
At The Current Rate, It Would Take Russia Centuries To Capture Ukraine
Russian forces managed to capture around 68 square miles of Ukraine in April. But it cost them 4,800 vehicles and more than 36,600 dead and wounded troops, according to one statistician who collects data mostly from official Ukrainian sources including the general staff in Kyiv.
In the same month, Ukrainian losses were 'minimal,' concluded analyst Konrad Muzyka of Rochan Consulting in Poland.
Ukraine sprawls across 233,000 square miles, 19% of which is under Russian occupation. At the current rates of advance and loss, the Russians would capture the rest of Ukraine in the year 2256 at the cost of 101 million casualties. The current population of Russia is 144 million.
Incredibly, staggering losses in people and equipment haven't yet crippled the Russian military in Ukraine. The Kremlin is equipping its forces with thousands of civilian vehicles, including scooters, compact cars and even at least one bus.
Meanwhile, it's recruiting 30,000 troops per month, Gen. Christopher Cavoli, commander of U.S. Army forces in Europe, told U.S. lawmakers on April 3. Since many of the wounded eventually return to the front line, the Russian armed forces recruit more people every month than they lose.
As a result, Cavoli said, the Russian force in Ukraine is actually growing. It now numbers no fewer than 600,000 troops, 'the highest level over the course of the war and almost double the size of the initial invasion force' in February 2022, Cavoli said.
How the Kremlin has managed to sustain and even expand its recruitment effort comes down to two things: money and mood. Record enlistments are 'driven by high sign-on bonuses and speculation that the war will soon be over,' explained Janis Kluge, deputy head of the Eastern Europe and Eurasia Division at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
Russian recruits.
Whether the money and good vibes are sustainable is an open question. 'All told, Russia's defense budget will account for 40% of all government expenditures which is at its highest level since the Cold War,' Cavoli said. By comparison, the United States spends just 13% of its federal budget on the military.
The spending has buoyed Russians' attitude toward the war, even as total casualties exceeded 800,000 earlier this year. 'As a direct result of its defense spending, Russian investments in its industrial base have reduced national unemployment to 2.4%,' Cavoli said. 'The Russian economy is on a war footing and will remain so for the foreseeable future.'
But a war footing isn't always very efficient. Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov has vowed to maintain the elevated military spending even as plummeting oil prices and the damage from Ukrainian drone attacks squeeze revenue from energy exports, cutting economic growth in Russia by more than half compared to a year ago.
To prolong the wartime spending spree, Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin raised personal and corporate taxes last year. 'Russia's leadership is not only prepared to increase the tax burden on Russians but is also shifting its economic development priorities,' explained Alexander Kolyandr, an analyst with the Center for European Policy Analysis in Washington, D.C. Obviously, war industries are the priority.
Losing a lot to gain very little in Ukraine and sustaining the costly effort through massive spending, Russian leaders are walking an economic and political tightrope.
But the danger hasn't dissuaded them. According to Cavoli, Putin and his ministers and generals are committed to a long war—one that could widen beyond Ukraine. 'The Russian regime has refashioned its military, economic and social structures to sustain what it describes as a long-term confrontation with the West—systemic changes that illustrate Russia's intention to confront us into the foreseeable future,' Cavoli warned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
Russian navy Maj. Gen. Mikhail Gudkov killed near Ukraine border
July 3 (UPI) -- The Russian military confirmed today that the leader of the Russian navy was killed near the Ukrainian border. Major General Mikhail Gudkov, deputy head of the Russian military, was killed in an operation near the border. Russian defense ministry said the operation in the western Kursk region was "combat work." It gave no further details. The region borders Ukraine's Sumy region. It's one of the most high-profile losses by Russia since it invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Russian President Vladimir Putin appointed Gudkov to his post in March. Oleg Kozhemyako, governor of the Primorsky region, announced the death on Telegram. He said 10 others also were killed. Kozhemyako described Gudkov as loyal and said he died "carrying out his duty." Four or more missiles may have struck the base, and several senior officers were killed in the attack. The base was near the village of Korenevo, about 19 miles from the front. Gudkov had led the 155th Marine Brigade, a unit on the front line that was often replenished because so many in the unit have been killed. The unit has been accused of war crimes by Kyiv, including the execution of nine Ukrainian prisoners of war last summer and possibly two other POWs. The unit took part in the attempt to take Kyiv, which failed. In 2023, it was in Vuhledar, where it was accused of more war crimes. It then redeployed to Kursk when the Ukraine military moved into the Russian region. So far, at least 10 Russian major generals or lieutenant generals have been killed in the war. On June 29, Ukrainian F-16 pilot Lt. Colonel Maksym Ustymenko, 31, was killed when his fighter jet was damaged trying to intercept Russian missiles and drones.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vladimir Putin tells Donald Trump he will not back down from goals in Ukraine, Kremlin says
Vladimir Putin told Donald Trump he "will not back down" from Russia's goals in Ukraine during a phone call today, the Kremlin has said. The spoke to his US counterpart for almost an hour, and "again raised the issue of an early end to military action" in Ukraine, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters. In response, Mr Putin said "Russia will not back down" from its aims there, which include "the elimination of the well-known root causes that led to the current state of affairs," Mr Ushakov said. The phrase "root causes" is shorthand for Moscow's argument that it was compelled to invade Ukraine in order to prevent the country from joining NATO. Ukraine and its European allies say this is a pretext to justify what they call an imperial-style war, but Mr Trump has previously shown sympathy with Russia. At the same time, Mr Putin told the US president that is ready to continue negotiating, the aide said. The Russian president said any prospective peace deal must see Ukraine give up its NATO bid and recognise his country's territorial gains. He also briefed Mr Trump on , which saw Russia and Ukraine exchange prisoners of war and dead soldiers. Specific dates for the third round of peace talks in Istanbul were not discussed - nor was the US decision to halt some shipments of critical weapons to Ukraine. Mr Putin and Mr Trump's call came after the Pentagon confirmed some weapons due to be sent to Ukraine have been held as it reviews military stockpiles. The paused shipments include air defence missiles and precision-guided artillery, two people familiar with the situation have said. Read more: The decision led to Ukraine calling in the acting US envoy to Kyiv on Wednesday to underline the importance of military aid from Washington. Kyiv also cautioned that the move would weaken Ukraine's ability to defend itself against intensifying Russian airstrikes and battlefield advances. Mr Putin and Mr Trump's phone call was the sixth they have publicly disclosed since the US president returned to the White House in January.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Star Lawyer Who Defended Trump's Family Issues Stark Warning About Presidency
The super-lawyer who kept Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump out of legal jeopardy during Robert Mueller's Russian investigation now fears Donald Trump will demolish the very institutions that protected them. 'I have never been as concerned as to whether our system can withstand the pressure it is being put to,' Abbe Lowell told the Financial Times, warning that the White House is 'pushing the tree to the point that it could break,' noting that during Trump's first term, critics of the president said democracy was 'tested but didn't break.' The legal eagle has defended several high-profile Democrat figures—including Bill Clinton and Joe Biden's son, Hunter. But he is perhaps best known for his high-stakes work for Trump's daughter and son-in-law. In June 2017, the Daily Beast reported that Kushner, 44, who is married to Ivanka, 43, had hired Lowell to join his defense team as Robert Mueller's Russia probe heated up. The following month, Ivanka followed suit, tasking the prominent lawyer to provide 'legal and ethical advice' as investigators examined possible campaign ties to Moscow, bringing both Trump family members under the same high-powered counsel. Now, Lowell says, Ivanka father's behavior in his second term threatens to smash the constitutional 'wall' separating courts from executive muscle. 'The crack you put in the wall today becomes the gash tomorrow,' Lowell had told Congress in 1998. That was 'not a bad prophecy', Lowell told the FT, saying that the structure is 'more than cracked, not yet crumbled.' In an attempt to fight back, Lowell, 73, has launched Lowell & Associates to combat what he calls government 'over-reach.' Nine law firms, he says, have already 'buckled' under Trump-era intimidation—agreeing to nearly $1 billion in work that advances the president's agenda while muzzling internal critics. Several defectors from those firms have signed up to Lowell's boutique organization, Lowell said, with many more showing interest. Clients include New York Attorney General Letitia James—now under federal investigation after winning a massive civil-fraud judgment against Trump—and former DHS official Miles Taylor, whose security clearance vanished after he blasted the president. Both hope Lowell's aggressive strategy can blunt a barrage of executive orders targeting universities, NGOs and even courthouses. 'I don't know the administration has the ability, breadth, depth and expertise to handle all' the resulting lawsuits, Lowell said. Yet the veteran litigator is under no illusion every legal action will stick. With a Supreme Court that 'believes in an executive branch with broad power,' reports the FT, Lowell says challengers must craft cases on First Amendment grounds rather than on presidential authority. Because if Trump diminishes the authority of the country's courts, Lowell warns, 'there will just be rubble from that wall.' The Daily Beast has approached the White House for comment.