
Drivers set for £700m EV charm offensive
Automotive bosses have been waiting for details of the government's next steps to reduce the cost of buying an electric vehicle outside a company car scheme. Last month's spending review set aside £1.4 billion 'to support the continued uptake of electric vehicles, including vans and HGVs'.
It is understood an announcement may be made this week that up to £700 million of this will be used for subsidies or grants to reduce purchase costs. Whitehall sources cautioned that the plans have yet to be signed off.
If the ideas win approval, it would give an EV financial incentive to everyday motorists for the first time since the plug-in grant ended in 2022.
The government is also allocating £25 million to help home-charging for households without driveways. Gullies will be cut into footways to allow cables to run safely beneath paving slabs. This means cars parked on the street can be charged at home. Some 20,000 of these are scheduled to be rolled out between now and the end of 2026.
Ministers also want to incentivise businesses to make the change. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, will on Sunday unveil a £30 million package to pay for thousands of charge points at delivery depots, paving the way for millions of groceries and goods deliveries to be made by zero-emission vehicles.
'We are making it easier and cheaper for British businesses to go electric,' Alexander said. 'This investment will position Britain as a global leader in electric freight, supporting cleaner vans and lorries and cutting business costs to transition to zero emission. With more than 1.4 million electric vehicles already on our roads, we're backing our logistics sector to cut pollution and drive jobs and investment across the UK.'
Ashwin Prasad, the chief executive of Tesco UK, said the grocer had been rolling out electric vans and trialling electric-powered lorries 'but there is still more work to do to reach our target of carbon neutrality across our own operations by 2035'. 'This scheme is an important step in ensuring the industry has the charging infrastructure needed to continue the electrification of our transport operations,' he said.
We are making it easier and cheaper for British businesses to go electric,' Alexander said. 'This investment will position Britain as a global leader in electric freight, supporting cleaner vans and lorries and cutting business costs to transition to zero emission. With more than 1.4 million electric vehicles already on our roads, we're backing our logistics sector to cut pollution and drive jobs and investment across the UK.'
Ashwin Prasad, the chief executive of Tesco UK, said the grocer had been rolling out electric vans and trialling electric-powered lorries 'but there is still more work to do to reach our target of carbon neutrality across our own operations by 2035'. 'This scheme is an important step in ensuring the industry has the charging infrastructure needed to continue the electrification of our transport operations,' he said.
Chris Ashley, from trade body the Road Haulage Association (RHA), said: 'Quite simply without the ability to charge at depot we are not going to see the introduction of electric HGVs, coaches and vans at the pace required.'
Electric car sales rose 39.1 per cent to 47,354 units in June, with one in four buyers going electric, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. This is still below the minimum mandated level, which stipulates that 28 per cent of new car sales and 16 per cent of new van sales should be zero emission this year.
Currently drivers can benefit from generous tax breaks if an electric car is bought on a company scheme. However, this benefit is not available universally.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
The real reason Gen Z have stopped being ‘sober curious'
Hold the kombucha and pour me a pint! It seems that Gen Z are actually drinking alcohol, and I'm not surprised one bit. I wish I'd made a note of the number of wine tastings, seminars, meetings and dinners where the seemingly existential crisis of Gen Z not drinking was discussed. Not to mention the thousands of entries on a brief Google search to see how much it's been written about. It was going to be the death knell of the wine industry. But I never really believed it was going to stay that way. People change, after all. And, it seems I was right. New data released by IWSR shows that the situation is altogether far more nuanced. I mean, aren't most things in life? It seems the ' sober curious ' generation have become curious about booze. IWSR's Bevtrac findings show a marked increase in 'alcohol participation levels' compared with two years ago. In research carried out in the top 15 markets (including the UK, North America and Australia) in April 2023, 66 per cent of Gen Z consumers said they had consumed alcohol in the past six months, this figure rose to 73 per cent in March 2025. And interestingly, the trend is especially strong in some key global markets, including the UK, where participation increased from 66 per cent to 76 per cent, Australia, where there was a staggering leap from 61 per cent to 83 per cent, and the US, with a huge bump from 46 per cent to 70 per cent. As Richard Halstead, COO of consumer insights at IWSR, says: 'There is evidence that the propensity to go out and spend more is recovering among this group – challenging the received wisdom that this generation is 'abandoning' alcohol.' Issues such as consumer confidence around inflation has had a huge cross-generational impact when it comes to purchasing, with the cost of living crisis having been brutal for many. But Gen Z have especially suffered, maturing in a period where they're met with soaring costs and stagnant salaries, not to mention the global pandemic and the impact it had on hospitality and real-life socialising. Further research published by Rabobank in April supports this notion, with data showing that Gen Z's drinking is actually on par with previous generations. And that in the US, the proportion that each generation spends of their after-tax income on alcohol is exactly the same – boomer, millennial and Gen Z'er alike. The headlines were misleading. We were being told that it's a generation obsessed with 'wellness', but it turns out they're just skint! And my God, we have all been there (I mean, I still mostly am, aren't you?). It's just that when I was starting out on an incredibly meagre salary, I was propping it up with a hefty overdraft and a plethora of credit cards. Banks were falling over themselves to give people like me credit cards and overdrafts without any checks as to whether you could actually afford them. My Egg card was well and truly funding my millennial avo and egg habit to the max. Want to go shopping? Get a store card. Want to go out for a drink? Put it on your credit card. I was a fully signed up card-carrying millennial who definitely drank above the recommended weekly allowance. Boozy Thursdays spread effortlessly into Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. I was the queen of knowing a little late-night drinking den that was still serving in the early hours of the morning. But I'm delighted that most of my Gen Z friends appear to be far more sensible and financially astute. Believe me, I learn a lot from them. And I'm thankful that personal finance isn't so readily available; it crippled me for many years. And looking at this situation from someone who makes a living from tasting and talking about drinks, with a heavy leaning on wine, I think the alcohol industry should be pleased with this emerging picture. The days of excessive underage drinking are hopefully dwindling and people are being more cautious with the amount they drink. Both of these are excellent outcomes. And there's a genuine interest in premium products too. Drinking less, but better, has never been an easier or cooler thing to do. Nothing stays the same forever. And the wine industry for the most part reflects this, showing a keen and energetic desire to welcome new consumers. In many ways, I feel nothing but excitement about these latest figures. It's one of my greatest pleasures to help people find the wine that sparks their love of this wondrous product that has endured for thousands of years. Wine and the world that surrounds it really is a beautiful thing, so here's to the latest generation of wine lovers, I can't wait to share a glass with you.


The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Crystal Palace ultras to launch furious protest march against Uefa after Eagles booted out of Europa League
FUMING Crystal Palace ultras have begged fans to join a planned protest march against the club's "unjust" relegation from the Europa League. The Eagles are appealing against Uefa's decision to demote Oliver Glasner's side to the Conference League next season for breaching multi-club ownership rules. 5 5 American businessman John Textor owns a stake in Palace and is also the majority owner of French club Lyon, who also qualified for the Europa League next season. The rules of European football 's governing body state clubs owned, to a certain threshold of influence, by the same person or entity cannot compete in the same European competition. Uefa 's rules set a deadline of March 1 2025 to show proof of multi-club ownership restructuring - a deadline which Palace missed. Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League last season, could replace FA Cup winners Palace in the Europa League next term. And now raging Palace fans have planned a protest to start from Norwood Clocktower to Selhurst Park on Tuesday night at 7:30pm. The ultras said even hinted at unfair treatment from Uefa, who they claim are often influenced by other clubs with more "prestige and money". A statement from the Holmesdale Fanatics read: "Uefa's decision to demote Crystal Palace to the Conference League is a terrible injustice for both our club and the game of football as a whole. "A team has won the oldest cup competition in the world and, with it, its first piece of silverware in the club's history. "A dream not unique to Palace fans but one shared by supporters of clubs across the country. "To then have the deserved prize of Europa League football unjustifiably taken away is emblematic of a European football governing body disconnected from the true values that makes the sport adored by fans everywhere. "It is indicative of why so many fans have fallen out with the modern game. "We call this protest not just for Palace's position in the Europa League to be reinstated, but with all football fans in mind. "Many clubs could be the next to be ruled against for lacking the historical prestige and financial resources to influence Uefa for their own gain." The X post was captioned with: "Time to act. Please share widely." It will take for around 12 minutes for the marchers to get from the meet-up point to Selhurst Park. 5 A timeline - why Palace have been demoted March 1: Uefa's deadline passes for clubs in multi-club groups to change their ownership structure. At that point, Crystal Palace were 12th in the Premier League and in the FA Cup fifth round. April 30: It is revealed Evangelos Marinakis has removed himself from control of Nottingham Forest, putting his shares into a blind trust when it looked like Forest would qualify for the Champions League alongside Olympiakos, also owned by the Greek billionaire. May 17: Palace win the FA Cup by beating Manchester City 1-0 and qualify for the Europa League. On the same day, Lyon qualify for the Europa League on the final day of the Ligue 1 season. But Lyon face the prospect of Uefa sanctions for over spending rules. May 25: Forest fail to qualify for the Champions League on the final day of the Premier League season but reach the Conference League instead, so Marinakis takes back control of the club. June 3: Uefa meet with Palace executives in Switzerland to discuss whether the Eagles are able to play in Europe next season. John Textor and Steve Parish attend the meeting to fight Palace's case. June 9: It is revealed Forest have written to Uefa warning that Palace could be in breach of Uefa's multi-club ownership rules. June 25: It is announced that Lyon have been relegated from Ligue 1 after failing to convince authorities they have resolved their financial difficulties. July 9: Lyon's appeal is upheld, meaning they are reinstated to Ligue 1 and their spot in the Europa League is confirmed. July 11: Palace's demotion to the Conference League is announced by Uefa, with the Eagles saying they will appeal the decision. As FA Cup winners, Palace won a spot in the Europa League for the 2025/26 campaign after beating Manchester City 1-0 at Wembley eight weeks ago. But that was brought into question with Lyon finishing sixth in Ligue 1 and earning their own Europa League spot. Palace stand to lose £3.9m up front in prize money and can win a maximum £18.4m from the Conference League, compared to a minimum £9.1m and potential £33.5m from a successful Europa League campaign. Textor - who Palace argue did not have overall control of the club - sold his 43 per cent stake to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson - albeit after the March 1 deadline. He then resigned from his leadership roles at Lyon when they were relegated to Ligue 2 after failing to convince authorities they have resolved their financial difficulties. This appeared to pave the way for Palace's Europa League participation. But, there was further uncertainty on Wednesday when Lyon won their appeal against their relegation and were reinstated to Ligue 1 - meaning they are able to take up their Europa League spot. 5 5 Palace argued Textor does not hold any decisive influence at the club, but the Premier League side's defence was not accepted. Club chief Steve Parish slammed 'ludicrous' Uefa for permitting 'the biggest injustice in the history of football'. Parish said on Friday that Johnson had passed the Premier League's owners' and directors' test and that everyone at Palace feel they have been made an example of by Uefa. Uefa rejects any claim that Palace have been harshly treated. It regards the case as a clear breach of the regulations, saying on Friday it had reached that conclusion after an 'assessment of the documentation submitted' by Lyon and Palace. Forest's place has not yet been confirmed, with Uefa 's Club Financial Control Body waiting until the outcome of the Court of Arbitration for Sport appeal.

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Lack of victims' rights in new Bill ‘outrageous', says Barnaby Webber's mother
The Victims and Courts Bill, which is currently passing through the Commons, will give victims no statutory right to be told about decisions affecting the detention, leave or discharge of their offenders with its current provisions, according to national charity Hundred Families. Discretion of the information will be left to hospital managers and probation services instead, with victims having no legal right to be informed, carry out a consultation or appeal any decisions. Valdo Calocane, who had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, killed 19-year-old students Barnaby and Grace O'Malley-Kumar and 65-year-old caretaker Ian Coates before attempting to kill three other people, in a spate of attacks in the city in June 2023. He was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January last year after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder. A judge-led public inquiry into the decisions made prior to the attacks was announced in February and is due to take place later this year. Emma Webber said the Bill would be 'a betrayal of every victim who has already been failed by this system' if it was passed into law in its current form. 'This must not happen. It is utterly outrageous that the Government would even contemplate this,' she said. 'So egregious are the failings by every single agency involved in every aspect of our tragedy that a statutory public inquiry is under way. 'A significant part of the inquiry will focus on the failings of 'hospital managers' and 'clinicians' who failed to do their jobs properly. Resulting in the monster who killed my beautiful child be allowed to roam the streets and hide in plain sight.' Ms Webber continued: 'Why has the Government chosen to include us as families in the proposals for the mental health bill, revision of our homicide laws and even the 10-year plan but conveniently chosen to ignore us on what is probably the one that will affect us the most?' Campaigners have called on victims minister Alex Davies-Jones to amend the Bill by guaranteeing all victims have the right to be consulted, receive necessary information and be informed of key decisions, and to create a formal appeal process when information is denied. Julian Hendy, founder of Hundred Families, said the Bill as it stands was 'not just a loophole, it's a kick in the teeth' for bereaved families and victims. She said: 'We are talking about offenders who have been convicted of the most serious of crimes, which cause extreme concern amongst the public. 'This is not about punishment. It's about basic fairness, compassion, and transparency. Victims and their families should not be shut out of decisions that affect their personal safety and recovery. 'We have a lamentably long track record in our country of ignoring victims of serious crime. That has to stop. There is a balance to be struck. 'The Government has a clear opportunity to put this right and they must not waste it.' The Victims and Courts Bill is currently at the report stage in the House of Commons after first being introduced to Parliament in May.