logo
Why the world must help Africa face climate change

Why the world must help Africa face climate change

Arab News12-06-2025
https://arab.news/8j895
According to the World Meteorological Organization, 'extreme weather and climate change impacts are hitting every single aspect of socioeconomic development in Africa and exacerbating hunger, insecurity and displacement.' This alarming statement underscores the scale of devastation sweeping across the continent as it faces the full force of a climate crisis it did little to cause.
While Africa contributes only a tiny fraction of global greenhouse gas emissions, it is bearing the heaviest burden of climate change — economically, socially and environmentally. As these impacts deepen, so too does the responsibility of global powers, especially the major emitters, to provide meaningful and sustained assistance.
Africa's economies are uniquely vulnerable to climate change because they are predominantly reliant on sectors highly sensitive to weather patterns — especially agriculture, fishing and natural resource extraction. Across East, West and Central Africa, erratic rainfall patterns, prolonged droughts, extreme heat and intense floods are decimating crops, killing livestock, damaging infrastructure and eroding livelihoods. Countries such as Nigeria, Ethiopia, Mali and Sudan have seen agricultural yields plummet, often wiping out entire seasons of staple crops such as maize, millet, cassava and sorghum.
This agricultural collapse is more than a farming crisis — it is an economic catastrophe. Agriculture accounts for up to 60 percent of employment in many African countries and constitutes a major source of national income. In Kenya and Somalia, repeated droughts have not only dried up fields but also drained public finances, as governments scramble to fund food aid, water delivery and emergency infrastructure repair. In 2024, floods across Central Africa destroyed critical roadways, bridges and water systems, forcing several governments to divert funds from education, healthcare and public development programs toward crisis management and reconstruction.
Climate change is turning development gains back by decades, especially in countries already facing instability
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
Moreover, energy and water systems, already under strain from underinvestment, have become further crippled by erratic climate conditions. Hydropower — an essential electricity source for countries like Zambia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo — is faltering due to drying rivers. As a result, power shortages are throttling manufacturing output, damaging businesses and pushing more people into poverty.
The longer these economic stresses persist, the harder it will be for African nations to achieve sustainable growth or attract investment. Climate change is turning development gains back by decades, especially in countries already facing fragility, conflict or economic instability. Without urgent financial and technological support, these economies may spiral into prolonged recession or collapse, with global repercussions.
Beyond the numbers and statistics lies an immense human cost. Families are being torn apart, homes destroyed, children are going hungry and millions are being forced to flee their lands. The continent is facing a massive displacement crisis — one that is rapidly escalating in scale and complexity. These numbers are only expected to grow, with many communities facing permanent relocation as climate shocks become more frequent and intense.
Food insecurity has reached catastrophic levels. Across the Sahel and West Africa, the number of people facing emergency and famine-level hunger is now over 36 million. Malnourishment in children is spiking, with irreversible consequences on cognitive development and long-term health. In many regions, climate disasters have also destroyed or damaged schools, forcing children out of education and leaving a generation without the tools to rebuild their futures.
Public health systems are also under immense strain. Rising temperatures and flooding have led to outbreaks of malaria, cholera and waterborne diseases. At the same time, heat waves are increasingly causing heatstroke and other heat-related illnesses, especially among the elderly and outdoor laborers. Poor communities, without access to medical care, clean water or sanitation, are bearing the brunt of these health emergencies. The social fabric of entire regions is unraveling. Competition over scarce resources — especially land and water — is intensifying conflicts. Climate change is not just a crisis of the environment — it is a multiplier of instability, violence and displacement.
Africa's tragedy is made even more bitter by its innocence in the making of this crisis. The continent contributes less than 4 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions. Most African countries have historically emitted negligible amounts of greenhouse gases, yet they are the most vulnerable to climate extremes and have the fewest resources to adapt.
This stark imbalance is a glaring injustice. The bulk of the world's emissions have come from industrialized nations — especially the US, European powers, China and other developed economies — that built their wealth on centuries of carbon-intensive industrialization. Yet these same nations have been slow, even reluctant, to fulfill their climate finance promises to developing countries, particularly those in Africa.
Climate justice demands more than rhetorical sympathy. It requires concrete action, systemic financial restructuring and a shift in how the global community perceives responsibility and vulnerability. Africa is not asking for charity — it is demanding fairness.
It is both a moral imperative and a strategic necessity for global powers to act. The industrialized world has the means, the technology and the historical responsibility to help Africa confront climate change. It must see African adaptation not as a cost, but as an investment in shared global security and prosperity.
Failure to support Africa will only deepen instability, provoke mass migration, fuel regional conflicts and disrupt global supply chains and markets. The cost of inaction — social, economic and geopolitical — will be far higher than the cost of proactive, coordinated intervention today.
Climate change is the ultimate borderless crisis. Droughts in the Horn of Africa, failed harvests in the Sahel and flooding in Central Africa do not remain contained — they send ripple effects across continents. Food shortages can lead to spikes in global food prices. Displacement and migration can strain bordering nations and contribute to humanitarian emergencies. Helping Africa is, in essence, helping the world.
Global powers must see African adaptation not as a cost, but as an investment in shared security and prosperity
Dr. Ramzy Baroud
Wealthy nations initially pledged $100 billion annually in climate finance to developing countries by 2020 — a target they have repeatedly failed to meet. Now, under the new global goal, this figure needs to be scaled up to $1 trillion to $1.3 trillion per year by 2030. This funding must be predictable, accessible and focused on both adaptation and mitigation.
Africa has enormous renewable energy potential — particularly solar and wind. Global support can fast-track a transition to clean energy, while also addressing the continent's vast energy access gap. Technological investment in climate-resilient agriculture, water management and disaster preparedness is essential. Tools like artificial intelligence-enabled early warning systems, climate-smart farming and green infrastructure can protect livelihoods and prevent disasters from becoming catastrophes.
Many African nations are trapped in unsustainable debt, limiting their ability to invest in climate adaptation. Debt restructuring, concessional loans and new financing tools must be implemented to ease this burden.
True resilience begins at the grassroots. Global aid must empower African communities, farmers, women and youth with the tools and knowledge to build adaptive systems suited to local realities.
If Africa is left to face climate change alone, the consequences will be devastating — not just for the continent but for the entire world. Mass displacement could grow into one of the largest refugee crises in human history. Widespread hunger, conflict and economic collapse could destabilize entire regions. The suffering would be unimaginable.
At the same time, failing to help Africa would undermine trust in global climate negotiations and multilateral cooperation. The legitimacy of climate agreements like the Paris Agreement rests on the principle of equity and shared responsibility. If the world's poorest and least culpable are abandoned, such agreements will lose meaning.
Ignoring Africa today is sowing the seeds of greater crises tomorrow — crises that no border, wall or ocean can prevent.
In conclusion, the responsibility of Western and global powers to help Africa is not optional — it is urgent, necessary and long overdue. Africa did not cause this crisis, yet it is paying the highest price. By acting now, global powers and the world's richest nations can prevent mass suffering, strengthen global stability and forge a path toward a more just and resilient planet. Helping Africa adapt to climate change is not just about generosity. It is about survival — for them and for us all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sudan's paramilitaries launch parallel govt, deepening the crisis
Sudan's paramilitaries launch parallel govt, deepening the crisis

Arab News

time4 hours ago

  • Arab News

Sudan's paramilitaries launch parallel govt, deepening the crisis

CAIRO: A paramilitary group and its allies in Sudan said they formed a parallel government in areas under the group's control, which are located mainly in the western region of Darfur where allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity are being investigated. The move was likely to deepen the crisis in Sudan, which plunged into chaos when tensions between the country's military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, exploded into fighting in April 2023 in the capital, Khartoum and elsewhere in the country. The RSF-led Tasis Alliance appointed Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, the commander of the paramilitary group, as head of the sovereign council in the new administration. The 15-member council serves as head of the state. The RSF grew out of the notorious Janjaweed militias, mobilized two decades ago by then-President Omar Bashir against populations that identify as Central or East African in Darfur. The Janjaweed were accused of mass killings, rapes and other atrocities. In the current war, the RSF has been accused of numerous atrocities. The Biden administration slapped Dagalo with sanctions, saying the RSF and its proxies were committing genocide. The RSF has denied committing genocide. The alliance spokesman Alaa Al-Din Naqd announced the new administration in a video statement from the Darfur city of Nyala, which is controlled by the RSF and its allied Janjaweed. Mohammed Hassan Al-Taishi, a civilian politician who was a member of a military-civilian sovereign council that ruled Sudan following the 2019 overthrow of Al-Bashir, was named as prime minister in the RSF-controlled government. Rebel leader Abdelaziz Al-Hilu, who commands the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) which is active in the southern Kodrofan region, was appointed as Dagalo's deputy in the council. The SPLM-N is a breakaway faction of the SPLM, the ruling party of neighboring South Sudan. The announcement came five months after the RSF and its allies signed a charter in February in Kenya's capital, Nairobi, with the aim of establishing a parallel government in RSF-controlled areas. At the time, many countries, including the US, rejected the RSF efforts and condemned the signing by the paramilitary group and its allies of what they called 'transitional constitution' in the Kenya-hosted conference. The Foreign Ministry of the internationally recognized government in Khartoum condemned the announcement in a statement. It called it a 'fake government' and urged the international community to not engage with the RSF-led administration. The RSF-led move was likely to deepen the division in Sudan. Yasir Arman, a rebel leader, said the move is likely to prolong the conflict and divide Sudan between two rival administrations.

Questions swell in Eswatini over five men deported from US
Questions swell in Eswatini over five men deported from US

Arab News

time13 hours ago

  • Arab News

Questions swell in Eswatini over five men deported from US

MBABANE: In the small African kingdom of Eswatini, the arrival of five men deported from the United States under Washington's aggressive anti-immigrant measures has sparked a rare wave of public dissent. The five, nationals of Vietnam, Laos, Yemen, Cuba and Jamaica, were flown to Eswatini's administrative capital of Mbabane on July 16 on a US military plane and incarcerated after US authorities labelled them 'criminal illegal aliens.' The US Department of Homeland Security said the men were convicted of violent crimes 'so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back.' The government of Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, has confirmed their presence. But spokesman Thabile Mdluli said they would not stay permanently, and 'will be repatriated in due course to their different countries.' That assurance, though, has not quelled a tide of questions and concerns that has risen within the kingdom about the operation. Civic and rights groups are wondering whether further deportees from the United States will arrive, and what rights the five men detained have. Public outrage at the lack of transparency led to 150 women protesting outside the US embassy in Mbabane on Friday. The protest, organized by the Eswatini Women's Movement, demanded the prisoners be returned to the United States and queried the legal basis Eswatini relied on to accept them. The five men are being held in the Matsapha Correctional Center, 30 kilometers (20 miles) south of Mbabane. The facility, notorious for holding political prisoners and overcrowding, has been undergoing renovations and expansions since 2018, reportedly funded by the United States as part of a program covering all 14 of the country's penal centers. Sources within the penitentiary administration said the men were being held in solitary confinement in a high-security section of the facility, with their requests to make phone calls being denied. The sources said the men have access to medical care and the same meals as the thousand other inmates, as well as a toilet, shower and television in their cells. Prime Minister Russell Dlamini has dismissed calls by lawmakers and from other quarters for the secrecy surrounding the agreement with Washington to be lifted. 'Not every decision or agreement is supposed to be publicly shared,' he said. Eswatini is the second African country to receive such deportees from the United States, after South Sudan earlier this month accepted eight individuals. The situation has sparked concerns about the potential implications for Eswatini, a country already grappling with its own challenges under the absolute monarchy of King Mswati III. The 57-year-old ruler has been criticized for his lavish lifestyle and has faced accusations of human rights violations. US President Donald Trump has used the threat of high tariffs against other countries, such as Colombia, to coerce them to take in people deported from America. Eswatini is currently facing a baseline US tariff of 10 percent — less than the 30 percent levelled at neighboring South Africa — which the government has said will negatively impact the economy. Trump has directed federal agencies to work hard on his campaign promise to expel millions of undocumented migrants from the United States. His government has turned to so-called third-country deportations in cases where the home nations of some of those targeted for removal refuse to accept them. Rights experts have warned the US deportations risk breaking international law by sending people to nations where they face the risk of torture, abduction and other abuses.

DR Congo accord with M23: fragile step toward peace
DR Congo accord with M23: fragile step toward peace

Arab News

time17 hours ago

  • Arab News

DR Congo accord with M23: fragile step toward peace

KINSHASA: A recent ceasefire agreed between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda-backed M23 rebels, set to take effect this week, ranks as a tentative step toward peace in the country's conflict-wracked east. Signed on July 19 in Doha, Qatar, the agreement saw the sides commit to a 'permanent ceasefire' and 'dialogue and negotiation' to facilitate the 'voluntary' return of refugees and displaced persons. But analysts cautioned the peace process in the mineral-rich region remains fragile and lacks sufficient international support. Thousands of people have died in fighting over the key towns of Goma and Bukavu, with many thousands displaced and facing a serious humanitarian crisis. Eastern DRC, rich in resources and bordering Rwanda, has been riven by conflict for more than 30 years. The crisis intensified with the 2021 resurgence of the M23 group and came to a head in January and February as the group seized Goma and Bukavu, setting up parallel administrations in each. Kinshasa had previously opposed direct dialogue with the M23. Diplomatic attempts to resolve the crisis, including mediation by Angola, failed. However, the surprise intervention of Qatar succeeded in bringing together Presidents Felix Tshisekedi of the DRC and Paul Kagame of Rwanda in Doha in mid-March. The pair committed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and 'that's when things really got moving,' said a Rwandan diplomatic source. 'This paved the way for negotiations at the technical level with a bilateral track between the DRC and Rwanda, and on the other side an internal track between the DRC and the M23,' the source said. 'Then the United States entered the fray and more or less took over the bilateral aspect.' Seeking foreign support against M23's rapid advances, Tshisekedi in early March discussed a mining agreement with the United States. On June 28, the foreign ministers of the DRC and Rwanda signed a 'peace agreement' in Washington. On July 17, the DRC government signed an agreement with US group Kobold Metals, which committed to investing in the digitization of geological data and the development of a lithium mine in southeast DRC. The Congolese president then resolved to hold direct talks with M23, having previously refused to do so, leading to the Doha agreement. The Doha agreement calls for a roadmap for the 'full restoration of authority' of the DRC government in the east of the country once a peace agreement is signed. But a dispute soon arose, when DRC government spokesman Patrick Muyaya spoke of an 'immediate withdrawal' of the M23, which has a political arm, the Congo River Alliance (AFC). 'Nowhere has it been mentioned that the AFC/M23 must leave liberated areas,' its spokesman, Lawrence Kanyuka, told AFP. This verbal escalation 'shows that there is the will on both sides to fight,' said Fred Bauma, executive director at the Congolese Ebuteli Institute. Without outside pressure — particularly from the United States and Qatar, and to a lesser extent the European Union — it will be difficult to end the conflict solely through dialogue, said Bauma. Reports by UN experts say Rwanda has sent troops to the DRC to support the M23 and has also provided the group with weapons and technology. Kigali has always rejected those accusations, saying it is simply engaged in 'defensive measures' against a Hutu armed group in eastern DRC, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) — an armed group founded by former Hutu leaders of the 1994 Rwandan genocide of the Tutsi ethnic group. The agreement has not yet put an end to the violence. Last Thursday saw at least 11 people killed in fighting between M23 and pro-Kinshasa groups, according to local sources. Both sides blamed the other. Kinshasa and the M23 gave themselves until July 29 to implement the declaration with the deal setting an August 8 deadline for formal negotiations on a comprehensive peace accord, to be signed by August 17. But analysts see these deadlines as short and it will be tough to meet them in the absence of 'sufficiently strong American diplomatic pressure,' says Congolese political analyst Christian Moleka. He says it could take 'six to eight months, or even a year to see the M23 withdraw' completely from areas which it controls.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store