Stokes, the all-rounder that keeps on ticking
Which is why Stokes emulating Imran Khan while becoming only the third player to complete the double of scoring 7,000 runs and taking 200-plus wickets in Test cricket, after Garry Sobers and Jacques Kallis, isn't merely an achievement, but a milestone. It's proof that allrounders aren't a dying breed yet.
You couldn't have seen this coming when Stokes retired hurt on 66 due to cramps. A night's rest however made way for a more agile version of the England skipper that tried to take a tight single and almost got run out after Anshul Kamboj's throw hit the stumps at the bowler's end. Next over, Stokes skipped down the pitch and clobbered Mohammed Siraj through cover for four, signalling a shift in momentum. Following over, Siraj erred in length again and Stokes went knee down for a splendid cover driven four.
England were eight wickets down by the time Stokes entered his 90s, which meant there was no question of hanging around, even though Liam Dawson was doing a fine job of holding one end. Stokes reached his first hundred in three years with a boundary — again off Siraj — took off his helmet, looked up in prayer, paused, took in the applause and shifted gears. His next 41 runs came in 34 balls, allowing England to reach 669, their fifth highest total in Tests.
For Stokes to choreograph this final push after taking five wickets in 24 overs — the second highest among England bowlers after Jofra Archer — in the first innings is remarkable considering how taxing the modern game has become.
Even more when you see how other teams have been struggling to produce a genuine fast bowling allrounder for a long time now, simply because of the workload. Hardik Pandya's back couldn't take it, as was the case with New Zealand's Kyle Jamieson. In this series alone, India have tinkered with Nitish Kumar Reddy, Shardul Thakur and Anshul Kamboj as all-rounder. None of them have been a success, and to top it Reddy was ruled out of the last two Tests due to injury.
Stokes however continues to tick along, bowling and batting as if his life depends on it.
The Lord's Test witnessed a similar effort (44, 2/63, 33 & 3/48) but not similar returns, even though they were good enough for Stokes to be named Player-of-the-Match. He later shed light on what keeps him going as an allrounder. 'I've taken myself to some pretty dark places, but if bowling your country to a Test match win doesn't get you excited, I don't know what does,' Stokes had said.
'I was cooked yesterday, but the game was on the line, nothing was stopping me. I'm an all-rounder, I get four opportunities to influence the game, and if one thing doesn't click... I'd like to score more runs, but you don't have a chance to worry about anything.'
This zeal to contribute in any way makes Stokes such an indispensable cricketer even though his peak as a batter hasn't quite coincided with the one as a bowler. Comparisons with Ian Botham are inevitable but unfair, yet it can't be ignored that Stokes has a better batting average and is now level with Botham on 14 hundreds.
Botham's consistency as a bowler is legendary but Stokes hasn't been as lucky because of injuries that forced him to pick his battles. Given he was key to England winning the ODI World Cup in 2019 and then the reset that has fuelled an entirely new brand of Test cricket, you could say Stokes has done exceptionally well on that front.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
25 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Lesson from Manchester? Ben Stokes & co believe that the world should play the game as per the moral code they have in their heads
Washington Sundar was on 80 and Ravindra Jadeja on 89 when Ben Stokes had had enough. He wanted to shake hands with the batsmen, the mandatory overs in the final hour of the final day of the fourth Test had begun. India batted on, and when both batsmen had reached three figures, called it quits at 425 for 4. Sounds perfectly reasonable. ADVERTISEMENT Except Stokes lost his rag on the field. Do you want a Test hundred against Harry Brook's bowling? England asked the batsmen at the crease, forgetting momentarily that they had been kept on the field for 143 overs, and having reduced India to 0 for 2, could only pick up two more wickets. Stokes was welcome to bowl whoever he wanted, but, with one Test to play, and there being no chance of forcing a result, he used his non-bowlers. On the field, frustrated that they could not do more after being in such a strong position, Stokes' momentary loss of calm might be forgiven. Aching limbs and tired bodies can play tricks on the calmest of minds. But, to suggest that India were putting personal milestones ahead of the game was churlish in the extreme. The fact is that England threw everything they could at India's batsmen, who dug deep and battled hard for a draw. Having done all the hard work, exactly why should either Washington or Jadeja walk off? Stokes was within his rights to offer, Shubman Gill equally so, to politely followed was problematic, to put it mildly. To state the obvious, Test hundreds don't come easy. Ask Washington, who has been left stranded on 85 and 96. India will eventually realise that Washington is a top-order batsman who also bowls very well, and when he's deployed higher up the order, there will no doubt be many more hundreds to follow. But, here he was on the verge of his maiden Test ton, and Stokes's England thought he was a bad sport for not running for cover at the earliest? ADVERTISEMENT Jadeja already had four Test hundreds to his name before this game, but he's a slightly different beast. Jadeja has played so many invaluable hands for India, many of them not close to three figures, but worth more than that in the context of the game. And, about three years ago, Jadeja was batting on 175 against Sri Lanka at Mohali when he told Rohit Sharma, the captain, to declare the Indian innings in order to give themselves enough time to bowl out the opposition. Which, of course, Jadeja planned to play a big part in. It's not as though Jadeja is a milestone even if he were, it should be no concern of the opposition captain. If the pursuit of personal milestones was affecting the team, that's a problem for Gill to deal with. If anything, a tough-but-fair competitor such as Stokes should welcome the opposition doing this. ADVERTISEMENT But even that is beside the point. The issue simply is that Stokes, and it seems some of his teammates, believe that the world should play the game as per the moral code they have in their heads. Not the rules of the game, and really, it should end there, but cricket has put this thing called spirit on a pedestal like no other sport. As one legendary cricketer once said, the spirit of cricket is best taken after the day's play, about three fingers deep and with as many cubes of ice. ADVERTISEMENT The sour taste in the mouth left by England's bitterness will pass soon enough, given the quick turnaround before the final Test. One of cricket's most diabolical decisions, Greg Chappell asking his brother to roll the ball underarm to New Zealand with six needed off the final ball to tie the game, was within the rules as they stood then. But, Chappell, when he had time to think about having won fair and square, freely admitted that the decision was the wrong one and the product of a mind that had endured a poor season, and was addled. It wasn't even heat of the moment. Perhaps Stokes will reach similar clarity at some point. Because his telling the world how this game ought to be played smacks of entitlement and privilege. For the best part, Stokes plays his cricket hard, gives it his all, and puts the game front and centre. Stokes is popular with fans and his worthy adversaries. Much more of this sort of behaviour and this might change. Gautam Gambhir, India's coach, defended his team, asking if England would have walked off with an early finish had the shoe been on the other foot. What he should have been asking was why his own batsmen came off so early in the end. After Stokes's first offer, it took only about 15 minutes for boxes to be ticked. But, having seen England's reaction, India should have made England bowl every last ball they were due, if only to make the point that neither the spirit of the game nor the moral high ground was the sole preserve of the England team.
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Divya, the girl who could become the queen
The little girl was dressed in a pink frock and a pinker overcoat. 'Divya Deshmukh,' she said when one asked her what her name was, on that November afternoon at the Nehru Stadium in Chennai. The year was 2013. She had just won the National Under-9 girls' chess championship, which was held as one of the side-events of the World championship match between Viswanathan Anand and Magnus Carlsen at Hyatt Regency. How time flies! Divya is now one of the most exciting young talents in international women's chess. The latest proof came on Monday, at Batumi in Georgia, where she became the first Indian woman to win the chess World Cup. In an all-Indian final, she defeated the much more experienced, higher-rated Koneru Humpy. After both the classical games had been drawn, the title had to be decided in tiebreaker games, played with shorter time controls. The first game was drawn in 81 moves. Divya had white pieces, and she ensured half-a-point through perpetual checks with her queen. The second game, in which Divya was black, was wilder, with both players making significant mistakes. On the 42nd move, an unwise pawn-push down the centre by Humpy had given the younger woman a clear advantage. But Divya returned the compliment just a move later, going for a pawn-exchange, instead of which she should have played her rook on the back rank. And now it looked the point in the second game too would be shared, in an equal rook-and-pawn ending. On the 54th move, however, Humpy went for a pawn-capture with her rook, and black got the advantage back But, Divya failed to capitalise yet again. Humpy's 69th move, with her pawn on the king-side, proved fatal, though. This time, Divya, made no mistake. When black's extra pawn reached the penultimate rank, threatening to turn into a queen, Humpy extended her hand, and conceded defeat. It was a significant moment for Indian chess. Here was the undisputed queen congratulating the princess who could one day become the queen. Divya's right hand went towards her face, and there would be tears of joy. She, however, forced a smile as FIDE president Arkady Dvorkovich came up to her and congratulated her. A little later, all her pent-up tears came out, as did her mother's. Namrata had sacrificed her career as a gynaecologist for the sake of her daughter's career. It hasn't been easy for the family, with Divya not having a sponsor, and chess, contrary to popular notion, is an expensive sport, as you need to travel around the world and quality coaches do not come cheap. The prize-money from the World Cup should come in handy: she has become richer by $50,000. That isn't the only thing that should make her smile. By winning the World Cup, she became India's 88th Grandmaster, and only the fourth woman from the country to do so. She, along with Humpy, also qualified for the Candidates tournament. This was very much a World Cup to remember for India's women.
United News of India
37 minutes ago
- United News of India
Pakistan spinner Sadia Iqbal relishing Cricket World Cup challenge
Karachi, July 28 (UNI) Pakistan sealed their spot in this year's ICC Women's Cricket World Cup with a perfect Qualifier campaign at home. With five wins from as many games, the hosts punched their ticket in the eight-team tournament. Coming on the back of a stellar campaign, lead spinner Sadia Iqbal believes Pakistan are ticking all the right boxes going into the tournament set to be hosted by India and Sri Lanka starting September 30. 'We had a good Qualifier campaign, the preparation was very good for it,' Iqbal was quoted in an interview with the PCB. 'We know that the competition is going to be tough at the World Cup, with all the big teams featuring in the tournament. We are preparing keeping that in mind with practice matches, variation, etc.' Iqbal was among the key contributors for Pakistan in the Qualifier campaign, snapping nine wickets during the tournament and finishing as their third-highest wicket-taker behind skipper Fatima Sana (13) and Nashra Sandhu (10). The 29-year-old tweaker continued her impressive run with the ball by reclaiming the No.1 spot in the ICC Women's T20I Bowling Rankings back in May, an ICC report said. Opening up on her individual feat, Iqbal said, 'This obviously depends on performances. The Rankings are determind based on performances. I try and give my 100 percent and everything else is a result of that." 'It's a big honour for me to become the No. 1 ranked bowler in the world while playing for Pakistan. It's always my desire to help lift the team to new heights with my performances," she said. 'I relish the added responsibility of the team relying more on me. It's challenging but I try and enjoy it,' Iqbal added. Pakistan will kickstart their Cricket World Cup campaign against Bangladesh on October 2, 2025 in Colombo. UNI BM
