It is govt and assembly speaker's responsibility to appoint LoP: Sena (UBT) MLA
The Sena , led by former state chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, is neither ignorant nor unaware of the procedural norms, Jadhav told reporters in the Vidhan Bhavan premises here.
Jadhav's name has been recommended by the Shiv Sena for the LoP post, a cabinet-level position.
Notably, Sena MP Sanjay Raut had said that in the past, the post of LoP was given to opposition parties even as they had not won 10 per cent of the seats at that time.
The combined strength of the opposition parties in the 288-member state assembly is nearly 50, he pointed out.
The Shiv Sena has the strength of 20, Raut had said, claiming that even if the strength of MLAs is less, there is no law or provision in the Constitution which says the House should function without the LoP.
Jadhav said, "There is no technical hurdle left in appointing the leader of opposition. The government cannot simply wash its hands off by pointing fingers at the speaker. When such a crucial constitutional post is vacant, both the government and the speaker must act."
The Sena MLA said he possesses written communication from the Vidhan Bhavan administration confirming that a specific numerical strength is not a prerequisite for staking claim to the position.
"Within the Maha Vikas Aghadi , the Shiv Sena has the highest number of MLAs. Our allies have also endorsed my candidature. The ball is now in the court of the government and the speaker," he said.
"This is the third consecutive session of the state legislature, and yet there is no leader of opposition in the assembly. This delay is not only unjustified but raises questions about the government's intent," Jadhav claimed.
He said his party has complied with all formalities and expectations and claimed the continued delay would amount to undermining the opposition's constitutional role in the House.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
SC opens up staff jobs for OBC and SC/ST blocs, 'omits' EWS
Supreme Court (AI-generated image) NEW DELHI: CJI B R Gavai, second from the Dalit community to head the judiciary, has amended the Supreme Court Officers and Servant (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1961, to provide for reservations to SCs, STs, OBCs, physically challenged, ex-servicemen and dependents of freedom fighters in direct recruitments to subordinate staff of the apex court. Rule 4A of the Act, amended and substituted on the CJI's instructions, has been gazetted through a notification issued on July 3. However, it omits reservation for candidates belonging to the economically weaker section (EWS), which was introduced by Parliament through Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act, 2019. The substituted Section 4A, as gazetted, reads: "Reservation in direct recruitment to various categories of posts specified in the Schedule, for the candidates belonging to SCs, STs, OBCs, Physically Challenged, Ex-servicemen and dependant of Freedom Fighters shall be in accordance with the Rules, orders, and Notifications issued from time to time by the Government of India in respect of posts carrying the pay scale corresponding to the pay scale prescribed for the post specified in the Schedule, subject to such modification, variation or exception as the Chief Justice may, from time to time, specify. " The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act introduced Articles 15(6) and 16(6) to give effect to 10% reservation for EWS in govt jobs and admissions to govt and govt-aided educational institutions. It received Presidential assent on Jan 12, 2019. The constitutional validity of EWS quota was challenged in Supreme Court by more than 20 petitions, mainly on the ground that it exceeded the 50% ceiling on quota imposed by SC in its Indra Sawhney judgment in 1992. A five-judge bench led by then CJI U U Lalit on Nov 7, 2022, by three to two majority, declared that Parliament's decision to provide quota for EWS category was constitutionally valid. The majority view was shared by Justices Dinesh Maheswari, Bela M Trivedi and J B Pardiwala, while Justices Lalit and S R Bhat ruled that EWS quota was illegal. On Dec 6, 2022, NGO 'Society for the Rights of Backward Communities' filed a petition seeking review of the Nov 7 judgment. A five-judge bench led by then CJI D Y Chandrachud on May 9, 2023 dismissed the review petition, thus giving judicial impregnability to the validity of the EWS quota.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi Confidential: Seed of distrust
Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan faced an awkward moment during a visit to a village in his constituency, Vidisha in Madhya Pradesh, on Sunday. The minister was interacting with local farmers when some of them complained about substandard soybean seeds. The farmers led him to their fields, where he himself dug into the soil and discovered that the seeds had failed to germinate. Chouhan promptly directed district officials to take strict action against the seed supplier. Observers are now wondering what further steps will be taken against those responsible for distributing poor-quality seeds in the minister's constituency. Utsav In Moscow The Manezhnaya Square in Moscow, adjacent to the Kremlin Wall, is bustling with Indian song and dance performances these days as part of the nine-day Bharat Utsav, which kicked off Saturday. Besides Indian Ambassador Vinay Kumar, several senior functionaries from the Capital are participating, including Chief Secretary Dharmendra and Tourism Secretary Niharika Rai. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta recently met Sergei Cheremin, Minister of the Moscow City Government, and exchanged views on enhancing ties between the two cities, in terms of urban management, tourism and transport. Marathi & MVA Wading into the Hindi-Marathi language row in Maharashtra, Union Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment Ramdas Athawale said the attacks on Hindi-speaking people by MNS workers is 'dadagiri (bullying) against Hindus'. Talking about the reunion of the Thackeray cousins — MNS's Raj Thackeray and Sena (UBT)'s Uddhav Thakeray — he said if the two join hands for the upcoming Mumbai civic polls, it will give a political advantage to the ruling Mahayuti alliance. A tie-up between MNS and Sena (UBT) will harm the Opposition's Maha Vikas Aghadi as the Congress and NCP will not join hands with them, said the minister.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
‘Arbitrary, to be replicated in Bengal.' What pleas by ADR, Mahua challenging EC's Bihar exercise say
While Moitra argued this was a violation of the right(s) to equality, freedom of speech and expression and life, Yadav also termed the decision 'manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of electoral laws'. The origins of this case lie in a June 24 decision of the ECI, which directed the state election commission to conduct a special intensive revision of the electoral polls in Bihar. New Delhi: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra and Bharat Jodo Abhiyan national convener Yogendra Yadav, among others, have moved the Supreme Court against the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, saying that a similar second revision of the voters list can be replicated in the state of West Bengal, in a similar fashion. 'It is submitted that it is for the very first time in the country that such an exercise is being conducted by the ECI, where electors whose names are already there in electoral rolls and who have already voted multiple times in are being asked to prove their eligibility,' Moitra's petition contended. Apart from this, similar petitions have been filed by non-profit organisations Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Jha has also filed a similar petition before the top court. ADR's petition, which has been filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan, also mentions alleged lack of due process and an 'unreasonably short timeline' for the revision exercise to take place, while adding that it could result in the removal of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement. 'ECI has issued unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar with close proximity to state elections which are due in November 2025. There are lakhs of citizens who do not possess the documents as required under the SIR order, there are many who may be able to procure the documents but the short timeline mentioned in the directive may preclude them from being able to supply the same within the time period,' it argued. Also Read: 'Worst attack' on Constitution, says Oppn after meeting EC over voter verification drive in Bihar Mahua Moitra's petition In her petition, Moitra also argued that the ECI's move violated provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and Articles 325 and 326 of the Constitution which state that no one can be ineligible for inclusion in a special electoral roll on grounds of religion, race, caste or sex, and mandate universal adult franchise for all. By way of her petition filed through advocate Neha Rathi, Moitra said she has information that the '(SIR) exercise is stated to be replicated in West Bengal from August 2025 for which instructions have already been given'. Saying that such a revision of electoral rolls is a direct threat to democratic rights, Moitra's petition argued that the electoral body was acting at the behest of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and was attempting to disenfranchise millions of voters, especially migrants and the economically disadvantaged. If not set aside, the order can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country and undermining of democracy and free and fair elections in the country, Moitra said while adding that the ECI must be restrained from issuing similar orders in other states too. Yogendra Yadav's petition By way of his PIL, Yadav challenged the ECI's special exercise in Bihar, saying it violated Section 22 of the RP Act, and Rule 21-A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, since both laws require procedural safeguards before deletion of names. Section 22 of the 1950 Act, outlines the process for correcting, transposing, or deleting entries in electoral rolls. It states that the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) is allowed to make changes to electoral rolls, either on an application or on their own motion, after an inquiry. However, such changes can be made only if an entry is erroneous, or there is a change of residence within the constituency, or requires deletion in case of someone's death. On the other hand, Rule 21-A talks about the process of including names which have inadvertently or erroneously been omitted due to some The ECI order ECI's June 26 order directing that an SIR be conducted requires the inclusion or retention of a voter's name in the electoral roll upon producing citizenship documents, like citizenship proof from either or both parents. If a voter cannot furnish this, they run the risk of exclusion. Moitra said this violates Article 326, which grants universal adult franchise to all persons, and introduces extraneous requirements which are not originally envisaged under the RP Act, 1950. The order arbitrarily excludes commonly accepted identity documents such as Aadhaar and ration cards from the list of accepted documents, which puts a 'huge burden' on the voters who are at a risk of getting disenfranchised, the petition said. It also pointed to current field reports from the state of Bihar that confirm that lakhs of residents across rural and marginalised areas in Bihar are at an imminent risk of disenfranchisement due to these stringent and unreasonable requirements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: ECI's voter verification drive in Bihar is tailor-made to keep Dalits, Muslims, EBCs out
