Terrorism laws will give gardaí 'ability to respond to domestic and cross-border threats'
The minister for justice, Jim O'Callaghan, will seek approval from ministers for the new Terrorist Offences Bill, allowing for the prosecution of a broader range of terrorist activities.
The laws will also move Ireland's counter-terrorism laws into line with those of other EU member states.
It will introduce three new terrorist offences directed at foreign terrorist fighters including receiving training for terrorism, travelling for the purposes of terrorism, and organising or facilitating travelling for the purpose of terrorism.
As well giving gardaí further abilities, the department has indicated it will facilitate Irish participation in enhanced counter-terrorism networks across Europe — including greater collaboration and the exchange of information.
The Government sees the new laws as marking 'a significant step forward in ensuring that Ireland's counter-terrorism framework is robust and fit for purpose in the face of modern terrorist threats'.
The courts will also be permitted to treat offences committed against a child as an aggravating factor when sentencing a person convicted of recruiting or providing training for terrorism.
Read More
Bill to update child sex abuse material terminology should be a 'no-brainer', says senator
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Michael O'Leary blasts Government's ‘smoke and mirrors' infrastructure plans while growth capped at Dublin Airport
Speaking as Ryanair announced a sharp rise in profits for the first quarter of its 2026 fiscal year to €820m, the airline boss slammed Government inaction to address the passenger cap at Dublin Airport. He questioned what he said will be 'smoke and mirrors' infrastructure plans from 'a government that wastes money'. The Government is expected to announce a €100bn infrastructure investment plan on Tuesday. "Here is infrastructure that is built and paid for that they won't allow us to use,' Michael O'Leary said. The Ryanair CEO said the coalition parties at promised urgent action to address the 2007 cap that restricts passenger numbers to 32 million but had failed to take any action. He accused the Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien, who is reported to be consulting the attorney general on possible actions of 'dither, delay and indecision'. In the meantime Ryanair's growth is being moved to markets including Poland, he said. Meanwhile, Ryanair itself reported figures on Monday that showed net income more than doubled in the first three months of its new financial year to €820m. That was more than double the €360m in the same period last year but the numbers are flattered by a number of factors including the fall of Easter and big hit Ryanair took in 2025 after effectively blocking via unapproved online travel agents. The latest results are still up 24pc versus the same period in 2024, a better comparison, according to Michael O'Leary. That increase reflects a recovery in fares to the 2024 level combined with growth: with 4pc traffic growth, unit revenue per passenger up 15pc and unit costs up just 1pc. Despite volatile energy prices Ryanair's fuel hedging provided a significant cushion. Future growth prospects also improved with delivery of the last 29 long delayed Boeing 'Gamechanger' aircraft now expected by the end of this year for service in the summer of 2026 while the manufacturer's new 737 Max 10 model is expected to be certified later this year with the first 15 of those jets due to Ryanair in spring 2027. Ryanair has reduced the number of engineers it had posted to monitor activity in Seattle. "(Boeing's) Kelly Ortberg and Stephanie Pope are doing a great job,' Michael O'Leary said. Ryanair plans to add 300 of Boeing's mosr fuel-efficient Max 10 by 2034. He said said one positive of the Trump administration was a more supportive regulatory environment for manufacturers in the US that could benefit Boeing. On tariffs he said he does not expect new levies to be imposed in either direction on aircraft between the US and EU it would be Boeing, not Ryanair, that will pay. '(If it happens) Boeing pays the tariffs,' he said. Meanwhile, he predicted a further delay when the new August 1st deadline for an EU-US trade deal falls due. "We expect Trump will chicken out again,' he said.
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Irish immigration officials refuse 265 Palestinian visa applications since 7 October attacks
IRISH IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS have refused visas for 265 Palestinians since October 2023, when Israel began its war in Gaza in response to attacks on its civilians by Hamas. Figures from the Department of Justice show that 1,249 visa applications by Palestinians were made between 1 October 2023 and 30 June of this year. They include 851 applications for short-stay C visas , which allow people to stay in Ireland for up to three months, and 398 applications for longer-term D visas , which allow people to work or settle permanently in Ireland and to apply for a residence permit. According to the figures, 445 Palestinians have been granted C visas since October 2023 while 208 Palestinians have been refused; and a further 288 Palestinians have been granted D visas during the same time-frame, while 57 Palestinians have been refused. The issue of visas for Palestinians has made headlines in recent weeks after The Journal reported that visas were refused for dozens of Palestinians from the West Bank who were due to travel to Ireland for a GAA tour this month. Advertisement GAA Palestine had plans in place for 47 Palestinians to travel here, including 33 children aged between 9 and 16 years of age. A total of 152 families in Ireland had signed up to host the group as they were to travel around Ireland. The figures provided by the Department do not include those for the GAA Palestine group, as they only cover successful applications and refusals up to the end up June. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan this week rejected criticism from GAA Palestine regarding his department's handling of their visa applications, insisting that their applications had been assessed 'fairly and accurately'. 'No matter who you are, you have to comply with the immigration rules,' he said. 'I'm not going to change those rules simply because there is media pressure put on me.' Citizens of Palestine are required to have a valid Irish entry visa before they seek to enter the State. However, a number of Palestinians have also claimed asylum in Ireland in recent years. This week, Cabinet heard that there were 957 international protection applications by Palestinians in 2024, though the figure dropped to just 65 applications in the first six months of 2025. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Q&A: What are the new online safety regulations that Big Tech is unhappy about – and will they work?
Coimisiún na Meán , the State's media regulatory body, is hoping to address unique issues posed to young people, and society at large, when it comes to online media consumption. 'The era of self-regulation in the tech sector is over,' they say, and propose the new Online Safety Code to affirm this. Set to come into effect this Monday, it's yet to be seen whether these new rules will have their desired outcome, although they have already ruffled the feathers of X , formerly Twitter, which launched High Court action on the State body's supposed 'regulatory overreach' . Q: What is the Online Safety Code? A: It's a lot to digest. The nearly 10,000-word document proposes various regulations on our online media consumption. It targets the service providers themselves – say, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, X, for example – in the hope of holding them 'accountable for keeping their users, especially children, safe online', Coimisiún na Meán says. READ MORE It works off the back of laws passed by the Dáil in 2022 as well as the EU Digital Services Act and the EU Terrorist Content Online Regulation. Needless to say, it is vast in scope although, at times, sparse in detail. It uses words like 'audiovisual commercial communications' and 'indissociable user-generated content', which simply mean ads and comments under those ads. And super obvious acronyms like VSPS ('video sharing platform services'; think, any social media). Q: What problems does it hope to solve? A: Many. In three words: algorithms, influence and ads. The code makes particular reference to children's online safety, and wants to protect them from content that would negatively impact their physical, mental, and even moral development. As Coimisiún na Meán sees it, this is most easily achieved through imposing restrictions on access to 'adult-only video content, including pornography and gross or gratuitous violence'. They want to crack down on advertisements directed explicitly towards children, and even those that urge children to pester their parents to buy the product or service being advertised. This practice exploits 'the special trust children place in parents, teachers or other persons', according to the code. [ Women in Ireland increasingly subjected to online hate and misogyny, groups warn Opens in new window ] More broadly, it places the onus on the social media platform to protect their users from content that constitutes incitement to hatred or violence against a protected group, displays of criminal offences under EU law, encourages self-harm or suicide, or glorifies an eating disorder Q: And how will they do this? A: This is where things get a bit tricky. Coimisiún na Meán has put forward suggestions. However, the new regulations simply mandate that social media platforms implement their own measures to ensure child safety on their platforms. The code hones in on the use of effective age verification strategies to ensure minors cannot access adult content online. 'An age assurance measure based solely on self-declaration of age by users of the service shall not be an effective measure for the purposes of this section,' the code sets out clearly, meaning people will no longer be able to just tick a box saying they're over 18. This is a big change in the digital landscape, as previously you only had to say you were 18 to access over-18 content, never having to prove it. The code further asks social media platforms that allow adult content to be uploaded on their site to establish an 'easy-to-use, user-led content rating system'. This should allow for content to be flagged as adult-only and unsuitable for children, who otherwise could access the content on the site. It makes an interesting caveat that violent and distressing imagery can be uploaded to the sites, but only for the advancement of civic discourse in the public interest. They introduce a nuance that this be allowed only 'provided such content cannot ordinarily be seen by children'. [ Media regulator made 'big mistake' in not tackling algorithms in online safety code, Dáil hears Opens in new window ] Q: Will the new rules actually work? A: We don't know yet. With suggestions instead of mandates, it will rely on the innovation and willingness of big tech firms to comply with standards that most people believe to be necessary to keep kids safe online. Managing director of Data Compliance Europe Simon McGarr takes issue with a letter to The Irish Times written by Coimisiún na Meán executive chairperson Jeremy Godfrey in January. In it, he writes that it is up to social media platforms to choose how to enforce their rules, and 'uploading documents and/or a live selfie is one such technique, when accompanied by appropriate privacy protections'. Q: Why are the big tech firms unhappy? A: Comisiún na Meán is contesting a case lodged in the High Court by X, formerly Twitter, which says the new code amounts to 'regulatory overreach' on private companies from the State body. X says the requirements are 'broadly framed' and may threaten freedom of speech by banning content that is unsavoury but legal. It makes the point that current EU regulations draw a distinction between illegal content, such as incitement to hatred, and harmful content, such as encouragement of self-harm.
