
ITAT rejects Congress appeal against tax demand of Rs 199 cr
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) Monday dismissed an appeal filed by Congress challenging a tax demand of ₹199.15 crore for assessment year 2018-19.
The tribunal rejected the party's claim for tax exemption under Section 13A due to late return filing and violations of cash donation limits, establishing strict compliance requirements for political parties seeking tax benefits.
"All these assessee's (Congress) vehement submissions fail to evoke our concurrence," ruled the quorum of judicial member Satbeer Singh Godara and accountant member M Balaganesh.
Referring to a leading
Supreme Court
judgment and a March 2016 high court ruling, the tribunal in its July 21 ruling held that an exemption mentioned in a tax statute must be "strictly complied with".
The 50 page ITAT order referring to the two rulings (SC and HC) said "this is for the precise reason that so far as an interpretation of such an exemption provision in a fiscal statute is concerned", not only the high court has made it clear "that Section 13A has to be strictly complied with" but also the Supreme Court in a 2018 ruling "has settled the issue that it is not liberal but stricter interpretation only in a taxing statute which has to be employed in an exemption claim".
Live Events
Dismissing Congress's appeal, the tribunal held "that being the case and in light of the fact that even Section 139(4B) has stipulated filing of return within the 'due' date i.e. required to be furnished u/s 139(1), we are of the considered view that the above former clause in fact restricts any further liberalism herein as clearly incorporating the expression of 'due' date". "Therefore, the moment there is violation of such a 'due' date, Section 13A third proviso gets attracted, so as to result in denial of exemption to the party concerned," the order said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
SC refuses interim relief to NEET-UG 2025 candidates hit by MP power outage, says counselling won't be stalled
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to grant any interim relief in two pleas filed by Neet-UG 2025 candidates, who suffered a power outage in exam centres in Madhya Pradesh. The candidates had petitioned the top court against a July 14 order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court refusing to order a re-test for them. A division bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar posted the pleas for resumed hearing on Friday. The bench said it will not stay the counselling process for eligible candidates post Neet-UG results, which has been notified as noted by one of the petitioners' counsels. Justice Narasimha, speaking for the bench, clarified that individual grievances will be dealt with by the court, but the counselling process will not be stayed as it would adversely affect thousands of candidates. On June 30, a single bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court had directed the National Testing Agency to conduct re-test of the Neet-UG 2025 for candidates affected by power outage at the centres in Indore and Ujjain, observing that the petitioners were put at a disadvantage for no fault of theirs. The single bench also observed that the counselling process will be subject to the re-test. However, last week, a division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside the single bench decision. It took note of an expert committee report, which opined that even though there was power outage at some centres, there was sufficient natural light enabling the candidates to take the test. Aggrieved, some of the students moved the Supreme Court.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC notices to MLAs Thakre, Datke over poll pleas
Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court on Wednesday issued notices to Congress MLA Vikas Thakre and BJP MLA Pravin Datke in response to separate election petitions filed by their opponents in the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. The court granted both leaders eight weeks to file their replies. Thakre's victory from West Nagpur was challenged by independent candidate advocate Pritam Khandate. Datke, who won from Central Nagpur, faced a petition from his opponent, Mohammad Imran Qureshi. Both petitions were filed within the 45-day statutory period after the declaration of results, complying with provisions under the Representation of the People Act. While the content of the petitions was not disclosed during the brief proceedings, legal observers note that such challenges typically involve allegations related to electoral conduct or procedural lapses. "The court has granted time for the respondents to file detailed replies," the petitioners said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Congress wants to discuss coalition coordination with National Conference: Digvijaya Singh
New Delhi: Veteran leader Digvijaya Singh, senior AICC observer to deal with coalition matters in Jammu and Kashmir, on Wednesday said Congress leaders had reached out to the National Conference (NC) leadership seeking a discussion on coordination of coalition functioning. The move comes amid an evident drift in the Congress-NC coalition since the formation of the Omar Abdullah government, following the election in the Union territory, and an apparent uneasiness in the NC over the Congress intensifying its agitation for full statehood to J&K. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Technology Design Thinking Digital Marketing Others Degree Data Science healthcare Project Management CXO MCA Healthcare Data Science Leadership PGDM Cybersecurity Operations Management Product Management Public Policy Management Finance MBA others Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details Addressing a press conference in Delhi along with AICC general secretary in-charge of J&K Syed Nazir Hussain and senior J&K leader Ghulam Ahmad Mir, Singh said, "There is a coalition government in J&K and in the coalition government, the Congress party has taken a stand that we will not join the cabinet till the statehood is not granted to J&K. In any coalition government, it is necessary to have coordination. Therefore, me, Nazir Sahib and our J&K PCC (Pradesh Congress Committee) and CLP (Congress Legislative Party) leaders will sit and discuss with the National Conference leaders and our other allies. We have to work to fulfill all the promises we have made to the people of J&K". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like We Can't Believe She Wore That To The Red Carpet Golfhooked Read More Though PCC president Tariq Hameed Karra was scheduled to be present at the press conference he didn't turn up, triggering talk that he was unhappy over certain aspects of internal discussions between many J&K Congress leaders and AICC brass on Tuesday but some party functionaries said he was "down with fever". Karra is locked in a fight with a section of J&K leaders. Singh, Hussain and Mir also spoke against the Centre for delaying its promise to grant statehood to J&K, even as they made it clear that the Congress would step up its agitation over the matter. Live Events Hussain also detailed how the PM had given a promise of reinstating J&K's statehood and how the Centre made similar promises in Parliament and before the Supreme Court.