Newsom's podcast sidekick: a single-use plastic water bottle
In most of the YouTube video recordings of Newsom's new podcast, 'This is Gavin Newsom,' a single-use plastic water bottle lurks on a table nearby.
Sometimes, it is accompanied by a single-use coffee cup. Other times, it stands alone.
Typically, such product placement would raise nary an eyebrow. But in recent weeks, environmentalists, waste advocates, lawmakers and others have been battling with the governor and his administration over a landmark single-use plastic law that Newsom signed in 2022, but which he has since worked to defang — reducing the number of packaged single-use products the law was designed to target and potentially opening the door for polluting forms of recycling.
Anti-plastic advocates say it's an abrupt and disappointing pivot from the governor, who in June 2022, decried plastic pollution and the plague of single-use plastic on the environment.
'It's like that whole French Laundry thing all over again,' said one anti-plastic advocate, who didn't want to be identified for fear of angering the governor. Newsom was infamously caught dining without a mask at the wine country restaurant during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Newsom's efforts to scale back SB 54, the state's single-use plastic recycling law, has dismayed environmentalists who have long considered Newsom one of their staunchest allies.
'Our kids deserve a future free of plastic waste and all its dangerous impacts ... No more,' Newsom said in 2022, when he signed SB 54. 'California won't tolerate plastic waste that's filling our waterways and making it harder to breathe. We're holding polluters responsible and cutting plastics at the source.'
Asked about the presence of the plastic water bottle, Daniel Villaseñor, the governor's deputy director of communications, had this response:
'Are you really writing a story this baseless or should we highlight this video for your editor?' Villaseñor said via email, attaching a video clip showing this reporter seated near a plastic water bottle at last year's Los Angeles Times' Climate Summit. (The bottles were placed near chairs for all the panelists; this particular one was never touched.)
More than a half-dozen environmentalists and waste advocates asked to comment for this story declined to speak on the record, citing concerns including possible retribution from the governor's office and appearing to look like scolds as negotiations over implementing SB 54 continue.
Dianna Cohen, the co-founder and chief executive of Plastic Pollution Coalition, said that while she wouldn't comment on the governor and his plastic sidekick, she noted that plastic pollution is an 'urgent global crisis' that requires strong policies and regulations.
'Individuals — especially those in the public eye — can help shift culture by modeling these solutions. We must all work to embrace the values we want to see and co-create a healthier world,' she said in a statement.
On Thursday, Newsom dropped a new episode of 'This is Gavin Newsom' with independent journalist Aaron Parnas. In the video, there wasn't a plastic bottle in sight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who will win the White House in 2028? JD Vance favorite, but Dems have better odds
Donald Trump is a little more than halfway through his first year in office, and already people are jockeying for position for the 2028 presidential election. It was about a year ago when Trump overtook Democratic nominee Kamala Harris as the favorite to win the election and he cruised from that point on. The tides have turned once again, and now democrats are favored to win back the White House in 2028. But last July, Harris was the overwhelming favorite to defeat Trump, so things can change in a hurry. According to a Democrat is -110 to win the 2028 Presidential Election. Republicans come in at +100. So while the lead is ever so slight, it is noteworthy that for the first time in about a year, Democrats are favored to win the next presidential election. If you think an independent can win, that's where the real money is. Independents are +2000 to win. 2028 presidential betting odds When it comes to individuals, nobody has really been able to pull away from the pack. Vice President JD Vance remains the top choice on the betting market. He comes in at +250. Trump himself comes in at No. 2 in betting odds at +900. Right now he can't run again, but Vegas believes that could change. On the Democratic side, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are the top two favorites, both coming in at +900. Bettinglectionodds also has their odds. That site has Vance as the favorite to be the next president with a 23.9 percent chance of winning. He's followed by Newsom (8.2 percent), Ocasio-Cortez (6.6 percent), Pete Buttigieg (4.9 percent), Josh Shapiro (3.7 percent), Ron DeSantis (2.5 percent) and Ivanka Trump (2.4 percent) as the favorites. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: 2028 presidential betting odds: Vance, Trump, Newsom, AOC favorites
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
This week in Trumponomics: The Trump slowdown is here
Economists have been warning that President Trump's trade wars will depress growth and hiring. Trump and his defenders say pshaw. But the Trump economy is suddenly looking shaky. Hiring slowed dramatically in July, and downward revisions for the two prior months reveal the weakest job market since the COVID recession in 2020. Employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, with the average for the past three months an anemic 35,000. In 2024, job growth averaged 168,000 new jobs per month. Up till now, Trump has waged his trade war with impunity. His tariffs have raised the average tax on imports from 2.5% to about 18%. That's a hefty tax on some $3 trillion worth of goods, paid by American businesses and consumers. Yet inflation is still below 3%. The stock market flinched in April and May but has since hit a series of new record highs. The second quarter of 2025, however, is now looking like it may have been the last respite before Trump's disruptive policies take their it's not just hiring. Second quarter GDP rose by 3%, which would be solid in normal times. But the numbers are distorted by a surge of imports in the first quarter and a corresponding plunge in the second. Even it out, and GDP growth in the first half of 2025 was a weak 1.2%. That's less than half the growth rate in the first half of 2024, which was a more robust 2.8%. Many companies are beginning to say Trump's tariffs are harming profits, including bellwethers Ford (F), General Motors (GM), and Procter & Gamble (PG). The US manufacturing sector has contracted for five months in a row, and manufacturing employment has dropped for three months straight. Tariff-related inflation might also be materializing. The inflation rate inched up from 2.4% in May to 2.7% in June. There were notable month-to-month price hikes in product categories dominated by tariffs, including clothing, appliances, sporting goods, and toys. Consumers don't normally notice small monthly price hikes, but they notice for sure if price hikes persist and stuff continually gets more expensive. All of these trends are exactly what the many critics of Trump's trade wars have predicted. Tariffs raise costs for any firm or household dependent on imports. Higher costs reduce spending and investment. Trump's episodic tariff announcements also create uncertainty because affected businesses can't predict future costs. That creates an incentive to wait instead of investing, expanding, or hiring. The net effect is lower growth, lower employment, and possibly stagflation. Read More: What is stagflation, and how does it impact you? It's possible that Trump will get the message and wind down his trade wars. But not before more chaos. Just as Trump was inking trade deals with Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, and the European Union, he upped the ante on some five dozen other countries by threatening tariffs on their imports as high as 40%, including a new 35% rate — up from 25% — on some Canadian imports. The US stock market had been hovering near record levels on the hope that the worst of Trump's tariff fulminations were over. But stocks sank anew on Aug. 1 on the latest tariff shock, plus the lousy job numbers. There's yet another tariff deadline, Aug. 7, when the latest barrage of tariffs will go into effect unless those 60-odd countries make trade deals with Trump. Some of them probably will. But the new regime of higher tariffs is here to stay, and whether the average tariff rate is 18% or 20% or 22%, everybody's going to have to deal with Trump's new import taxes. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances The consolation prize is that the weakening economy makes the Federal Reserve much more likely to cut interest rates in the fall. Odds of a quarter-point rate cut in September jumped from 38% to 81% after the latest job and tariff news, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool. Trump, of course, has been hectoring the Fed to cut rates, and the weakening Trump economy now gives it a reason to. Most economists think the economy will slow from 2.8% GDP growth in 2024 to around 1% in 2025 and 2026. That's not a recession, but weak growth will make jobs more scarce, keep a lid on wages, and intensify the economic blahs many people feel. It's probably happening now. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Colleges must speak up for their Chinese students
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said all the right things last week after Hong Kong issued arrest warrants for 19 pro-democracy activists in other countries, including in the U.S. 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational oppression,' Rubio declared in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil.' But we already tolerate the transnational oppression of one large group on our soil: Chinese students. And for the most part, our universities have kept silent about that. That's because of the billions of dollars that Chinese students bring to American colleges, of course. We're already facing an expected decline in Chinese enrollment because of the Trump administration's threats against international students, which higher-education leaders have rightly condemned. But if we really cared about those students — and not just their tuition fees — we would also speak out against the Chinese government's extraterritorial targeting of their fundamental freedoms. Anything less makes us look petty, scared and small. In a report issued last year — titled 'On my campus, I am afraid' — Amnesty International showed how Chinese and Hong Kong students in the U.S. and Europe faced surveillance and intimidation from Chinese authorities. Students reported being photographed and followed at protests, and that their families back home had been harassed. At Georgetown, for example, a Chinese law student who handed out pamphlets denouncing China's 'zero-COVID' policies was videotaped by members of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, an organization sponsored by the Chinese government. They told him that the pictures would be sent to security officials in China. And soon after that, his family was interrogated and warned that they could face penalties if he continued to speak out. None of this is news, unfortunately. In 2021, ProPublica reported that Chinese intelligence agents were using local informants to threaten and harass students in America. Some Chinese students said they avoided taking courses with other students from their country, because they did not know who was working for the government — and who might report on them. And in 2020, when COVID forced universities to move online, the Wall Street Journal revealed that some professors had told Chinese students that they wouldn't be evaluated on class participation. The faculty didn't want their students to feel the need to speak up and risk getting on the wrong side of Chinese security officials, who were likely monitoring them on Zoom. 'There is no way I can say to my students, 'You can say whatever you want on the phone call and you are totally free and safe,'' one Harvard professor admitted. But most of our university leaders are keeping quiet about the matter. They don't want to take any risks, either, with so much money at stake. A welcome exception is Purdue University, which denounced Chinese spying after ProPublica revealed that one of its students was harassed by security agents for posting a letter about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. That's a taboo topic in China, which has prohibited public discussion and commemoration of the event. 'Any student found to have reported another student to any foreign entity for exercising their freedom of speech or belief will be subject to significant sanction,' declared Mitch Daniels, Purdue's president at the time. 'We regret that we were unaware at the time of these events and had to learn of them from national sources,' Daniels added, referring to the 2021 ProPublica report. The rest of us have no excuse, especially now. Everything we have learned over the last four years confirms the same fact: China is intimidating students at our institutions. And so is the Trump administration, of course. It has arrested and deported international students who made pro-Palestinian comments. And it has been screening the social media accounts of student visa applicants to find 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Nobody knows what that means, so applicants have been scrubbing their accounts of material about Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and anything else that might put them in the administration's crosshairs. To me, that sounds more like China than America. Our most important founding principle is freedom of expression. And we are flouting it by harassing our international students, even as we accuse them of being hostile to it. But we can't make a persuasive case against Trump's assault on freedom if we ignore the Chinese attacks on it. Anticipating that many international students won't be allowed to come here, some universities — including my own — are creating online courses and programs to serve them. That's a great gesture, but it also leaves the students even more vulnerable to harassment by internet snoops back home. And that's why we have to speak up for the students and make it clear that we won't tolerate intimidation of them, just as Rubio said. Thomas Jefferson — who knew something about America's founding principles — swore 'eternal hostility against every form of tyranny.' He didn't care where it came from. Neither should we.
