‘Star Wars' From Darth Maul's Perspective Sounds Fascinating
Maul: Shadow Lord, a new animated series, was announced at Star Wars Celebration Japan last month and it'll bring the former Sith Lord back to the forefront in a big, big way. Speaking with fellow Star Wars star Katee Sackhoff, voice of Maul Sam Witwer revealed a few broad clues about what we can expect from the show, including how Maul perceives the plan formulated by his former master, Darth Sidious.
'This is a guy who knew that the Empire was coming, and he was part of that,' Witwer said on The Sackhoff Show. 'He was supposed to be part of the Clone Wars. He was supposed to work with his master, and they were going to bring about the destruction of the Republic and the destruction of his hated enemy, the Jedi Order. He was raised to hate them. He trained his whole life to destroy them. Well, now we have a show where, OK, all of that was done, but Maul, yeah, you killed a bunch of Jedi during the Clone Wars, but you did not work with Sidious. You didn't know the whole plan. And in fact, you got so scared about his plan that you tried to stop it at the last second.'
'Now the Empire's here, which Maul would have known that that was his master's intent,' he continues. 'But now that he's seeing it, he's like, 'Is this what he had in mind? Because this isn't what I thought it would be…' Maul comes from a time of swords and sorcery and magic and knights and now all of that color is being sucked out of the universe by this mechanized empire. And Maul's like, 'Is this right? Is this the universe that we were trying to build?''
That's fascinating, is it not? Seeing the grand plans of Emperor Palpatine through the eyes of someone who worked with him before Darth Vader. Before Count Dooku. Before Grand Moff Tarkin or Grand Admiral Thrawn. Someone who was there at the beginning and is now confused about what he thought the plan was, and what it ended up being.
But, as Witwer explains, that's kind of the aim of Maul: Shadow Lord.
'It truly is a show about bad guys versus worse guys,' he said. 'And our bad guys are still bad guys. This isn't going to be a show where you go, oh, you find out Maul is just a real teddy bear, man. He's just misunderstood… But the idea is, in fact, that even though he's a bad guy, is he as bad as Sidious or Vader? And the answer is actually no. From the Sith perspective, this guy has flaws. And these flaws are… the humanity that seeps in at various points. And some of this is humanity he did not have maybe early in Clone Wars. But because of things that happened to him, he's rethought a lot of things.'
Rethinking things is part of what is making Maul: Shadow Lord work too. Witwer explained that, as he was working with Filoni on Clone Wars and Rebels, they'd come up with ideas for Maul that they loved, but couldn't fit in the show. Now, all those ideas are coming back.
'There were ideas that I had back in Clone Wars that I would present to Dave, or even in Rebels,' Witwer said. 'And I also know things that Dave wanted to do. And Dave would go, 'We're going to cut this part out of the script that I have that I like so much because this isn't Maul's show.' Or I'd say, 'Dave, what if this happens?' And he goes, 'It's not Maul's show. You can't go into that little level of detail. We're seeing this from Ezra's perspective or Ahsoka's perspective.' And every time he said, 'This isn't Maul's show,' it never occurred to me that Maul could have a show. So I just took those ideas and I'm like, well, I guess we'll never see that. And now he's like, well, it's Maul's show.''
You can watch the full clip below and keep an eye out for Maul: Shadow Lord in 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Engine fuel supply was cut just before Air India jet crash, preliminary report says
CNN — A cut in the fuel supply to the engines caused last month's Air India crash that killed 260 people, a preliminary report has found. The London-bound plane had barely left the runway at Ahmedabad airport when it hurtled back to earth. Everyone on board was killed, except for one passenger. According to the report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, obtained by CNN, the fuel control switches in the cockpit of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner had been flipped, starving the engines of fuel. Investigators were able to get data out of the plane's 'black box' recorders, including 49 hours of flight data and two hours of cockpit audio, including from the crash. The aircraft had reached an airspeed of 180 knots when both engines' fuel cutoff switches were 'transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec,' according to the report. 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report reads. Shortly after, the switches were reversed back to where they should have been, and the engines were in the process of powering back up when the crash happened. On the 787, the fuel cutoff switches are between the two pilots' seats, immediately behind the plane's throttle levers. They are protected on the sides by a metal bar and have a locking mechanism designed to prevent accidental cutoff. Airport footage shows the Ram Air Turbine, an emergency power source on an aircraft, deployed during the plane's initial climb after takeoff, the report said. The plane started to lose altitude before crossing the airport perimeter wall. 'When fuel control switches are moved from CUTOFF to RUN while the aircraft is inflight, each engines full authority dual engine control automatically manages a relight and thrust recovery sequence of ignition and fuel introduction,' the report states. Seconds after the engines attempted to relight, one pilot called out, 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY.' The controller called out for the plane's callsign, but didn't get a response and watched the plane crash in the distance. The fuel switches were 'designed to be intentionally moved,' according to CNN safety analyst David Soucie, who said cases in which all fuel switches were turned off accidentally are 'extremely rare.' 'Throughout the years, those switches have been improved to make sure that they cannot be accidentally moved and that they're not automatic. They don't move themselves in any manner,' Soucie said on Friday. The captain of the flight was a 56-year-old who had flown more than 15,000 hours in his career. The first officer was a 32-year old man with over 3,400 flying hours. Investigators also noted settings on equipment found in the wreckage was normal for takeoff. The plane's fuel was tested and found to be of satisfactory quality, and no significant bird activity is observed in the vicinity of the flight path, according to the report. The takeoff weight for the plane was found to be within allowable limits, and there were no 'Dangerous Goods' on the aircraft. Investigators found the flaps on the wings of the plane were set in the 5-degree position, which is correct for takeoff, and the landing gear lever was in the down position. The left engine was installed on the plane on March 26 and the right was installed on May 1, the report said. Air India flight 171 took off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in India's western state of Gujarat on June 12. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was headed to London Gatwick, and scheduled to land at 6:25 p.m. local time. Air India had said 242 passengers and crew members were on board. That included 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese and one Canadian. In addition to those on board, a number of people on the ground were killed when the plane crashed into the BJ Medical College and Hospital hostel. The crash resulted in 260 fatalities total, according to the report. A number of the dead on the ground resulted from the plane hitting the hostel. Air India acknowledged that it received the report and said it will continue cooperating with authorities in the investigation. 'Air India stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident,' the airline posted to X on Saturday (local time). 'We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
6 takeaways from the Senate's crypto market structure hearing
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter. Following the May release of the CLARITY Act, the House of Representative's market structure bill to establish a cryptocurrency regulatory framework, the Senate Banking Committee met with industry leaders Wednesday to discuss how the Senate would craft its own framework. Here are six takeaways from the hearing. Countries like the U.K., Japan and Singapore are implementing bespoke digital asset frameworks, as the U.S. has fallen behind, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger said. '[W]e must view establishing a federal regulatory framework as a national priority,' Mersinger said. 'Digital assets and blockchain technology are revolutionizing financial services, supply chains, and digital identity. The country that leads on this policy will set global norms and unlock enormous economic and strategic benefits. The United States should be that leader, and this is our moment to lead.' Mersinger noted that regulating the industry with the laws already in place has 'created ambiguity,' thus limiting innovation and pushing changemakers to other jurisdictions with clearer crypto rules. She also noted that traditional bank regulations are not fit for purpose for digital assets or the blockchain, as they're meant for centralized intermediaries – 'and that's not what we're dealing with here.' 'Without thoughtfully crafted rules for the road, we risk stifling innovation, leaving American consumers without proper safeguards and protections, and ceding leadership in a sector that will define the future of global finance and technology,' she said. In his opening statement, committee Chair Sen. Tim Scott, R-SC, said that Senate Republicans recognize 'the need to clarify and clearly define what is a commodity and what is a security and how digital assets can trade and be custodied in a way that fosters innovation while protecting investors.' Mersinger asserted that regulators must recognize that digital assets are not securities. 'Code is not a security,' she said. Timothy Massad, former chairman of the CFTC and former assistant secretary of the Treasury Department, implied that the discussion is broader than that. 'This is a technology. It's not an asset class. It will be used in many ways, including in tokenizing securities,' Massad said. 'Whether something in digital form is a security, a commodity, or neither, cannot be easily defined by a paragraph or two in a statute,' he said. 'It depends on what the token represents, whether there is an issuer, whether the transaction is one in which capital is being raised, and so forth.' Additionally,the technology and its use cases are rapidly evolving, 'so we should not lock in definitions that will prove obsolete soon,' he said. Americans lost more than $9 billion to crypto scams last year, up 66% from the previous year, according to Federal Bureau of Investigation statistics cited by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the committee's ranking member. Additionally, 'terrorist organizations demonstrated increased sophistication in their use of cryptocurrency, turning to unhosted wallets, mixers, and privacy coins like Monero,' according to TRM Labs, which Warren also cited. But 'the data shows that more illegal activity still happens with cash than with crypto,' according to Scott, potentially referring to 2024 Treasury data that found 'the use of virtual assets for money laundering remains far below that of fiat currency.' 'Criminals use cash-based money laundering strategies in significant part because cash offers anonymity. They commonly use U.S. currency due to its wide acceptance and stability,' the Treasury reported. According to Chainalysis co-founder and CEO Jonathan Levin, blockchain enhances the ability to act quickly against illicit access. 'Following the money on the blockchain is actually easier than in traditional finance.' 'Issuers of tokenized assets can actually take actions to easily freeze and seize assets,' he added. 'In a recent pig butchering case, crypto exchange OKX and stablecoin issuer Tether froze and then seized $225 million of criminal proceeds in collaboration with U.S. Secret Service. The traceability and programmability of these assets is a key benefit in addressing illicit activity.' Chainalysis works with banks, fintechs and public agencies to mitigate fraud, and found that less than 1% of crypto transactions are linked to illegal activity, putting it on par with traditional finance, Levin said. Warren called out President Donald Trump personally for his myriad dealings in the crypto industry, including issuing his own memecoin, having a portfolio of crypto investments, and (for his sons) owning a bitcoin mining company. According to Chainalysis, Trump and his associates made more than $320 million on fees from the $TRUMP memecoin, Warren cited. 'If Congress passes a bill creating a new federal regulatory framework for the crypto market, what will happen to the crypto market? Is it likely to grow?' Warren asked Richard Painter, a former chief White House ethics lawyer. 'It will grow substantially,' he said. 'And what will that do to the value of President Trump's memecoin?' Warren asked. 'It will make him very rich, even richer than he already is,' Painter said. Painter also took aim at lawmakers mulling crypto legislation after receiving hefty campaign donations from crypto firms. He'd recently tweeted that Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY, who co-sponsored the stablecoin legislation that preceded the GENIUS Act, had received $217,000 in campaign donations from crypto firms. The president having an outsized role in digital assets and Congress members receiving campaign contributions from the crypto industry and voting on the bill will lead to 'a lack of confidence in our regulatory system,' Painter said. Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-DE, asked Painter about the risks of Congress moving too quickly on crypto legislation without a clear understanding of market consequences. 'The risk is that we repeat the experience of regulating the banks in the 1920s and the depression that followed, 10 years of depression,' Painter said. 'The risk is that we repeat what happened in 2008 when campaign contributions poured into Congress from the securities swap industry, elsewhere in the financial services industry, and we had decades of de-regulation, the economy collapsed, millions of American families losing their homes, people unemployed.' 'We do not want another economic collapse caused by de-regulation of the financial services sector,' he said. Recommended Reading FDIC vice chair wants regulators to hurry up on addressing tokenization Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Strategy, Metaplanet and Others Sit on Billions in Bitcoin Gains — and They're Not Selling
With bitcoin (BTC) trading at a record high above $117,000, some of its largest institutional holders are sitting on massive gains — and show no sign of planning to cash out. Strategy (MSTR), the software company turned bitcoin holding giant, owns nearly 600,000 BTC, according to data, and has made an estimated $28 billion in unrealized profit at $117,464 price, data from Strategy Tracker shows. The company has spent more than $42 billion accumulating its stash, which makes it the third-largest bitcoin holder. Only the pseudonymous bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto and asset manager BlackRock hold more. However, BlackRock holds bitcoin on behalf of investors in its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), which launched in January last year. Strategy, by contrast, holds the tokens on its balance sheet. The firm's co-founder and executive chairman, Michael Saylor, has repeatedly said that he has no intention of ever selling. In fact, during BTC's all-time high run yesterday, he gloated, "The halls of eternity echo with the cries of those who sold their Bitcoin," in an X post. And who can blame him? After all, his company's BTC holdings far outpace those of every publicly traded company. Other corporate bitcoin holders are also seeing their balances swell. Japanese firm Metaplanet (3350), which began aggressively accumulating BTC in 2024, now owns 15,555 coins worth roughly $1.83 billion. That translates to an unrealized profit of $284 million. Meanwhile, El Salvador, the first nation to adopt bitcoin as legal tender, holds 6,234 BTC worth nearly $733 million at current prices. Its bitcoin bet has turned into a $232 million paper gain, a significant reversal from the losses it faced during the 2022 bear market. Smaller firms are riding the rally too. Semler Scientific (SMLR), which followed Strategy's treasury strategy last year, owns 4,636 BTC and sits on $160 million in unrealized gains. France's Blockchain Group (ALTBG) holds 900 BTC, and still has $30.5 million in gains on paper. While these companies could lock in massive profits by selling, most haven't budged. In the bitcoin community, many of these holders are known as 'maxis' — short for maximalists — who believe in holding the asset indefinitely. Some may take profits over time, but others, like Saylor, have stated publicly they plan to hold forever.
