Debate over future of US AI regulation hinges on broadband funding
By Jody Godoy and David Shepardson
WASHINGTON: The fight over a proposed 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence heated up on Wednesday, with Republican and Democratic Senate leaders differing on whether such a measure would be tied to billions of dollars in funding to help states improve broadband infrastructure.
Major AI companies including
Alphabet
's Google and
OpenAI
have expressed support for Congress taking
AI regulation
out of the hands of states, to free innovation from a panoply of differing requirements. But opponents of the measure, including the
Teamsters union
-- which raised concerns on Wednesday about worker surveillance and self-driving vehicles -- say states should be able to protect their residents.
The proposed moratorium, part of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, faces mounting pressure from critics ahead of crucial votes by the U.S. Senate expected this week. A previous version of the measure would have secured compliance by blocking states that regulate AI from the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program, known as BEAD.
Unions, state lawmakers and attorneys general, faith leaders and the conservative Heritage Foundation have all opposed the measure, as have at least three Senate Republicans concerned that it would erode states' rights and erase state protections for creative workers and children online. Amid that criticism, Republican Senator
Ted Cruz
, who leads the commerce committee, released an updated version on Wednesday, which he said would only restrict states that tap a new $500 million fund to support AI infrastructure.
"This pause in AI regulation is voluntary and not a federal mandate on states," Cruz's office said in a fact sheet. Senator Maria Cantwell, senior Democrat on the commerce committee, disputed that interpretation, saying the measure continues to hold the BEAD funding hostage, "forcing states to choose between protecting consumers and expanding critical broadband infrastructure to rural communities."
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick voiced his support for the measure in a post on social media site X, saying it would end "the chaos of 50 different
state laws
and makes sure American companies can develop cutting-edge tech for our military, infrastructure, and critical industries--without interference from anti-innovation politicians."
A Commerce Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to an inquiry from Reuters whether compliance with the moratorium would be voluntary as Cruz's office stated.
Earlier on Wednesday, the president of the
International
Brotherhood of Teamsters -- a union representing more than 1.3 million workers, many of them in blue-collar jobs such as trucking -- had called the measure "a disaster for communities and working people."
Teamsters President Sean O'Brien, who spoke at the Republican National Convention last year, said in a letter posted on social media site X that the measure "denies citizens the ability to make choices at the local or state level."
"Pure and simple, it is a giveaway to
Big Tech companies
who reap economic value by continuing to operate in an unregulated void where their decisions and behavior are accountable to no one," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'If he gets in...': Trump vs Zohran Mamdani escalates as US President threatens to pull the plug in fiery clash
Trump issues omnious warning to Zohran Mamdani Live Events Zohran Mamdani hits back (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Days after US President Donald Trump called New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani 'a communist,' he has again stepped up his attack against the Democratic socialist. The commander-in-chief threatened to cut New York City off from federal funds if Zohran Mamdani "doesn't behave himself" should he be a stern warning against Mamdani, the president called Mamdani a "lunatic" and said it was "inconceivable" that the democratic socialist could actually win the mayoral election. Trump also said that if he should succeed, the new mayor is "going to need to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money."Trump went on a fresh rant against Zohran Mamdani on Sunday on the heels of the 33-year-old's stunning win in the recently concluded Democratic mayoral primary. 'He's a communist. I think it's very bad for New York,' Trump told Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo. 'But let's say this: If he does get in, I'm going to be president, and he's going to have to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money.'In an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump argued that a Mamdani victory was 'inconceivable' because he perceived the candidate to be 'a pure communist'.Trump has been on a rant against Mamdani after the latter pulled off a shocking upset against former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the closely watched primary last week. The President railed against the fast-rising Democratic star in a Truth Social post after polls closed.'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line,' he wrote. 'We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous. He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart… Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!'The president doubled down on those insults in his interview with Fox News, branding Mamdani a 'radical left lunatic' — his moniker of choice for many of his perceived political who he would support for New York City mayor, Trump kept it vague.'I don't want to say that because I have a lot of people, a lot of friends,' he said. 'I don't want to get into that. I can tell you this: Whoever's mayor of New York is going to have to behave themselves, or the federal government is coming down very tough on them financially.'"I was very surprised," Trump said, adding that he had "never heard of" Mamdani before the primary, adding, "I don't know who he is."Speaking Sunday with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Mamdani said, 'no, I am not' a communist. Mamdani pushed back in a separate interview, denying that he was a also said that he had 'already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am – ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for'.'I have already started to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am—ultimately, because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for,' he shot back.'When we talk about my politics, I call myself a democratic socialist, in many ways, inspired by the words of Dr. King from decades ago, who said: 'Call it democracy, or call it democratic socialism. There has to be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country,'' Mamdani 33, has yet to secure endorsements from the biggest Democratic officials, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, both coincidentally of New York. The New York City mayoral election will take place on November 4, 2025.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Got To Do Right Thing": Donald Trump's Big Warning To Zohran Mamdani
Washington: US President Donald Trump has threatened to cut federal funding for New York City if favoured mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani--a democratic socialist-- "doesn't behave himself", should he win the November 4 elections. The Republican leader, however, argued that Mamdani's victory was "inconceivable" because he is a "pure communist" candidate. "Let's say this, if he does get in, I'm going to be president and he is going to have to do the right thing, but they're not getting any money. He's got to do right thing. It's shocking that I would have assumed that. I used to say we will never have a socialist in this country. No, but we'll have a communist. I mean, he's a communist, he's gonna be mayor of New York," Trump said during an interview with Fox News. Trump, who grew up in New York and built his sprawling real estate business there, said Mamdani's victory is "very bad" for the city. "Whoever's mayor of New York is going to have to behave themselves, or the federal government is coming down very tough on them financially," he added. New York gets over $100 billion from the federal government through different entities and programs, according to the city's comptroller data. Mamdani Replies Thirty-three-year-old Mamdani also took to the talk shows on Sunday, asserting he would "absolutely" maintain New York's status as a sanctuary city so that "New Yorkers can get out of the shadows and into the full life of the city that they belong to." The Indian origin leader, meanwhile, denied he was a communist, as labelled by Trump. Asked directly on NBC's "Meet the Press" whether he is a communist, he said, "No, I am not." "And I have already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am, ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for," Mamdani said. "I'm fighting for the very working people that he ran a campaign to empower, that he has since then betrayed." The Ugandan-born state assemblyman had trailed former governor Andrew Cuomo in polls but surged on a message of lower rents, free daycare and buses, and other populist ideas in the notoriously expensive metropolis. His shock win last week resonated as a thunderclap within the Democratic party and drew the ire of Trump and his collaborators, who accused Mamdani of being a radical extremist. Current Mayor Eric Adams is a Democrat but is campaigning for re-election as an independent, while Cuomo may also run unaffiliated.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill set to further tarnish Treasuries' lustre overseas
As the Trump administration's "big, beautiful bill" grinds its way through the U.S. Senate, incentives are growing for foreign investors to diversify out of U.S. Treasuries losing sheen from prospects of deficit spending and inflation-boosting tariffs. President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending measure will boost U.S. debt by $3.3 trillion, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates, while runaway deficits and swelling debt led Moody's to cut its credit rating in May. "Definitely I'm concerned about the fiscal deficit expansion ," said Toshinobu Chiba, a Tokyo-based rates and credit fund manager for Simplex Asset Management. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Easy Living: Small Home with Bath for Seniors Compact 60 sqm Mini House for Seniors – Includes Toilet & Bath (See Inside) | Search Ads Search Now Undo Chiba said he has been using futures to shift away from Treasuries and into European debt, but aims to move that trade to the cash bond market when Trump's "big, beautiful bill" passes and inflation expectations tick upwards. "I think the first options should be Europe, especially the bunds and French bonds, and also Australia and Singapore are options for global investors." Live Events Traditionally a refuge for markets, Treasuries have been volatile since April, becoming less attractive for overseas investors as Trump's erratic policies on tariffs and taxes drove them to pare exposure to the dollar and U.S. markets. U.S. Treasury International Capital (TIC) data shows foreign money leaving U.S. short and long-term debt and banking flows stood at a net $14.2 billion in April, the same month that Trump rattled global markets with his "Liberation Day" tariffs. The U.S. national debt has increased fourfold in less than 10 years to some $36 trillion, with about $29 trillion held publicly. Japan is the biggest external holder of Treasuries with $1.13 trillion, followed by Britain with $807.7 billion and China with $757.2 billion, TIC data shows. Treasuries fell in the aftermath of the tariff news, with benchmark 10-year yields reaching as high as 4.629% on May 22 before settling down to about 4.277%. Treasury 10-year yields have swung between 3.9% and 4.629% since April. Passage of Trump's long-simmering bill would give investors another reason to fret about the state of U.S. finances. Senators debating the measure in a marathon weekend session were expected to pass it late on Monday and in the Asian trading day on Tuesday. Senate Republicans are set on using an alternative calculation method for the bill's cost that does not factor in extending the 2017 tax cuts and seems to save $500 billion, according to an analysis by the Bipartisan Policy Center. Prospects for even wider deficits in the U.S. may compel European investors to dump Treasuries and bring their money home, said Gustavo Medeiros, London-based global head of research at emerging markets investment manager Ashmore Group. When Treasuries and other major bond markets sold off in April, the Bund market held firm. Though the amount of German debt is also growing after the new government's trillion euro defence and infrastructure spending push, Europe's biggest economy is the only G7 member with a debt-to-GDP ratio below 100%, bolstering its safe-haven credentials. "That not only creates an upward, better opportunity for the equity markets, but it also is going to increase the issuance of risk-free German bunds and pan-European debt," Medeiros said. "So you're going to have a lot of incentive for capital to come back." Yet a widespread sell-off is unlikely, despite fiscal concerns over Trump's spending bill that are expected to steepen the Treasury yield curve as investors demand higher returns to hold U.S. debt for longer, said analyst Masahiko Loo. "The reduction in foreign US Treasury holdings has been a long-term structural trend rather than a sudden exodus," said Loo, a senior fixed income strategist at State Street. "It is a 'diversification, not divestment' story with foreign investors, particularly in Asia." Hemant Mishr, group CIO of SCUBE Capital, is also betting on a steeper Treasury curve. "The markets are worried and U.S. risk premiums will further widen," he said. "We expect U.S. credit default swaps to continue quoting at a substantial premium to similarly rated sovereigns."
