logo
The three things terrorist Alexander Dighton blamed for his vicious attack on police officers

The three things terrorist Alexander Dighton blamed for his vicious attack on police officers

Wales Online13-06-2025

The three things terrorist Alexander Dighton blamed for his vicious attack on police officers
The 28 year-old loner said his grievances which led to his attacks on police had been brewing for 15 years or more.
He made a fire under a police van to lure officers out
(Image: PA )
Sentenced to life for a ferocious attack on a police station in South Wales loner Alex Dighton launched into an unhinged tirade against what he sees as government corruption. He blamed three things that he saw as being possible reasons for violence against the state.
Addressing the judge Mark Lucraft KC at the Old Bailey on June 13 the 28-year-old from Pontyclun, said he was "not interested in fame" but wanted a "conversation" about matters that bothered him.

Airing grievances ranging from lockdown parties held by Boris Johnson to the Tavistock gender clinic, Dighton, who represented himself in court, cited issues he said had been bothering him for years. Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here.

The Old Bailey heard he defendant harboured extreme anti-Islam, anti-immigration and anti-government views. He had sympathy for far right politics and misogynistic Incel groups.
Alexander Dighton has been jailed for life
(Image: PA Media )
A police investigation into Dighton's activities after the attack showed he had shared some of these entrenched views on social media, including X, and in chat rooms , but they had not been so extreme as to have broken the law. The gamer also identified with characters on Warhammer.
Article continues below
Addressing the court as he faced a life sentence behind bars Dighton said in a matter of fact tone: "I don't care about myself being noticed. Fame is not important to me. What I think is important is having a conversation about where Britain is right now. Whether violence against the state is justified.
"Has the state got to a point where violence is justified? You have grooming gangs and Boris Johnson having parties in lockdown. Open corruption. You have the Tavistock Clinic mutilating children.
'I have been watching this for 15 years…this is years of build up. People have such a short memory.

'I will be done. It doesn't bother me."
Dighton was armed with a knife, sharpened poles and Molotov cocktails when he attacked Talbot Green police station on January 31 this year. Today he was jailed for life with a minimum of 22 years in prison for the attack.
The loner, who lived in Pontyclun, previously admitted 10 charges relating to the attack, including attempting to murder of a police officer.

Dighton, who the court hard has been of good behaviour in custody and had no previous convictions, was considered to have been motivated by terrorism, the judge said. He had shown no remorse for the attack which left police officers needing hospital treatment and still held "rigid" and extremist views.
The former prize winning student, who won a Wales-wide competition in advanced mechanical engineering for his computer-aided design of a wobbler engine aged 18, told the court his unhappiness with the system had begun at school.
Diagnosed with Asperger's aged seven he spent two years at a special educational needs primary before going on to mainstream secondary and university. The court heard he had had some mental health problems and a "difficult" family upbringing.
Article continues below
But the judge deemed there were no mitigating factors for the violence he committed at Talbot Green police station, other than early guilty pleas, and he represented a continuing danger with his lack of remorse and entrenched views.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stormont: Charities call for executive to drop anti-poverty strategy
Stormont: Charities call for executive to drop anti-poverty strategy

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Stormont: Charities call for executive to drop anti-poverty strategy

Almost fifty charities and anti-poverty organisations are calling for the Northern Ireland Executive to withdraw its draft strategy to tackle poverty, saying that families "deserve better".An anti-poverty strategy was first committed to by Stormont 19 years ago, but the first-ever plan was only agreed by executive parties last month.A letter to Stormont ministers said it is "more harmful to have a strategy that will not address poverty, than no strategy at all".In a statement, the Department for Communities (DfC) said the strategy was the "culmination of hard work and collaboration" from a broad range of groups "including the anti-poverty co-design group". Groups including Save the Children, the Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action (NICVA), the Ulster Farmers Union (UFU) and trade unions are among signatories of the anti-poverty strategy was released for public consultation earlier in June for a period of 14 Unionist Party (DUP) Communities Minister Gordon Lyons, whose department has responsibility for the document, said the plan was "realistic", given the financial constraints Stormont departments are operating the plan was agreed in May by the executive, First Minister Michelle O'Neill said it probably could "go further" but denied there was a row between Sinn Féin and the DUP over it. What is in the Northern Ireland poverty strategy? The 28-page paper sets out the executive's approach to tackling poverty over the next 10 outlines efforts already being taken by various departments to help minimise the risks of people falling into poverty in Northern Ireland, as well as reducing its impacts and ways to help people get out of document states that poverty is "not a problem which the executive can solve in isolation", but one that requires community groups, business, councils and voluntary groups to adds that the strategy will be accompanied by a programme of delivery to be updated on an ongoing basis. What does the letter say? It states that those who have signed it want to share their "dismay and frustration" at the draft adds: "The undersigned agree that the Northern Ireland Executive's draft Anti-Poverty 'Strategy' does not meet the criteria of a reasonable strategy."It fails to fulfil what oversight bodies, including the NI Audit Office and Public Accounts Committee, outline as the basic elements of any strategy."They are critical that it does not include defined and specific actions or targets."We acknowledge that the minister has indicated that an action plan with targets and specific actions will follow at a later, unspecified date, but every expert, every oversight body is clear that a strategy must include measurable and time-bound targets within or alongside the strategy," it states."We are committed to working with you in good faith to eradicate poverty in Northern Ireland, and therefore, we are asking the NI Executive to withdraw their support of the draft Anti-Poverty Strategy, on the basis that it is more harmful to have a strategy that will not address poverty, than no strategy at all."Our children, families and communities – your constituents – deserve better."Those who have signed it include: Barnardo's NI, the Simon Community, Action for Children, NICVA (Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action), the Law Centre NI, Age NI and Conradh na a statement, a DfC spokesperson said the minister has "listened carefully to the recommendations made, many of which have been included and actioned in the Anti-Poverty Strategy"."The strategy is out for public consultation and we encourage anyone with an interest to engage with the consultation and make their views known."

Let Kneecap and Bob Vylan speak freely
Let Kneecap and Bob Vylan speak freely

New Statesman​

time2 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Let Kneecap and Bob Vylan speak freely

Photo byGetting charged with a terror offence is the best thing that could have happened for Mo Chara's career. Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, one third of Belfast rap trio Kneecap, was in Westminster Magistrates' Court two weeks ago, brought there by the Metropolitan Police for allegedly brandishing a Hezbollah flag at a London gig over six months prior. It's the perfect formula: Kneecap have made pro-Palestine and anti-British-state stances a keystone of their product; now they can say on stage at Glastonbury that they're being persecuted for their activism by a government more interested in policing their language than looking after starving children in Gaza; and they might even be right. Taking a leaf out of the Kneecap playbook, rap duo Bob Vylan made their own headlines at Glastonbury on Saturday. On the same afternoon as Kneecap's set at the West Holt stage, in the baking heat, one half of the pair led the crowd in a chant: 'Death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]'. Somerset Police, for some reason, have got involved. Wes Streeting told Laura Kuenssberg yesterday that it was 'appalling'; the BBC – who broadcast the set live – is embarrassed; Glastonbury festival is in a pickle – how to marry their punk free-speech stick-it-to-the-man credentials with their acts who contravene such basic politeness codes? They have settled for saying they are 'appalled' by Vylan, just like Streeting. Can you believe in free speech and be annoyed by rude and misguided people at the same time? The answer is simple: this should never have been a police matter, Glastonbury needn't apologise, and the BBC has bigger things to worry about than broadcasting bad music by admittedly unpleasant but staggeringly banal rappers. I would suggest Labour cabinet ministers also had more pressing issues to address, on this of all weekends. Palestine flags are common at Glastonbury anyway, but this year they are ubiquitous, with too many to count in the thousands-strong crowd that shouted 'death to the IDF' back at Bob Vylan. That crowd was unusually extreme. But no matter your fealty to any cause, and no matter the political tastes of the professional Glastonbury-goers (simplistic and ugly they may be), it is hard to argue that any response to the Bob Vylan interjection beyond 'ignore them' is appropriate, or commensurate. In this, the millennial left and the young online right are united. The pragmatic case made by both sides is simple: by investigating the duo, or charging them, Bob Vylan's campaign is elevated beyond any reasonable proportion; it brings more eyeballs to the message (totally counterproductive if you are also minded to condemn them); and hands them the argument that they are victims of an oppressive state. This is precisely how the charges against Mo Chara have cemented his career. But the principled case is far more important: Free-speech absolutism is the only logical position in a modern democracy. In Britain the left has been hounded by agents of the state as far back as the wars against Revolutionary, and then Napoleonic France. Spies, provocateurs, and strong-armed police tactics have been used to suppress conversations and organisations for the best part of two centuries. Free speech as a societal axiom was and is the only answer to these bullying tendencies. The last ten years, when all sorts of left-liberals cowardly abandoned this principle, were a nadir for the movement, both in Britain and abroad. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Maybe that same movement, watching Kneecap and this rapper face over-the-top condemnation will recover some of its sense. It's almost always fine for people to say things that other people don't agree with. That may be cliché to argue, but the fact that we keep having to argue this suggests the fact is neither ingrained nor obvious. [See also: The Kneecap crossover event] Related

US tariff relief for UK carmakers and aerospace comes into force
US tariff relief for UK carmakers and aerospace comes into force

Glasgow Times

time2 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

US tariff relief for UK carmakers and aerospace comes into force

Car manufacturers exporting to the US will face a 10% tariff quota, down from 27.5%, while the aerospace sector will see a 10% levy removed entirely. Sir Keir hailed the 'historic trade deal' with the US, clinched after Donald Trump imposed the import taxes as part of his 'liberation day' tariffs on countries across the world. US President Donald Trump (left) and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking to the media at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The Prime Minister and US president finalised the deal for those sectors at the G7 summit, but levies on steel have been left standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Talks are ongoing to secure 0% tariffs on core steel products from the UK. The executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances on the supply chains for UK steel intended for export, as well as on the 'nature of ownership' of production facilities. Sir Keir said: 'Our historic trade deal with the United States delivers for British businesses and protects UK jobs. 'From today, our world-class automotive and aerospace industries will see tariffs slashed, safeguarding key industries that are vital to our economy. 'We will always act in the national interest – backing British businesses and workers, delivering on our Plan for Change.' Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal would save hundreds of millions each year and safeguard thousands of jobs. 'We agreed this deal with the US to protect jobs and support growth in some of our most vital sectors – and today, we're delivering on that promise for the UK's world-class automotive and aerospace industries.' Kevin Craven, head of aerospace trade association ADS, said the sector 'hugely appreciated' the efforts to reach a deal. Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders chief executive Mike Hawes said the agreement was 'good news for US customers and a huge relief for the UK automotive companies that export to this critically important market'. The Government is also due to update Parliament on Monday on ethanol and quotas on US beef. Under the deal, it was agreed that a 20% tariff on US beef imports to the UK be removed and the quota for US beef raised to 13,000 metric tonnes. The Vivergo Fuels site near Hull (Vivergo Fuels/PA) A 19% tariff on ethanol imports from the US is also due to be removed, with a tariff-free quota of 1.4 billion litres of US ethanol applied. The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. The UK's largest bioethanol plant warned last week that it could be weeks from stopping production. Hull-based Vivergo Fuels said the start of talks with the Government was a 'positive signal' but that it was simultaneously beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store