MPs urge ministers to introduce long-awaited rules on supply chain deforestation
Under the previous Government's proposals, businesses will be prohibited from using or selling goods containing palm oil, cocoa, beef, leather and soy linked to deforestation.
This due diligence system was part of the 2021 Environment Act but ministers are yet to bring forward the necessary secondary legislation or set a timetable for when they will do so.
EAC chairman Toby Perkins asked Mr Reed to set out a specific date for introducing the legislation 'ideally before the New Year' so that the rules can be in place for the new financial year in April.
The letter said: 'Delays in bringing forward this legislation makes the Cop15 agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, and the UK's commitment to ending deforestation and forest degradation by 2030, harder to achieve.
'However, it also leaves businesses with uncertainty and will leave them with less time to prepare and comply with the regime.
'On 2 June, in your response to the Committee, you recognised the urgency of taking action to ensure forest risk commodities are not driving deforestation and stated you would set out the Government approach in due course.'
Several British supermarkets recently warned that they are in 'limbo' waiting for the Government to introduce the new rules.
In an open letter earlier this month, retailers such as Tesco, Sainsbury's and Lidl said deforestation presents an increasing risk to supply chain stability as well as food security.
But they also said the UK could suffer millions in export losses to the European Union if Government inaction leaves businesses unprepared to comply with the bloc's own deforestation rules, which are due to come into force at the end of this year.
Asked recently whether the Government has a timetable for introducing the legislation, the Environment Secretary told the PA news agency: 'Currently no, but we are working at pace so we can do this as quickly as possible.'
On the supermarkets' letter and whether the Government is looking to speed up progress on introducing the rules, Mr Reed said: 'Absolutely.'
'I agree with the supermarkets,' he said. 'The previous Government was just dragging their heels without ever coming to a conclusion about what we do about protecting forests in other countries as well as in our own country.
'And of course forests, trees, woodlands were very important for capturing carbon and cleaning the atmosphere so we don't want to be importing food that has been grown where the forests have been destroyed.
'The Government is working with supermarkets, with food producers and internationally to make sure we get the outcome and we can do that as soon as possible to give everybody certainty about how we move forward on this.'
PA has contacted the Environment Department for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man City verdict on 100+ charges could be months away with further delays in sight
Club executives and senior football figures believe that the Manchester City case could still go until at least October before the initial outcome, as the controversy threatens to complicate another Premier League season. Some club leaders have even speculated that it might arrive in the campaign's second international break, from 4-18 October, given previous patterns regarding similar cases. An outcome was expected last season, given that the hearing concluded in early December. It has nevertheless rumbled on into the summer, and means another season faces the weight of potential upheaval and drastic change through possible points deductions. Manchester City stridently insist upon their innocence. Actual details of the process have been kept under lock and key, with only those directly involved knowing exactly how it is going, due to the sensitivity of the case. The charges involve accusations of City breaching football's financial regulations, and Freedom of Information requests revealed that the British embassy in Abu Dhabi discussed the case. Bloomberg even reported that UAE officials raised the charges in a meeting with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy in 2024, but Lammy said it was a matter for the Premier League. Insiders with knowledge of certain aspects of the investigation are nevertheless predicting a September-October outcome, with some believing it will come in one of the international breaks. The initial outcome of City's Associated Party Transaction case ended up arriving on 7 October 2024, which was at the start of that period's Fifa window. Such stances have nevertheless been subject to change, given there was previously a widespread view that the initial decisions would be published around Easter, and the end of April. The controversy - which has now been ongoing since the initial Der Spiegel "Football Leaks" in November 2018 and resulted in the Premier League announcing 100+ charges in February 2023 - is commonly seen as an "existential moment" for the league and the wider game regardless of outcome. Premier League insiders say it has also had another effect, which is in delaying proper governance. Clubs are now unwilling to push through or even suggest any major changes in the running of the competition, due to the belief that the outcome of the case could change absolutely everything. There is also a split between clubs regarding what should happen if the most severe charges are proven and City are punished. While a minority would push for outright expulsion in such an event, that is seen as unlikely since it would require a special shareholder vote and a majority of 15 clubs. Other clubs are more in favour of a potential punishment allowing everyone to get on with it, as they feel the controversy is now causing undue damage to the Premier League. That very view is nevertheless seen by other executives as a concerted "tactic" by City, since the stakeholders are more likely to become fatigued by the process the longer it goes on. Another split revolves around the idea of "a stay" in the event of a potential City punishment, and whether the club face sanctions straight away or after an appeal. One senior club executive told The Independent that there is unlikely to be any tangible change to anything for even a year after the initial outcome, due to the various stages of the process as well as possible appeals. As it is, City themselves are understood to be "confident" they will be cleared.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bat delaying our new car park, says Games Workshop
The plastic miniatures manufacturer behind the Warhammer table-top game has revealed that a single bat is holding up its expansion plans. On Tuesday, Games Workshop said a common pipistrelle microbat had been found on a site near the company's Nottingham headquarters where bosses are trying to build a new car park. The winged creatures – generally small enough to fit into a matchbox – are protected by law, meaning developers must put in place mitigations when disrupting their habitats. Games Workshop said the temporary new car park was being created at its sprawling campus headquarters on a Nottingham industrial estate, which houses two manufacturing plants as well as the Warhammer World hobby shop. The FTSE 100 company revealed the bat problem as it provided an update on its finances to investors, assuring them things looked 'solid' despite some disruption from Donald Trump's tariffs in the US. It said things were 'in line with our detailed operational plans and policies', before adding: 'The exception was the news about tariffs and the cute-looking pipistrelle bat that is delaying our work on our new temporary car park. 'We are carefully looking after the bat and we hope the uncertainty around tariffs is resolved soon.' Planning battle It comes after Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, complained that planning rules were holding back the economy. She said businesses should be able to 'focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about the bats and the newts'. HS2, the rail mega-project, also sparked controversy when it emerged that £100m had been spent on a 1km-long 'bat shed' designed to protect a colony of bats from 225mph trains. The tunnel-like structure covers tracks near Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire. However, under reforms of regulators announced in March, ministers have taken aim at what they say are disproportionate bat-related restrictions. At the time Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, said: 'It should not be the case that to convert a garage or outbuilding you need to wade through hundreds of pages of guidance on bats. 'Environmental guidance, including on protecting bats, will be looked at afresh. 'Natural England has agreed to review and update their advice to Local Planning Authorities on bats to ensure there is clear, proportionate and accessible advice available.' Under the changes, the Government ordered Natural England, the nature watchdog, to remove all references to the Bat Conservation Trust from its guidance. The trust has hit back, arguing it is false to suggest 'that in order to grow the economy we must sacrifice our natural heritage'. A statement published by the group in January said: 'Pitting nature against development is dangerous, irresponsible and unnecessary. 'The language being used by government ministers is divisive and ignores the pragmatic and sustainable ways that could be used to build more homes and infrastructure. 'Rather than using soundbite politics, it is time for the Government to work with Bat Conservation Trust and others to find pragmatic solutions that will benefit the economy, society and wildlife.'
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Mercedes-Benz and Porsche flag €800m in combined costs from Trump tariffs
Update: Date: 2025-07-30T07:01:00.000Z Title: Mercedes-Benz, Porsche and Aston Martin count steep cost of US tariffs Content: Good morning, and welcome to our live coverage of business, economics and financial markets. Car companies around the world are laying out the cost of Donald Trump's trade war, with Mercedes-Benz saying tariffs will cost it €362m (£313m) while German sportscar maker Porsche saying it would cost €400m. British sportscar manufacturer Aston Martin Lagonda also said that it cut production and limited exports to the US to try to limit the financial impact. Mercedes-Benz said the tariffs were 'causing great uncertainty', and had hit sales, which dropped 9% year-on-year to 453,700 units in the second quarter. Reuters reported that Mercedes said tariffs would cut profits by about 1.5 percentage points, equivalent to a tariff effect of €362m on the division's adjusted operating profit. Ola Källenius, Mercedes-Benz's chief executive, said: We achieved robust financial results in the second quarter given the dynamic business environment. The best response is to stay on course to deliver desirable and intelligent products, while keeping a tight grip on costs. Porsche said the introduction of increased US import tariffs resulted in additional costs of €400m in the first half of the year as the company protected customers from price increases. The effect of Trump's trade war was also evident in the UK, where Aston Martin was forced to cut back production and run down stocks at US dealers in order to avoid the tariffs of 27.5%. Those have now been reduced to 10% under the UK's trade deal with the US – although only for the first 100,000 exports on a first-come, first-served basis. Adrian Hallmark, Aston Martin's chief executive, said: The evolving and disruptive US tariff situation was unhelpful to our operations in the second quarter. In response, we adjusted production and limited imports through April and May while awaiting confirmation of a trade agreement between the UK and the US, leveraging existing inventory held by our US dealers in that period. We resumed shipments to the US in June in anticipation of a finalised agreement which came into effect on 30 June 2025. We continue to actively engage the UK government to urge them to improve the quota mechanism to ensure fair access for the whole UK car industry to the 10% rate on an ongoing basis. 9am BST: Germany GDP growth rate (second quarter; previous: 0.4%; consensus: -0.1%) 9am BST: Italy GDP growth rate (second quarter; prev.: 0.3%; consensus: 0.2%) 10am BST: Eurozone GDP growth rate (second quarter; prev.: 0.6%; consensus: 0%) 10am BST: Eurozone economic sentiment index (July; prev.: 94 points; consensus: 94.5) 1:30pm BST: US GDP growth rate (second quarter annualised; prev.: -0.5%; consensus: 2.4%)
