Mercedes-Benz and Porsche flag €800m in combined costs from Trump tariffs
Date: 2025-07-30T07:01:00.000Z
Title: Mercedes-Benz, Porsche and Aston Martin count steep cost of US tariffs
Content: Good morning, and welcome to our live coverage of business, economics and financial markets.
Car companies around the world are laying out the cost of Donald Trump's trade war, with Mercedes-Benz saying tariffs will cost it €362m (£313m) while German sportscar maker Porsche saying it would cost €400m.
British sportscar manufacturer Aston Martin Lagonda also said that it cut production and limited exports to the US to try to limit the financial impact.
Mercedes-Benz said the tariffs were 'causing great uncertainty', and had hit sales, which dropped 9% year-on-year to 453,700 units in the second quarter. Reuters reported that Mercedes said tariffs would cut profits by about 1.5 percentage points, equivalent to a tariff effect of €362m on the division's adjusted operating profit.
Ola Källenius, Mercedes-Benz's chief executive, said:
We achieved robust financial results in the second quarter given the dynamic business environment. The best response is to stay on course to deliver desirable and intelligent products, while keeping a tight grip on costs.
Porsche said the introduction of increased US import tariffs resulted in additional costs of €400m in the first half of the year as the company protected customers from price increases.
The effect of Trump's trade war was also evident in the UK, where Aston Martin was forced to cut back production and run down stocks at US dealers in order to avoid the tariffs of 27.5%. Those have now been reduced to 10% under the UK's trade deal with the US – although only for the first 100,000 exports on a first-come, first-served basis.
Adrian Hallmark, Aston Martin's chief executive, said:
The evolving and disruptive US tariff situation was unhelpful to our operations in the second quarter. In response, we adjusted production and limited imports through April and May while awaiting confirmation of a trade agreement between the UK and the US, leveraging existing inventory held by our US dealers in that period.
We resumed shipments to the US in June in anticipation of a finalised agreement which came into effect on 30 June 2025. We continue to actively engage the UK government to urge them to improve the quota mechanism to ensure fair access for the whole UK car industry to the 10% rate on an ongoing basis.
9am BST: Germany GDP growth rate (second quarter; previous: 0.4%; consensus: -0.1%)
9am BST: Italy GDP growth rate (second quarter; prev.: 0.3%; consensus: 0.2%)
10am BST: Eurozone GDP growth rate (second quarter; prev.: 0.6%; consensus: 0%)
10am BST: Eurozone economic sentiment index (July; prev.: 94 points; consensus: 94.5)
1:30pm BST: US GDP growth rate (second quarter annualised; prev.: -0.5%; consensus: 2.4%)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump's latest Liberation Day means another dark day for America
Precisely what poor, benighted Syria and prosperous, neutral Switzerland have done to deserve US tariffs of 41 per cent and 39 per cent respectively is hard to discern. Neither is the kind of industrial superpower that represents a threat to America's economic hegemony, and both would, in their different ways, prefer to stay on reasonably good terms with the Trump White House. It is, sadly, easier to see why Canada got whacked with a 35 per cent levy on some of its exports – and Donald Trump's tariff tactics do have a hint of the mob about them. Mr Trump suggested that Canada's decision to recognise the state of Palestine as a sovereign nation would make it harder to achieve a trade deal, and he also mentioned the scourge of fentanyl. But then again, Mexico, which has also recognised Palestine and is by far the more important source of the drug, has been granted a 90-day tariff reprieve. Ever since the opening salvo in the Trump tariff war on 2 April – so-called Liberation Day – the shifting schedules and random pauses have lacked both rhyme and reason. Even at the time, their supposed 'reciprocity' was ridiculed. They have generated huge uncertainty, and, for a time, did so much damage to the dollar and US Treasuries on the capital markets that even Mr Trump had to make a tactical retreat. In fact, the US president's observed tendency to cave in whenever a trading 'partner' showed any sign of resistance led to the unwelcome 'Taco' sobriquet – 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Some countries, such as the UK, Japan and the EU member states, have breathed a sigh of relief that they have escaped the worst, while others – often impoverished ones with no diplomatic leverage, such as Bangladesh and Lesotho – will find it difficult to cope with tariffs that are now considered moderate, but would have seemed shocking even a few years ago. Yet the game, even now, is not over. China – the second-largest economy in the world, and America's most formidable rival – has been left out of this supposedly final list of tariff increases. The trade talks between the two economic giants in Stockholm are dragging on, the prohibitive mutual tariffs having been abandoned, and they may well be extended past the next deadline of 12 August. President Trump met his match in Xi Jinping, and will not be imposing any further punitive trade sanctions on China for fear of another tit-for-tat escalation. Thus far, the markets have received the latest news of tariffs with some equanimity, but a collapse in trade between the world's two greatest economies would generate the kind of turmoil Mr Trump doesn't need right now. Even assuming that the eventual trade truce with China avoids disaster, these US tariffs are, in broad terms, the highest since 1934 and the era of the notorious Smoot-Hawley Act, which helped to strangle world trade and exacerbated the Great Depression. The Trump tariffs are no less damaging to world trade, and thus to economic growth, including that of the United States. But these restrictions on trade are what Mr Trump's Maga 'base' voted for, the folk memory of the previous disastrous experiment with tariffs having faded. The president's winning slogan was 'America First', epitomising a zero-sum, nationalistic view of the world, and unfortunately, he has proved as good as his word on inauguration day: 'Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.' Words that were both misguided and economically illiterate, naturally – but a promise kept. Many of the worst fears of America's friends and allies are coming true in these early months of Mr Trump's second term. With far more preparation than took place prior to his first term (which followed an election that, reputedly, he never expected to win), the US president has pressed on with his protectionist, isolationist, natalist agenda with speed and determination, surrounded by mostly underqualified, grotesquely sycophantic cronies. The judiciary is increasingly cowed, and Congress is listless in defending the constitution. The tendency to Caesarism is apparent in everything from the theatrical executive orders to the grandiose golden remodelling of the White House, and the contempt for the chair of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell – a 'moron', apparently. Mr Trump thinks he can, with a stroke of a Sharpie, abolish the birthright to citizenship enshrined in the 14th amendment, passed in 1868. His conception of 'America First' is more America Alone, yet everything he does weakens American power and prosperity. It is an inward-looking, selfish, exclusionary approach. Undoubtedly it enjoys a political constituency, but ultimately it will prove self-defeating.
Auto Blog
40 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Aston Martin May Sell Stake in Formula 1 Racing Team and Go Private in Turnaround Efforts
Tesla is falling behind BYD in several key international markets, but its rival's recent operational struggles are opening a door of opportunity. Despite coming up with some compelling vehicles in recent years, Aston Martin has continued to struggle financially, leading it to some tough decisions as it plots a path forward. Among other efforts, the storied British automaker reportedly plans to sell its stake in its Formula 1 racing team, and some expect the company to delist itself from the London Stock Exchange. Aston only owns 4.6 percent of the racing team, but the sale would raise $146 million for the company, which desperately needs cash. The automaker cited tariffs and a slowdown in China for its struggles, saying it would only break even this year, which caused a drop in its share prices. The company's stock market valuation has dropped from almost $6 billion in late 2018 to just over $1 billion today. That said, the F1 team sale valued the company at $3.2 billion. While Aston Martin won't have a stake in the F1 team after the sale, it will continue a relationship with the sport through naming and branding agreements, so we won't see a change on the grid. The automaker's car lineup is one of the most compelling in its history, so there are reasons for Aston to be encouraged. Its first SUV, the DBX has grown to account for almost half of its sales, and other new models have received stellar reviews from customers and critics. 2025 Aston Martin DBX 707 — Source: Kyle Edward Lawrence Stroll acquired the Force India F1 team in 2018 and transformed it into the Aston team we know today. Stroll and his partners have continue investing in the business, but many credit Netflix's Drive to Survive with bringing the sport's value to an all-time high. About the Author Chris Teague View Profile
Rhyl Journal
40 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Last wheat delivered to largest bioethanol plant under threat after trade deal
Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, has said it is facing closure within weeks following the decision to end the 19% tariff on American bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. The plant buys more than a million tonnes of British wheat each year from more than 4,000 farms and says it has purchased from 12,000 individual farms over the past decade. Managing director Ben Hackett wrote to growers earlier this year explaining that the plant will only be able to honour existing contractual obligations for wheat purchases while uncertainty continues. Mr Hackett said the last scheduled load arrived at the plant on Friday. Last month, Vivergo, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is was beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided. It said Britain's two largest bioethanol producers – Vivergo and Ensus in Teesside – are now in urgent negotiations with the Government. The firms say the UK-US trade deal and regulatory constraints on the industry have made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Mr Hackett said on Friday: 'We have a choice of going down a path of stagnation, decline, unemployment, economy shrinking, or we have a choice of going towards a path of investment, growth, prosperity, job creation, and that's why it's crucially important that the Government comes to a decision quickly, and comes to a decision in favour of supporting the UK bioethanol industry.' Farmer Matt Pickering, of Pickering and Sons, near Gainsborough, Lincolnshire, sold the last load of wheat to Vivergo. Mr Pickering said: 'We struggle with the quality of our land type, so we tend to go for out-and-out bulk volume shed fillers. Vivergo has been a fantastic home for us to sell feed wheat into.' Mike Green, owner of haulage company AgHaul, who transported the last load to the plant, said: 'We're in the dark. We don't know where we're going. 'It's very uncertain, uncharted waters, and it's worrying as we've already seen a decline in work.' The landmark came as Meld Energy said the uncertainty over the plant is putting its plans for a 'world-class' green jet fuel project on the Humber in jeopardy. Earlier this year, Meld Energy signed a £1.25 billion agreement with Vivergo Fuels to anchor a Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) facility at Saltend Chemicals Park in Hull. Meld Energy chief executive and founder Chris Smith said: 'We're excited about the potential to bring our sustainable aviation fuel project to the Humber – one of the UK's most important industrial and energy hubs. 'But, for projects like ours to succeed and the flow of vital investment to be forthcoming, we need a strong and integrated low-carbon ecosystem. 'A bioethanol plant on site at Saltend is a critical part of that mix. Without it, we'd have to consider alternative locations overseas where that infrastructure is already in place.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families which is why we entered into formal discussions with the company on potential financial support last month. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said officials and ministers have met with Vivergo and Ensus consistently over the last few months to discuss options to address 'significant challenges' that the bioethanol industry has been facing for some time. It said engagement with the companies 'continues at pace' and external consultants have been brought in to help.
