logo
THE ECONOMIST: What does the Israel, Iran conflict mean for the world's oil prices?

THE ECONOMIST: What does the Israel, Iran conflict mean for the world's oil prices?

West Australian18-06-2025
For the past two years, the Middle East has been a tense place. Houthis have bombed commercial ships; Israel has begun full-blown military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon; it and Iran have exchanged rockets. Yet oil markets remained calm, since the worst-case scenario — a full-blown war between Israel and Iran — had been avoided.
That scenario now appears alarmingly close. On the evening of June 12th, Israel launched dozens of air strikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites.
The attack threatens to inflame the Gulf, which pumps a third of the world's oil. Brent crude, the global benchmark, rose by 8 per cent on June 13, to $US74 a barrel ($114). How high might it now go?
So far, no oil supply has been lost. Instead, higher prices reflect the possibility of future disruption. In October, when tensions last flared, a largely symbolic Iranian reaction allowed for de-escalation.
A similar outcome this time would see much of the risk premium evaporate, says Jorge León of Rystad Energy, a consultancy. Brent would probably then hover between $US65 and $US70.
That does not appear to be the most likely outcome, however. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, says strikes on Iran will continue for 'as long as it takes'.
America's president, Donald Trump, has warned that Israel's next move could be 'even more brutal'.
The cycle of strikes and retaliation could therefore last weeks. It might nevertheless stop short of an all-out war, in which case some Iranian oil supply would still be lost — perhaps 600,000 barrels a day (b/d) — as Western sanctions were toughened up. Since that only amounts to 0.6 per cent of global supply, price rises would probably be limited to $US5-10 a barrel.
The temperature would crank up another notch if Israel targets Iran's oil wells and export terminals. Were Iran's crude to be shut in, global supply would lose 1.7m b/d. Iran's Gulf neighbours, the core of the Organisation for the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), have lots of idle wells.
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates alone have 3-4m b/d of spare capacity, which they could use in a crunch. It is not a given that they would, because doing so might be seen by Iran as collaboration with Israel, inviting retaliation.
They would also not mind prices rising, having tried (and failed) to push them up over much of the past two years. In such a situation, prices would rise in a linear fashion as Iran's oil exports dwindled. They might hit a ceiling just below $US90 a barrel, as supply from OPEC and elsewhere became available.
The more aggressively Israel behaves, the greater the risk that Iran resorts to desperate measures. Among the most desperate would be to try to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which 30 per cent of the world's seaborne crude and 20 per cent of liquid natural gas travel.
Even in the 'Tanker War' of the 1980s, when Iran and Iraq fought and 239 oil tankers were bombed, shipments did not slow and prices stabilised after an initial spike. Iran would have to blockade the whole route.
That would be rash, not least because the narrow waterway, which links the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, is vital to Iran itself. Moreover, both America (whose president wants oil prices to stay low) and China (which relies on oil imports from the Gulf) would probably send their navies to unblock the passage. Indeed, despite threatening such action several times, so far Iran has never dared take the risk.
Suppose, this time, it does. Saudi Arabia could divert some exports through its East-West pipeline, which has a capacity of 5m b/d, equivalent to about half of what the Kingdom produces.
But 85 per cent of Iraq's exports, and all of those of Kuwait, Oman and Qatar, have no other route to market, meaning Brent might then rush past $US100 a barrel, says Michael Haigh of Société Générale, a bank.
And there is an even worse scenario. Many of the Gulf's largest oil-production sites are within reach of Iranian missiles. Protecting them is just about impossible, especially in Saudi Arabia, since they are spread over enormous distances.
Were Iran to bomb them, prices might top $US120 a barrel, according to JPMorgan Chase, another bank. Across the region, risks are building. Global oil markets have just become a lot more flammable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese will ‘cave in' to pressure from pro-Palestine marchers
Albanese will ‘cave in' to pressure from pro-Palestine marchers

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Albanese will ‘cave in' to pressure from pro-Palestine marchers

Former Victorian Liberal Party president Michael Kroger reacts to Sydney's pro-Palestine march, which temporarily shut down the Harbour Bridge. 'There's a reason the left demonstrate because in the end, weak, Western governments cave in to mass demonstrations,' Mr Kroger told Sky News host Paul Murray. 'He [Anthony Albanese] is going to recognise Palestine, which would be extraordinarily premature. 'Of course, he'll cave in on this … this demonstration was effectively there solely to pressure Albanese and to intimidate people.'

Iran's army chief says Israeli threats remain
Iran's army chief says Israeli threats remain

The Advertiser

time6 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Iran's army chief says Israeli threats remain

The commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, says threats from Israel persist, according to state media. Israel and the US launched strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June during the so-called 12-day war, in which Tehran retaliated against Israel with several barrages of missiles and drones. "A one per cent threat must be perceived as a 100 per cent threat," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over." He said the Islamic Republic's missile and drone power "remains standing and ready for operations". In July, Israeli Minister of Defence Israel Katz warned his country would strike Iran again if threatened. The commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, says threats from Israel persist, according to state media. Israel and the US launched strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June during the so-called 12-day war, in which Tehran retaliated against Israel with several barrages of missiles and drones. "A one per cent threat must be perceived as a 100 per cent threat," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over." He said the Islamic Republic's missile and drone power "remains standing and ready for operations". In July, Israeli Minister of Defence Israel Katz warned his country would strike Iran again if threatened. The commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, says threats from Israel persist, according to state media. Israel and the US launched strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June during the so-called 12-day war, in which Tehran retaliated against Israel with several barrages of missiles and drones. "A one per cent threat must be perceived as a 100 per cent threat," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over." He said the Islamic Republic's missile and drone power "remains standing and ready for operations". In July, Israeli Minister of Defence Israel Katz warned his country would strike Iran again if threatened. The commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, says threats from Israel persist, according to state media. Israel and the US launched strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June during the so-called 12-day war, in which Tehran retaliated against Israel with several barrages of missiles and drones. "A one per cent threat must be perceived as a 100 per cent threat," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over." He said the Islamic Republic's missile and drone power "remains standing and ready for operations". In July, Israeli Minister of Defence Israel Katz warned his country would strike Iran again if threatened.

Israel PM says in 'profound shock' over hostage videos
Israel PM says in 'profound shock' over hostage videos

News.com.au

time9 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Israel PM says in 'profound shock' over hostage videos

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed "profound shock" over videos showing two emaciated hostages in Gaza, with the EU also denouncing the clips on Sunday and demanding the release of all remaining captives after nearly 22 months of war. Over the past few days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages seized during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war in Gaza. The images of Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David have sparked strong reactions among Israelis, fuelling renewed calls to reach a truce and hostage release deal without delay. A statement from Netanyahu's office late Saturday said he had spoken with the families of the two hostages and "expressed profound shock over the materials distributed by the terror organisations". Netanyahu "told the families that the efforts to return all our hostages are ongoing", the statement added. Earlier in the day, tens of thousands of people had rallied in the coastal hub of Tel Aviv to urge Netanyahu's government to secure the release of the remaining captives. In the clips shared by the Palestinian Islamist groups, 21-year-old Braslavski, a German-Israeli dual national, and 24-year-old David both appear weak and malnourished. There was particular outrage in Israel over images of David who appeared to be digging what he said in the staged video was his own grave. The videos make references to the dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, where UN-mandated experts have warned a "famine is unfolding". EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the images "are appalling and expose the barbarity of Hamas", calling for the release of "all hostages... immediately and unconditionally". - 'Hamas must disarm' - Kallas said in the same post on X that "Hamas must disarm and end its rule in Gaza" -- demands endorsed earlier this week by Arab countries, including key mediators Qatar and Egypt. She added that "large-scale humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach those in need". Israel has heavily restricted the entry of aid into Gaza, which was already under blockade for 15 years before the war began. UN agencies, aid groups and analysts say that much of the trickle of food aid that Israel allows in is looted by gangs or diverted in chaotic circumstances rather than reaching those most in need. Many desperate Palestinians are left to risk their lives under fire seeking what aid is distributed through controlled channels. On Sunday, Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli fire killed nine Palestinians who were waiting to collect food rations from a site operated by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Israeli attacks elsewhere killed another 10 people on Sunday, said civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal. - 'Emaciated and desperate' - Israeli newspapers dedicated their front pages on Sunday to the plight of the hostages, with Maariv decrying "hell in Gaza" and Yedioth Ahronoth showing a "malnourished, emaciated and desperate" David. Left-leaning Haaretz declared that "Netanyahu is in no rush" to rescue the captives, echoing claims by critics that the longtime leader has prolonged the war for his own political survival. In his conversations with Braslavski and David's families on Saturday, Netanyahu accused Hamas of "deliberately starving our hostages", and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said he was "initiating a special UN Security Council meeting on the issue of the Israeli hostages". Braslavski and David are among the 49 hostages taken during Hamas's 2023 attack who are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Most of the 251 hostages seized in the attack have been released during two short-lived truces in the war, some in exchange for Palestinians in Israeli custody. - Red Crescent says HQ hit - Hamas's 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to a tally based on official figures. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed at least 60,430 people, also mostly civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run territory's health ministry, deemed reliable by the UN. The Palestine Red Crescent Society said in a post on X early Sunday that one of its staff members was killed and three others wounded in an Israeli attack on its Khan Yunis headquarters, in southern Gaza. There was no comment from Israel. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP cannot independently verify tolls and details provided by the civil defence and other parties. Overnight from Saturday to Sunday, Israel's military said it had "most likely intercepted" a rocket launched from southern Gaza. Meanwhile, in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, firebrand National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said he had prayed at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, where his repeated visits are seen as a provocation to many Palestinians. The mosque is Islam's third-holiest site, and is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, though Jews are barred from praying there under a long-standing convention. In a video statement recorded during his visit -- Ben Gvir said "the response to Hamas's horror videos" should include Gaza's occupation and plans for the "voluntary emigration" of its people. Jordan, which acts as the site's custodian, condemned the minister's visit as "an unacceptable provocation, and a reprehensible escalation".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store