logo
Parents In Other Countries Do This 1 Thing — And American Kids Might Be Missing Out.

Parents In Other Countries Do This 1 Thing — And American Kids Might Be Missing Out.

Yahoo5 hours ago
My son, age 14, loves watching the Japanese show 'Old Enough' on Netflix. The premise is that young children — ages 4, 3 and even 2 — are sent to run errands by themselves. Cleverly disguised camera crews trail them on their journeys while their parents wait for them at home or some other predetermined meeting point. The kids walk though neighborhoods, cross the street, navigate public transit and manage interactions with shopkeepers. One little girl carries her mother's work pants to be mended. Another child purchases dumplings from a vendor.
The children's focus and determination is captivating, and it's impossible not to become invested in their success at the task. The kids are also adorable. Their reactions and facial expressions regularly crack my son up. But that isn't the show's only allure. The sheer implausibility of the whole endeavor draws him in.
'You would've never let me do something like this,' he observed. 'You would've been freaking out.'
He's not wrong. When he was 3, I likely would've sent him hang gliding before allowing him to cross the street alone. But my parenting instincts aren't just a product of my own neuroses. They're part of a culture, and here in the U.S. we've developed a culture of overprotectiveness and fear when it comes to kids acting independently.
By keeping them safely within arms' reach, what are our kids missing out on? And what are some ways we could give them the opportunity to practice these vital life skills?
What kids' independence looks like in other countries.
Japan isn't the only nation where you can find kids navigating a town's streets and public transportation without adult supervision.
Mei-Ling Hopgood lived in Argentina as a new mother, writing about the experience in her book 'How Eskimos Keep Their Babies Warm,' in which she explores parenting practices around the globe. She noted that it was common in Argentina and in other countries to see children commuting to and from school without adults.
In some places, the reasons behind this particular independence are structural. Not all families have cars, so the only options may be walking, biking or taking public transit.
Another factor is parents' level of trust in their community. When they send their kids out of the house, do they assume they will be safe and that the adults they interact with will be helpful and trustworthy?
In Argentina, Hopgood saw signs of trust in the community of surrounding adults.
'If a child is crossing the street, not with a parent, or if an older person is crossing the street and needs help, they will take your hands. For example, when I would take the girls back to Argentina when they were little, the drivers that would pick us up, a man they did not know, would take their hands and walk them to the car,' she said, much to the surprise of her daughters, who by then were living in the U.S.
'The thinking [is] that adults are there to help you,' Hopgood told HuffPost. This includes men and even men you don't know, and was a real shift from the 'stranger danger' panic that permeated her American childhood. It was 'notable to me because of the bias against men being nurturing people, or they are the strangers you should be afraid of.'
Journalist Michaeleen Doucleff observed a similar kind of autonomy among the Maya, Inuit and Hadzabe children that she observed when researching her book 'Hunt, Gather, Parent.'
Children in these cultures, she told HuffPost, 'have enormous freedom to decide where they go, what they do and who they're with. Parents and older kids are around them, observing and ensuring they are safe. But generally their movements and actions are their own.'
Again, there is a shared assumption that children are safe moving throughout the community.
This autonomy extends to kids setting their own schedules — deciding when do go to bed, for example (an often fraught topic for American parents that has generated the profession of sleep consultant). In general, kids were entrusted with a multitude of what an American would likely consider 'adult' responsibilities: 'They use knives and the stove. They help take care of younger siblings (playing with them, changing diapers, feeding them). They take care of animals or a family garden. They learn to hunt, slaughter/butcher animals, make clothes. They work at local stores. They climb trees, gather firewood or forage for food,' Doucleff said.
This trust in children's ability to handle things includes managing their emotions and speaking for themselves. 'They are allowed to get upset, have tantrums, without being scolded or forced to control their emotions very early,' Doucleff said. In addition, she said, 'parents allow children to talk for themselves' rather than answering questions directed at them on their behalf or prompting them with what to say.
Other cultures also have a higher tolerance for risk when it comes to kids' behavior. Helen Russell, author of the forthcoming 'The Danish Secret to Happy Kids' (released already in Britain as 'How to Raise a Viking'), observed in Denmark that children often take risks in their extensive outdoor play and are expected to resolve conflicts among themselves when they arise.
Likewise, children speak for themselves and are expected to dress themselves (including the all-important snowsuit!) and feed themselves, rather than being told by adults what to say, what to wear and when and what to eat.
Danish children, Russell told HuffPost, are allowed to pretty much 'roam free,' and the same is true in other Nordic countries. 'Icelandic children are all allowed to roam free until a state-sanctioned 'curfew' in the summer holidays, when Iceland enjoys 24-hour sun. So, come July, 13- to 16-year-olds are allowed to run wild until midnight, while children up to the age of 12 get to hang out until 10 p.m.,' she said.
Why it's important to foster kids' independence.
Letting children travel about, do chores and play without interference from adults can allow the adults more time to get their own work done and might seem to require less effort. Doucleff, however, noted that it's not that parents are letting their children go unattended. 'Adults keep a close eye to ensure kids are safe. So it's not about simply doing less.'
The key difference, she explained, is that 'parents don't interfere with children's actions and movements, especially during play.'
Kids, not adults, are the ones who truly reap the rewards of this dynamic. 'Lack of autonomy is strongly associated with anxiety and depression,' Doucleff said, while 'high levels of autonomy are linked to confidence, drive and all-around better mental health. In the communities I visited in 'Hunt, Gather, Parent,' children had these in spades.'
Autonomy, she explained, 'enables children to learn adult skills ... . So they can be active contributors to their families and not simply attended to by their parents.'
We know that being able to contribute meaningfully can help kids feel a sense of mattering, which is protective of their mental health. Knowing that adults trust them to get from one place to another or use the kitchen knives helps them believe in their own abilities and gives them opportunities to 'learn on their own, make mistakes on their own,' Hopgood said. Experience teaches them that they can figure things out for themselves and overcome challenges.
Russell explained that all the outdoor play kids engage in in Denmark, in spite of frigid weather, also has a positive effect on their well-being.
'Studies show that spending time outdoors improves well-being and cooperation, reduces stress, helps with concentration and evens out differences between low-achieving and high-achieving children,' she said.
Hopgood, a journalism professor at Northwestern University, noted that here in the U.S. we are beginning to see the effect of a lack of independence once these children head off to college. 'Students coming to university, [their] maturity and responsibility level is years below what they were some years ago. Because of many reasons, but parents have done so much for them.' Without practice, kids lack problem-solving skills and confidence in their ability to tackle challenges without their parents' help.
Ways parents can help kids gain independence.
There's no need to move all the way to Latin America or Scandinavia to help your kids learn independence. Some communities, by their design, are more conducive to kids' autonomy than others, and some places are also simply safer. But even within the confines of your own home, there are steps you can take to encourage this growth.
'It's about having confidence in children's ability to learn and grow at a young age without the need for constant interference from adults,' Doucleff said.
Doucleff measured her own interference in her children's lives by counting how many times per hour she gave them commands. ('Eat two more bites, please.' 'Give me the ball.') She initially found that this number was 120 — which is in line with what most kids experience in Western cultures.
'In cultures with autonomous children, parents give only two to three commands per hour. So a hundred times fewer! It's radically different than the approach that's common in the U.S.,' she said.
She encourages parents to use their cellphones to record their own interactions with their children and count the number of commands they are giving now and make a goal of getting that number down to three per hour.
You can start slow, by having a low-command hour just once a day, perhaps at the playground.
She also recommends that parents take some time to observe their children. 'See what their interests are but also their skill level. Then you know when to back off and be confident that they've got the situation handled or when to jump in to help if they need it.'
Focus on building up their independence in a specific domain by 'teaching them skills they need to handle any dangers or problems that may arise in these environments,' such as using knives and electrical plugs, crossing streets or watching for cars. 'Then schedule time in their week to simply be autonomous in these environments (without devices),' she said.
You don't have to start by letting them roam free all afternoon. Instead, you might begin by letting them walk home from school with a sibling or group of friends. If they're interested in cooking, you could plan to let them make breakfast for themselves on Saturday mornings.
'A little goes a long way,' Doucleff said. 'Just adding a few hours of autonomy each week will help your child immensely. You'll see a huge difference in their anxiety, behavior and overall confidence and self-sufficiency.'
Related...
What Is Child Endangerment? When Leaving Your Child Alone Becomes A Crime.
9 Parenting Practices From Around The World That May Totally Surprise You
11 Seemingly Innocent Phrases You Shouldn't Say To Kids
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sorry, Jelly Roll: WWE SummerSlam showed yet again why we shouldn't write off celebrity crossovers prematurely
Sorry, Jelly Roll: WWE SummerSlam showed yet again why we shouldn't write off celebrity crossovers prematurely

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sorry, Jelly Roll: WWE SummerSlam showed yet again why we shouldn't write off celebrity crossovers prematurely

Seth Rollins may have delivered the swerve of the night in New Jersey, but there was one other spot Saturday at WWE SummerSlam Night 1 which shocked us on the Uncrowned desk: The moment when first-time WWE competitor Jelly Roll was smashed through the announcer table following a leapfrog splash from Logan Paul. 'That was probably the biggest celebrity bump we have ever seen,' was the immediate takeaway from our own Anthony Sulla-Heffinger, and I don't think you'll find anyone to argue with that. Indeed it may very well have been the most high-adrenaline spot of the whole three-and-a-half hour show. Not bad for a man who only started wrestling training this year. If you spend any time on social media, you'll know that WWE takes a bit of flak for these celebrity cameos. For a certain type of purist, these kinds of publicity moves are the antithesis of what they think pro-wrestling should be — even if the WWE has now repeatedly shown that it can turn celebrities (at least some of them) into credible sports entertainers. You don't have to be a sports media analyst to see why WWE is so keen to work with these celebrities in the first place. When Bad Bunny first appeared at WrestleMania 37, Nick Khan claimed WWE saw a 30% jump in its Spanish-speaking viewership — and that was before Bunny's famous street fight at Backlash, which rightly was regarded as one of the matches of the year. The social media explosion has only provided more metrics for the likes of Nick Khan to get excited. Let's not forget that the clip of IShowSpeed being speared by Bron Breakker — the one that nearly broke the influencer in half — in this year's Royal Rumble generated more than 300 million views on X alone. If the price of getting that many eyes on the product is irritating a few older fans, you can see why WWE doesn't care about the latter. Of course, these celebrity crossovers aren't exactly risk-free. Earlier this year, we saw WWE bet big on Travis Scott, even making him the pivotal player in the WrestleMania 41 finale — a creative plan that was shot down by pretty much every wrestling pundit within minutes of its execution. As with a lot of things in wrestling, there is only so far you can go with the crowd against you. Now the reports are that WWE and Travis Scott have fallen out (even if he remains a close contact of TKO supremo Ari Emanuel), bringing his involvement to an unceremonious end. Likewise, Jelly Roll's first cameo — back at SummerSlam 2024 — drew some justified criticism for the way in which he effortlessly demolished two full-time wrestlers, thus potentially undermining the craft in the eyes of the casual viewer. But last night showed that WWE has learned its lesson on that front. (Though, arguably, they are still massively under-booking Austin Theory and Grayson Waller…) Sure, Jelly Roll might not quite have the prodigious talent of Bad Bunny and Logan Paul — surely WWE's most successful celebrity crossovers — but it was clear Saturday that he's been putting in the work on his training. That allowed WWE to script a plausible tag match around his involvement, and to set up that incredible table spot. Don't be surprised if we see him returning to the ring again before long, particularly given the unexpected finish. That's a very different ballgame to Cardi B, whose involvement as host was much smaller than expected. There had been whispers she might be involved somehow in the Jade Cargill match — perhaps with the two of them holding up the belt to celebrate at the end — but those went out of the window when Tiffany Stratton scored her surprise win. By the mid-point of the show, you could have forgotten she was even there. It isn't like WWE won't be smiling either way. For those unaware, the rapper currently boasts some 164 million followers on Instagram and 286 million likes on TikTok. By comparison, Roman Reigns and Rhea Ripley have Instagram followings of 10 million and 6 million respectively (though The Rock dwarfs all of them together with 393 million). Those kinds of numbers aren't just translating to more views for WWE's product, it's also adding ammunition to WWE's own marketing pitch, particularly when it comes to getting host cities to pay for events. We know from their WrestleMania pitch-deck that they make a big deal of their social media viewership. 'It's incredible, the amount of [famous] people that want to be involved,' said Triple H, speaking on a podcast earlier this year. Then again, it isn't like the enthusiasm only flows one way, given the treatment that WWE happily dishes out to its preferred celebrity partners. The rapper Breland apparently had his own private dressing room in return for a brief crowd cutaway shot at Saturday night's show. When you hear stuff like that, it's easy to be cynical, particularly when you factor in how few actual WWE signees would ever be awarded the same treatment. But last night's table splash spot reminded even us more cantankerous fans that we shouldn't write off these celebrity crossovers entirely. If the celebrities and influencers are willing to take bumps like that and get SummerSlam promoted on "The Jimmy Kimmel Show"? Well, then we might just have a reason to be excited next time Nick Khan gets another A-lister in his sights for a future stadium show.

The Deeper Meaning Behind the 'My Oxford Year' Ending Montage
The Deeper Meaning Behind the 'My Oxford Year' Ending Montage

Elle

timean hour ago

  • Elle

The Deeper Meaning Behind the 'My Oxford Year' Ending Montage

Spoilers below. The coming-of-age genre loves to make its characters choose between a relationship and their future. We're seeing it in The Summer I Turned Pretty, with Belly abandoning plans to study in Paris to stay with her fiancé, Jeremiah (who didn't want her to go anyway). Earlier this spring, we saw it in Forever: Justin wants to go with Keisha to Howard University, but she'd prefer that they have their own experiences. There are many other instances of this in pop culture, usually with the girl choosing a boy over her dreams. Cosmopolitan recently pointed out examples in The Hills, Boy Meets World, and more. (And let's not forget how Nate became the villain in The Devil Wears Prada for trying to keep Andy from her job.) Watching these relationships as the audience, it might be easy to scold the women who choose the boy. Like, Girl, stand up! He is not worth it! My Oxford Year, Netflix's newest romance film, complicates that decision with life-or-death stakes. The movie stars Sofia Carson (the streamer's go-to leading lady) as Anna, a big dreamer and type-A planner who takes a gap year to fulfill her childhood fantasy of attending Oxford University. Once she's done with her poetry course, she has a high-profile finance job waiting for her back in the States. But then she falls for her hot professor, Jamie Davenport (Queen Charlotte's Corey Mylchreest), who messes up her plans. Despite their undeniable mutual attraction, Jamie wants to avoid getting into a committed relationship with Anna. Not because he's emotionally unavailable, but because he has terminal cancer and doesn't want to break her heart. He has even opted to not take further treatment, despite his family's objections. Still, he and Anna can't resist each other, and they go for it anyway. They are so in love that Anna finds herself facing a critical decision: Should she still go back to the U.S. for her Goldman Sachs job, or should she stay in the U.K. with Jamie to help take care of him and keep him company for however much time he has left? An integral factor in this situation is that Jamie vehemently does not want Anna to stay. She has such a bright future ahead of her; she shouldn't give it up for a guy she just met and who won't be around for much longer. 'I would never make you make such a bloody stupid decision,' he tells her, also pointing out that there isn't much career growth if she decides to work at the university. When Anna tells him she isn't taking the Goldman job after all, he's furious. But Anna and Jamie's relationship has been quite eye-opening for her. Throughout their time together, her lifelong love for poetry and literature has only deepened. She expresses her dreams of traveling the world. She loves the Henry David Thoreau quote, 'Live life deliberately,' which has long inspired her to plan out every detail of her trajectory. But after encountering Jamie and his carpe diem approach to life, she realizes perhaps Thoreau was referring to something else. Living deliberately is not about planning everything, but about 'being definite about every small moment,' she says in the film. And what is life but not a series of moments? At the end of My Oxford Year, Anna and Jamie make up from their argument and spend the night together, but Anna wakes up to find Jamie nearly unconscious. He has a critical case of pneumonia that will likely kill him. At the hospital, the doctor wants to discuss next steps for treatment with Jamie's parents, but they decide to honor his wishes and let nature take its course. Back at home, lying on what is now Jamie's death bed, he and Anna talk about her future. Now that she's stayed in the U.K., she can go on the 'grand tour' she's always dreamed of. The itinerary includes Amsterdam, to see a hidden chapel; Paris, to get drunk by the Seine; Venice, to ride a gondola; and Greece, to see the Temple of Poseidon and swim in the Aegean Sea. As Anna plans her travels aloud, a tender montage of her and Jamie visiting these sites appears onscreen—until, in the end, it's revealed that she was alone the whole time. When the film jumps back to Jamie and Anna on the bed, it appears he has died right beside her. She might not have Jamie physically with her when she goes on her dream trip, but she does take his lessons and worldview with her as she moves forward with her life. As Carson previously told ELLE, their relationship 'changes her forever and for the better,' because she learns to 'lean into what brings her joy and what always was the love of her life, and that was poetry and literature.' Sure enough, in the film's final scene, Anna is now a professor at Oxford, teaching a poetry class of her own. My Oxford Year argues that choosing your love is choosing your future—especially if that love helps you achieve the dreams you were too scared to chase. In a sense, it eliminates the decision entirely, because you can have both; you can have your cake and eat it too. It's very romantic, it's melodramatic, and it's definitely rare, but it works in the context of a sappy, two-hour Netflix film with Sylvia Plath references and idyllic English settings. But in the cases of Belly from TSITP or Lauren from The Hills (who are both 'the girl who didn't go to Paris'), or any experience rooted deeper in reality, it's not quite the same. Those decisions, and the men involved, require a little more... deliberating.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store