Public satisfaction grows for NOPD, but drops for Cantrell
The big picture: NOPD Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick has the highest approval rating for an elected officials in the city, according to the survey from the New Orleans Crime Coalition.
The police department's satisfaction rate (31%) was the lowest it had been in more than a decade when Kirkpatrick started in 2023, according to the group's surveys.
It's now up to 47%, with a majority of surveyed residents (54%) saying they feel the city is safe.
Zoom in: 65% of respondents said they think the city is on the wrong track.
Approval ratings for Cantrell (27%, down from 31%) and Orleans Parish Sheriff Susan Hutson (18%, down from 32%) dropped this year.
City Council's stayed pretty much the same (47% this year and 48% last year).
The poll was taken after 10 inmates escaped from the Orleans Justice Center, which Hutson manages.
This is how public officials and agencies fared in the job approval survey:
Winners
Kirkpatrick (53% approval)
DA Jason Williams (51%)
NOPD (47%)
City Council (47%)
Losers
Sewerage & Water Board (79% disapproval)
Cantrell (62%)
Hutson (62%)
Meanwhile, New Orleans voters will elect a new mayor and sheriff this fall.
This poll has Michelle Woodfork in the lead for the sheriff's job and Helena Moreno leading in the mayor's race.
See our running list of mayoral candidates.
Zoom in: This is the 16th annual NOPD Citizen Satisfaction Survey from the New Orleans Crime Coalition.
The group says it started it in 2009 to highlight areas needing improvement and to encourage reforms within the department.
The Greater New Orleans Foundation, GNO Inc. and the Business Council of New Orleans and the River Region paid for this year's survey.
How it works: Faucheux Strategies conducted the phone survey from May 27 to June 4 to track key metrics related to residents' perceptions.
The poll surveyed a representative sample of 800 New Orleans adults and has a margin of error of 3.46%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Judge says R.I. officials have immunity in First Amendment lawsuit
Travis, who was presiding over the meeting as council president pro-tempore, cut him off and said, 'You will be talking about city government or you'll be leaving.' Cote said he did plan to talk about the government, but Travis had an officer escort him out of the meeting. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up The ACLU filed the lawsuit, accusing Warwick City Council members of violating Cote's First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case. Advertisement In an order Tuesday, Senior US District Court Judge William E. Smith agreed to dismiss the City Council members in their personal capacities but not their professional capacities, reducing the lawsuit to a case against the city. 'Travis's act indeed may have violated Cote's constitutional rights, may have evinced poor judgment, and may even have been done in service of an inappropriate motive or intent,' Smith wrote. Advertisement 'But legislative immunity 'is not forfeited simply because the activities, if unprotected, might violate a plaintiff's constitutional rights,' ' he wrote, citing a prior ruling. Ultimately, if Travis 'overstepped the boundary of sound judgment,' she should be held accountable not under federal law 'but at the ballot box,' Smith wrote, citing another ruling. In a footnote, the judge said, 'It appears that Travis was, in fact, called to account for her alleged actions.' He noted Travis decided to not seek reelection and in 2024 agreed to Smith said the US Supreme Court has held that local legislators are entitled to 'absolute immunity' for their legislative activities, so the key question in this case is whether Travis's decision to boot from the meeting Cote represented 'legitimate legislative activity.' 'Facing this difficult question, the court believes that both precedent and prudence favor the conclusion that Travis's action ... was within the sphere of legitimate legislative activity,' Smith wrote. He cited a City Council rule that allows council president to 'preserve decorum and order.' On Wednesday, Cote criticized the judge's ruling and said it could have implications for the rest of Rhode Island. 'It's really bad news. This can be interpreted so broadly,' Cote said. 'If you get up in front of your town council or school committee meeting, and they don't like the content of what you are speaking about, they can remove you without ramifications. Your First Amendment rights are gone. I guess we are in Moscow.' Advertisement But Steven Brown, executive director of the ACLU of Rhode Island, said the lawsuit will proceed against the city even though City Council members can't be held liable in an individual capacity. 'The suit remains quite alive and we will be pursuing the matter,' he said. 'They are not off the hook by any means.' Brown emphasized the significance of the litigation. 'The ability of members of the public to speak to their representatives on topics of public interest is crucial to a democratic form of government,' he said. 'Mr. Cote wanted to talk about something that clearly involved city business and something extremely important, so barring him from being able to talk about it undermined the whole point of the public comment period.' An attorney representing Warwick and City Council members, Marc DeSisto, declined to comment. Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
CBS News
11 hours ago
- CBS News
Ocean City, Maryland, votes against restrictions on short-term rentals
Voters in Ocean City, Maryland, rejected an ordinance that would have put restrictions on short-term rental properties. The ordinance failed during a special election Tuesday, with 800 votes for and 834 votes against the measure, according to the city government. The ordinance, passed by the mayor and city council in March, would have initially imposed a minimum five-night stay for homes rented in certain single-family neighborhoods or mobile home communities. These changes would have gone into effect for 2025 and 2026. By January 2027, the measure would have required a minimum 31-night stay for homes rented in those designated communities. The ordinance would have impacted Ocean City's R-1 single-family districts and MH mobile home district. Currently, there are five R-1 districts in the city, and one mobile home district. More than 4,000 homes would have been affected by the ordinance. After it was passed by city leaders last year, the rental ordinance received sharp criticism, especially from the Ocean City Maryland Property Rights group. The group launched a petition that led to the special election. In it, advocates claimed the changes to short-term rentals would threaten property rights and lessen Ocean City's appeal as a vacation destination. "A ban on short-term rentals in Ocean City won't just hurt hosts," the group said in their petition. "It will hurt Ocean City's economy, its appeal to family vacationers, and its community spirit." The petition encouraged residents to vote against the ordinance. WJZ has reached out to the mayor's office for comment.
Chicago Tribune
13 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Mayor Brandon Johnson's CFO says property tax hike ‘likely' in 2026 budget
Mayor Brandon Johnson's team teased plans this week to take another swing at raising property taxes to close the city's more than $1 billion budget gap, despite an aldermanic revolt last year and continued resistance to such a hike. Asked in an interview with Bloomberg's Romaine Bostick whether a property tax increase would again be proposed for the city's 2026 budget, Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski said 'it is likely that that will be part of the package,' without addressing how to garner support from the City Council to pass it. One of Johnson's 'budgeteers' last year, Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, said he would need to see major cuts and efficiencies to be won over. 'And if it doesn't happen, I'm a no vote, and so are the majority of my colleagues,' he said. 'We need to start talking about stuff we never talked about before.' Jaworksi affirmed cuts will also be part of the mayor's budget package, but said the administration is 'hoping to avoid' reducing services. She suggested the city would be addressing a chief complaint from the business community about the unpredictability of property taxes. 'You're thinking about investment, uncertainty is the enemy, right?' It's a similar line to the one Mayor Lori Lightfoot used when she successfully proposed tying annual property tax hikes to 5% or the rate of inflation, whichever was lower. Johnson, who campaigned against raising property taxes and instead pitched other progressive revenues, backed off of Lightfoot's policy in his first budget, only to renege last year amid a nearly $1 billion deficit. Aldermen preemptively voted against that hike. The final budget instead included a bigger share of one-time fixes — including using federal pandemic dollars and prior-year surplus — to close the gap. Ratings agencies that help determine how much the city will owe on debt have cited a lack of progress finding 'permanent and high impact solutions' to close its budget gap as black marks. Property taxes are among the most stable and predictable revenues the city can raise on its own. Fitch also dinged the city earlier this year for its pursuit of other revenues 'that require state or voter support, which do not appear to be forthcoming in the near term.' Jaworski has argued the state should legalize taxing services. Johnson has called for taxing the rich, but since the failure of the 'Bring Chicago Home' referendum, has not proposed how the city would do it. Ald. Brian Hopkins, 2nd, said he appreciated Jaworski's commitment to a balanced budget, but cautioned Johnson's administration to not start discussions by saying a property tax hike is necessary. It is the mayor's job — not Jaworski's — to sell the public on such a tax hike, and a critical part of doing that is showing the math that would make it necessary, Hopkins said. 'People don't want to be told it's inevitable and unavoidable, because they don't believe that,' he said. 'It'll spark a rebellion. People will feel manipulated and like something is being forced down their throats.' While currently opposed to a property tax hike, Hopkins said 'I don't think we can rule out anything.'
