Chief minister Yogi Adityanath reviews Kanwar yatra plans in west Uttar Pradesh
CM Yogi assessed the preparations for the Kanwar Mela at the temple and sought detailed updates from district magistrate Deepak Meena regarding the arrangements for the influx of Kanwariyas, said officials of the UP information department.
'CM Yogi also inquired about the progress of the Dudheshwar Nath temple corridor being developed under the tourism department within the temple premises. After visiting the temple, CM Yogi proceeded to the Ghaziabad police lines, from where he boarded a helicopter to shower flower petals on Kanwariyas travelling along routes passing through various districts of western UP, especially near the borders of Muzaffarnagar and Meerut,' said officials.
'CM Yogi expressed satisfaction about the arrangements taken up for Kanwar Yatra and Kanwariyas in Ghaziabad. We also briefed him about the progress of the temple corridor, for which several old shops need to be shifted out. We will also hold a meeting in this regard within a week, and further progress is expected soon,' said district magistrate Deepak Meena.
The temple corridor in Ghaziabad is expected to be built on the lines of the corridor in Kashi Vishwanath in Varanasi.
While in Meerut district, CM Yogi warned of strict action against any attempt to disrupt the Yatra.
'It is the responsibility of every Kanwar sangh and every Shiv bhakt to expose such elements and immediately inform the authorities. The entire Yatra route is under CCTV surveillance, and once the Yatra concludes, strict action will be taken against those identified. Their posters will also be displayed publicly,' said CM Yogi in a statement issued by the department.
CM Yogi while taking a dig at the previous governments said that before 2017, such pilgrimages were neither supported nor respected, but they were obstructed.
'Today, with a government that values and protects faith, it is the collective duty of all devotees to carry forward this tradition with peace and respect. If anyone receives information about any such person, they should inform the administration instead of taking the law into their own hands,' said CM Yogi.
Reacting to CM Yogi's statements, Samajwadi Party's district president Faizal Hussain, said, 'The Kanwar Yatra went on peacefully during previous years and previous governments, and it was never stopped. People of different faiths have always supported and contributed towards it. Political statements should be avoid during religious events. But, it is the habit of the BJP leaders to play divisive politics. They will never raise and listen to the issues of unemployment, poverty, lack of education facilities and healthcare which largely affect the common man.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat Confidential: ‘Right' Prasad
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has awarded the 'Eat Right Prasad' certificate to mohanthal prasad provided to devotees by the Ambaji Temple trust. Stating that it is a matter of pride for Gujarat, the state government attributed the 'achievement' to the 'quality and cleanliness' of the prasad provided to devotees by the temple trust and the disciplined functioning of the temple. 'This success has been achieved under the guidance and leadership of Shree Arasuri Ambaji Mata Devasthan Trust and Additional Collector Kaushik Modi,' it stated. In 2023, the mohanthal prasad, made of gram flour, ghee and sugar, landed in controversy and was replaced by chikki, citing longer shelf life and reports of alleged adulteration that followed. The Drugs Control Administration (FDCA) also seized ghee from the firm, which was given the contract to make the prasad. 'Eat Right Prasad' certificate is awarded to religious places, which follows strict standards of food safety, hygiene and quality while preparing and distributing prasad. Councillors' Protest Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillors, during a general board meeting of the Surat Municipal Corporation on Tuesday, protested against the issue of creek floods in the city by showing up in mud-soaked clothes. The councillors, including Leader of Opposition Payal Sakariya, also raised slogans against the ruling BJP, blaming the party for the situation in Surat. AAP councillor Dharmesh Bhanderi said, 'Our motive behind attending the general board meeting in mud-soaked clothes is to register our protest against the ruling BJP, as they have failed to guard Surat against creek floods. Surat witnesses creek floods every year, and the ruling party has no solution. The flood-affected people have to shift from their houses to other places.'
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — July 24, 2025
Unceremonious exit The Vice-President's office, once a symbol of parliamentary balance, is now seen as a new front in partisan conflict. In our constitutional design, neutrality in high offices is not optional but foundational. Yet, this principle has been steadily eroding, perhaps more rapidly of late. Neutrality in constitutional roles ensures institutional trust and continuity. Without it, governance risks becoming a series of political skirmishes fought through institutions meant to rise above them. R. Narayanan, Navi Mumbai Jagdeep Dhankhar's abrupt resignation is a shock. The conspicuous absence of the ceremonial send-off and farewell speeches for him is an unhappy development given his standing as a constitutional authority. As such, parties across the political spectrum should refrain from getting into a political slugfest over his resignation. Instead, they should facilitate the process of the election of the next Vice-President of India. G. Ramasubramanyam, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh Tamil Nadu politics In an interview in this daily, ('Tamil Nadu' page, July 22), Edappadi K. Palaniswami, who is the AIADMK General Secretary, Leader of the Opposition in Tamil Nadu and also former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, has asserted that his party would return to power and form the government on its own next year. Even though it is the AIADMK's major alliance partner, the BJP is not a strong force. However, there is a strong possibility of its popularity rising in Tamil Nadu on account of its efficient governance at the Centre. But Mr. Palaniswami's ambition to capture power and rule solely will not be realised unless he takes steps to enlarge the spectrum of his political alliance. Anti-incumbency votes will move to the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam headed by actor Vijay and the beneficiary will be the DMK despite its mediocre performance. K. Chellappan, Seattle, U.S. The electoral ties forged between the BJP and the AIADMK do not seem to be working well (Editorial and 'Data Point', both July 23). The AIADMK is finding it hard to convince the people that it will not allow the saffron party to swallow it up. It is a 'catch-22 situation' for the AIADMK, as stated in the 'Data Point'. It cannot be seen to be with a party that speaks ill of Tamil Nadu's illustrious leaders. Neither can it sever ties with the BJP for fear of central agencies being unleashed on its leaders. The AIADMK lacks the political heft and the ideological conviction to stand up to the BJP. G. David Milton, Maruthancode, Tamil Nadu
