logo
‘Perverse' benefits system is unsustainable, warns Liz Kendall

‘Perverse' benefits system is unsustainable, warns Liz Kendall

Yahoo12-06-2025
Liz Kendall has said 'perverse incentives' in the benefits system must be tackled as she resists pressure from Labour rebels to water down her welfare reforms.
The Work and Pensions Secretary said the Government needed to take 'urgent action' to get people into work and warned that the rise in claims for personal independence payment (Pip) was 'not sustainable'.
In a letter to Debbie Abrahams, the chairman of the Commons work and pensions select committee, Ms Kendall said: 'Reforms are needed now to make the system sustainable, while supporting those people with the greatest needs.
'Our plan to rebalance the rates in Universal Credit will remove perverse incentives that trap people in benefit dependency.'
The comments come as Ms Kendall's plans to cut personal independence payment (Pip) and the health element of universal credit face mounting criticism from Labour MPs.
Last month the MPs' committee urged Ms Kendall to delay the implementation of her reforms, citing concerns about 'the impact of the proposed cuts in universal credit health support on employment, poverty and health outcomes'. Backbenchers have also been calling for the proposals to be dropped.
Dismissing their concerns, Ms Kendall wrote: 'We urgently need welfare reform to give people a better future – to stop people from falling into inactivity, restore trust and fairness in the system.'
As it stands, those who are permanently signed off work because of sickness and claim universal credit health top up receive more than twice as much as those on the basic level of universal credit. Those signed off sick do not need to look for work, while those on basic universal credit do.
Ms Kendall and others argue that this encourages people to claim sickness benefits and puts them off trying to find work.
A report from the Resolution Foundation found that 'changes to the benefits system over the last decade have strengthened the incentive to claim incapacity and disability benefits'.
The changes to the welfare system include stricter eligibility for claiming Pip and reducing payments for new claimants of the health element of Universal Credit. They are forecast to save £5bn by 2030.
The Work and Pensions Secretary said the reforms were necessary as the current rise in Pip cases was outpacing the increase in disability prevalence.
Even after changes to disability benefits, the number of people on Pip is still forecast to grow by 750,000 by the end of the parliament, according to government estimates.
The cost of Pip is poised to rise from £15bn before the pandemic to £37bn in real terms by the end of the decade, while the overall cost of sickness and disability benefits is expected to climb to £100bn.
Pip is the main non-means-tested benefit for those with health conditions or disabilities, with payments of up to £9,500 a year to help people with living costs and getting around.
'With Pip caseload and costs forecast to continue rising, reforms are needed now to make the system sustainable, while supporting those people with the greatest needs,' said Ms Kendall.
Under plans announced in March, the Government will tighten the eligibility criteria for people to claim Pip.
A separate but linked concern are worries about the high level of unemployed young people.
The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics show that 923,000 people aged between 18 and 24 were not in employment, education or training (Neet) in between January and March 2025. There are concerns that many will find themselves stuck on benefits without help.
Alison McGovern, the employment minister, told the work and pensions committee on Wednesday: 'The situation for young people – well, it's a big worry for me at the moment.'
Ms McGovern added that the high number of Neets meant there were 'nearly one million young people effectively on the scrapheap. They need a start, they need a chance for a career'.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cracking the Ceiling
Cracking the Ceiling

Entrepreneur

time38 minutes ago

  • Entrepreneur

Cracking the Ceiling

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. For decades, gender parity in the workplace has been the subject of discussion, debate, and data. But despite years of targeted initiatives, executive pledges, and shifting public discourse, women remain underrepresented in senior roles across most industries - particularly in science and technology. One executive who has seen both the limitations and the potential of change from inside the C-suite is Tara McGeehan, President of CGI UK and Australia, a London based global IT and business consulting services firm. "Throughout my career, I have learnt that as women, we often subconsciously put limitations on ourselves for a variety of reasons," she says. "I have also learnt that sometimes limitations are put upon us outside of our comprehension or ability to control." These barriers - both internal and systemic - remain a defining feature of the female professional experience. Yet McGeehan argues that meaningful progress begins with the choices made at the very outset of a woman's career, specifically, where and with whom she chooses to work. "For women looking to start a career, it is important to work for a company that emulates and reflects your values," she advises. "Does it already employ role models you can look up to and learn from? Will it inspire you? Can you see yourself thriving and developing in your career there?" McGeehan advocates for a level of scrutiny on employers that is often reserved for applicants. In an increasingly talent-led labour market, she believes candidates should feel empowered to ask hard questions. "Ask yourself these questions or better still, ask them at the interview stage and see if it's the right fit for you. You want to work in a comfortable, supportive, and inclusive environment that supports you in your growth and success." The ability to thrive in such an environment, she notes, is also tied to confidence and communication. Speaking up, particularly early in one's career, can be a challenge. But for McGeehan, it is essential. "Once you have secured your first role, I'd encourage you to share your thoughts and ideas. Diverse talent creates diverse ideas. This, in turn, pushes boundaries and innovation." Innovation, she suggests, is not the product of a singular vision, but of collective input from across levels and backgrounds. "It's important to have strong female voices across the whole business, be it those in leadership positions or those in their first professional role." Despite improvements in representation, McGeehan remains clear-eyed about the distance still to go. "There's still a long way to go in tackling the glass ceiling, and so none of us, regardless of our role, can afford to let up in our efforts to make our industry as diverse, equitable, and inclusive as it absolutely must be." That sense of shared responsibility - at all levels - is a consistent theme in her commentary. While individual advancement is important, collective advocacy remains central to progress. So too does ambition, often viewed with discomfort or suspicion when expressed by women in the workplace. McGeehan is unequivocal: such ambition is not only acceptable, it is necessary. "My final piece of advice is that it's okay to aspire to a successful career as a woman," she says. "If you have the ambition and the drive, and are working with a company that embraces this, there's no reason why you shouldn't achieve it." Her words suggest a quiet but resolute optimism: that change is possible, but not inevitable. It must be built - consciously, collaboratively, and continuously.

Aldi to refund customers if they miss an England goal
Aldi to refund customers if they miss an England goal

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Aldi to refund customers if they miss an England goal

Aldi will reimburse unlucky football fans in Hampshire who miss an England goal during the UEFA Women's Euro 2025 tournament while shopping in-store. The supermarket chain has pledged to support its customers who miss key moments of the game by giving them back up to £100 in Aldi vouchers. Advertisement This is part of their initiative to encourage support for the women's teams throughout the tournament. Rebecca Heley, communications director at Aldi UK, said: "We're backing the Lionesses and the Dragons all the way this summer and we want to make sure our shoppers enjoy the games too. "We've got a wide range of products in store to help people celebrate across the country and for anyone shopping with us while the action's unfolding – whether they've popped out to top up on match-day snacks or are watching along on-the-go – we're giving Aldi shoppers another reason to cheer when one of our home nations scores this summer." READ MORE: Free parking offered to those who book Princess Cruises trips Advertisement To claim the reimbursement, shoppers have to be at the checkout when England scores a goal in any match throughout the tournament. They then need to send a picture of their receipt to MissedAGoal@ The first two entrants per goal will be given the value of their shop back in Aldi vouchers, up to £100. The time on the receipt must be during the same minute that a Lioness scores a goal for England.

If You Invested $10K In Omega Healthcare Investors Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?
If You Invested $10K In Omega Healthcare Investors Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

If You Invested $10K In Omega Healthcare Investors Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Omega Healthcare Investors Inc. (NYSE:OHI) is a real estate investment trust that primarily invests in skilled nursing and assisted living facilities in the U.S. and the U.K. It is set to report its Q2 2025 earnings on July 31. Wall Street analysts expect the company to post EPS of $0.75, up from $0.71 in the prior-year period. According to Benzinga Pro, quarterly revenue is expected to reach $295.80 million, up from $252.75 million a year earlier. Don't Miss: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. . Tired of Grid Failures and Charging Deserts? This Startup Has a Solar Fix and $25M+ in Sales — The company's stock traded at approximately $34.79 per share 10 years ago. If you had invested $10,000, you could have bought roughly 287 shares. Currently, shares trade at $36.67, meaning your investment's value could have grown to $10,540 from stock price appreciation alone. However, Omega Healthcare also paid dividends during these 10 years. Omega Healthcare's dividend yield is currently 7.31%. Over the last 10 years, it has paid about $27.11 in dividends per share, which means you could have made $7,792 from dividends alone. Summing up $10,540 and $7,792, we end up with the final value of your investment, which is $18,332. This is how much you could have made if you had invested $10,000 in Omega Healthcare stock 10 years ago. This means a total return of 83.32%. However, this figure is significantly less than the S&P 500 total return for the same period, which was 256.40%. Trending: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Omega Healthcare has a consensus rating of "Buy" and a price target of $36.28 based on the ratings of 20 analysts. The price target implies around 1% potential downside from the current stock price. The company on May 1 announced its Q1 2025 earnings, posting FFO of $0.75, beating the consensus estimate of $0.74, while revenues of $276.80 million came in below the consensus of $288.69 million, as reported by Benzinga. "We are pleased with our first quarter results, as we continue to grow FAD per share, while further de-levering the balance sheet. We have accretively invested approximately $423 million year-to-date through April 30th and, as a result, we are increasing our 2025 AFFO guidance to be between $2.95 and $3.01 per share from our previous guidance of between $2.90 and $2.98 per share," said CEO Taylor Pickett. Check out this article by Benzinga for four analysts' insights on Omega Healthcare. Given no expected upside potential, growth-focused investors may not find Omega Healthcare stock attractive. Conversely, the stock can be a good option for income-focused investors, who can benefit from the company's solid dividend yield of 7.31%. Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . , which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. Image: Shutterstock This article If You Invested $10K In Omega Healthcare Investors Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now? originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store