'Reflection Of Values': Varnika Kundu As Stalker Vikas Barala Gets Appointed Haryana AAG
Vikas Barala and his friend allegedly pursued her, attempted to block her path, and tried to enter her vehicle.
Delhi-based disc jockey Varnika Kundu on Wednesday said that she continues to have faith in the Indian judiciary after her stalker Vikas Barala, the son of Haryana Bharatiya Janata Party chief, was appointed as an Assistant Advocate General (AAG) at Delhi by the Haryana government. She further added that the appointment of such an accused to a public position of power is not just a political decision, but is a reflection of values and standards.
Barala, accused in a 2017 stalking case, is among over 100 law officers whose appointments were notified on July 18 by the state government.
Issuing her statement on his appointment, Kundu wrote, 'Appointing someone to a public position of power is not just a political decision – it's a reflection of values and standards. So perhaps the questions should be directed at the authorities whose ethics and standards allowed this decision to be made."
'Our policymakers run the country; the rest of us are just hoping they remember that they work for the Indian citizen," the statement read, adding, 'What I will speak about is my own case – and the fact that despite months of national media attention, it has dragged on for this long with little progress."
'Although we seem no closer to a conclusion than we were five years ago, I continue to hold faith in the judiciary until the verdict is announced – but I won't deny that faith has wavered," Kundu stated, asserting her faith in the judiciary.
2017 Stalking Case
The Kundu stalking case dates back to 2017, when the daughter of former senior IAS officer VS Kundu — Varnika Kundu, was heading to her home in Chandigarh when she noticed a car following her.
Vikas Barala and his friend allegedly pursued her, attempted to block her path, and tried to enter her vehicle.
Following this, an FIR was filed under Sections 354D (stalking), 341 (wrongful restraint), 365 (attempt to abduct) and 511 (attempt to commit an offence) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The two men were also charged with drunk driving in the FIR.
The trial is ongoing in a Chandigarh court, where the next date of hearing is August 2, 2025.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
NIA attaches D-Company operative's properties in Gujarat BJP leaders' murder case
Anti-terror agency National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Friday said it has attached two properties belonging to Mohammad Yunus, an alleged member of the Pakistan-based D-Company gang, in connection with the 2015 double murder of BJP workers in Bharuch, a major crackdown on D-Company's operations in India, properties located in Bharuch city were attached under Section 33(1) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, based on a recent order by the NIA Special Court in Ahmedabad in connection with the double murder attached properties include a residential house in Ward No. 3, City Survey No. 3614 and a property in City Survey No. 3615, covering a total area of 174 square metres," NIA said in a statement. Yunus, also known as Manjro, was arrested for his alleged involvement in the conspiracy and murder of BJP workers Shirish Bengali and Pragnesh Mistry. Former BJP president of Bharuch and senior RSS member Bangali and general secretary of Bharatiya Janta Yuva Morcha Mistry were shot dead in the district on November 2, 2015.- EndsMust Watch
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
HC warns of severe action for cybercrimes targeting children
Underscoring the seriousness of cyber offences targeting children, the Delhi High Court has said that such crimes will attract severe consequences, reflecting the grave psychological impact on victims. While upholding the conviction of a man in a cyber-bullying case involving a minor, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, in a judgement delivered on July 28, stated that digital abuse, though often faceless and silent, can be as mentally scarring as physical violence. The court was hearing an appeal in a 2016 case registered following a complaint lodged by the mother of a 14-year-old girl, a Class IX student, who became the target of a cyber assault. According to the prosecution, the victim received a morphed nude image with her face superimposed on another person's body, accompanied by a threatening message warning that the obscene content would be posted on Facebook unless she complied with the sender's demands. 'The present case reflects a textbook example of cyber-bullying, where an adolescent girl, who was pursuing her studies, became a victim of a targeted assault upon her privacy and dignity,' said Justice Sharma. 'Such conduct, in the virtual world, has very real and devastating consequences in the real world,' the judge said. The High Court said the psychological impact on a minor is difficult to quantify in words in a judgment. A trial court convicted the accused under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and the Information Technology Act. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years. The High Court found no grounds to interfere with the conviction, noting that the plea for leniency on behalf of the man 'stands on a fragile footing'. 'It is important not only to detect and punish such crimes effectively but also to affirmatively uphold a child's right to safety, dignity, and mental well-being in such cases,' it added.
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian fuel exports escape Trump's tariff net, no Russian penalty yet
India's exports of petroleum products such as diesel and jet fuel to the U.S. continue to be exempted from the levy of any import duty or tariff, and President Donald Trump has, for now, not indicated the penalty he plans to impose to deter New Delhi's energy trade with Russia. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump had announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on India, along with an additional penalty, citing concerns over the country's energy and defence ties with Russia, as well as existing trade barriers. However, the executive order he signed thereafter only gives effect to the 25% tariff on Indian goods coming to the U.S. Even this has an exclusion list that includes finished pharmaceutical products (tablets, injectables and syrups), active pharmaceutical ingredients, electronics and ICT goods (semiconductors, smartphones, SSDs and computers), and petroleum products (crude oil, LNG, refined fuels, electricity and coal). The executive order also does not indicate any penalty that is to be levied for Russian trade. According to official data, India exported 4.86 million tonnes of petroleum products to the U.S. in fiscal year 2024-25 (April 2024 to March 2025) for over $4 billion. Reliance Industries Ltd is the biggest exporter of fuel to the U.S. With fuel exports continuing to be on the exemption list, it means business as usual for India and companies like Reliance, analysts said. Also, a relief would be if no penalty is imposed to punish India for its oil imports from Russia, they said, adding that for now, the U.S. administration has not indicated any penalty. "For now, there is nothing but you never know," an analyst said. From just 0.2% before the Russia-Ukraine war to now accounting for 35-40% of total crude imports, India's reliance on Russian oil has surged — drawing fresh scrutiny with Mr. Trump announcing a penalty on top of a 25% tariff, or tax, on all goods going to the U.S. India historically bought most of its oil from the Middle East, including Iraq and Saudi Arabia. However, things changed when Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. India, the world's third-largest crude importer after China and the U.S., began snapping up Russian oil that was available at a discount after some in the West shunned it as a means to punish Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine. From a market share of just 0.2% in India's import basket before the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia overtook Iraq and Saudi Arabia to become India's No.1 supplier, with a share as high as 40% at one point of time. This month, Russia supplied 36% of all crude oil, which is converted into fuels like petrol and diesel, that India imported. Announcing the imposition of 25% tariff or tax on all Indian goods going to the U.S., Mr. Trump had said New Delhi "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." "India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25%, plus a penalty for the above (Russian purchases), starting on August First," he said in a post on social media. India bought 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, according to global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler. That month, Indian imports from Iraq were 1.23 million bpd and 883,000 bpd from Saudi Arabia. In June 2022, Russia overtook Iraq to become India's largest oil supplier. That month, it supplied 1.12 million bpd as compared to 993,000 bpd that came from Iraq and 695,000 bpd from Saudi Arabia. Russian imports peaked to 2.15 million bpd in May 2023 and have varied since then, depending on the discount at which the oil was available. But the volumes never slipped below 1.4 million bpd, which is more than what India was buying from its top supplier Iraq before the Russia-Ukraine conflict. In July, imports from Russia averaged 1.8 million bpd, almost double of 950,000 bpd imports from Iraq. Saudi imports stood at 630,000 bpd, according to Kpler. After the Ukraine war, Western energy sanctions against Russia pushed it to cut prices for those buyers still willing to purchase its crude. The discounts on Russia's flagship Urals crude to Brent — the world's most well-known benchmark — were as high as $40 per barrel at one point but have been trimmed since to less than $ 3. G7 countries in December 2022 imposed a $60 per barrel price cap on Russian crude. Under the mechanism, European companies were permitted to transport and insure shipments of Russian oil to third countries as long as it is sold below the capped price — an effort to limit the impact of the sanctions on global oil flows but ensure Russia earns less from the trade. Last month, the European Union decided to lower the price cap to $47.6 and introduced an automatic and dynamic mechanism for its review in the future. The idea is to keep the cap at 15% lower than the average market price. In addition to stoking India's economy, cheap Russian oil gave refiners lucrative business — refining that crude and exporting the products to deficit countries. These included the European Union, which had banned direct crude oil purchases from Russia. This month, the European Union decided to ban the import of refined oil produced from Russian crude.
