Iran raises death toll from war with Israel to more than 900
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iran raised the official death toll for its war with Israel on Monday, with official media reporting 935 people were killed in the country during the 12-day conflict .
The state-run IRNA news agency did not give a breakdown between military and civilian casualties, but said of the 935 people, 38 were children and 132 were women. Its previous report last week said 627 people had been killed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
39 minutes ago
- News24
‘Body parts flying everywhere': At least 51 killed as Israel fires on Gaza seafront rest area
At least 51 people were killed in Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will visit the US. Opposition leader Yair Lapid said Israel no longer derived benefit from the war. Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed at least 51 people, including 24 at a seafront rest area, as fresh calls grow for a ceasefire in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory. The swift resolution of Israel's 12-day war with Iran has revived hopes for a halt to the fighting in Gaza, where more than 20 months of combat have created dire humanitarian conditions for the population of more than two million. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will visit the White House on 7 July, a US official told AFP on condition of anonymity. US President Donald Trump recently urged Israel to 'make the deal in Gaza', and the Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer is visiting Washington this week for talks with US officials. But on the ground, Israel has continued to pursue its offensive across the Palestinian territory. READ | 'We will achieve both tasks': Netanyahu argues Israel will return hostages, end Gaza war Gaza's civil defence agency said 51 people had been killed by Israeli forces on Monday, including 24 in a strike on a rest area on Gaza City's seafront. 'I saw body parts flying everywhere, and bodies cut and burned... It was a scene that made your skin crawl,' 26-year-old eyewitness Ahmed Al-Nayrab told AFP, recalling a 'huge explosion that shook the area'. 'The place is always crowded with people because the rest area offers drinks, family seating and internet access.' Another eyewitness, 35-year-old Bilal Awkal, said 'blood covered the ground and screams filled the air'. Women and children were everywhere, like a scene from a movie about the end of the world. Bilal Awkal Approached for comment by AFP, the Israeli army said it was 'looking into' the reports. The Hamas government media office reported that photojournalist Ismail Abu Hatab was among those killed in the strike. Israeli restrictions on media in Gaza and difficulties in accessing some areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers and authorities in the territory. Civil defence spokesperson Mahmud Bassal told AFP that 27 others were killed by Israeli strikes or fire across Gaza, including 11 near aid points in the centre and south. Eyewitnesses and local authorities have reported repeated killings of Palestinians near distribution centres in recent weeks, after Israel began allowing in a trickle of aid at the end of May. Hassan Jedi/Anadolu via Getty Images Samir Abu Jarbou, 28, told AFP by phone that he had gone with relatives to pick up food in an area of central Gaza around midnight. 'Suddenly the (Israeli) army opened fire, and drones started shooting. We ran away and got nothing,' he said. In the southern city of Khan Yunis, the dead and wounded were rushed to a hospital in an open-top trailer after aid seekers said they were fired on by Israeli forces in Rafah. 'The targeting was deliberate, aimed at people as they were leaving,' eyewitness Aboud al-Adwi told AFP. 'There was no one among us who was wanted or posed any threat. We were all civilians, simply trying to get food for our children,' he added. AFP footage from Nasser Hospital showed the wounded being treated on a blood-stained floor. The Israeli military did not immediately provide comment when asked by AFP about the civil defence reports. Doaa Albaz/Anadolu via Getty Images Netanyahu had said on Sunday that Israel's 'victory' over Iran had created 'opportunities', including for freeing hostages. Opposition leader Yair Lapid, meanwhile, said on Monday there was 'no longer any benefit' to the war. Israel's defence minister suggested during a meeting with Netanyahu and the army's general staff that the campaign in Gaza was nearing its goal. 'We now face the completion of the campaign in Gaza, to achieve its objectives - foremost among them, the release of all hostages and the defeat of Hamas,' Israel Katz said. Trump had said on Friday that he was hoping for a new ceasefire in Gaza 'within the next week'. Three days later, Washington announced the $510-million sale to Israel of bomb guidance kits and related support. 'The United States is committed to the security of Israel, and it is vital to US national interests to assist Israel to develop and maintain a strong and ready self-defence capability,' the US Defence Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) said in a statement. Qatar's foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari told journalists on Monday that 'momentum' had been created by the Iran truce but 'we won't hold our breath for this to happen today and tomorrow'. Israel launched its campaign in response to Hamas' 7 October 2023 attack, which resulted in the deaths of 1 219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Of the 251 hostages seized during the assault, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56 531 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers these figures to be reliable.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Study Warns Trump's Plan for US Aid Cuts Risks 14 Million Additional Deaths
(Bloomberg) -- Deep cuts to the US Agency for International Development and its potential dismantling under President Donald Trump could result in about 14 million additional deaths by 2030, according to a study released in a prominent medical journal. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer The report published Monday in The Lancet, which analyzed data from 133 low- and middle-income countries from 2001 to 2023, estimates that USAID-funded programs helped prevent more than 91 million deaths over the past two decades, including 30 million among children. If the cuts continue, researchers project 1.8 million excess deaths in 2025 alone, with a total of 14 million by 2030 — including 4.5 million children under age five. 'US aid cuts — along with the probable ripple effects on other international donors — threaten to abruptly halt and reverse one of the most important periods of progress in human development,' the study said. 'This crisis would stem from a conscious and avoidable policy choice — one whose burden would fall disproportionately on children and younger populations, and whose consequences could reverberate for decades,' it said. The analysis follows Trump's Jan. 20 executive order suspending most foreign aid programs. The dismantling of USAID was among the administration's first major moves after Trump tapped Elon Musk to lead a broad effort to reduce government spending. Nearly all of the agency's 10,000 staffers have since been forced out. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has defended the cuts as necessary to fix past failures and root out progressive ideology. In 2023, the US accounted for 43% of all government humanitarian funding worldwide, up from 39% a decade earlier. USAID managed more than $35 billion in foreign assistance in fiscal 2024, while its operating budget — including salaries and overhead — was about $2 billion. The study found that countries receiving higher levels of USAID support saw a 15% drop in overall mortality and a 32% decline in child mortality. Disease-specific improvements included a 65% reduction in HIV/AIDS deaths, 51% in malaria and 50% in neglected tropical diseases. Though best known for its health initiatives, USAID also funds education, water and sanitation, nutrition and poverty programs. The study noted that these investments have long-term health impacts. For example, improved sanitation alone can reduce child mortality by 17%. Shutting down USAID could cost more than $6 billion, including hundreds of millions in legal fees tied to lawsuits over layoffs and program cancellations, according to a draft State Department assessment. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
How Did Israel's Air Defenses Fair Against Iran's Ballistic Missiles?
HEBRON, WEST BANK JUNE 15: Streaks of light from Iranian ballistic missiles are seen in the night ... More sky above Hebron, West Bank, as Iran resumes its retaliatory strikes against Israel. The renewed wave of attacks follows heightened regional tensions and comes in response to previous Israeli operations targeting Iranian territory. (Photo by Wisam Hashlamoun/Anadolu via Getty Images) The twelve-day Israel-Iran war this June saw two unprecedented air wars take place in parallel. One pitted Israeli fighters and their long-range munitions against Iran's large but dated air defense system. The other tested Iran's arsenal of medium-range ballistic missiles against Israel's advanced and battle-tested air defense system. This article looks at the latter conflict, primarily waged between the missileers of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force and the Israeli Air Force's Air Defense Command. Ballistic missiles appeal militaries lacking the air superiority or aircraft to reliably execute long-range strikes with manned aircraft. And unlike slower, lower-flying cruise missiles or kamikaze drones, ballistic missiles are practically immune to fighter interception, and difficult to down with all but the most advanced air defense systems. Since the 1990s Iran focused on developing medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs) that can reach Israel with reduced time to launch and greater precision. Iran's MRBM inventory remained modest for years but exploded in size by the 2020s to an estimated 2,000 to 2,500 MRBM-class missiles. Notable Iranian MRBM series include the Emad, Ghadr, Dezful and Khorramsher-4 (AKA Kheiber Shekan), as well as the older Shahab-3 (essentially bulked-out Scud) and the newest Fattah-1 and -2 missiles able to maneuver during the terminal phase. Some Iranian MRBMs appear capable of releasing cluster payloads too. Iran's ballistic missiles are complemented by a modest inventory of cruise missiles like Soumar and its Paveh subvariant, numerous long-distance kamikaze drones, and missile-armed combat drones. However, ever since Iraq attacked Israel with Scud missiles back in 1991, Israel has invested in a multi-layered integrated air defense system capable of missile defense co-developed with the United States. Because Israel is geographically small, it proved comparatively easy to densely blanket the country in overlapping air defense layers. This system's famous bottom-layer, Iron Dome, is primarily (but not exclusively) optimized for interception of cheap, short-range artillery rockets and drones launched by Hamas and Hezbollah. Technically the Iron Beam laser weapon and other systems reinforce the bottom layer. The medium-to-long-range layer, David's Sling, has replaced Patriot batteries supplied by the United States, defending against both aircraft, cruise missiles, and short-range ballistic missiles using a missile called Stunner. Israeli warships and ground launchers also employ the medium/long-range Barak air defense system, which compared to David's Sling is fully-indigenous, cheaper and slightly shorter-ranged. (This June, Barak was employed against Iranian drones.) Israel's upper layer defense comes from the older Arrow-2 capable versus medium-range ballistic missiles, and Arrow-3 effective against intermediate- and even intercontinental-range missile. These benefits from huge Green Pine-series radars for early warning and to help cue fire control sensors towards incoming threats. Israeli air defense is currently supplemented by one each U.S. Army Patriot and THAADS batteries, the latter specifically designed for MRBM-interception. Israel air defense performance versus MRBMs, cruise missiles and drones was first tested by two large-scale Iranian raids in April and October 2024. Supported heavily by the U.S. and other allies, upwards of 80% of Iranian missiles were shot down, with minimal damage incurred (notably including cratering of the tarmac of Nevatim airbase.) When Israel surprise attacked Iran on June 13, Israeli warplanes particularly sought to target Iran's MRBM force in two ways: by hunting down furtive ballistic missile launcher trucks, and bombing the stocks of missiles the launchers drew from—either through direct destruction, or by caving in tunnel accesses needed to withdraw missiles from their fortified subterranean cells. It's much cheaper to destroy missiles still on the ground. Post-war, the IDF claimed it had destroyed 'hundreds' of missiles on the ground and '50%' of Irans launchers (which may imply 180 launchers, going by an earlier IDF claim). Israel's targeting of Iranian launchers and command-and-control nodes apparently left Iran unable to replicate the large-scale coordinated surges of missiles it launched twice in 2024. Nonetheless, over the course of 12 days of hostilities, Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps managed to launch 530 to 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, of which at least 31 impacted near military targets or populated areas, and a few dozen more reportedly blasting unpopulated areas. It's unclear how many, if any, cruise missiles Iran launched during the June war. An unknown number likely failed at launch or midflight, though likely a lower percentage than the very high failure rates of Iran's 2024 raids which some U.S. officials allege had a 50% failure rate (at launch or midflight.) The lack of similar observation may mean Iran learned from the April attack. Sam Lair writing at the Arms Control Wonk blog states the video footage appears to confirm the expenditure of at least 34 Arrow-3 and nine Arrow-2 missiles, as well as 39 American THAADS missiles. The Arrow-3s were mostly observed in the first night of hostilities, while most THAADS were observed June 15-19. Furthermore, a David's Sling Stunner and even more surprisingly Iron Dome were credited with kills of MRBMs despite not being built to defeat such faster, higher-flying missiles. The below video shows how Iron Dome's observably slower Tamir interceptors nonetheless managed to twist into position to blast a ballistic missile plunging to target. Powerful SM-3 missiles were also apparently fired by U.S. Navy warships in defense of Israel judging by recovered debris. As in Iran's April campaign, the drone assault—this time allegedly counting 1,100 drone, averaging just over 90 daily—proved ineffectual, with just one reaching a populated area. The remainder were shot down by fighters of several air forces and surface-launched missiles, or were neutralized through electronic warfare, or simply fell short of target. To be fair, the drone barrages may still have aided Iran by diverting attention from ballistic missiles and compelling expenditures of expensive missiles. The IAF claims to have shot down 90% of missiles. Missile expert Fabian Hoffman estimated on his blog that between 420 and 470 missiles were intercepted on his blog, noting Israel seemingly improved its missile interception rate over 2024. He speculates this may have been due to the ability to conduct 'shoot-look-shoot' engagements, in which an initial failed attempted intercept provides data used for a second intercept attempt using a lower-layer interceptor. Despite 10% or less striking targets, Iranian missiles caused more damage and killed more people than in 2024—28 dead, all civilian save for one-off duty soldier. Missiles combusted an oil refinery in Haifa and struck a hospital, a science institute and residential areas. They also landed on or near Israeli airbases and high-level command posts. Exactly how Iran's missile targeting was allocated between military, economic and civilian targets remains unclear. In truth, most Iranian MRBMs are imprecise, on average deviating dozens or hundreds of meters from target, making it hard to distinguish between unintentional and deliberate attacks on civilians. Despite Israel's qualitatively effective defenses, an underlying quantitative war attrition was at play that threatened to degrade Israel's position over time: Iranian stocks of MRBM-class missiles likely exceeded the number of anti-MRBM interceptors possessed by Israel (ie. Arrow-2 and 3). Anti-ballistic missile interceptors are very costly—generally millions of dollars per shot, while produced in small volumes annually. Lair points out in his blog that the 39 THAADS observably expended exceed the annual production rate (32) per year. THAADS costs $12 million per shot, while Israel's Arrow are in the low-to-mid single-digit millions. So, given enough time Iran might have eventually exhausted Israel's upper-layer interceptor stocks. A report by the Wall Street Journal on June 18 hints such a shortage was looming, causing the U.S. to scramble in more of its own resources. Vigorous targeting of Iranian missile launchers bought Israel time—a strategy known as 'left of launch' defense. Holding fire against incoming missiles that were calculated as being unlikely to land near populated areas also preserved inventory. That said, Iran would in theory would have wanted to wage its own 'left-of-launch' campaign targeting Israeli fighter bases and supporting logistics. While Israeli airbases were hit, there's yet to be photographic evidence of combat aircraft losses. Ultimately, hostilities ended before the supply of interceptor missiles dead. However the 12 day war has highlighted yet again several key realities of ballistic missile defense: it is highly appealing to have ways of defeating ballistic missiles, very expensive to do so (and more so than the missiles it is defending against), and that there is insufficient production of interceptor missiles globally relative to the offensive arsenals they may be pitted against.
