula to the European mainland – fearful of undermining the business case for nuclear (an industry French politicians back to the hilt). Even worse is Germany's infamous unitary electricity price zone – by which German politicians insist that electricity should cost the same in its wind-rich north and gas-reliant south, even though the cables to connect the two halves of the country do not exist. This has major ramifications for prices elsewhere in the bloc, the biggest loser being Denmark, where power prices are much higher because of competition from Bavaria. Similarly, the for-profit firms that manage electricity grids are usually the same companies that own the cables – allowing them a stranglehold on bill-payers. Whenever there is a bottleneck in the grid, companies usually just lay down more (expensive) copper cables, instead of opting for cheaper 'non-wire solutions', because at the end of the day, it's consumers who foot the bill. Meanwhile, a lack of regulatory oversight allows low-voltage grid operators (the ones who deliver power to households) to make a killing. A recent investigation in Germany found local monopolies earning up to 50% return on their investment in 2023 (ten times more than would be appropriate). A full account of the many factors inflating Europe's energy bills could fill a book. But the villain of the story wouldn't be gas itself, rather the pretence that gas is singularly responsible for our crippling energy bills. Much as they would have us believe otherwise, governments played a major role in getting Europe hooked on gas. Not only did they mismanage energy transitions (look no further than Germany's hopeless attempt to ditch coal and nuclear at the same time ), but they profit from our pain with high rates of VAT. Europe can't fix its gas woes overnight, but there are other levers it should pull. The Roundup De-risking, not de-coupling – Ursula von der Leyen said on Tuesday that the EU must accelerate efforts to 'de-risk' from China, warning that Beijing's control over critical supply chains like rare earth minerals, alongside support for Russia, pose a growing threat to Europe's economy and security. € in Bulgaria – EU finance ministers gave the final green light on Tuesday for Bulgaria to adopt the euro on the first day of January 2026, nearly 19 years after the country joined the European Union. Parliamentary probe – The European Public Prosecutor's Office has launched a formal investigation into allegations of misusing over €4.3 million of EU funds by Identity and Democracy, a defunct far-right group in the European Parliament that included France's Rassemblement National, a spokesperson for EPPO said on Tuesday. Across Europe Embargoing nowhere – Spain's promise for an arms embargo on Israel faces continued hurdles, as the country continues to import weapons and utilise Israeli military technology in domestic production, and political divisions over the matter deepen. Anonymous immunisation – Public vaccination registration in the Netherlands is being impacted by a rise in anonymous data reporting and a decline in vaccination rates in specific demographics, according to the Dutch Public Health Institute, making it difficult for the organisation to provide exact vaccination rates. A migration loss for Merz – A German court ruled Tuesday that the government must issue visas to an Afghan family previously accepted under a programme for those at risk after the Taliban seized power in 2021, which was frozen by Merz's new government.
Euractiv
9 hours ago
- Euractiv
German court rules at-risk Afghan family must be given visas
A German court ruled Tuesday that the government must issue visas to an Afghan family previously accepted under a programme for those at risk after the Taliban seized power in 2021. The new government under conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz has frozen the programme, but Berlin's administrative court said the family had been given a "legally binding" commitment and must be allowed to travel to Germany. About 2,500 Afghans with similar approvals are estimated to be in Pakistan waiting to be able to travel to Germany. The programme was set up for those who worked with Germany's army or other institutions in Afghanistan, as well as journalists and activists judged to be threatened by the Taliban. However, the new government under Merz – who made a crackdown on immigration one of his key election pledges – has said in its coalition agreement it wants to end the programme "as far as possible". The family concerned by Tuesday's decision is currently in Pakistan and had lodged an urgent appeal, telling the court they were about to be deported to Afghanistan where they would be in fear of their lives. The family was given approval to come to Germany in 2023 under the programme. They then applied to the German embassy in Islamabad for visas, but these have not been issued. The court said the government had the right "to decide whether and under what conditions the admission programme for Afghan nationals will be continued" and could "abstain from new approvals during this decision process". But "it cannot release itself" from approvals which have already been given, it said. According to the last update given about the scheme given in April 2024, more than 33,000 Afghans have travelled to Germany under the programme. (om)
Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany moves towards drafting men for compulsory military service
BERLIN – Germany is set to revive a form of mandatory military service under a new draft law championed by Defence Minister Boris Pistorius in a controversial shift in Berlin's defence policy. Germany had abolished compulsory conscription in 2011, but Pistorius has lobbied for under both the current and previous governments, citing the need to make Germany 'ready for war' in light of the growing threat from Russia. The proposed system, inspired by Sweden's model, will initially rely on volunteers but include mandatory elements, German magazine Der Spiegel reported on Monday. The plan would require all men turning 18 after 31 December 2007 to complete online questionnaires detailing personal information and interest in serving, followed by invitations to official in-person screenings and potential conscription for some men. Should the voluntary enlistment fall short, the German parliament could authorise compulsory conscription based on Germany's defence needs. Pistorius hopes to have some 30,000 volunteers a year by 2029, with improved conditions and monthly compensation of over €2,000, a rise of 80%. However, that target is only half of the 60,000 the minister previously cited as necessary to meet NATO capability requirements. The draft law puts the required peace-time size at 203,000, up from currently 181,000 troops. The plan also aims to expand Germany's pool of reservists to 200,000. Sticking points The move to include compulsory elements is highly controversial. Pistorius's attempt to introduce such a law since 2023, led by his Social Democrats (SPD), failed due to staunch resistance from his own party and the Free Democrats (FDP), their coalition partner. While Merz's Christian Democrats are in favour of compulsory service, the SPD remains sceptical. In 2024, Pistorius could only narrowly avert a motion from the party's youth wing that would have called to oppose any compulsory military service.
