Superannuation changes explained: Why 80,000 retired and super-rich Aussies will pay more tax
Key changes from July 1
Why were the changes introduced?
Who is affected from this rich tax and how?
Support and backlash
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The federal government will introduce new tax measures targeted at high-value accounts or the richest retirement savers and increase the mandatory employer contribution rate. There are growing worries that the country's $4.1 trillion pension system is becoming a way for people to accumulate wealth.This will change Australia's superannuation system starting on July 1. The Labour Government called for making the system more equitable and sustainable.The Labor Party initially unveiled this proposal in 2023, saying that it wouldn't take effect until after the 2025 election. However, it was put on hold due to not getting the required support in the Senate This change came after the Labor Party's landslide victory last month, which has now paved the way for the bill to be prioritized in parliament in July.The mandatory employer contribution of the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) has increased from 11.5% to 12% of ordinary wages.A 30% tax will now apply to earnings on the portion of super balances above $3 million. This is in addition to the standard 15% tax that they, along with most Australian workers, usually pay on investment earnings in their superannuation accounts.Only the excess over $3 million is taxed at the higher rate.About 10,000 Australians with defined benefit pensions, mostly retired public servants, will also face the 30% tax. However, they can defer payment until benefits are accessed, with interest charged.The Labor government has said the changes are a step toward fairness and budget sustainability. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said it's 'hard to justify generous tax breaks on very large balances' when most Australians retire with much less. The government expects to raise approximately $2.7 billion annually, or $40 billion over a decade, helping to fund aged care and health services.Most Australians will benefit from the rise in employer contributions. A person earning $100,000 annually will see their super contributions grow from $11,500 to $12,000 annually. Over time, this translates to significant extra savings.Some employees on fixed 'salary plus super' contracts may see a slight reduction in take-home pay if their employer offsets the increased SG rate.Those who salary-sacrifice into super should also watch the new concessional cap, now set at $30,000, to avoid paying extra tax.Roughly 80,000 Australians with super balances exceeding $3 million will face the new 30% tax on earnings above that threshold. This change targets the ultra-wealthy, many of whom benefit significantly from the low-tax super environment.Notably, the tax also applies to unrealized capital gains. That means you may owe tax on the rising value of your investments even if you haven't sold them. Critics say this could hurt those with illiquid assets like property or private shares.The new rules also cover defined benefit pensions, which pay fixed retirement income rather than fluctuating investment returns. Those affected can defer the tax until they begin receiving payments, but interest will apply, currently around 4.5% per year.The reforms are unlikely to have a direct impact on younger workers right now. Most will take decades to accumulate even a fraction of $3 million in super.However, there's a long-term concern: the $3 million threshold is not indexed to inflation. Over time, more people, including younger Australians, could fall under the higher tax rate due to account growth. Some financial experts warn that if thresholds remain frozen, this could become a 'tax trap' decades later.Supporters of the reform argue it helps restore equity to a system increasingly skewed in favour of the rich. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called the changes "modest but meaningful," while Treasurer Chalmers says the goal is 'fiscal responsibility with fairness.'Critics, however, point to the lack of inflation adjustment and the taxing of unrealized gains as potential long-term problems. Opposition leaders have warned that younger workers may eventually be caught in a 'tax time bomb.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
From Mumbai to Marseille: IMEC is bound to redefine India-Europe ties
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The inaugural session of the Raisina Mediterranean Dialogue in Marseille on 12th-13th June identified connectivity-and-infrastructure-related challenges as a new frontier for geoeconomics growth and competition. This event not only consolidated the growing influence of the Dialogue but also highlighted the depth of the Indo-French strategic partnership. This robust relationship is the essential driving force behind ambitious projects such as the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor IMEC ).Launched on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in New Delhi in September 2023, IMEC is a 6,400-kilometre multimodal corridor from Mumbai to Marseille that will play a key role in accelerating the integration between these three regions, particularly in the maritime, energy and digital sectors. The corridor has been a priority of the bilateral agenda since President Emmanuel Macron's State visit in January 2024 as chief guest for India's 75th Republic Day. In February 2025, during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's official visit to France, the joint declaration of the two Leaders underlined the importance of IMEC as a project 'fostering connectivity, sustainable growth trajectories, and access to clean energy in all these regions.' With France and India at both ends of the corridor, IMEC is a further illustration of the momentum in Indo-French strategic the crossroads of three continents, Marseille is a major gateway to Europe, the Mediterranean and Africa. Not only is Marseille the European capital city of connectivity, but it is also the world's sixth largest digital hub, along with a Euro-Mediterranean hydrogen hub under development. A flagship project of the Global Gateway connectivity strategy, IMEC is designed to create new avenues for trade, low-carbon energy, and data exchanges between Europe and exemplifies France's strong commitment to enhancing connectivity with India. On the sidelines of the United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice, President Macron chaired the 'Summit for a More Connected Mediterranean' on 9th June. On this occasion, heads of state and government, as well as several business leaders from North Africa, Europe and the Gulf, reasserted their shared interest in fostering geoeconomics initiatives such as IMEC for the benefit of all. France reaffirmed the vision of IMEC as a network of connectivity rather than a single infrastructure line connecting two points, from the ports of Marseille to Mumbai. This ensures the resilience of the project, which has been developed to diversify global supply chains. There are already multiple interconnection points in each region or country, such as the ports of Mundra, Mumbai or Vadhavan in connectivity goal is supported by both the public and private sectors, as highlighted by the declaration of the CEO of CMA-CGM Group, Mr Rodolphe Saadé, who received Prime Minister Modi at the Group's headquarters in Marseille. The organization of the first Raisina Mediterranean Dialogue, with the participation of Dr S. Jaishankar, Hon'ble Minister for External Affairs of India, is also the result of a partnership between the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) and CMA-CGM. The Dialogue provided a unique platform to reinforce discussions between the Mediterranean and the Indo-Pacific a broader perspective, despite the geopolitical context in West Asia, most of IMEC's signatories have recently renewed their commitment to move forward with this corridor. France hosted the first virtual meeting of IMEC Sherpas in May 2025, during which the consolidation of the governance structure and the development of feasibility studies were collectively identified as shared priorities. The involvement of various private sector players is essential to the project's political leadership will be instrumental in taking IMEC to the next level. After his visit to France, Prime Minister Modi agreed in Washington with President Trump to bring together all the stakeholders within the next six months. Such a perspective will be instrumental in implementing a collective governance framework and steering the pre-project phase. In the same vein, during the visit of the College of Commissioners to India, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, also declared the European Union's willingness to take concrete steps to advance the will continue advocating for a new endeavour to shape IMEC and make it a reality across the three segments of the project. The India-France Year of Innovation in 2026 will also offer an invaluable opportunity to deepen cooperation in sectors that are key for IMEC, from AI to clean energy.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US penalty risk on Russian oil may add USD 9-11 billion to India's import bill
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India's annual oil import bill could rise by USD 9-11 billion if the country is compelled to move away from Russian crude in response to US threats of additional tariffs or penalties on Indian exports, analysts the world's third-largest oil consumer and importer, has reaped significant benefits by swiftly substituting market-priced oil with discounted Russian crude following Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine in February oil, which accounted for less than 0.2 per cent of India's imports before the war, now makes up 35-40 per cent of the country's crude intake, helping reduce overall energy import costs, keep retail fuel prices in check, and contain influx of discounted Russian crude also enabled India to refine the oil and export petroleum products, including to countries that have imposed sanctions on direct imports from Russia. The twin strategy of Indian oil companies is posting record is, however, now under threat after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. The 25 per cent tariff has since been notified but the penalty is yet to be within days of the European Union banning imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, this presents a double whammy for Indian Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst (Refining & Modeling) at global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler termed this as "a squeeze from both ends".EU sanctions - effective from January 2026 - may force Indian refiners to segment crude intake on one side, and on the other, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade."Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty," he fiscal, India spent over USD 137 billion on import of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy - who collectively account for a bulk (more than 50 per cent in 2025) of the 1.7-2.0 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude imports into India - the challenge is Nayara is backed by Russian oil giant Rosneft and has been sanctioned by the EU last month, Reliance has been a big fuel exporter to one of the world's largest diesel exporters - and with total refined product exports to Europe averaging around 200,000 bpd in 2024 and 185,000 bpd so far in 2025 - Reliance has extensively utilised discounted Russian crude to boost refining margins over the past two years, according to Kpler."The introduction of strict origin-tracking requirements now compels Reliance to either curtail its intake of Russian feedstock, potentially affecting cost competitiveness, or reroute Russian-linked products to non-EU markets," Ritolia Reliance's dual-refinery structure - a domestic-focused unit and an export-oriented complex - offers strategic flexibility. It can allocate non-Russian crude to its export-oriented refinery and continue meeting EU compliance standards, while processing Russian barrels at the domestic unit for other redirecting diesel exports to Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America is operationally feasible, such a shift would involve narrower margins, longer voyage times, and increased demand variability, making it commercially less optimal, he data shows a notable decline in India's Russian crude imports in July (1.8 million bpd versus 2.1 million bpd in June), aligning with seasonal refinery maintenance and weaker monsoon-driven demand. However, the drop is more pronounced among state-run refiners, likely reflecting heightened compliance sensitivity amid mounting geopolitical refiners, who account for over 50 per cent of Russian crude intake, have also begun reducing exposure, with fresh procurement diversification underway this week as concerns over US sanctions said replacing Russian crude isn't plug-and-play. The Middle East is the logical fallback, but has constraints - contractual lock-in, pricing rigidity, and a mismatch in crude quality that affects product yield and refinery configuration."The risk here is not just supply but profitability. Refiners will face higher feedstock costs, and in the case of complex units optimized for (Russian) Urals-like blends, even margins will be under pressure," he the future course, Kpler believes India's complex private refiners - backed by robust trading arms and flexible configurations - are expected to pivot toward non-Russian barrels from the Middle East, West Africa, Latin America, or even the US, where economics shift, while operationally feasible, will be gradual and strategically aligned with evolving regulatory frameworks, contract structures, and margin replacing Russian barrels in full is no easy feat - logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught. Supply substitution may be feasible on paper, but remains fraught in practice."Financially, the implications are massive. Assuming a USD 5 per barrel discount lost across 1.8 million bpd, India could see its import bill swell by USD 9-11 billion annually. If global flat prices rise further due to reduced Russian availability, the cost could be higher," it would increase fiscal strain, particularly if the government steps in to stabilize retail fuel prices. The cascading impact on inflation, currency, and monetary policy would be difficult to ignore.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Andrew Tulloch turned down Mark Zuckerberg's $1 billion job offer. His LinkedIn profile is viral
A graduate of the prestigious University of Cambridge, he started his career as a strategist with Goldman Sachs before an 11 year stint with Meta, where he worked mostly on machine learning. In October 2023, he quit Meta for OpenAI – the company that revolutionized the AI race with ChatGPT. Just over a year later, he moved from OpenAI to Thinking Machines Lab – the AI startup that has become the target of Mark Zuckerberg's poaching blitz and one that is valued at $12 billion in its seed round despite not having launched a product yet. Andrew Tulloch reportedly turned down Meta's job offer that could have earned him $1.5 billion over six years. We are talking about Andrew Tulloch, an Australian computer scientist who turned down Mark Zuckerberg's job offer that would have potentially earned him as much as $1.5 billion over a period of six years, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. Who is Andrew Tulloch? Andrew Tulloch is a machine learning expert and co-founder of Mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab – a company that aims to take AI beyond chatbots. He has been in the news ever since he was revealed to be the man who turned down Meta's staggering nine-figure offer. The Journal report noted that even in Silicon Valley, where big paychecks don't raise eyebrows, it is rare for someone to turn down a nine-figure salary. People familiar with the matter said that the $1.5 billion figure is contingent upon bonuses and stock performance. However, Meta spokesman Andy Stone called the description of the offer 'inaccurate and ridiculous'. Stone added that any compensation package is predicated on a stock rising, per the report. A report in Wired earlier stated that Zuckerberg had been trying to recruit researchers from Thinking Machines Lab for Meta's new superintelligence unit. However, no one at TML has accepted his offers so far. Andrew Tulloch's viral LinkedIn profile A screenshot of Tulloch's work experience, listed on his LinkedIn profile, has been going viral on social media. The screenshot charts his dream trajectory from Goldman Sachs to Meta to OpenAI and finally Thinking Machines Lab. On his own website, Tulloch said he attended 'graduate school in mathematical statistics at Trinity College, Cambridge, graduating with distinction (the highest grade).' He also holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Sydney. Between his bachelor's and master's degrees, Tulloch worked at Facebook. 'Before graduate school, I worked on machine learning systems at Facebook from April 2012 until starting graduate school in October 2013, working on all aspects of the advertising machine learning platform, from feature engineering to the inference platform to the real-time serving system,' he explained. (Also read: Top AI researcher rejects Meta's staggering $1 billion offer: Report)
