Medieval cold case is a salacious tale of sex, power, and mayhem

Yahoo

06-06-2025

Researchers have uncovered handwritten letters, court documents, and a coroner's report related to the nearly 700-year-old cold case murder of a medieval priest. Published on June 5 in the journal Criminal Law Forum, the investigation draws on direct archival evidence from Cambridge University that is helping fill in the gaps to a high-profile true crime scandal that would make headlines even today. But despite a mountain of firsthand accounts, the murder's masterminds never saw justice.
On Friday, May 3, 1337, Anglican priest John Forde began a walk along downtown London's Cheapside street after vespers (evening prayers) shortly before sunset. At one point, a clergyman familiar to Forde by the name of Hasculph Neville approached him to begin a 'pleasant conversation.' As the pair neared St. Paul's Cathedral, four men ambushed the priest. One of the attackers then proceeded to slit Forde's throat using a 12-inch dagger as two other assailants stabbed him in the stomach in front of onlookers.
The vicious crime wasn't a brazen robbery or politically motivated attack. It was likely a premeditated murder orchestrated by Ela Fitzpayne, a noblewoman, London crime syndicate leader—and potentially Forde's lover.
'We are looking at a murder commissioned by a leading figure of the English aristocracy. It is planned and cold-blooded, with a family member and close associates carrying it out, all of which suggests a revenge motive,' Cambridge University criminology professor Manuel Eisner explained in a statement.
To understand how such a brutal killing could take place in daylight on a busy London street, it's necessary to backtrack at least five years. In January 1332, the Archbishop of Canterbury sent a letter to the Bishop of Winchester that included a number of reputation-ruining claims surrounding Fitzpayne. In particular, Archbishop Simon Mepham described sexual relationships involving 'knights and others, single and married, and even with clerics in holy orders.'
The wide-ranging punishments for such sinful behavior could include a prohibition on wearing gold and other precious jewelry, as well as large tithes to monastic orders and the poor. But the most humiliating atonement often came in the form of a public walk of shame. The act of contrition involved walking barefoot across Salisbury Cathedral—England's longest nave—in order to deliver a handcarried, four-pound wax candle to the church altar. What's more, Archbishop Mepham commanded that Fitzpayne must repeat this penance every autumn for seven years.
Fitzpayne was having none of it. According to Mepham's message, the noblewoman chose to continue listening to a 'spirit of pride' (and the devil), and refused to abide by the judgment. A second letter sent by the Archbishop that April also alleged that she had since absconded from her husband, Sir Robert Fitzpayne, and was hiding in London's Rotherhithe district along the Thames River. Due to this, Archbishop Mepham reported that Ela Fitzpayne had been excommunicated from the church.
But who tipped the clergy off to her indiscretions? According to Eisner's review of original documents as part of the Cambridge University Institute of Criminology's Medieval Murder Maps project, it was almost certainly her ex-lover, the soon-to-be-murdered John Forde. He was the only alleged lover named in Archbishop Mepham's letters, and served as a church rector in a village located on the Fitzpayne family's estate at the time of the suspected affair.
'The archbishop imposed heavy, shameful public penance on Ela, which she seems not to have complied with, but may have sparked a thirst for vengeance,' Eisner said. 'Not least as John Forde appears to have escaped punishment by the church.'
But Forde's relationship with the Fitzpaynes seems to have extended even more illicit activities. In another record reviewed by Eisner, both Ela Fitzpayne and John Forde had been indicted by a Royal Commission in 1322. The crime–assisting in the raid of a Benedictine priory alongside Sir Fitzpayne. They and others reportedly assaulted the priory a year earlier, making off with around 18 oxen, 30 pigs, and 200 sheep. The monastery coincidentally served as a French abbey's outpost amid increasing tensions between France and England in the years leading up to the Hundred Years' War.
Archbishop Mepham was almost certainly displeased after hearing about the indictment of one of his own clergy. A strict administrator himself, Mepham 'was keen to enforce moral discipline among the gentry and nobility,' added Eisner. He theorizes that Forde copped to the affair after getting leaned on by superiors, which subsequently led to the campaign to shame Ela Fitzpayne as a means to reassert the Church's authority over English nobility. Forde, unfortunately, was caught between the two sides.
'John Forde may have had split loyalties,' argued Eisner. 'One to the Fitzpayne family, who were likely patrons of his church and granted him the position. And the other to the bishops who had authority over him as a clergy member.'
Archbishop Mepham ultimately wouldn't live to see the scandal's full consequences. Fitzpayne never accepted her walk of shame, and the church elder died a year after sending the incriminating letters. Eisner believes the Fitzpaynes greenlit their hit job on Forde only after the dust had seemingly settled. It doesn't help their case three bystanders said the man who slit the rector's throat was none other than Ela Fitzpayne's own brother, Hugh Lovell. They also named two family servants as Forde's other assailants.
Anyone waiting for justice in this medieval saga will likely be disappointed.
'Despite naming the killers and clear knowledge of the instigator, when it comes to pursuing the perpetrators, the jury turn[ed] a blind eye,' Eisner said.
Eisner explained the circumstances surrounding an initial lack of convictions were simply 'implausible.' No one supposedly could locate the accused to bring to trial, despite the men belonging to one of England's highest nobility houses. Meanwhile, the court claimed Hugh Lovell had no belongings available to confiscate.
'This was typical of the class-based justice of the day,' said Eisner.
In the end, the only charge that ever stuck in the murder case was an indictment against one of the family's former servants. Five years after the first trial in 1342, Hugh Colne was convicted of being one of the men to stab Forde in the stomach and sentenced to the notorious Newgate Prison.
As dark and sordid as the multiyear medieval drama was, it apparently didn't change much between Ela Fitzpayne and her husband, Sir Robert. She and the baron remained married until his death in 1354—when she subsequently inherited all his property.
'Where rule of law is weak, we see killings committed by the highest ranks in society, who will take power into their own hands, whether it's today or seven centuries ago,' said Eisner.
That said, the criminology professor couldn't help but concede that Ela Fitzpayne was an 'extraordinary' individual, regardless of the era.
'A woman in 14th century England who raided priories, openly defied the Archbishop of Canterbury, and planned the assassination of a priest,' he said. 'Ela Fitzpayne appears to have been many things.'