logo
Political parties split over calls to fire NPA boss Batohi

Political parties split over calls to fire NPA boss Batohi

Eyewitness News06-06-2025
CAPE TOWN - Political parties in Parliament are split on whether the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Shamila Batohi, should be fired.
While ActionSA said Batohi should leave the position due to high-profile failures by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), the Democratic Alliance (DA) said it doesn't support her removal.
But the DA said the NPA is in desperate need of a massive overhaul and has introduced a 'reform package' for the NPA that includes passing the DA's 'Scorpions 2.0' bill to create an independent anti-corruption commission.
ActionSA parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, called for the immediate removal of Batohi and demanded a full parliamentary inquiry into the NPA's ongoing prosecutorial failures.
READ: NPA shouldn't be let off the hook for faltering on several cases: GL community safety committee
In a statement, Trollip said the NPA had once again 'exposed its deep dysfunction, either through incompetence or wilful neglect', with the latest disgrace being the collapse of the asbestos corruption case involving Former Free State Premier Ace Magashule and his former personal assistant, Moroadi Cholota.
But DA Justice spokesperson, Glynnis Breytenbach, said earlier that her party would not support a motion to remove Batohi because the problems go deeper than just leadership.
'We certainly wouldn't table such a motion, and we certainly wouldn't support it. The national director is not the problem at the NPA. It's not a one-man job or a one-woman job, and while I think she possibly could have things differently, she's not doing a bad job.'
She said the failures of the NPA are not attributable to her alone, saying she has less than a year left in office, which is more of a concern for the DA.
ALSO READ: NPA's hopes of trying rape-accused Omotoso suffer blow after his voluntary departure
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minister wants foreign offenders to serve time in countries of origin
Minister wants foreign offenders to serve time in countries of origin

TimesLIVE

time24 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

Minister wants foreign offenders to serve time in countries of origin

Foreign criminals sentenced to jail time should ideally be deported to their countries of origin to serve their terms, says correctional services minister Pieter Groenewald. He hopes the home affairs department can assist with deportations of foreign offenders granted parole. His department spends R11m a day on inmates from other countries, he told parliament's correctional services portfolio committee on Tuesday. 'The South African taxpayer foots the bill for more than 24,000 foreigners in correctional facilities. Calculated at R463 per day, this results in an expense of R11,112,000 per day. 'We are exploring various solutions, including diplomatic approaches.' Anna Molepo, the department's chief deputy commissioner of community corrections, previously told the committee the number of sentenced foreigners in South African prisons was 12,676 in January 2025, which was 12.4% of the sentenced inmate population. The committee was briefed in February on the challenges the department faced, including the legal issues that affect deportation orders and the processing of foreigners. The department said it was working to ensure the Immigration Act aligns with the relevant frameworks. On Tuesday, Dereleen James, an ActionSA MP, called for accelerated deportation policies. 'Prisoners live in relative comfort while our communities are being destroyed, broken, under-resourced and forgotten,' James said. The R463 daily cost per inmate could fund 555,600 loaves of bread, enough to feed 277,800 households with two loaves each.

NPA petitions the Supreme Court of Appeal over Cholota ruling appeal
NPA petitions the Supreme Court of Appeal over Cholota ruling appeal

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

NPA petitions the Supreme Court of Appeal over Cholota ruling appeal

The National Prosecuting Authority has petitioned the Supreme Court of Appeal following a controversial dismissal by Judge Loubser of their application for leave to appeal. The National Prosecuting Authority has petitioned the Supreme Court of Appeal following a controversial dismissal by the Free State Division of the High Court, Bloemfontein on its application for leave to appeal. The petition, filed on Monday, comes after Judge Loubser dismissed the NPA's request for the judge to reserve questions of law under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Act. The ruling has drawn attention as it relates to the jurisdictional authority of the Free State Division of the High Court to hear the case against Moraidi Cholota, who has been implicated in the ongoing asbestos scandal that has plagued the region. The court found that it has no jurisdiction to try the former Free State premier Ace Magashule's personal assistant in the R255-million asbestos case, as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful. NPA national spokesperson, Mthunzi Mhaga, said the judge's decision not only undermined the legal process but also initiated a potential gap in justice surrounding the serious allegations presented in the case. "The NPA is of the firm view that the Honourable judge erred in dismissing the application for leave to appeal, and that there are reasonable prospects of success to appeal the Cholota judgment, and that there are compelling reasons for the SCA to hear our appeal. "We are also exploring the possibility of approaching the Constitutional Court, challenging the same judgment, given the possible far-reaching implications on many other extradition matters," said Mhaga. It is important to note that during the previous trial within a trial concerning the jurisdiction issue, the merits of the state's case against Cholota were neither adjudicated nor formally assessed. This withdrawal from a full examination has led the NPA to maintain that the charges she faces remain viable and can be substantiated in a subsequent trial. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.

MK Party claims selective prosecution, stands by Molefe and Gama
MK Party claims selective prosecution, stands by Molefe and Gama

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

MK Party claims selective prosecution, stands by Molefe and Gama

MKP senior members and MPs Siyabonga Gama and Brian Molefe will continue their work in the National Assembly despite facing charges. Image: file The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) has come out in strong support of its senior members and MPs, Brian Molefe and Siyabonga Gama, who are facing charges related to a multi-billion rand scandal involving the procurement of locomotives at Transnet. The party's national spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, questioned the National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) impartiality, accusing the justice system of engaging in a "troubling pattern of retaliation" against party members who have held state institutions to account. Molefe, Gama, and two other former Transnet executives, Anoj Singh and Thamsanqa Jiyane, were arrested and released on bail of R50,000 each on Monday. Ndhlela said the party would not be silenced or intimidated by the charges against its members. "The continued attacks on their character and professional integrity are not isolated incidents: they are part of a systemic purge targeting those who dare to challenge the status quo," he said. The MK Party has consistently called for accountability within state-owned enterprises and institutions like the NPA, which must be held to the highest standards of integrity. However, Ndhlela claims that when the party raises legitimate questions about institutional bias and political capture, the response is swift and punitive. "We reject the notion that these arrests are rooted in a genuine pursuit of justice. Instead, they are part of a broader, deeply troubling campaign that seeks to intimidate and criminalize black professionals, intellectuals, and revolutionaries, particularly those associated with the MK Party," Ndhlela said. 'It is increasingly evident that when the MK Party challenges institutions captured or influenced by narrow political interests, our members become targets,' he said. Ndhlela further said the two members would continue to be the party's MP's until further notice. 'These charges reek of nothing else, but you know, a political agenda. So, we're not going to now, all of a sudden, purge our people and our members on the basis of, you know, cases or should we say charges that are brought to them on the basis of, you know, something that transpired when there was the Transnet and so on so forth. So, let's await the court process to unfold and we said we respect the rule of law. Let's allow the process to unfold and we take it from there,' Ndhlela reportedly said. Molefe, Gama, Singh and Jiyane, face 32 charges, including fraud, corruption, and violations of the Public Finance Management Act and the Companies Act. According to the charge sheet, the four executives allegedly conspired to favor the Chinese Rail Corporation (CRC) in the procurement of locomotives, resulting in inflated costs of at least R18 billion. The four executives are set to face trial in October 2025. If convicted, they could face significant penalties, including imprisonment and fines. The trial will determine whether the four executives are guilty of the charges against them, which include dereliction of corporate and constitutional duty, fraud, and corruption. Molefe faces 10 charges, Gama six charges, and Jiyane three charges, while Singh faces 13 charges. They are all accused of benefiting from bribes during their tenure as Transnet officials.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store