logo
Trump's funding cuts push US researchers to Europe, reversing 20th-century trend

Trump's funding cuts push US researchers to Europe, reversing 20th-century trend

India Today26-04-2025
The US has suspended research funding schemes for researchers in the country following a move by the Trump administration. The action, which targeted DEI programmes, has also impacted researchers.The Trump administration provided its rationale by arguing that researchers at some universities participated in pro-Palestine protests held on campuses such as Harvard and Columbia. It also claimed that the universities were supporting and promoting DEI programmes, which are not aligned with Donald Trump's policies.advertisementThe science offices of the United States have thus far halted or withdrawn no less than six billion dollars in grants and contracts at several of the nation's foremost universities.
This forms part of the Trump administration's effort to reshape matters of admission, instruction, and governance within these places of learning.The administration has charged that Columbia University and Harvard University did not prevent acts of violence and harassment during protests tied to the war in Gaza.Funding was also cut at the University of Pennsylvania, citing the case of a transgender athlete competing in women's sport, which Mr. Trump declared an affront to the dignity and safety of women. Meanwhile, grants at Cornell, Princeton, and Northwestern have been suspended, though no clear cause has been given.With the US cutting funds for researchers, European governments have been planning ways to recruit them. France and Norway recently launched new funding programmes for researchers.advertisementOn April 23, 2025, the Research Council of Norway announced it would provide 100 million kroner (approximately 7.2 million) in funding to more easily recruit researchers from around the world.As per a Guardian report, the Nordic nation's Minister of Research and Higher Education, Sigrun Aasland, stated: "It is vital for Norway to be active in a challenging situation for academic freedom. We can make a difference for excellent researchers and valuable knowledge, and we wish to do this as soon as possible."Many scholars of science have spoken with concern over the funding cuts, warning that such acts may slow the steady work that science has built through many years. They fear that efforts to fight disease and address changes in the climate may fall into delay.It is also thought that the goals set by the Sustainable Development Agenda may suffer setbacks in the years ahead if such measures continue.THE 20TH CENTURY MIGRATION TRENDThe trend of researcher migration we see now is a reversal of what the world witnessed in the early 20th century and in the decades that followed, driven by the European crises caused by World War I and World War II.During World War II, the US welcomed scientists such as Albert Einstein, who had fled Germany after being persecuted as a Jew. Alongside him came Hans Bethe and John von Neumann, among other prominent scientists welcomed by the US.advertisementAlthough the circumstances were different -- the earlier migrations driven by global crisis - the efforts of these scientists played a significant role in America's rise as a scientific and technological power.Their contributions led to major achievements, like the creation of the atomic bomb during the Manhattan Project.Von Neumann's work laid the foundations of modern computer science and artificial intelligence through what became known as von Neumann architecture.
(l to r) Einstein, Bathe and Neumann (Photos: Wikimedia Commons)
At the same time, there were key breakthroughs in theoretical physics, quantum mechanics, and relativity, reshaping the scientific landscape of the 20th century.AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EUROPEAN COUNTRIESA coalition of European governments has also addressed this. In April 2025, in a letter to European Commissioner for Innovation Ekaterina Zaharieva, the governments of France, the Czech Republic, Austria, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia, Spain, Slovenia, Germany, Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania highlighted the opportunity to offer displaced academics a favourable environment.advertisementThe letter, reported by Politico, called for an "attractivity boom." Although the letter did not mention the US directly, it clearly aimed to take advantage of the movement of researchers and focused on creating new opportunities for them.It warned that 'freedom of science can be put at risk anywhere and at any time' and urged the European Commission to act swiftly.French Research Minister Philippe Baptiste assured that France is ready to assist researchers impacted by funding reductions in the United States.In an interview with Politico, he stated: "It is urgent to organise ourselves to welcome talents who would like or need to leave the United States."Almost 300 scholars have already signed up for a programme instituted by a French university to support US-based researchers experiencing difficulties amid the American government's crackdown on academic institutions.One former French president has even called for establishing a "scientific refugee" status to safeguard scholars under threat.Earlier this year, Aix-Marseille University in France became one of the first European universities to respond. With its programme "Safe Place for Science," the university is providing about 20 researchers with three years of funding to continue their work safely.advertisementLast week, the university reported that it had received 298 applications in just one month. Of these, 242 candidates were found eligible.Applicants hailed from top institutions such as Johns Hopkins University, NASA, Columbia, Yale, and Stanford, according to the university's statement.FUNDING CUTS IN US UNIVERSITIESSince January, Trump has sharply reduced funding for research and education. The US Department of Education is slashing nearly half its workforce, while universities such as Johns Hopkins have cut jobs due to lost federal grants.Columbia University faced a major blow when $400 million in grants were terminated on March 7 over alleged "antisemitic harassment." This included $250 million worth of grants from the NIH.The crackdown also led to Indian PhD student Ranjani Srinivasan self-deporting after her visa was revoked due to alleged involvement in pro-Palestine protests.The University of Pennsylvania was also affected, facing a $175 million cut over its policies allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports. This followed Trump's February executive order reversing NCAA regulations. UPenn, however, stated that it has not received formal notice.These sweeping funding cuts have triggered hiring freezes, budget reductions, and a decrease in PhD admissions, raising serious concerns about the future of US scientific innovation.advertisementThe upheaval triggered by the US cuts in expenditure has created fresh opportunities in Europe, where states are vying to win the displaced scientists over.While in the 20th century America's rise to a scientific superpower was heralded by scientists' exodus, the transition now holds a potential reshuffle of the worldwide research map.Must Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia in deep trouble as US decides to provide arms to Ukraine through..., missiles and rockets worth Rs 250000000000000 to be....
Russia in deep trouble as US decides to provide arms to Ukraine through..., missiles and rockets worth Rs 250000000000000 to be....

India.com

time14 minutes ago

  • India.com

Russia in deep trouble as US decides to provide arms to Ukraine through..., missiles and rockets worth Rs 250000000000000 to be....

Russia in deep trouble as US decides to provide arms to Ukraine through..., missiles and rockets worth Rs 250000000000000 to be.... The Russia-Ukraine war is far from over. In the latest development, US President Donald Trump said that the US will send weapons to Ukraine through NATO and NATO will bear the full cost of these weapons. This move comes after the negotiation on ceasefire failed between Russia and Ukraine. Notably, US itself is a member of NATO which is an international military alliance. By 2025, NATO has 32 member countries. Its purpose is to ensure collective security of member countries and protect them from external attacks. US contributes 66% to NATO expenses. What will be the cost of the aid? According to media reports, the US is preparing to send a package of $300 million (Rs 2.5 thousand crores) to Ukraine, which will include Patriot missile systems and medium-range rockets, although a final decision on the weapons is yet to be taken. This is a legal method that allows the President to send weapons directly from US stockpiles in bad times. Earlier, the Trump administration had only sent weapons approved by former President Joe Biden to Ukraine. What is agreement on arms between US, NATO and Ukraine? This new arms agreement is between the US, NATO and Ukraine. Earlier the US used to send arms directly to Ukraine, but now this process will happen through NATO. Rs 90 thousand crores aid to Ukraine A conference for the reconstruction of Ukraine was held in Rome, the capital of Italy. In this conference, Ukraine was promised aid of 10 billion euros (Rs 90 thousand crores rupees). The European Commission announced aid of 2.3 billion euros (about 2.7 billion dollars). Zelensky said at this conference that Russia's assets should be used to rebuild Ukraine. He also demanded increased arms supplies, joint defense production and investment. The Ukraine Reconstruction Conference, held in Rome on 10 and 11 July 2025, is attended by 38 countries and several international organisations.

'Most transformative term…': Michael Whatley explains how Trump overturned the painful Biden years
'Most transformative term…': Michael Whatley explains how Trump overturned the painful Biden years

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Most transformative term…': Michael Whatley explains how Trump overturned the painful Biden years

At the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, RNC Chair Michael Whatley declared Donald Trump is having the most 'transformative term of any president since Ronald Reagan.' He highlighted Trump's comeback, victories in battleground states, the GOP's legislative wins, and efforts to secure borders, cut taxes, and restore US strength. Whatley praised youth conservatives and called them the present not just future of the Republican Party. Show more Show less

Will India be hit with a 500% tariff? Here's what we know
Will India be hit with a 500% tariff? Here's what we know

India Today

time30 minutes ago

  • India Today

Will India be hit with a 500% tariff? Here's what we know

India has not yet been able to finalise a trade deal with the United States, even as the deadline for a new wave of tariffs set by President Donald Trump draws to a government official quoted by Reuters, a delegation from India is expected to visit Washington soon in a fresh attempt to break the deadlock over duties on auto components, steel, and farm products. These items have emerged as key sticking points in what has become a long and complex trade remains one of the few countries still in talks with the US at a time when the Trump administration is preparing to enforce steep new tariffs on imports from several nations starting August this year, a team of Indian officials travelled to the US for trade talks, but the visit ended without a breakthrough. Disagreements remained on sensitive areas like market access for American agricultural products and tariff reductions on high-value industrial COUNTRIES RECEIVE TARIFF LETTERS, INDIA STILL WAITINGMeanwhile, at least 14 other countries have already received formal letters from the US, notifying them of upcoming tariffs ranging from 25% to 40%. India has not received such a letter yet, an indication that negotiations are still alive, but time is running to the pressure is a bill that could bring even more drastic consequences for Indian Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, a bipartisan bill introduced by Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, aims to punish countries that continue to buy Russian oil and other energy products. The bill targets major importers like India and China and includes provisions for tariffs as high as 500%.While no such tariff has been imposed yet, the threat has created fresh concerns in New Delhi.'I'm looking. It's totally my option. They pass it totally at my option, and to terminate totally at my option. And I'm looking at it very strongly,' Trump told reporters during a Cabinet Bandyopadhyay, economist at Infomerics Valuation and Ratings, said the impact could be severe if such measures are put into effect.'The 500% tariff is an extreme step and its imposition will depend on the outcome of diplomatic discussions and trade talks. India's stance has been clear, our oil purchases are based on national energy security. These are long-term decisions made in the interest of the economy,' Bandyopadhyay added that India should strongly highlight these concerns during negotiations. 'The US itself continues to rely on Russian uranium for its nuclear plants. India must bring such facts to the table to argue for a more balanced approach.'EXPORT SECTORS AT RISK IF TALKS FAILBeyond the Russia-related concerns, Bandyopadhyay pointed out that failure to reach a broader trade agreement could put several key Indian sectors at risk. 'Exports of gems and jewellery, marine products, pharmaceuticals, electronics, and steel, all heavily dependent on the US market, could suffer significant losses,' he warned. 'If tariffs are reinstated or raised, Indian exporters could face losses of $7–10 billion.'Despite the challenges, there may still be a path forward. According to a Bloomberg report, the US is reportedly nearing an interim trade deal with India. If finalised, this deal could result in proposed tariffs being capped below 20%, a huge improvement compared to the sweeping hikes other countries are the deal goes through, India would become one of the few countries to receive trade concessions from the United States, even as Trump increases tariff pressure on many countries in Asia, the new tariffs already declared range between 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines and up to 40% for Laos and said that India has already made a generous offer in its talks with Washington.'India has proposed reducing the tariff gap with the US from 13% to below 4%. This includes zero tariffs on 60% of US imports and preferential access for 90% of American goods,' he return, India is seeking relief from proposed duties and better access for its labour-intensive exports such as textiles, shrimp, bananas, and grapes. But deep differences remain, especially in the agriculture and dairy sectors. The US has demanded lower tariffs on apples, nuts, and genetically modified crops, which India is hesitant to allow due to concerns from small farmers and political opposition at home.(Disclaimer: The views, opinions, recommendations, and suggestions expressed by expert in this article are their own and do not reflect the views of the India Today Group.)- EndsTune InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store