
Your Garbage Has a 'Wild Afterlife' on the International Black Market
Scientific American spoke with Clapp about the people who break apart and sort our trash all over the world, the growth of the global waste economy and the future of waste management.
[ An edited transcript of the interview follows.]
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Can you tell me where our exported garbage and not-quite-recyclable goods end up?
It would depend what type of trash we're talking about, when we're talking about it or from which country it's being discarded. But a lot of global trash over the last 30 to 40 years has been going to poor countries under the guise that it's being recycled. That trash will get broken down, or someone will attempt to make some use out of it—to extract some profit from it—and that's an extremely dangerous and often lethal process where all sorts of contaminants and forever chemicals enter local ecosystems. They go into the air, they go into the water, and they do huge amounts of damage—damage to, disproportionately, the most vulnerable populations in the world.
Why would one country ever, under any circumstances, buy the garbage from another country? Is someone getting scammed, or is there a legitimate reason to buy boatloads of biological, technological or toxic waste?
That is one of the reasons why I got interested in this topic. We send our waste to the very countries that cannot handle their own domestic waste outputs. I think the dichotomy that's worth keeping in mind with the waste trade is that it's not necessarily rich countries versus poor countries; within poor countries, you have importers who are actually buying the waste for pennies, and they are very much part of the problem. The most important thing to understand about the waste trade is that in the 1980s many poor countries felt that they had no option other than to import waste from the so-called global north. They were heavily indebted; they were desperate for factories, ports, industry of any kind. And so I think there's a really insipid, disturbing history of how and why the waste trade began.
Which leads to the question—how much money is actually involved in this global waste economy?
Let's say it costs $140 to put a ton of old plastic in a landfill. A waste broker would actually have to pay the landfill in order to bury that plastic. But what if instead you could sell that plastic to an importer in Malaysia for a few dollars? Then you're not paying $140; you're actually making $2 or $3. That said, a lot of the waste trade, by nature, is operating underground. If you're sending waste to another country, you're not calling it trash on any export document—you're calling it recyclable material. One thing that I hope my book encourages or leads people to question is how much of our waste is actually moving around the world.
What are you most interested in regarding the future of this waste economy and of waste management on a global scale?
I think what's really interesting about the global waste trade is that in many ways it's like the global drug trade. You see organized crime groups that are getting more and more involved in the waste trade because, frankly, the supply of this stuff is endless. The punishment if you get caught moving waste is negligible. I think the future of waste export and waste movement is organized crime. I think they're going to see this as a monumentally lucrative opportunity.
What was the most shocking story you uncovered while researching for this book?
The most shocking story probably was with the cruise ship-dismantling industry in Türkiye. On the Aegean coast of Türkiye, there's a [town] called Aliağa where American cruise ship companies disproportionately send a lot of their ships to be dismantled. And you would think that the process of deconstructing a cruise ship would be mechanically refined, but it's actually kind of this maniacal process done almost entirely by hand where you have armies of helmeted men filing into these cruise ships and breaking this stuff up. One thing that I found was that most of the men who get recruited into doing this work have little idea of what they're doing. They've never seen the ocean before. They were recruited from the middle of Türkiye and given a week's worth of training. It's absolutely excruciating.
What was the most surprisingly common occurrence across all of your research?
In terms of the most common story that I would hear, it's the extent to which in poor countries trash, and especially plastic, is just regarded as another commodity. Generally [the people I encountered didn't] think about this stuff as a potentially toxic substance. That was shocking to me. In places such as Java and [other parts of] Indonesia, hundreds of tons of Western plastic are imported every week and used as fuel in tofu factories, and then that tofu gets exported around the world's most populous island [Java]. I was just struck by how kind of pedestrian it seems to just burn plastic in places to get rid of it or to find some use for it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scientific American
12-07-2025
- Scientific American
Math Puzzle: How Many Handshakes?
Leila and Sahar are attending a dinner party with four other couples. Each attendee knows their partner, but they may or may not know anyone else there. Before the five couples sit down to eat, anyone who doesn't know each other shakes hands. After everyone sits, Leila makes an observation to the table: 'I just noticed that no two of you shook hands the same number of times.' How many hands did Leila and Sahar each shake? (Martin Gardner previously included a variation of this puzzle, attributed to mathematician Lars Bertil Owe, in his Mathematical Games column in the May 1973 issue of Scientific American.)


Scientific American
11-07-2025
- Scientific American
Your Garbage Has a 'Wild Afterlife' on the International Black Market
Sorting your trash and recycling is common practice: break down the cardboard boxes, separate the compostable material and plastics and put them into the correct containers, put the trash on the curb, and you're done. But what happens next is where the story gets interesting. A billion-dollar industry exists around moving countless tons of waste from wealthy countries to poorer ones. For two years journalist Alexander Clapp lived out of a backpack and visited the smelliest parts of the most beautiful places on Earth—looking for hidden dump sites in the Venezuelan jungle and scaling mountains of trash in Ghana—for his new book Waste Wars: The Wild Afterlife of Your Trash. He tracks the massive scope of waste management, from top-level international relations to underground whisper networks, and reveals the dirty underbelly of what happens to our trash. Scientific American spoke with Clapp about the people who break apart and sort our trash all over the world, the growth of the global waste economy and the future of waste management. [ An edited transcript of the interview follows.] On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Can you tell me where our exported garbage and not-quite-recyclable goods end up? It would depend what type of trash we're talking about, when we're talking about it or from which country it's being discarded. But a lot of global trash over the last 30 to 40 years has been going to poor countries under the guise that it's being recycled. That trash will get broken down, or someone will attempt to make some use out of it—to extract some profit from it—and that's an extremely dangerous and often lethal process where all sorts of contaminants and forever chemicals enter local ecosystems. They go into the air, they go into the water, and they do huge amounts of damage—damage to, disproportionately, the most vulnerable populations in the world. Why would one country ever, under any circumstances, buy the garbage from another country? Is someone getting scammed, or is there a legitimate reason to buy boatloads of biological, technological or toxic waste? That is one of the reasons why I got interested in this topic. We send our waste to the very countries that cannot handle their own domestic waste outputs. I think the dichotomy that's worth keeping in mind with the waste trade is that it's not necessarily rich countries versus poor countries; within poor countries, you have importers who are actually buying the waste for pennies, and they are very much part of the problem. The most important thing to understand about the waste trade is that in the 1980s many poor countries felt that they had no option other than to import waste from the so-called global north. They were heavily indebted; they were desperate for factories, ports, industry of any kind. And so I think there's a really insipid, disturbing history of how and why the waste trade began. Which leads to the question—how much money is actually involved in this global waste economy? Let's say it costs $140 to put a ton of old plastic in a landfill. A waste broker would actually have to pay the landfill in order to bury that plastic. But what if instead you could sell that plastic to an importer in Malaysia for a few dollars? Then you're not paying $140; you're actually making $2 or $3. That said, a lot of the waste trade, by nature, is operating underground. If you're sending waste to another country, you're not calling it trash on any export document—you're calling it recyclable material. One thing that I hope my book encourages or leads people to question is how much of our waste is actually moving around the world. What are you most interested in regarding the future of this waste economy and of waste management on a global scale? I think what's really interesting about the global waste trade is that in many ways it's like the global drug trade. You see organized crime groups that are getting more and more involved in the waste trade because, frankly, the supply of this stuff is endless. The punishment if you get caught moving waste is negligible. I think the future of waste export and waste movement is organized crime. I think they're going to see this as a monumentally lucrative opportunity. What was the most shocking story you uncovered while researching for this book? The most shocking story probably was with the cruise ship-dismantling industry in Türkiye. On the Aegean coast of Türkiye, there's a [town] called Aliağa where American cruise ship companies disproportionately send a lot of their ships to be dismantled. And you would think that the process of deconstructing a cruise ship would be mechanically refined, but it's actually kind of this maniacal process done almost entirely by hand where you have armies of helmeted men filing into these cruise ships and breaking this stuff up. One thing that I found was that most of the men who get recruited into doing this work have little idea of what they're doing. They've never seen the ocean before. They were recruited from the middle of Türkiye and given a week's worth of training. It's absolutely excruciating. What was the most surprisingly common occurrence across all of your research? In terms of the most common story that I would hear, it's the extent to which in poor countries trash, and especially plastic, is just regarded as another commodity. Generally [the people I encountered didn't] think about this stuff as a potentially toxic substance. That was shocking to me. In places such as Java and [other parts of] Indonesia, hundreds of tons of Western plastic are imported every week and used as fuel in tofu factories, and then that tofu gets exported around the world's most populous island [Java]. I was just struck by how kind of pedestrian it seems to just burn plastic in places to get rid of it or to find some use for it.
Yahoo
05-06-2025
- Yahoo
Trump hits Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti with travel bans amid immigration crackdown
President Donald Trump announced a total ban Wednesday on the entry of Haitian nationals into the United States and partially limited Cubans and Venezuelans from coming into the country, as part of a broader travel ban affecting several other nations. The White House published a proclamation that 'fully restricts and limits the entry' of Haitian nationals and 'partially restricts and limits' the entry of Cuban and Venezuelan nationals. The travel ban goes into effect on June 9. READ MORE: Trump travel ban: 'no exceptions' for Cubans, Venezuelans. Other islands may join Haiti on list The travel ban is the latest of federal government move to clamp down on legal immigration from Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela in particular. On his first days in office, Trump asked his administration to evaluate what countries had insufficient vetting and screening that warranted visa suspensions. As a result of the proclamation, the United States will suspend the issuance of most immigrant and non-immigrant visas for Cubans and Venezuelans. Nationals from those countries seeking to travel on immigrant visas and tourism, business, student and academic non-immigrant visas — visa categories B-1, B-2, B1/B-2, F, M, and J — will not be allowed to enter the United States starting June 9. Meanwhile, there will be a full ban on entry into the U.S. for Haitian nationals. The ban does not apply to individuals who currently hold valid visas. Other nations affected by the full ban include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Countries affected by the partial ban include Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo and Turkmenistan. The proclamation applies to nationals from the designated countries who are outside the United States and don't have a valid visa on the effective date of the proclamation. It notes there are exceptions for green-card holders, dual nationals who have a passport not designated under the travel ban, and immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, including minor children, parents and spouses with certain immigration visas. But U.S. citizens seeking to reunite with older children and siblings in the countries included in the ban will be affected. Diplomats, foreign government officials and members of international organizations fall under the exceptions. 'The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those aliens approved for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans or our national interests,' Trump said in the proclamation. In 90 days and every six months thereafter, the secretaries of State and Homeland Security must evaluate whether any suspensions should be continued or terminated. At the annual Haiti Funders Conference in Boston on Wednesday evening, several attendees expressed shock and dismay at the development. 'Singling Haiti out for special treatment provides no protection to U.S. national security, but is another in a long line of transparently racist attacks against Haitians period,' said Brian Concannon, executive director of the Boston-based Institute for Justice and Democracy. Trump declared in the proclamation that he views the measure as a way to protect the United States from terrorism and crime, and that the designated countries lack screening and vetting information for travelers. He added that the countries singled out cannot effectively manage the travel documents of their nationals. In the proclamation, the White House said Cuba is considered a state sponsor of terrorism and that its government does not cooperate on law enforcement matters or take back its own nationals as deportees. It also declared that Venezuela lacks a competent central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, and does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures. It also pointed to Venezuela's traditional refusal of deportees, though independent information obtained by the Miami Herald show that over 4,600 Venezuelan nationals have been deported to Caracas in the last four months. The diplomatic relations between Caracas and Washington have been suspended in 2019 when the Trump administration recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the interim president of Venezuela. For both Venezuela and Cuba, the proclamation says that consular officials shall reduce the validity of other non-immigrant visas to the 'extent permitted by law.' In Havana, the U.S. Embassy has not issued visitor visas since late 2017, with some exceptions made to allow the entry into the U.S. of a few humanitarian cases, activists, independent entrepreneurs, artists, among others. Most Cubans have since needed to apply for non-immigrant visas in third countries. Since Trump took office, the Cuban government has accepted a monthly flight with deportees from the U.S., as it has done since deportations flights to Cuba resumed on April 2023. In the case of Haiti, the White House pointed to rates of overstay in the United States by visa holders and said the country's lack of a centralized government means it cannot ensure nationals are not national security threats. The U.S. Embassy in Port-au-Prince has not been processing visa requests in its consulate for at least two years, which also prompted many Haitians to apply for a Biden-era humanitarian parole program the Trump administration ended as soon as it came into office. The travel ban was announced as Haitians awaited to hear whether the Trump administration would extend or revoke Temporary Protected Status for more than 500,000 Haitians currently living in the U.S. Trump unsuccessfully attempted to end Haiti's TPS during his first term, and experts and advocates fear it will happen again. Pierre Imbert, a Miami community leader and cofounder of Ayiti Community Trust and Hope on a String, noted that Wednesday's ban bars Haitians who are lifelines between their families on the island and South Florida. 'Access to the United States is key to sustaining families. But it's not a one-way thing. You have a number of families in commerce in Haiti who go back and forth on a U.S. them from accessing the country is yet another chapter in the tragedy of Haiti,' Imbert said. He highlighted how Haitians under the Biden admnistration had come legally through the humanitarian parole program because visa services on the island were either suspended or severely limited. The Trump administration ended the parole program for Haitians, and now they cannot enter on visas. 'It's not only unfair, but it fails the test of rational thinking,' said Imbert, noting that many Haitian nationals attending the Boston conference will not be able to enter the United States in a few days. Guerline Jozef, co-founder and executive director of immigrant advocacy group Haitian Bridge Alliance, told the Miami Herald in a statement that it's ironic that the United States views Haiti as a national security threat when the U.S. is the principal source of illegal weapons to Haitian gangs. Wednesday's proclamation comes after the U.S. Supreme Court gave Trump the green light to go ahead with plans to suspend a Biden-era parole program known as CNHV that allowed over half a million immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to live and work in the United States. In addition, the Trump administration ended Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans—a designation that had provided deportation protection to over 600,000 people. The Supreme Court has allowed Trump to move forward with the termination as litigation continues in the lower courts. Adelys Ferro, executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, based in South Florida, criticized the proclamation, calling it a clear display of racism and discrimination. 'They didn't even try to hide the racism, discrimination and xenophobia when drawing up this list. They don't bother anymore,' Ferro said. She noted that the countries facing full or partial restrictions share a common thread: 'They are nations ravaged by war, dictatorships, famine, and death.' International human rights organizations such as Human Rights First, which has offices in New York City, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., condemned Trump's new travel ban, calling it a continuation of xenophobic policy. 'This return to divisive and racist policies to target entire populations marks yet another anti-immigrant and punitive action taken by President Trump,' said Robyn Barnard, senior director of Refugee Advocacy at Human Rights First. 'The ban will harm refugees, asylum seekers and other vulnerable populations, including many who have been waiting to reunite with loved ones in our country. Bans do nothing to make our country secure, but rather undermine our national security and arbitrarily target those most in need of protection.' This is not the first travel ban under a Trump administration. Trump first issued a travel ban in January 2017 during his first term, when he imposed a 90-day ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and barred entry for all refugees without a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days. In September 2017 a new proclamation expanded the restrictions, banning nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Chad, Venezuela and North Korea from entering the U.S. In the case of Venezuela, certain government officials and their immediate family members were banned, but not its nationals in general on tourist or business visas.