German court lifts ban on far-right magazine
Germany's previous government banned Compact magazine and the company that publishes it, Compact-Magazin GmbH, in July.
Then-interior minister Nancy Faeser described Compact as "a central mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene", and said it "agitates in an unspeakable way against Jews, against people with a history of migration and against our parliamentary democracy".
Compact appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, which suspended the ban in August 2024 pending a full consideration of the case.
Following a hearing earlier in June, the court lifted the ban altogether on Tuesday.
The court said Germany's constitution guaranteed freedom of the press and opinion "even for the enemies of freedom" and that, on grounds of proportionality, a ban could only be justified if the publisher's anti-constitutional activities were proven to be "formative" for the group.
It said a review of the evidence showed that the material in question did not reach that threshold.
Compact is run by far-right figure Jurgen Elsasser and produces the monthly magazine of the same name, which has a circulation of about 40,000, as well as an online video channel, Compact TV.
It also runs an online shop selling books, CDs, DVDs and other merchandise.
Compact has been published since 2010.
In its annual report for 2023, Germany's domestic intelligence agency said that it "regularly disseminates ... anti-Semitic, anti-minority, historically revisionist and conspiracy theory content".
The strength of the far right has caused increasing concern in Germany in recent years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Protest laws questioned after 'indefensible' injuries
Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia.
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Kanye West: Ye barred from Australia over anti-Semitism after song release
Kanye West has officially been banned from Australia after the recent release of an anti-Semitic song, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has revealed. The American rapper, who has now legally changed his name to Ye and is married to Australian designer Bianca Censori, had a tourist visa used to visit family here, but officials cancelled it after he released a song called Heil Hitler in May. 'He's been coming to Australia for a long time… and he's made a lot of offensive comments,' Mr Burke said. 'But my officials looked at it again once he released the Heil Hitler song, and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia.' West's song, initially released on social media platform X, was banned from YouTube and Spotify. Mr Burke said Australia's immigration law 'draws a stricter line' depending on the purpose of the visa. He said the West case was the only occasion he could think of where someone's visa had been cancelled over anti-Semitism when the visa class wasn't for public advocacy, such as a lecture tour. 'We have a problem in Australia with anti-Semitism. We have a problem in Australia with Islamophobia. We have a problem with a range of forms of bigotry,' he said. 'I think that what's not sustainable is to import hatred. Some people say, 'Oh, don't you believe in freedom of speech' and for Australian citizens, yeah, you've got full freedom of speech – but we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.' The Government contemplated barring the rapper in 2023 over anti-Semitic comments. Cabinet minister Jason Clare said at the time that people who had made similar comments had had visas denied and he expected West would face the same scrutiny. Then-opposition leader Peter Dutton said at the time his 'inclination would be not to allow him in'.
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Kanye West barred from Australia over anti-Semitic song
Kanye West has officially been banned from Australia after the recent release of an anti-Semitic song, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has revealed. The American rapper, who has now legally changed his name to Ye and is married to Australian designer Bianca Censori, had a tourist visa used to visit family here, but officials cancelled it after he released a song called Heil Hitler in May. 'He's been coming to Australia for a long time… and he's made a lot of offensive comments,' Mr Burke said. 'But my officials looked at it again once he released the Heil Hitler song, and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia.' West's song, initially released on social media platform X, was banned from YouTube and Spotify. Mr Burke said Australia's immigration law 'draws a stricter line' depending on the purpose of the visa. He said the West case was the only occasion he could think of where someone's visa had been cancelled over anti-Semitism when the visa class wasn't for public advocacy, such as a lecture tour. 'We have a problem in Australia with anti-Semitism. We have a problem in Australia with Islamophobia. We have a problem with a range of forms of bigotry,' he said. 'I think that what's not sustainable is to import hatred. Some people say, 'Oh, don't you believe in freedom of speech' and for Australian citizens, yeah, you've got full freedom of speech – but we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.' The Government contemplated barring the rapper in 2023 over anti-Semitic comments. Cabinet minister Jason Clare said at the time that people who had made similar comments had had visas denied and he expected West would face the same scrutiny. Then-opposition leader Peter Dutton said at the time his 'inclination would be not to allow him in'.
