
Let Kneecap and Bob Vylan speak freely
Photo byGetting charged with a terror offence is the best thing that could have happened for Mo Chara's career. Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, one third of Belfast rap trio Kneecap, was in Westminster Magistrates' Court two weeks ago, brought there by the Metropolitan Police for allegedly brandishing a Hezbollah flag at a London gig over six months prior.
It's the perfect formula: Kneecap have made pro-Palestine and anti-British-state stances a keystone of their product; now they can say on stage at Glastonbury that they're being persecuted for their activism by a government more interested in policing their language than looking after starving children in Gaza; and they might even be right.
Taking a leaf out of the Kneecap playbook, rap duo Bob Vylan made their own headlines at Glastonbury on Saturday. On the same afternoon as Kneecap's set at the West Holt stage, in the baking heat, one half of the pair led the crowd in a chant: 'Death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]'. Somerset Police, for some reason, have got involved. Wes Streeting told Laura Kuenssberg yesterday that it was 'appalling'; the BBC – who broadcast the set live – is embarrassed; Glastonbury festival is in a pickle – how to marry their punk free-speech stick-it-to-the-man credentials with their acts who contravene such basic politeness codes? They have settled for saying they are 'appalled' by Vylan, just like Streeting.
Can you believe in free speech and be annoyed by rude and misguided people at the same time? The answer is simple: this should never have been a police matter, Glastonbury needn't apologise, and the BBC has bigger things to worry about than broadcasting bad music by admittedly unpleasant but staggeringly banal rappers. I would suggest Labour cabinet ministers also had more pressing issues to address, on this of all weekends.
Palestine flags are common at Glastonbury anyway, but this year they are ubiquitous, with too many to count in the thousands-strong crowd that shouted 'death to the IDF' back at Bob Vylan. That crowd was unusually extreme. But no matter your fealty to any cause, and no matter the political tastes of the professional Glastonbury-goers (simplistic and ugly they may be), it is hard to argue that any response to the Bob Vylan interjection beyond 'ignore them' is appropriate, or commensurate.
In this, the millennial left and the young online right are united. The pragmatic case made by both sides is simple: by investigating the duo, or charging them, Bob Vylan's campaign is elevated beyond any reasonable proportion; it brings more eyeballs to the message (totally counterproductive if you are also minded to condemn them); and hands them the argument that they are victims of an oppressive state. This is precisely how the charges against Mo Chara have cemented his career.
But the principled case is far more important: Free-speech absolutism is the only logical position in a modern democracy. In Britain the left has been hounded by agents of the state as far back as the wars against Revolutionary, and then Napoleonic France. Spies, provocateurs, and strong-armed police tactics have been used to suppress conversations and organisations for the best part of two centuries. Free speech as a societal axiom was and is the only answer to these bullying tendencies. The last ten years, when all sorts of left-liberals cowardly abandoned this principle, were a nadir for the movement, both in Britain and abroad.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Maybe that same movement, watching Kneecap and this rapper face over-the-top condemnation will recover some of its sense. It's almost always fine for people to say things that other people don't agree with. That may be cliché to argue, but the fact that we keep having to argue this suggests the fact is neither ingrained nor obvious.
[See also: The Kneecap crossover event]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
36 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Scheme to register foreign agents comes into force but China avoids top tier
The new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs) comes into effect from Tuesday, requiring anyone carrying out 'political influence activities' on behalf of a foreign power to register with the Government or face prosecution. The rules, which cover activities such as political communications or lobbying, were introduced in 2023 as part of efforts to strengthen national security amid concerns about covert action by foreign governments. Security minister Dan Jarvis said: 'We welcome legitimate engagement with all countries, but we will not tolerate covert attempts to manipulate our political system or society. 'The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme gives us the tools to confront growing threats to our national security, one of the foundations of our plan for change, without compromising the openness that defines our democracy.' The new rules also include an 'enhanced tier', which requires anyone working for certain states to declare any activity, not just political work. Mr Jarvis said: 'This is about creating accountability and visibility so that covert influence operations have nowhere to hide, and ensuring we have the tools to detect and disrupt them.' Failing to register with Firs carries a maximum sentence of two years, or five years for agents of states in the enhanced tier. So far, only Iran and Russia have been placed in the enhanced tier, with both nations accused of operating covertly in the UK to shape public opinion and intimidate opponents. But despite calls from some MPs to include China in the enhanced tier, Russia and Iran remain the only nations on the list. Beijing has been repeatedly accused of seeking to covertly influence British politics and academia. A 2023 report by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee found China had engaged in 'aggressive' interference, including seeking to 'penetrate or buy academia to ensure that its international narrative is advanced and criticism of China suppressed.' Following the announcement in April that Russia would be included in the enhanced tier, Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was 'astonishing' that China had not received similar treatment and accused the Government of 'prioritising economic links over national security'. At the time, Mr Jarvis replied that the Government had a 'consistent long-term and strategic approach' to the UK's relationship with China. He added: 'The Government's policy is clear – we will co-operate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must, including on issues of national security.'

Rhyl Journal
38 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Scheme to register foreign agents comes into force but China avoids top tier
The new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs) comes into effect from Tuesday, requiring anyone carrying out 'political influence activities' on behalf of a foreign power to register with the Government or face prosecution. The rules, which cover activities such as political communications or lobbying, were introduced in 2023 as part of efforts to strengthen national security amid concerns about covert action by foreign governments. Security minister Dan Jarvis said: 'We welcome legitimate engagement with all countries, but we will not tolerate covert attempts to manipulate our political system or society. 'The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme gives us the tools to confront growing threats to our national security, one of the foundations of our plan for change, without compromising the openness that defines our democracy.' The new rules also include an 'enhanced tier', which requires anyone working for certain states to declare any activity, not just political work. Mr Jarvis said: 'This is about creating accountability and visibility so that covert influence operations have nowhere to hide, and ensuring we have the tools to detect and disrupt them.' Failing to register with Firs carries a maximum sentence of two years, or five years for agents of states in the enhanced tier. So far, only Iran and Russia have been placed in the enhanced tier, with both nations accused of operating covertly in the UK to shape public opinion and intimidate opponents. But despite calls from some MPs to include China in the enhanced tier, Russia and Iran remain the only nations on the list. Beijing has been repeatedly accused of seeking to covertly influence British politics and academia. A 2023 report by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee found China had engaged in 'aggressive' interference, including seeking to 'penetrate or buy academia to ensure that its international narrative is advanced and criticism of China suppressed.' Following the announcement in April that Russia would be included in the enhanced tier, Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was 'astonishing' that China had not received similar treatment and accused the Government of 'prioritising economic links over national security'. At the time, Mr Jarvis replied that the Government had a 'consistent long-term and strategic approach' to the UK's relationship with China. He added: 'The Government's policy is clear – we will co-operate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must, including on issues of national security.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Glastonbury proves that I was right to try to reform the BBC: NADINE DORRIES
I have long believed that the BBC is one of the main supporting pillars of socialism in Britain today and that many who work for it are rootedly anti-Semitic. After the events of the weekend, when the Corporation live-streamed disgusting chants of 'death, death to the IDF [ Israel Defence Forces]' by punk duo Bob Vylan from Glastonbury, who can doubt it?