logo
Doomed Pilots Cursed and Shouted and Apparently Tried to Save Their Plane Just 1 Second Before Black Hawk Collision

Doomed Pilots Cursed and Shouted and Apparently Tried to Save Their Plane Just 1 Second Before Black Hawk Collision

Yahoo2 days ago
American Airlines Flight 5342 seems to have not been advised of the potential danger it was shortly before the Jan. 29 crash
While the Army Black Hawk helicopter that collided with an American Airlines regional passenger jet near Washington, D.C., in January appears to have been oblivious to the danger everyone was in — the American pilots reacted with alarm mere milliseconds before impact.
That's according to a transcript of the conversations in the cockpit of Flight 5342, between Capt. Jonathan Campos, the pilot, and Sam Lilley, the first officer and co-pilot.
The transcript was released this week by the National Transportation Safety Board as part of a new investigative hearing that started on Wednesday, July 30, and will continue until Friday, Aug. 1.
The NTSB has spent months examining what caused the crash over the Potomac River near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on the night of Jan. 29.
All 64 people on the passenger flight were killed along with the three crew members of the helicopter.
Major issues before the collision included the helicopter not seeming to know how high it was in the sky, potentially because of a fault measuring instrument; the decision by air traffic control to allow the helicopter to attempt to manually 'pass behind' the larger jet in the infamously congested airspace; and a long-established pattern of military craft flying around the airport in very close proximity to commercial flights — even when it's not possible for the larger planes to detect them.
With the hearings underway, the NTSB has also released thousands of pages of records from its ongoing probe.
Together, they provide a more complete picture of what was going on in the helicopter, in the passenger plane and in the control tower in the minutes before the deadliest aviation incident in the U.S. in decades.
The cockpit transcript from the Black Hawk helicopter, piloted by Capt. Rebecca Lobach on a flight back to Fort Belvoir in Virginia, shows she and her crew were well aware of the approaching American Airlines plane.
They had been repeatedly warned about it and were going to attempt, they said, to 'visually separate' and maneuver around it themselves, which an air traffic controller approved (rather than, as some other pilots have noted, instructing them to pause in the air).
But the pilots of Flight 5342, on their way from Wichita, Kan., did not seem to have any awareness they were on a collision course.
https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf
The transcript from their cockpit shows they began communicating with air traffic control five minutes before the crash and were soon told to use Runway 33.
They hesitated at that direction and discussed it amongst themselves for about 15 seconds.
'I really don't want to but I guess, uhhh tell 'em–' one says to the other, who starts to reply, 'I mean I can just tell 'em–'
Then the first pilot interjects again: 'Nah it's fine, we got the numbers for it, yeah tell 'em we're fine, we'll do 3-3 we'll do it.'
In the next several minutes, they prepare the plane to land. Twenty seconds before impact, an automated alert is heard stating 'traffic, traffic.'
At almost the exact same time, unbeknownst to the pilots, the Black Hawk helicopter is requesting approval to use 'visual separation' and fly around them. (The plane and helicopter could not communicate with each other via radio, only with air traffic control.)
It remains unclear if the helicopter crew knew they were flying above the altitude limit of 200 feet, although Lobach's instructor, Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Eaves, had notified her at one point about her height and told her to 'come down.'
One second before the collision, a clicking sound is heard in the American Airlines cockpit.
One of the pilots says 'oh' — and curses.
The other pilot says, more loudly, 'Ohhhh ohhhh.'
The NTSB told reporters earlier this year that the data showed Flight 5342 was 'beginning to increase its pitch' — conceivably as a last-ditch effort to get out of the way, though that has not been confirmed.
Then they crashed.
Capt. Campos was previously remembered by the Transportation Security Administration for his 'outstanding legacy of leadership and duty to others.'
He had been inspired to service, according to the TSA, after his New York City police officer father died when he was 9.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
'He often traveled with his father's badge and even had a tattoo of the badge with number 4935 on his right shoulder,' the TSA said.
Lilley, Campos' co-pilot, was planning for his wedding when he died, his father, Tim Lilley, previously told PEOPLE.
'I was so proud when Sam became a pilot,' Tim wrote on Facebook in January. 'Now it hurts so bad I can't even cry myself to sleep."
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

50-Year-Old Woman in Disbelief After Neighbor Called Her ‘Sad' for Complaining About Party: ‘Should We Have Sucked It Up?'
50-Year-Old Woman in Disbelief After Neighbor Called Her ‘Sad' for Complaining About Party: ‘Should We Have Sucked It Up?'

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

50-Year-Old Woman in Disbelief After Neighbor Called Her ‘Sad' for Complaining About Party: ‘Should We Have Sucked It Up?'

'Should we have just sucked it up, closed our windows and stayed inside?' she asked, following the confrontation with her neighborNEED TO KNOW A 50-year-old woman teamed up with a group of neighbors to confront a tenant in their apartment complex who hosted a large party Recalling the situation on Reddit, she said the exchange became "toxic" when the other person and her friends began hurling insults at the group 'Should we have just sucked it up, closed our windows and stayed inside?' the woman askedA 50-year-old woman is having second thoughts about her decision to confront a new tenant in her apartment complex. On Monday, July 28, the woman penned a lengthy post on Reddit's Am I the A------ forum, explaining that she lives in a large apartment complex with 'historical significance.' She said it has huge communal gardens that are great for sitting in with friends or solo. In recent years, however, neighbors have been using the shared space to host parties with over 50 attendees on the weekend. She said the events are often noisy until the early hours, guests use residents' parking bays and the grounds are used as a toilet due to no available facilities nearby. 'Recently, a new-ish tenant declared her intention to hold a big party in the grounds and her Facebook post got a few 'likes' (from her friends), but when it came to the weekend in question she had hired in a massive marquee that could easily hold 100 people and decided to put it up right in the middle of the gardens,' the woman wrote. The woman said the tenants who live in the apartment complex have a Facebook group, where many began to complain about the disruptive party and the size of the marquee. She recalled that other members of the group, who 'don't get impacted by garden parties as they're on the other side of the building,' started hurling insults. 'We are apparently 'sad, mean, despicable, douchebags,' just some of the choice phrases,' the original poster recounted, before revealing that several members on her side of the group were also trolled privately. The woman said everyone who complained about the party noise was accused of 'piling on' the host. 'We then received a massive 'pile on' of messages ranging from the 'mean, miserable, despicable, sad old farts' to the petulant 'I hope you're happy' grumpiness backlash piled on all weekend,' she continued. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. She described the exchange in the Facebook group as getting 'toxic very quickly.' She argued the comments made by those who disagreed were the party were 'really tame,' while those who supported the event made it personal. 'So, AITA [am I the a------] for being part of the no group?' the woman asked Redditors. 'Should we have just sucked it up, closed our windows and stayed inside?' Responses to the post reassured the woman that it was the right decision to confront the tenant hosting the loud party. Many advised her to make a noise complaint with the police or to report the tenant to the housing manager. 'NTA [not the a------]. Communal spaces such as this are intended for the use of residents, not to be used by mobs of outsiders. No event should be allowed to affect any of you in the ways that you describe,' one person commented. 'NTA. I think you all are being way too polite about huge parties of people p---ing in your gardens. More people should be loudly angry about that,' another wrote. Read the original article on People

Woman Accuses Roommate of 'Showing Off' After Talking to Guest About Her Family's Culture
Woman Accuses Roommate of 'Showing Off' After Talking to Guest About Her Family's Culture

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Accuses Roommate of 'Showing Off' After Talking to Guest About Her Family's Culture

She was just sharing her background when a guest asked about her cooking, but now her roommate thinks she crossed a lineNEED TO KNOW A woman explains her multicultural background to a guest who asks about her cooking Her roommate later accuses her of flirting and being "showy" in her own kitchen The woman says she just answered his questions and now faces awkward tension at homeA woman got into a tense confrontation with her roommate over a seemingly innocent conversation about her culture. The 21-year-old, who describes herself as half Mexican and half Chinese, was left questioning whether she crossed a line after speaking about her heritage with a guest in their shared apartment. 'My parents came to the US before I was born, but thought it was very important for me to learn their native languages and participate in both of their cultures," she explains in her Reddit post. As a result, she grew up fluent in both Spanish and Mandarin and surrounded by a rich blend of Chinese and Mexican cuisine due to their love of cooking. The conflict unfolded one evening when she was cooking dinner, specifically, a family-created "fusion" dish, at home. 'I got stuck on a particular step, so I called my mom to ask for help and we talked in Spanish,' she writes, adding that her 23-year-old roommate, Ann, unexpectedly returned home with friends. One of the male guests entered the kitchen after noticing the aroma and asked what she was making. 'I explained the dish was created by my parents to blend Mexican and Chinese cuisine,' she recalls, noting that the guest seemed genuinely interested in the cultural fusion. He then asked why she was speaking Spanish on the phone, prompting her to share a bit about her upbringing. 'I told him that I'm half Mexican and half Chinese, and that I grew up speaking both Spanish and Mandarin with my parents,' she writes. The conversation continued with more questions about food and language, which she answered enthusiastically. The next day, the situation took a turn when another roommate told her that Ann felt she was 'showing off and flirting' with the guest. 'This pissed me off because I wasn't trying to flirt with him and he was the one who started the conversation with me,' she says. Wanting to clear the air, she approached Ann to discuss what happened, but the talk didn't go well. 'She just seemed annoyed and told me that it was obvious how it looked and I should be more mindful when she has her friends over,' the woman writes. Caught off guard by the accusation, she pointed out that she hadn't even been informed that guests were coming over. 'I told her that I can't be 'mindful' if she doesn't even warn me about having company over,' she says, adding, 'She said that she doesn't have to get my permission to invite people to the apartment.' At this point, the poster admits she got frustrated and decided to drop the conversation. 'I was getting irritated by this point so I let the conversation die down after this,' she shares. Since then, the atmosphere at home has been noticeably strained. 'Every time I see her she's short with me and barely acknowledges me,' she explains. With tension lingering, she turns to Reddit to ask if she "behaved out of line." Responses from Reddit users flooded in, offering strong support. One commenter emphasizes, 'This doesn't have anything at all to do with your heritage. This has to do with somebody she's obviously interested in was talking to you.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Another backed her up by addressing the apartment dynamic. ''She said that she doesn't have to get my permission to invite people to the apartment.' She's right. And you don't need permission to talk to people in your apartment.' Though the original post centers on cultural identity and a casual kitchen conversation, it became clear that jealousy may be at the heart of the issue. Still, the poster insists she had no hidden motives. Her only intention, she explains, was to cook dinner and share a meaningful part of her life when asked, expressing both pride in her heritage and confusion over the backlash. For the poster, the ordeal remains unresolved, but she ends on a lighter note by sharing, 'I posted the recipe to what I made on my profile since many of you were curious!' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

7 Revelations From Transport Safety Board's Hearings Into DC's Deadly Midair Collision
7 Revelations From Transport Safety Board's Hearings Into DC's Deadly Midair Collision

Epoch Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

7 Revelations From Transport Safety Board's Hearings Into DC's Deadly Midair Collision

Critical data, reports, and interviews revealed more insight into how the crash occurred. A helicopter flies near the crash site of the American Airlines plane on the Potomac River near Reagan National Airport in Arlington, Va., on Jan. 30, 2025. A helicopter flies near the crash site of the American Airlines plane on the Potomac River near Reagan National Airport in Arlington, Va., on Jan. 30, days of 'fact-finding' hearings into a catastrophic crash between an Army Black Hawk helicopter and a commercial jet concluded on Aug. 1, with new information shedding light on the events leading up to the collision near Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington earlier this year. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an independent agency tasked with investigating transportation accidents, has led the probe into the disaster, releasing preliminary reports in the months since the crash. The agency's final report, which will reveal the probable cause of the accident, is expected next year. Story continues below advertisement The three-day 'fact-finding' hearings hosted by the NTSB revealed critical details about the incident, including inconsistent altitude readings on the helicopter, persistent staffing issues at Reagan National Airport's air traffic control tower, and criticisms over the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) response to the disaster. Crew Had Inconsistent Readings While the NTSB had already determined earlier this year that the helicopter was above its 200-foot maximum allowed altitude for its route along the Potomac River, new details this week revealed that its crew Here are seven revelations from the NTSB's hearings into the midair the NTSB had already determined earlier this year that the helicopter was above its 200-foot maximum allowed altitude for its route along the Potomac River, new details this week revealed that its crew was operating with incorrect altitude data. The Sikorsky Black Hawk was equipped with a radio altimeter and a barometric altimeter. The first, which uses radio waves to determine altitude, is considered more accurate. However, panelists at the hearing on Wednesday said the crew was trained to use the barometric altimeter, which uses barometric pressure to determine distance from the ground. Story continues below advertisement Throughout its flight, the crew called out elevations to air traffic control that were roughly 80 to 100 feet lower than what their radio altimeter was recording, the NTSB said. Struggled to Hear Air Control Roughly two weeks after the collision occurred, the NTSB Investigators also tested three other helicopters of the same model after the collision and recorded similar discrepancies between the two altimeters, with the differences in altitude increasing when the rotors were two weeks after the collision occurred, the NTSB announced that the helicopter crew likely did not hear a critical air traffic control instruction in the moments before the crash. According to the aircraft's cockpit voice recorder data, the controller's instruction to 'pass behind' the CRJ700 jet was 'stepped on' when the crew engaged a microphone. However, that was not the only time the crew struggled to hear air traffic control. Story continues below advertisement At one point, the pilot asked her instructor if the control tower's audio was muffled. Then her instructor said after another exchange that he 'definitely didn't catch' what was said, and told the pilot, 'I'm glad you did.' Chair Rips Into FAA Jennifer Homendy, chairwoman of the NTSB, did not hold back this week when grilling officials from the FAA. Details emerged that a working group of air traffic controllers had suggested changes to the helicopter routes near Washington in 2022, but were told the addition of new collision risk areas, including to the helicopter route implicated in the crash, was 'too political.' Homendy ripped into the FAA, criticizing its response to the disaster as overly bureaucratic. Story continues below advertisement 'You know what FAA did after the accident … you transferred people out, instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem,' she said. 'Are you kidding me? Sixty-seven people are dead. How do you explain that?' 'Fix it; do better,' Homendy added. Helicopter Not Using Location Tech A key location transmitting technology, known as ADS-B Out, was not engaged on the helicopter at the time of the crash. The Army has a policy of disabling the tracking technology during certain flights in the Washington area, including on sensitive or classified missions with commander approval. Story continues below advertisement It wasn't previously known if the Black Hawk crew had chosen to leave the technology off or if it was inoperable during the flight. NTSB investigators determined that the ADS-B Out systems on the Army's fleet of older Black Hawk helicopters were not working due to a time-setting issue. While the army has purchased new ADS-B systems to upgrade its fleet, it's not clear if using the technology would have helped avoid the crash. Testimony on Friday indicated that the CRJ700 jet did not have ADS-B In, which is needed to receive ADS-B Out signals. Story continues below advertisement Since the crash, the FAA has mandated that all aircraft use ADS-B In and Out. On Tuesday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) introduced legislation that would mandate it on all aircraft. Chronic Staffing Issues at Tower While The Epoch Times has previously reported on the nationwide shortage of air traffic controllers since the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, new details this week revealed that the control tower at Reagan National Airport was The military would have to request an exemption to turn it off if Cruz's bill gets signed into The Epoch Times has previously reported on the nationwide shortage of air traffic controllers since the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, new details this week revealed that the control tower at Reagan National Airport was chronically understaffed FAA Deputy Chief Operating Officer Nick Fuller defended the staffing levels and suggested the control tower was nearly fully staffed on the night of the collision. Story continues below advertisement However, a contractor hired by the FAA to conduct compliance verifications at the airport's control tower said it had 'always been on the lower number of staffing, not necessarily healthy.' He said the staffing was a 'concern,' but was rebuffed when calling for adding another operations manager and staff specialist to assist with the tower's workload. An NTSB investigator also criticized the FAA for overworking its controllers with a 'just make it work' mentality when fewer workers are available for high-demand tasks. American Airlines Boosted Flights The NTSB revealed that American Airlines had been increasing its number of flights during specific times within the hour, a practice known as 'front loading' and 'back loading.' Clark Allen, who was operations manager at Reagan National Airport when the accident occurred, said it was a concern for air traffic control. Story continues below advertisement Conversations were conducted between the control tower and the airline's scheduling team to address the schedule. Eric Silverman, who is an air traffic control and airfield operations manager for American Airlines, said the scheduling increase happened in early 2022, and 'then we made changes where we could within the FAA-mandated slot program.' Robert Clifford, the attorney representing family members of the crash victims, criticized American Airlines for the flight load. 'The evidence presented thus far reveals that American Airlines' actions to maximize [Reagan National] arrival rates and hourly operations that help drive its profits directly led to flight 5342 being switched from the runway one approach to the higher risk runway 33 approach where the runway was shorter and helicopter route 4 intersected the approach path,' Clifford told The Epoch Times. 'This put all 67 people into a perilous and disastrous collision course.' Story continues below advertisement American Airlines did not respond to a request for comment by publication time. FAA Allegedly Knew About Risks The NTSB alleged that the FAA had known for years about serious safety risks in the airspace around Reagan National Airport, especially with the inclusion of military aircraft flights. 'Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you that,' Homendy said. Rick Dressler, an aviation site manager for Metro Aviation Inc. and a former Army aviator and retired Air Force officer, said his community was particularly concerned whenever the 12th Aviation Battalion was operating in the Washington airspace. That is the same battalion that was operating the Black Hawk helicopter on the night of the crash. Story continues below advertisement 'I don't like saying that [the] 12th aviation battalion gives us all pause in the community,' Dressler said. 'We are all very uncomfortable' whenever that battalion is operating in the area, he added. The Army did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store