logo
Government demands investigation after Lindsey oil refinery owner collapses

Government demands investigation after Lindsey oil refinery owner collapses

State Oil – the parent company of Prax Group, which owns the Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire – appointed administrators on Monday.
A separate winding-up order has also been made against the Lindsey oil refinery and related businesses and a liquidator has been appointed.
More than 180 staff are employed by State Oil, while it is thought that around another 420 work at the Lindsey refinery.
Energy minister Michael Shanks said the firm's collapse was 'deeply concerning' and that the company had left the Government with 'little time to act'.
He said the Government is demanding an investigation into the conduct of the company's directors and the circumstances surrounding its failure.
The Lindsey site is one of only five large oil refineries remaining in the UK after the recent closure of the Grangemouth plant in Scotland.
Prax Group is led by majority owner and chairman and chief executive Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai, who bought the Lindsey oil refinery from French firm Total in 2021.
Mr Shanks said: 'There have been longstanding issues with this company and workers have been badly let down.
'The Secretary of State is today writing to the Insolvency Service to demand an immediate investigation into the conduct of the directors and the circumstances surrounding this insolvency.
'The Government will ensure supplies are maintained, protect our energy security, and do everything we can to support workers and the local community, including engaging with trade unions and industry bodies.'
He added: 'The Government believes that the business's leadership have a responsibility to the workers and the local community.
'We call on them to do the right thing and support the workers through this difficult period.'
Trade union Unite said the Government needed to urgently intervene to help protect UK fuel supplies and jobs.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'The Lindsey oil refinery is strategically important and the Government must intervene immediately to protect workers and fuel supplies.
'Unite has constantly warned the Government that its policies have placed the oil and gas industry on a cliff edge.'
Built in 1968, the Lindsey refinery can process around 113,000 barrels of oil a day.
Clare Boardman, joint administrator of State Oil and Prax, said: 'We appreciate that this is a very difficult and uncertain time for the employees and everyone involved and we will be on site to support them during this challenging period.
'We will be considering all options for the group, including the prospect of a sale for the group's upstream business and retail operations in the UK and Europe, all of which remain outside of insolvency.
'We thank the group's team members and other stakeholders for their continued support.'
Prax Group was not immediately available for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England
Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England

The Education Secretary has said that the scheme will 'give a lifeline' to families. Family hubs were originally rolled out across 75 local authorities at the start of 2024 by the then-Conservative government. Officials say that the hubs will be rolled out in every local authority by April 2026, and there will be expanded so there are up to 1,000 of them by the end of 2028. Among the services available at the locations will be birth registration, debt advice, midwifery services and support for parents who are separating or have separated. Officials hope that the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social care. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson praised the scheme (Ben Whitley/PA) Bridget Phillipson said: 'It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve – our new Best Start family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children. 'I saw firsthand how initiatives like Sure Start helped level the playing field in my own community, transforming the lives of children by putting in place family support in the earliest years of life, and as part of our plan for change, we're building on its legacy for the next generation of children. 'Making sure hard-working parents are able to benefit from more early help is a promise made, and promise kept – delivering a lifeline of consistent support across the nation, ensuring health, social care and education work in unison to ensure all children get the very best start in life.' The Conservatives have said that the announcement 'brings little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services'. Shadow education secretary Laura Trott (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'That lack of clarity is part of a wider pattern. 'This is a Government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns.' Charity Save The Children has said it is 'pleased' to see the Government 'making it easier for families to get the help they need'. Dan Paskins, executive director of Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: 'Focusing on family services for the under-fives will be vital in securing better outcomes for children, and we welcome the Best Start In Life announcement. 'We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK Government making it easier for families to get the help they need. 'With ministers now demonstrating an increasingly ambitious plan for children in the UK, we hope this drive for change continues when the child poverty strategy is released in autumn. 'This must include scrapping the two-child limit to Universal Credit, which is the only meaningful way to reduce the UK's record child poverty rate.' The head of the NAHT union welcomed the move. General secretary Paul Whiteman said: 'This is a positive step forward towards ensuring all children get the best start – and we are pleased to see tangible investment following this week's announcement of new targets for school readiness.'

The benefits Bill debacle offered a valuable lesson for politicians
The benefits Bill debacle offered a valuable lesson for politicians

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

The benefits Bill debacle offered a valuable lesson for politicians

SIR – Following the shambolic passage of Labour's welfare Bill on Tuesday (report, July 2), perhaps politicians will now realise that, once the benefit tap is turned on, it becomes virtually impossible to turn it off. Terence Gabriel Herne Bay, Kent SIR – The inevitable consequence of Sir Keir Starmer's latest U-turn on benefits is that the 'working people' he is allegedly anxious to represent are going to have to pay for it. David Nunn West Malling, Kent SIR – According to figures from the Office for National Statistics, the Government borrows about £285,000 (and rising) every single minute, £200,000 of which (also rising) is immediately used to pay interest on the nation's debt. The remainder doesn't even account for the cost of disability benefit (about £105,000 a minute). Advice to those in financial trouble would be categorical: maxing out the credit card and borrowing to pay interest has no future, and has to stop. Set against this, the emotional – some might say hysterical – contributions from several MPs to Tuesday's welfare debate in the House of Commons could be viewed as reckless. If the Prime Minister, who claims he finds it easy to be ruthless, is incapable of convincing his MPs to show financial restraint, he is failing this great nation – and I fear we all face a very dark future as a consequence. Robert Jowitt Dulverton, Somerset SIR – We have been told countless times of the £22 billion 'black hole' inherited by the Labour Government after 14 years of Conservative rule. It is worth noting that, in that time, the Tories had to find funds to restore the economy after the last Labour government departed, as well as meet the costs arising from the Covid pandemic and the Ukraine war. Now you report (June 29) that the Government's many U-turns have added to a £40 billion 'black hole', which the Chancellor needs to fill at the next Budget . This was before the announcement of the latest amendments to the benefits Bill. So, in her first year, Rachel Reeves has managed to turn a 'black hole' of £22 billion into one of more than £40 billion. One wonders how soon this Labour Government, like its predecessor, will have to admit that there's no money left. In the meantime, how much more damage will be inflicted upon the British economy? Adam Massingham Ashford, Kent Connolly's conviction SIR – Apart from the severity of the sentence, which our judicial establishment is yet to justify, to my mind there are two problems with Lucy Connolly's 'incitement' conviction ('Beware calls to change British justice in the wake of the Lucy Connolly case', Letters, June 29). The first is that Mrs Connolly, upon reflection, deleted the offending tweet. This seems to confirm that there was no intention to incite. Unless the deletion was merely a tactic, I believe that most jurors would struggle to find the defendant guilty. Secondly, one might expect a minimal requirement for a conviction to be that the Crown Prosecution Service should provide evidence that someone was incited. Has anyone convicted of crime in the post-Southport chaos cited Mrs Connolly's contribution as a motivator? Without such evidence, Mrs Connolly seems to stand accused of a fantasy crime, and is now suffering the consequences of a judgment that is at odds with most people's understanding of British justice. The criminal hurdle of 'beyond reasonable doubt' has not even been approached, let alone overcome, in my opinion. Jeremy Hosking Bantry, Co Cork, Ireland VAT on school fees SIR – The decision to add VAT to independent school fees was originally framed as a targeted measure to support state education, with the revenue ringfenced for that purpose. More recently, however, the Prime Minister has described this policy as a 'tough decision' that underpins the largest investment in affordable housing in a generation. Given that the projected income from VAT on school fees was £1.5 billion, it is surprising to hear it linked to a £39 billion housing programme, as well as to the recruitment of 6,500 new teachers and the expansion of free school meals. The scale of return being attributed to this policy appears ambitious. Meanwhile, just six months into implementation, estimates of the number of pupils leaving the independent sector have risen from 3,000 to more than 11,000. That means thousands of families are no longer paying VAT, and are instead entering a state system already under strain. The resulting disruption in the independent sector is no longer hypothetical. Several schools have closed, and prominent institutions across the UK are being taken over by private investors. Is this the intended consequence of the policy? If difficult decisions must be taken, surely it is reasonable to ask whether they are producing meaningful outcomes. In this case, many in the education sector are wondering if the social and financial cost of disruption is proportionate to the return. Andrew J McGarva Rector, Morrison's Academy Crieff, Perthshire SIR – Regarding Rhidian Llewellyn's letter (July 1), perhaps the money used to fund cricket bursaries for non-academic pupils to attend public schools could be better spent on encouraging pupils at state schools to play cricket. Susan A Smith Ashburnham, East Sussex Heatwave hysterics SIR – I totally agree with Philip Johntson ('Welfarism has made Britain so soft we can't even handle a heatwave', Comment, July 2). When I was five or six, I was often sent away to my grandparents for the summer, either in London or Bournemouth. I recall running around in the heat, which I understood from my grandparents was 'nearly 100 degrees' (Fahrenheit, of course). There was no need for expensive bottled water, as most parks had at least one drinking fountain. These have sadly been done away with. It's time the Met Office stopped issuing panic-stricken warnings. Mike Salter Aberdeen SIR – The BBC weather forecast, once the most gentle adjunct to the news, has over the past 10 years become an intense drama, where death and destruction are predicted on an almost daily basis. Those who have worked in the hotter parts of the world, or travelled to countries nearer the equator, must be bemused by the dire warnings given out when temperatures are due to rise to the low thirties. Perhaps the Government should introduce a summer cooling allowance for the frail and elderly, as air-conditioning is very expensive to install and run. Brian Farmer Carmarthen SIR – I was astounded to read of the 'heat strike' motion put forward by members of the British Medical Association (BMA), demanding that NHS staff should not be forced to work in conditions above a certain temperature (report, June 20). Unfortunately, patients do not stop being ill in hot weather. As a veteran of the Royal Army Medical Corps, I think of our motto, In Arduis Fidelis (faithful in adversity). Perhaps those in the medical profession who want to desert their patients should ponder these words, and demonstrate a little more commitment and resilience for their patients. Mike Gillingham Chelmsford, Essex Power of tablecloths SIR – The decline in restaurant standards (Letters, June 29) started when tablecloths were removed. Dining at a bare table smacks of the canteen or public bar, and leads to quick eating. This may be convenient, but there are times when only the grace of a properly set table, laid with cloth, real flowers, large napkins, sparkling glasses and several pieces of cutlery, including a dessert fork, will do. Trying to find a restaurant that provides such an arrangement can take considerable effort. A recent attempt was unsuccessful, so we settled for lunch at a five-star hotel to celebrate a family event – with a bare, incompletely set table. It did not enhance our dining experience, and we will not return. Heather Erridge Weston-super-Mare, Somerset SIR – During a visit to Simpson's in the Strand many years ago, one of my lunch guests asked for steak tartare (Letters, June 29), but added, 'Please can I have it well done?' The seasoned waiter, oozing experience and diplomacy, and without a moment's pause, highly recommended another dish from the bill of fare, which was gratefully accepted. Tim Oldfield Wye, Kent Dubious claims about gender in Shakespeare SIR – Ruth Fernando's assertion that Macbeth is a gender-fluid play (report, June 29) made me laugh out loud. The famous lines uttered in desperation by Lady Macbeth – 'unsex me here,/And fill me, from the crown to the toe, top-full/Of direst cruelty' – surely relies upon the fact that she is a woman alone and in crisis, in a world of strong, violent and unpredictable men. David Hunter St Columb Minor, Cornwall SIR – If the Royal Shakespeare Company wants to know how to interest today's youngsters in the Bard's work (Comment, June 17), it has only to consult Mrs Burrows, who taught English Literature to girls in Kent in the 1970s. Minute dissection of the language revealed plenty of insults and sexual references that ensured total attention and aided comprehension. Gillian Courage Cheltenham, Gloucestershire British philanthropy SIR – With the Giving and Impact Summit returning to the London Stock Exchange on Tuesday, we write to highlight the vital role of philanthropy in British society, and the importance of unlocking the full potential of high-net-worth giving. The UK is a generous nation. Last year, the public donated over £15 billion to charity, maintaining our position as the fourth most generous country internationally. Successful entrepreneurs and wealth creators can leverage their full range of assets – financial resources, strategic skills, time and leadership experience – to tackle society's most urgent problems. With the greatest wealth transfer in history underway, as fortunes pass to younger generations, we have a unique opportunity to embed a culture of significant giving among emerging philanthropists. The Government should make more use of matched funding schemes, and simplify the gift aid process. The wealth management sector should better equip advisers to discuss philanthropy with clients, and we should explore other innovative solutions, such as introducing optional donations from lottery winners. Philanthropy built Britain's great universities, museums and cultural institutions. As we face unprecedented global challenges, we need today's successful wealth creators and wealth holders to step forward with the same boldness and vision. The opportunity for change has never been greater. Dame Vivien Duffield Chair, Clore Duffield Foundation Gary Lubner Founder, This Day Charitable Foundation John Studzinski Founder and Chair, Genesis Foundation Lord Verjee (Lib Dem) Founder, The Rumi Foundation Lord Browne of Madingley (Crossbench) Founder, John Browne Charitable Trust Baroness Rebuck (Lab) Chair, Somerset House Lord Stevens of Birmingham (Crossbench) Chair, Cancer Research UK Sir Peter Bazalgette Council Chair, Royal College of Art Professor Geeta Nargund Co-founder and Director, Social Impact Enterprises Ltd Vice Chair, British Red Cross Ajaz Ahmed Founder, and Trustee, Mission 44 and Virgin Unite Alex Chesterman Amar Shah Andrew Dixon Founder of ARC InterCapital, Woodhaven Trust and Fairer Share Andrew Harrison Chair of Trustees, Mental Health Innovations Andrew Law Chair and CEO, Caxton Associates Founding Trustee, Law Family Charitable Foundation and Law Family Educational Trust Andy Wates Chair, Wates Family Enterprise Trust Batia Ofer Chair, Royal Academy of Arts Trust Co-Founder, Idan and Batia Ofer Family Foundation Founder and Chair, Art of Wishes Bill Holroyd Founder, OnSide YouthZones Bob Wigley Chair, UK Finance Brent Hoberman Chair and Co-Founder, Founders Forum Group, Founders Factory and firstminute capital Bruce Carnegie-Brown Carol Shanahan Chair, Port Vale Football Club Trustee, The Port Vale Foundation Trust and EFL in the Community Founder, The Hubb Foundation Charles Gurassa Chair, Oxfam GB Chair, Migration Museum Chris Oglesby CEO, Bruntwood Trustee, Oglesby Charitable Trust Jane Oglesby Chair, Oglesby Charitable Trust Dame Elizabeth Corley Chair Emerita, Impact Investing Institute Chair, Schroders plc Dame Marit Mohn Co-Founder, The Mohn Westlake Foundation Dame Martina Milburn DMC Philanthropy Daniel Levy Co-Chair, The Grove Hotel President, Jewish Volunteering Network Chair, Immanuel College David Dangoor Chair, The Exilarch's Foundation and Dangoor Education David Forbes-Nixon Chair and Founder, DFN Foundation David Gregson Chair and Co-Founder, #BeeWell Chair, Gregson Family Foundation David Pearl Chair and Chief Executive, Pearl & Coutts Founder and Chair, David Pearlman Charitable Foundation Dinesh Dhamija Chair, Copper Beech Group Founder, Dr Nik Kotecha Founder, Morningside Pharmaceuticals Ltd Founder and Chair, Randalsun Capital Ltd and The Randal Charitable Foundation Dr Robert D Kilgour Dr Vijay C Patel CEO, Waymade plc Chair, Waymade Capital Dr Vikas Shah Duke of Richmond and Gordon Chair, The Goodwood Estate Company Ltd Trustee, Goodwood Education Trust, Lennox Trust and Goodwood Art Foundation Earl Cadogan Cadogan Charitable Trust Edmund Lazarus Founder and Managing Partner, EMK Capital Emma Kane Deputy Chair, Elton John AIDS Foundation Gavin Patterson Chair, Alzheimer's Research UK Graham Baker Founder, Butchers Pet Care Graham Edwards Chair, Edwards Family Foundation Trustee, The Pennies Foundation Grant Gordon Chair, Ethos Foundation Harry Hyman Founder, International Opera Awards Ian Marcus Chair, Shurgard Self Storage Deputy Chair, Saracens Multi Academy Trust Ian Rosenblatt Founder, Rosenblatt Law James Lambert Founder investor and Deputy Chair, The Bicester Collection Trustee, The National Gallery James Reed Chair and CEO, Reed Chair, Big Give Trustee, The Reed Foundation Jamie Ritblat Founder and Executive Chairman, Delancey Trustee, Heritage of London Trust Trustee, The Ritblat Family Foundation Trustee, Blenheim Palace Joanna Barnett Chair, Fields in Trust Joe Garner Chair, Tennis First John Booth Chair, The National Gallery Vice- President, The King's Trust John Caudwell Founder, Caudwell Children and Caudwell Youth John Hartz Co-Founder, Inflexion Private Equity Trustee, Inflexion Foundation Founder, Hartz Family Foundation Jonathan Straight Chair, WasteAid Judy Dewinter Chair, Royal Free Charity President, Myeloma UK Justin Byam Shaw Founder, The Felix Project Keith Black CEO and Chair, Regatta Chair, Regatta Foundation Trustee, Family Foundation Chair, Jewish Leadership Council Keith Breslauer Vice Patron, The Royal Marines Charity Chair, PTI, formerly The Prince's Teaching Institute Koolesh Shah Founder, London Town Group Lady Jill Shaw Ruddock Founder and Chair, The Second Half Foundation Laurence Geller Chair, Loveday & Co Chancellor, University of West London Founder, Geller Commission on Dementia Care Laurence Kirschel Founder, Outernet London; Founder, Adot charity Leo Noé Founding Trustee, Rachel Charitable Trust Chair, Centre for Social Justice Foundation Trustee, Project Seed Lord Gadhia (Non-affiliated) Chair, British Asian Trust Lord Lupton (Non-affiliated) Chair, The Ashmolean Museum Founder Chair, The Lovington Foundation Lord Kestenbaum (Lab) Chancellor, University of Plymouth Trustee, Teach First Chair, Chief Rabbinate Charitable Trust Lord Davies of Abersoch (Non-affiliated) Chair, Letter One Chair, Glyndebourne Opera House Lord Levy (Lab) Life President, Jewish Care, Sense, Barnet and Southgate College, JFS School and JLGB Lord Wei (Con) Co-founder and Director, The Shaftesbury Partnership Co-founder, Teach First Lord Fink (Con) Lord Stuart Marks Malik Karim Founder and CEO, Fenchurch Advisory Partners Mark Adlestone Chair, Beaverbrooks Charitable Trust Martin Port Matthew Westerman Chair, Clocktower Foundation Meheen Rangoonwala Global Programme Manager, Rangoonwala Foundation Michael Samuel Chair, Anna Freud Chair, Full Fact Chair, Somerset Community Foundation Chair, Family Foundations Michelle Pinggera Deputy Chair, The King's Trust International Mike Still Mike Welch Founder, Founder, The Welch Trust Trustee, King's Trust USA Neil Blair Founder and Chair, The Jigsaw Network Nick Wheeler Founder and Chair, Charles Tyrwhitt Shirt Nicola Loftus Senior Vice President, Jewish Care Oliver Gregson CEO, Wealth Management, Schroders plc Oliver Pawle Chair, Korn Ferry Board Paul Drechsler Trustee, The Felix Project Peter Samuelson Chair, First Star Scholars UK Philip Marsden Chair, MCC Foundation Chair, Marsden Family Trust Trustee, Royal Academy Ric Lewis Founder and Chair, The Black Heart Foundation Richard Huntingford Vice-President, The King's Trust Richard Oldfield Chair, The Christopher and Henry Oldfield Trust Richard Reed Partner, JamJar Richard Ross Chair, Rosetrees Rick Sopher Roland Rudd Chair, Tate Chair, Millfield School Trustee, Speakers for Schools Ambassador, Alzheimer's Society Trustee, Royal Hospital Chelsea Shabir Randeree Randeree Charitable Foundation Chair, King's Trust International Shahzad Malik General Partner, Advent Life Sciences Chair, MQ Shalni Arora Savannah Wisdom Sherry Coutu Chair, Founders4Schools Shobi Khan CEO, Canary Whary Group Trustee, British Library Simon Collins Chair, Global Leadership Board, University of Manchester Simon Turner Co-Founder, Inflexion Private Equity Trustee, Inflexion Foundation Chair, The Roundhouse Sir Damon Buffini Chair, National Theatre and Royal Anniversary Trust Co-Founder, Buffini Chao Foundation Sir Douglas Flint Chair, The Royal Marsden Cancer Charity Sir Jeremy Isaacs Chair, The J Isaacs Charitable Trust Honorary Life Chair, Noah's Ark Children's Hospice Sir John and Lady Sorrell Co-Founders and Trustees, The Sorrell Foundation and The National Saturday Club Sir Keith Mills Patron, Sported Sir Kenneth Olisa Founder and Chair, Aleto Foundation Chair, BusinessLDN Sir Lloyd Dorfman Chair, Royal Opera House Deputy Chair, Community Security Trust Sir Martin Sorrell Executive Chair, Founder, S4 Capital Founder, WPP Chair, JMCMRJ Sorrell Foundation Sir Mick Davis Sir Nicholas Coleridge Chair, Historic Royal Palaces Sir Paul Marshall Chair and CIO, Marshall Wace Founder, the Marshall Institute for Philanthropy and Social Entrepreneurship Sir Ron Kalifa Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou Founder and President, Stelios Philanthropic Foundation Sir Victor Blank Sonal Sachdev Patel CEO, GMSP Foundation Philanthropist in Residence, LSE Stephen Brenninkmeijer Founder, Willows Investments Stephen Grabiner Founder and Chair, The Blue Thread Foundation Steve Morgan Founder and Chair of The Steve Morgan Foundation Steve Rigby Chair, The Rigby Foundation Steven Kaye Director, The Aimwell Charitable Trust Steven Lewis Founder, Lewis and Partners President, Jewish Care Stuart Gulliver Chair, Maggie's Cancer Charity Stuart Roden Founder and Chair, Roden Family Foundation Co-Founder and Chair, Unlocking Potential Chair, the Design Museum Sunita Arora Founder, Arora Charitable Foundation Surinder Arora Founder and Chair, The Arora Group Tania Slowe and Paddy Walker Chair, J Leon Philanthropy Council Hon Charles Wigoder Founder and Chair, The Wigoder Family Foundation William Sieghart Chair, Henry Smith Foundation Yan Huo Founder, Huo Family Foundation

Lifetime ISAs: Why they divide opinion
Lifetime ISAs: Why they divide opinion

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Lifetime ISAs: Why they divide opinion

Liam Roberts had only just finished university, but he was already thinking ahead to how to buy a home and fund 2018, he was looking for a way to build up some savings, and so he chose a Lifetime ISA (LISA).Anyone under 40 can open a LISA to either help save towards retirement or buy a first home. Savers can put in up to £4,000 a year and the government will top it up by 25%."It is an excellent product," says Liam, now aged 28. "The government paid £4,000 towards my first home." He bought a two-bedroom home in Manchester in 2022, using the cash savings and government bonus to help pay the mortgage LISA was automatically closed, and so, after getting his job as an asset manager, he opened another time it was a stocks and shares LISA, for even longer-term retirement plans. Again, he puts in the maximum £4,000 a year, and gets the 25% government bonus. He can start making withdrawals, without a penalty, from the age of 60."They are designed for long-term planning," he says. In a job that involves reading financial products, he knew what he was signing up for, and that it would work well for his everyone has the same knowledge, though, or the same opportunity to make the most of the benefits of the LISA. There remains a limited number of providers, with High Street banks and building societies not among them. The influential Treasury Committee of MPs has said the LISA is ripe for reform, as the commitment of taxpayer funds is of you have got in touch via Your Voice, Your BBC to express your dismay about the product's the heart of these concerns are two issues:the penalty involved in withdrawing money early, which means people face losing 6.25% of their own savingsthe cut-off which means LISA savings can only be used when purchasing a property up to a value of £450,000 - a threshold that has been unchanged since LISAs were launched in 2017, despite rising house prices particularly in south-east EnglandThose who have been in touch have hit out at the penalty, particularly after being caught out by the £450,000 limit. 'Upset and annoyed' One of those was Holly from London. The 28-year-old says she lost around £750 when she bought her home in 2023."I was very upset because I'd been using it to save for a house since I was 19 and I did actually use the money to buy my first home as the scheme intended."She says at 19 the chances of buying a house over £450,000 felt very remote but then her career was going well and she met her future husband."What annoys me is that I bought the home with my now husband and my share is well under £450,000 but of course that wasn't taken into account," she says. Daniel Slavin set up a LISA in his 20s. At the time, as a single person, he understood why the thresholds were there and thought it was a good fast-forward a few years, and now married, when it came to buying a house, he and his wife Lucy fell foul of the £450,000 they were still able to buy without needing to use their LISA, Lucy says it put them in a difficult financial position."It is incredibly frustrating knowing that if we need to withdraw the money our only option is to lose part of our savings," says the 32-year-old, who works as a research specialist for a charity."I can understand losing the bonus if you withdraw early but the penalties are awful."Daniel, 33, who's a doctor, has since stopped paying into his LISA."The current government wants us to buy houses and increase growth and I don't think they should penalise us for doing the right thing and saving money," he need to take inflation into account, he says. "They should change the rules." Barrier to new savers Commentators and campaigners are keen to see Lewis, founder of MoneySavingExpert, says the £450,000 threshold is "unjust, unfair and the rules need changing"."If a LISA is used to buy a property above the threshold, there should be no fine, they should get back at least what they put in," he said."And this flaw doesn't just hurt those with LISAs. It puts off many young people, especially from lower income backgrounds, who tend to be more risk averse, from opening LISAs in the first place."Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, says that LISAs had proven popular among the self-employed, who can save for retirement despite not having access to a workplace she called for the penalty for early withdrawal to be eased, and the age limit for opening a LISA to be extended. Savings habit LISAs were launched under the then-Conservative government in April then, 6% of eligible adults have opened one, with about 1.3 million accounts still open, according to the most recent are clearly divided among those account holders about how well they government says the LISA is a source of celebration but, in time, it could well address some of their concerns."Lifetime ISAs aim to encourage younger people to develop the habit of saving for the longer term, helping them to purchase their first home or build a nest egg for when they are older," a Treasury spokesperson said."We welcome the committee's report and will now review its findings and respond in due course." Additional reporting by Alex Emery, Kris Bramwell and Shanaz Musafer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store