logo
How To Tell If A Lower Salary Is The Right Career Move

How To Tell If A Lower Salary Is The Right Career Move

Forbes7 hours ago
A lower salary doesn't always mean a step back. With the right strategy, it can be a smart career ... More move toward growth, learning, or a healthier work-life balance. getty
You've received a job offer. The role sounds promising, the team feels like a great fit, and the experience could open doors, but then you see the number. The salary is lower than expected, maybe even lower than you can comfortably live on. So now you're stuck asking yourself a question that feels both personal and practical: Is this job still worth it?
As a career coach, I've worked with many professionals who have faced this very decision. And here's the truth: the right move isn't always black and white. It comes down to clarity, intention, and understanding the full picture. Here's how to evaluate a low-paying offer with confidence, not confusion.
Before you dive into spreadsheets or call your accountant, take a moment to reflect. What does worth it mean to you right now? Is it about building experience in a new field? Is it about finally getting out of a toxic work environment? Or is it about financial stability, full stop?
'Worth it' is different for everyone, and it can shift depending on where you are in your career or life. For some, a lower-paying job with growth potential may feel like a smart investment. For others, it may be too risky or unsustainable. Start with your values, goals, and priorities, not someone else's metrics. If a role aligns with where you want to go long term, it may be worth serious consideration, even if the short-term payoff isn't ideal.
Some jobs don't pay much up front, but offer serious returns later on. Will this role teach you in-demand skills? Give you access to a strong network or mentorship? Put you on a path toward higher earning potential in 6-12 months?
For example, maybe it's a startup where you'll wear multiple hats and gain cross-functional experience quickly. Maybe it's a nonprofit that offers leadership opportunities early on. Or maybe the role gives you access to training, certifications, or clients that could level up your resume for future opportunities.
Ask yourself: 'Will this job make me more valuable in a year than I am today?' If the answer is yes, it might be worth accepting a temporary dip in salary for a major leap in career trajectory.
Salary is important, but it's only one part of the package. Take time to assess the total offer . Does the job come with strong health benefits? Generous PTO? Remote flexibility that cuts commuting costs? Tuition reimbursement or wellness stipends?
These perks can directly improve your quality of life and your budget. In some cases, strong non-monetary benefits can offset a lower base salary. A job that allows you to work from home, save on transportation, and maintain a better work-life balance might be more valuable than a higher-paying role that burns you out in six months. Make sure you're comparing total compensation, not just the paycheck. Know Your Financial Flexibility
Let's talk reality: can you afford to take this job right now? Look at your monthly expenses, savings, and financial goals. Would this salary cover your basics like housing, food, transportation, and health care? Would you be living paycheck to paycheck? If so, how long could you reasonably sustain that while staying mentally and emotionally well?
If taking the job means constant financial stress, borrowing money, or sacrificing basic needs, then it's likely not a sustainable choice. But if you have some financial cushion or support, and the role offers strong future benefits, it might be a calculated risk you're willing and able to take.
There's no shame in needing stability now. Your well-being and security matter. At the end of the day, you can still find growth-minded roles that don't ask you to compromise them. Be Honest About the Trade-Offs
Every job comes with trade-offs. A low salary might mean faster career growth or better work-life balance. But it can also mean delayed financial goals, side hustles to stay afloat, or needing to renegotiate sooner than expected. Be honest with yourself: What are you willing to trade, and what are you not?
Ask questions like: 'Will I feel resentful six months in if I accept this offer?' or 'Am I taking this job out of fear, or because I believe in the opportunity?' Talk to people in similar roles. Run the numbers. And then trust your answer. Whatever it is.
Remember, you're allowed to say no to a job that doesn't support your goals. And you're also allowed to say yes to one that feels right in other ways, even if the salary isn't ideal.
Deciding whether to accept a low-paying job isn't about settling; it's about strategy. It's about weighing your personal goals, your current circumstances, and your long-term vision. There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but there is a right answer for you .
If you do take the role, set a timeline to reassess your progress, advocate for raises, and look for new opportunities when the time is right. If you pass, trust that more aligned offers will come your way.
Keep in mind that you're not just building a career here. You're building a life that reflects your values and ambitions. Don't be afraid to choose what serves both. Rooting for you!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EQT and CPP Investments to acquire NEOGOV, a provider of HR and compliance software for U.S. public sector agencies, from Warburg Pincus and Carlyle
EQT and CPP Investments to acquire NEOGOV, a provider of HR and compliance software for U.S. public sector agencies, from Warburg Pincus and Carlyle

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EQT and CPP Investments to acquire NEOGOV, a provider of HR and compliance software for U.S. public sector agencies, from Warburg Pincus and Carlyle

The EQT X fund ("EQT") and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ("CPP Investments") have agreed to acquire NEOGOV, which serves over 10,000 public sector agencies with purpose-built government HR and compliance software solutions NEOGOV's cloud-native solutions support the full employee lifecycle and help public sector agencies drive efficiency and stay compliant with local policies and regulatory frameworks EQT and CPP Investments will partner with CEO Shane Evangelist and the management team to accelerate growth and expansion, building upon their track records in the US software sector STOCKHOLM, July 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- EQT announced today that the EQT X fund ("EQT") together with Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ("CPP Investments") have agreed to acquire NEOGOV (the "Company") from funds managed by Warburg Pincus and Carlyle. Founded in 2000 and headquartered in El Segundo, California, NEOGOV delivers purpose-built human capital management and public safety solutions to nearly 10,000 public sector organizations across North America. NEOGOV's cloud-native suite supports the full employee lifecycle – from recruitment and onboarding to performance management and compliance management – while helping agencies stay compliant with local policies and regulatory frameworks. "Local governments are the backbone of our communities. Our mission is to help them operate more efficiently and serve citizens more effectively. EQT and CPP Investments share our vision and bring the experience and capital to help us scale faster," said Shane Evangelist, CEO of NEOGOV. "Our priorities include advancing product innovation and AI capabilities to help public sector agencies drive increased efficiency and compliance adherence. EQT and CPP Investments' deep expertise in software and broad network of advisors will be instrumental to supporting NEOGOV's growth." "We are excited to partner with Shane and the NEOGOV team, who are operators at the highest levels. The team brings a deep understanding of the challenges that public sector agencies face, and we're proud to support a company that has earned such trust in the public sector," said Arvindh Kumar, Partner and Co-Head of EQT's Global Technology Team. Tyler Parker, Managing Director in the EQT Private Equity advisory team, added: "It's rare to find a software company that is so well-loved by its customers, and we look forward to partnering with NEOGOV to continue to modernize public sector operations and deliver impactful technology to those on the front lines of civic service." "NEOGOV is a leading software platform with distinct customer offerings that is poised for growth due to increasing demand from its customers across North America. Together with its strong management team, the Company is a good fit for our strategy to invest in high-quality software companies. We look forward to supporting the Company in this next phase of development alongside EQT and the management team," said Sam Blaichman, Managing Director, Head of Direct Private Equity, CPP Investments. With this transaction, EQT X is expected to be 60 – 65 percent invested (including closed and/or signed investments, announced public offers, if applicable, and less any expected syndication). The transaction is subject to customary conditions and approvals and is slated for completion in the coming months. Moelis & Company LLC served as exclusive financial advisor and Willkie Farr & Gallagher served as legal counsel to NEOGOV. Jefferies LLC served as exclusive financial advisor and Ropes & Gray served as legal counsel to EQT. Contact EQT: EQT Press Office, press@ CPP Investments: Asher Levine, Public Affairs & Communications, alevine@ T: +1 929 208 7939NEOGOV: Scott Jensen, Vice President of Marketing, sjensen@ This information was brought to you by Cision The following files are available for download: PR_EQT CPPI NEOGOV_25.07.28 DSC03016 View original content: Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Why Dispo's co-founder made the leap from social media to steelmaking
Why Dispo's co-founder made the leap from social media to steelmaking

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Dispo's co-founder made the leap from social media to steelmaking

Daniel Liss, co-founder of the social network Dispo and the dating app Teaser AI, is convinced he's onto the next big thing: steelmaking. It all started, incongruously, with a few op-eds he wrote for TechCrunch about anti-trust enforcement in social media. The commentaries apparently caught the attention of some folks in Washington D.C., Liss told TechCrunch, and resulted in him being invited to guest judge a war game capstone exercise in spring 2023 hosted by the National War College. The war game was very au courant, running a scenario in which the U.S. and China fought for supremacy over Taiwan and the South China Sea. Liss's take away from the exercise? 'Our core supply chain of the arsenal of democracy — literally, the ships that my grandfather fought in — we don't have the ship-building capacity. If we did, we don't have the steel to make it,' he said. At that point, Liss said he became 'really interested — obsessed, even' with the steel supply chain. 'That was really the birth of Nemo Industries.' The basic pitch for Nemo Industries, Liss's latest startup, appears as though it were drawn from a Venn diagram of two very American anxieties, steelmaking and AI. The company, until now, has been operating in stealth, but Liss gave TechCrunch a peek behind the scenes. First, the obvious part: Nemo will use AI to optimize the production of pig iron, modernizing an industry that Liss said is woefully outdated. 'These plants are run on, at best, Excel spreadsheets. At worst, clipboard technology,' he said. The people who run them have 'unbelievable expertise,' he added, but that's the sort of thing that doesn't scale well. But Liss isn't pitching Nemo as just another piece of industrial software. Rather, Nemo is planning to build its own furnaces. The decision was driven by Liss's conviction that companies which use AI from inception will have a '20% to 30% margin advantage' over competitors. In steelmaking, such conviction doesn't come cheap. Hyundai Motor Group said in March that it would build a $6 billion steel plant in Louisiana to supply its factories in the U.S. Nemo's plant may not cost that much since its operations will be focused on pig iron, an intermediate product which steelmakers use to make a range of different alloys. Nemo will fire its furnaces using natural gas, which releases less carbon dioxide than coal, which is commonly used in the iron and steel industry. Liss said the company is considering capturing the furnaces' carbon pollution; tax incentives introduced under the Inflation Reduction Act remain largely intact, and they make the endeavor profitable for Nemo, he said. Liss's partner in Nemo is Michael DuBose, an investor who previously worked at Cheniere Energy, a natural gas company. 'He's built billions of dollars in LNG infrastructure,' Liss said. The startup will need that sort of scale if it's to succeed. Nemo previously raised $28.2 million, according to PitchBook, and it is currently in talks with existing investors to raise a $100 million Series A with existing investors, a person familiar with the matter told TechCrunch. The company also has received offers for over $1 billion in incentives from two southern states if the company can build three plants over the course of 15 years, the person said. It's a tall order for anyone to tackle, but Liss said that sort of ambition is required if the steel industry is going to deliver the sort of returns desired by venture capitalists. And, he added, basic industries like steel have historically delivered big wins for investors. 'When you look at the history of our country, many of the greatest companies that created outsize outcomes for their initial investors were in these categories,' Liss said. 'Ultimately, what were the Rockefellers and the Carnegies and the Melons and the Fricks investing in? The dollar amounts are so big in these categories.'

EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can't back that promise
EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can't back that promise

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can't back that promise

Less than a day after President Donald Trump claimed that the European Union had agreed to invest $600 billion into the United States as part of a trade deal that will see Trump ask Americans to shoulder a 15 percent import tax on many European goods, EU officials are quietly backtracking. The deal to avert a full-on trade war between the U.S. and one of its major trading partners came into shape over the weekend as Trump met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. Trump had threatened to impose a 30 percent tax on EU imports in a letter to von der Leyen earlier this month. But he told reporters traveling with him on his extended-weekend golf holiday that he and von de Leyen had agreed that the U.S. would impose 'a straight-across tariff of 15 percent' for 'automobiles and everything else' imported into the U.S. from the bloc. Trump also said the EU had agreed to open its own markets by not raising any retaliatory taxes on American goods. Though tariffs are designed to promote domestic production and purchasing by taxing imported goods, the increase in cost typically falls on consumers, not foreign governments. This is because retailers often sidestep the increased import costs by raising prices. Still, the president's public statements have indicated that he sincerely believes that tariffs are paid by foreign nations as a sort of tribute for the purpose of accessing American markets. In fact, they are paid by American importers and passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. The European Commission president called the agreement a 'huge deal' that would 'bring stability' and 'bring predictability,' calling both benefits 'very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' The president also claimed that the agreement would bring $600 billion into American coffers by way of investments made by the EU into U.S. companies. But on Monday, multiple EU officials walked back the massive outlay by noting that it would be made by a variety of private companies over which the bloc has no authority when it comes to corporate spending priorities. One such official told Politico that none of the funds touted by Trump would be from the public coffers of any EU nation. 'It is not something that the EU as a public authority can guarantee. It is something which is based on the intentions of the private companies,' the official said. Another official stated that the $600 billion figure had been calculated "based on detailed discussions with different business associations and companies in order to see what their investment intentions are,' but as of Monday the European Commission has not announced any plans to use any sort of incentives to encourage the investment at issue. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store