logo
The winners and losers of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The winners and losers of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

RNZ News8 hours ago
By
Matt Egan
and
Tami Luhby
, CNN
President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 26 March.
Photo:
Francis Chung/Politico/Getty Images via CNN Newsource
Analysis
- President Donald Trump has promised that the "big, beautiful bill" passed by Congress will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation in American history.
Of course, the ultimate beauty of this sweeping legislation is very much in the eye of the beholder.
The bill could end up boosting some workers and industries, while others may be left worse off.
Corporate America
Big business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable, applauded the Senate's passage of the bill on Tuesday.
Corporations are betting they will benefit from the legislation making permanent the tax breaks in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
The package would restore a tax break from the 2017 tax package that allowed businesses to fully write off the cost of equipment in the first year it was purchased. The incentive has been phasing out since 2023.
Also, the legislation would once again allow businesses to write off the cost of research and development in the year it was incurred. The TCJA required that companies deduct those expenses over five years, starting in 2022.
Manufacturers
Manufacturers are especially happy that the bill would make significant changes to how the US tax code treats the construction of new manufacturing facilities.
Businesses will be allowed to fully and immediately deduct the cost of building new manufacturing facilities. This temporary provision is retroactive to 19 January, 2025 and continues for construction that begins before 1 January, 2029.
And in a bid to incentivise more chipmaking in America, the legislation would enhance tax credits for semiconductor firms building manufacturing facilities in the United States.
Small businesses and partnerships
The National Federation of Independent Business, the leading small business lobbying group, praised the legislation for making permanent a special deduction for the owners of certain pass-through entities who pay businesses taxes on their individual tax returns.
That deduction, which applies to small businesses and partnerships formed by lawyers, doctors and investors, would get increased in the House version of the bill from 20 percent to 23 percent. The Senate bill kept it at 20 percent.
High-income Americans
The net income for the top 20 percent of earners would increase by nearly US$13,000 per year, after taxes and transfers, according to an analysis of a near-final version of the Senate bill by Penn Wharton Budget Model.
That amounts to a 3 percent average increase in income for those households.
For the top 0.1 percent of earners, the average annual income gain would amount to more than US$290,000, according to Penn Wharton.
Americans living in high-tax states should also benefit because the bill temporarily increases limits on deductions for state and local taxes for householders making up to US$500,000 annually to US$40,000 per year for five years.
However, millionaires who lose their jobs will not be able to collect unemployment benefits, according to a recent provision added to the Senate bill.
Workers who receive tips and overtime
Certain workers will receive an extra tax break through 2028.
Employees who work in jobs that traditionally receive tips could deduct up to US$25,000 in tip income from their federal income taxes, while workers who receive overtime could deduct up to US$12,500 of that extra pay.
However, highly compensated individuals, who make more than US$160,000 in 2025, would not qualify.
Low-income Americans
Many people at the lowest end of the income ladder would be worse off because the package would enact historic cuts to the nation's safety net program, particularly Medicaid and food stamps.
Among the many changes to these programs would be the addition of federally mandated work requirements to Medicaid for the first time in its 60-year history and the expansion of the work mandate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the formal name for food stamps. Parents of children ages 14 and up are among those who would have to work, volunteer, take classes or participate in job training to keep their benefits.
Millions of low-income Americans are expected to lose their benefits because of the work requirements and the bill's other measures affecting Medicaid and food stamps. Notably, few of those dropped from Medicaid coverage would have access to job-based health insurance, according to a Congressional Budget Office report about the House version of the package.
Those in the lowest-income group, earning less than US$18,000 a year, would see a US$165 reduction in their after-tax, after-transfer income, once the safety net cuts are taken into account, according to Penn Wharton. That's a 1.1 percent decrease.
The next level, who earn between US$18,000 and US$53,000, would get a US$30 bump in income, or 0.1 percent.
Middle-income households would see their income rise by US$1.430, or 1.8 percent. They earn between US$53,000 and US$96,000.
The health provisions won't only hit low-income Americans. The Senate is also tightening verification requirements for the Affordable Care Act's federal premium subsidies, which could also leave some middle-income Americans uninsured.
All told, the bill could result in more than 10 million more people being uninsured in 2034, according to a CNN analysis of the bill and CBO forecasts.
Hospitals
Hospitals are not happy with the health care provisions of the bill, which would reduce the support they receive from states to care for Medicaid enrollees and leave them with more uncompensated care costs for treating uninsured patients.
"The real-life consequences of these nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts - the largest ever proposed by Congress - will result in irreparable harm to our health care system, reducing access to care for all Americans and severely undermining the ability of hospitals and health systems to care for our most vulnerable patients," said Rick Pollack, chief executive of the American Hospital Association.
The association said it is "deeply disappointed" with the bill, even though it contains a US$50 billion fund to help rural hospitals contend with the Medicaid cuts, which hospitals say is not nearly enough to make up for the shortfall.
Clean energy and EVs
The Senate removed a last-minute excise tax on wind and solar that experts warned would have been a "killer" for the clean energy industry.
However, the Senate bill still strips tax incentives for wind, solar and other renewable energy projects by 2027 and gives developers stringent requirements to claim them.
The American Clean Power Association slammed the legislation as a "step backward for American energy policy" that will eliminate jobs and raise electric bills.
Electric vehicle makers could also be left worse off because the GOP bill ends EV tax credits of up to US$7500 at the end of September. Previously those tax credits were scheduled to last through 2032, providing a powerful incentive for car buyers.
Deficit hawks
The Senate version of the package would increase the deficit by about US$3.4 trillion over the next decade, according to CBO.
Adding trillions to the debt risks lifting already elevated interest rates. That in turn will make it more expensive for Americans to finance the purchase of a car or a home and for businesses to borrow money to grow.
Not only that, but higher rates would force the federal government to devote even greater resources to finance its own mountain of debt.
The CBO expects US federal government interest costs to surpass US$1 trillion per year.
US spending on interest has already more than tripled since 2017, surpassing what the federal government's entire defense budget.
-
CNN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump planning UFC fight at White House for US 250th anniversary
Donald Trump planning UFC fight at White House for US 250th anniversary

RNZ News

time32 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Donald Trump planning UFC fight at White House for US 250th anniversary

By Nandita Bose for Reuters Donald Trump attends a UFC event at New Jersey in June. Photo: VANESSA CARVALHO/AFP US President Donald Trump says he plans to bring an Ultimate Fighting Championship event to the White House next year to help celebrate the 250th anniversary of the country's declaration of independence. Known in the mixed martial arts world as the 'Combatant in Chief', Trump counts UFC president Dana White as a close friend and considers fans of the sport part of his political base. Trump made the announcement during a winding speech that ricocheted from topic to topic at the Iowa state fairgrounds. The event served as a prelude to 4 July Independence Day celebrations on Friday. "We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House," Trump said. "We have a lot of land there. "We are going to build a little - we are not, Dana is going to do it - we are going to have a UFC fight, championship fight, full fight, like 20-25,000 people, and we are going to do that as part of 250 also." Trump has been a regular attendee at UFC fights, most recently attending at New Jersey in June. UFC and its parent company, TKO Group Holdings, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. - Reuters

Guam nuclear radiation survivors 'heartbroken' after being excluded from compensation bill
Guam nuclear radiation survivors 'heartbroken' after being excluded from compensation bill

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Guam nuclear radiation survivors 'heartbroken' after being excluded from compensation bill

Pacific Association for Radiation Survivors (PARS) members at a gathering. Robert Celestial, second left (holding book), says people on Guam are "heartbroken" that radiation exposure compensation is not being extended to them. Photo: RNZ Pacific / Eleisha Foon People on Guam are "disappointed" and "heartbroken" that radiation exposure compensation is not being extended to them, the president of the Pacific Association for Radiation Survivors (PARS) says. Robert Celestial said he and others on Guam are disappointed for many reasons. "Congress seems to not understand that we are no different than any state," he told RNZ Pacific. "We are human beings, we are affected in the same way they are. We are suffering the same way, we are greatly disappointed, heartbroken," Celestial said. The extension to the United States Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) was part of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" passed by Congress on Friday (Thursday, Washington time). Downwind compensation eligibility would extend to the entire states of Utah, Idaho and New Mexico, but Guam - which was included in an earlier version of the bill - was excluded. All claimants are eligible for US$100,000. Guam Republican congressman James Moylan attempted to make an amendment to include Guam before the bill reached the House floor earlier in the week. "Guam has become a forgotten casualty of the nuclear era," Moylan told the House Rules Committee. "Federal agencies have confirmed that our island received measurable radiation exposure as a result of US nuclear testing in the Pacific and yet, despite this clear evidence, Guam remains excluded from RECA, a program that was designed specifically to address the harm caused by our nation's own policies. "Guam is not asking for special treatment we are asking to be treated with dignity equal to the same recognition afforded to other downwind communities across our nation." Moylan said his constituents are dying from cancers linked to radiation exposure. From 1946 to 1962, 67 nuclear bombs were detonated in the Marshall Islands, just under 2000 kilometres from Guam. New Mexico Democratic congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernández supported Moylan, who said it was "sad Guam and other communities were not included". The RECA extension also excluded Colorado and Montana; Idaho was also for a time but this was amended. Robert Celestial, army veteran and Pacific Association of Radiation Survivors president. Photo: RNZ Pacific / Eleisha Foon Celestial said he heard different rumours about why Guam was not included but nothing concrete. "A lot of excuses were saying that it's going to cost too much. You know, Guam is going to put a burden on finances." But Celestial said the cost estimate from the Congressional Budget Office for Guam to be included was US$560m where Idaho was $1.4b. "[Money] can't be the reason that Guam got kicked out because we're the lowest on the totem pole for the amount of money it's going to cost to get us through in the bill." The bill also extends to communities in certain zip codes in Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Alaska, who were exposed to nuclear waste. Celestial said it's taken those states 30 years to be recognised and expects Guam to be eventually paid. He said Moylan would likely now submit a standalone bill with the other states that were not included. If that fails, he said Guam could be included in nuclear compensation through the National Defense Authorization Act in December, which is for military financial support. The RECA extension includes uranium workers employed from 1 January 1942 to 31 December 1990.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store